The Rest of Canada

The Rest of Canada

1

Outline

Canadian energy system Ontario electricity policy 1980 NEP Canadian energy policy in 2010s

2

3

4

5

6

7

Green Energy Politics in Canada: Comparing Electricity Policies in BC and Ontario George HobergFaculty of ForestryUniversity of British Columbia Ian H. RowlandsEnvironment and Resource StudiesUniversity of Waterloo

8

Generation sources

9

Comparison: more complex governance in Ontario Roles of government, regulatory

commission similar

10

Table 1Ontario BC

generation Private, OPG Private, BC Hydrotransmission Hydro One BC Hydrodistribution Mostly local entities BC HydroLong term planning Ontario Power

AuthorityBC Hydro

aggregator IESO BC Hydro

Ontario – prelude Harris government reshapes electricity sector in

1990s Liberal government 2003 – request for proposals

approach ran into problems of political favouritism Opened door for alternative approach Policy entreprener (Paul Gipe) framed ‘feed-in tariffs’

as a means of local economic development March 2006 McGuinty announced North America’s

first feed-in tariff programme –Renewable Energy Standard Offer Programme (RESOP)

Design problems caused it to flop

11

Ontario - Green Energy and Green Economy Act – May 2009

Attract investment in renewable energy

Promote a culture of energy conservation

Create a competitive business environment

Increase job opportunities Reduce GHGs (15% reduction by

2020)

Note: also ambitious coal phase out by 2014

12

Feed-in Tariff FIT program was intended for projects > 10 kW,

microFIT <10 MW bioenergy, waterpower, solar photovoltaic, wind Prices ranged from 10.3 cents per kWh for larger

landfill gas to 80.2 cents per kWh for smaller, rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) projects ‘cover development costs plus a reasonable

rate of return Contracts were 20 years in length (40 years for

waterpower projects) overwhelming response: 4,600 MW contracted

13

14

Controversy

Excessive costs, subsidy NIMBY response, especially to wind 2011 election: Hudek pledges to kill

program Liberal minority ensured program’s

continuance

15

BC – Shift 1 – 2002 Energy Plan New sources of generation would be

private Created separate transmission

authority – reversed in 2010

16

BC Shift 2 – 2007 Energy Plan New coal fired power plants would only be

allowed if they used carbon capture and storage New natural gas generation would only be

allowed if its emissions were offset 50% of new electricity demand had to be made

through conservation (demand side measures) Ensure self-sufficiency to meet electricity needs,

including ‘“insurance’” by 2016 Ensure “clean or renewable electricity

generation continues to account for at least 90 per cent of total generation.”

17

BC – Shift 3 – Clean Energy Powerhouse2010 Clean Energy Act (1)

“to be a net exporter of electricity from clean or renewable resources with the intention of benefiting all British Columbians and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in regions in which British Columbia trades electricity while protecting the interests of persons who receive or may receive service in British Columbia” (Section 2(n)).

Maintains self-sufficiency requirement, move date up 2020 from 2026

Strengthens the clean and renewable requirements from 90 to 93%

Strengthens the conservation requirement from 50% to two-thirds

All imply significant new private power projects 18

BC – Shift 3 – Clean Energy Powerhouse2010 Clean Energy Act (2)

BC Utility Commission authority removed from: Long term plan approval Export contracts development under the new

policy The Site C dam in the Peace River region,

currently under regulatory review The Northwest Transmission Line designed to

connect new areas of mining development to the provincial grid

The province’s $1 billion smart meters program 19

BC Shift #4: Return to Focus on Low-cost Reliability (2012) March 2011: Christy Clark sworn in

the “families first” agenda, BC Hydro proposes 30% rate increase

BC Hydro moves from cherished partner to pariah

Government imposes lower rate increases, prohibits BCUC from having hearings

20

Comparisons – similar big policy changes Both provinces adopted significant

new legislation dual objectives of reducing

greenhouse gases while simultaneously promoting the development of a new clean energy industrial sector

Inspired by struggles in traditional core industries

21

Comparisons – different policy instruments FIT in Ontario Request for proposals in BC Active policy entrepreneurs in

Ontario, missing in BC Both ran into serious costs problems More politically salient in Ontario But still salient enough in BC to

result in major changes in policy and governance.

