The Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) Compliance & Enforcement Presented By: Jeanna R. Henry Environmental Scientist Land & Chemicals Division EPA Region 3
The Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA)
Compliance & Enforcement
Presented By: Jeanna R. Henry
Environmental Scientist Land & Chemicals Division
EPA Region 3
Jeanna’s Background • Bachelor of Science
– Major: Environmental Health – Minors: Chemistry & Biology
• Began as a RCRA Inspector and Enforcement Officer w/ EPA Region 3 in 2000 – Conducted/attended over 200 inspections – Negotiated and Settled over 60 Administrative Penalty Orders
• In 2010, took on additional role as a Remedial Project Manager in the RCRA Corrective Action Program
• Actively participate on HQ regulation development and training development workgroups 2/27/2013 2 US Environmental Protection Agency
Introduction • This presentation will provide an overview for
the following topics: – General overview of RCRA. – RCRA Generator Categories – Types of Hazardous Waste – Types of Universal Waste – Proposed Regulation of Pharmaceutical Hazardous
Waste – RCRA Compliance Inspections – Enforcement and the Cost of Non-Compliance
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 3
The Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (aka “RCRA”)
• Enacted in 1976 as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) of 1965.
• RCRA has been amended several times, most significantly by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984.
• RCRA has 4 Subtitles: – Subtitle C (hazardous waste) – Subtitle D (solid waste) – Subtitle I (underground storage tanks) – Subtitle J (medical waste)
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 4
RCRA’s Primary Goals:
• Protect human health & the environment from hazards posed by waste disposal;
• To conserve energy and natural resources through waste recycling and recovery;
• To reduce or eliminate the amount of waste generated, including hazardous waste; and,
• To ensure that wastes are managed in an environmentally safe manner. 2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 5
Managing Hazardous Waste – Subtitle C
• Regulates HW from “cradle-to-grave”
• Procedures for the proper identification and classification of HW
• Standards for facilities that generate, transport, treat, store or dispose of HW.
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 6
RCRA Generator Status *Varies By State
• Hazardous Waste Determination – Generator’s