22

Comparisons - Privatization Privatization has gone much further in

Ontario than in BC BC limited to new generation Much of Ontario’s electricity purchases are

subject to market prices; all electricity purchases are controlled by regulated rates

explanation? timing of when utility privatization initiatives were influential in Canada and what party was in power at the time.

23

Comparisons - rates Ontario rates

2X BC Ontario uses

time of use pricing

BC – new smart meters but no TOU yet (unsustainable)

24

Political control

similar governance changes Assertion of provincial government

authority Independent regulators seen as

threat to clean energy agenda Ditto for municipalities

25

Still, impressive policy change Changes confronted implementation challenges and

political resistance But fundamentals of the policy shifts are still in place Ontario is still on target to phase out coal Ontario - remarkable increase in renewable energy

generation BC’s 93% RPS and 2/3rd conservation requirement are

impressive BC’s ambitious GHG reductions targets are in tact, for

now when motivated, leader-centered parliamentary

governments can create meaningful policy change to promote energy sustainability

26

The NEP and Legacy Trudeau

27

Prelude to NEP 1957-1961 1959 – National Energy Board

Created 1961 – National Oil Policy

two market policy▪ east of Ottawa Valley, cheap imported

Venezuela oil▪ Ontario and west, more expensive Canadian

oil▪ delivered by Trans-Canada Pipeline▪ continental price under umbrella of US

protectionism▪ growing exports to US

Rapid growth in oil and gas industry

28

Prelude to NEP 1973-1980 1973 – OPEC oil embargo

link to global geo-politics: Arab-Israeli War price controls on domestic crude oil and natural

gas subsidized consumption by refiners through oil

import compensation program (OICP) 1975 – Petro-Canada established

foster resource development increase federal government information about reserves

1979 – Iranian revolution led to world price doubling gap between Canadian prices and world prices increased

29

1980 Political Economy of Energy in Canada Oil coalition: federal

Conservative Party, western provincial governments, and oil industry rapid convergence to

world prices smaller federal share of

revenues privatization of Petro-

Canada enabling foreign

ownership

Federal Coalition: federal Liberal and NDP Party, central and eastern provincial governments slower increase in prices larger federal share of

revenues strengthening of Petro-

Canada regulation on foreign

ownership

30

National Energy Program October 1980 budget “a centralist, nationalist and

interventionist political and policy initiative which at its core was intended to substantially restructure the key relationships of power and the sectoral and regional distribution of wealth in Canadian energy politics” (Toner and Bregha 1984).

31

National Energy Program 1980 3 goals

security of supply▪ Petroleum Incentive Program (PIP) encouraged

exploration and development Canadianization

▪ 50% Canadian ownership by 1990 (from 29%)▪ PIP criteria favoured Canadian firms on Canada Lands▪ enlarge Petro-Canada through acquisitions

interregional equity in price and revenue sharing▪ 8% Petroleum and Gas Revenue Tax (PGRT)

32

Backlash Against NEPcbc retrospective video

Universal industry opposition Vehement opposition by Alberta – led

by Premier Peter Lougheed cutback in oil production cancellation of 2 oil sands projects

Compromise of 1981 produced a new pricing system old domestic oil increased to 75% world

price new conventional oil at world price

33

NEP denouement

Beginning in 1982, world oil prices began to plummet

34

NEP denouement

Oil price decline after 1982 Mulroney Era (Progressive

Conservative) begin in Fall 1984 Western Accord effectively

dismantled NEP deregulated oil prices phased out PGRT

35

NEP Enduring Legacy

Lesson: mistaken federal government overregulation

Strengthened Alberta’s anti-Ottawa tendencies

Revived as a bogey-man to discredit major federal energy-related initiatives including climate action

36

Canadian Energy Strategy for 2010s

37

CCCE

1. Enhance the Canadian brand

2. Strengthen energy literacy and a culture of energy conservation

3. Build North American energy self sufficiency

4. Diversify energy markets

5. Invest in sound energy infrastructure

6. Create a Canadian energy technology advantage

7. Ensure sufficient regulatory process

8. Facilitate stronger partnerships with Aboriginal peoples on energy projects

9. Facilitate a coherent climate policy

10. Build an integrated labour force strategy

38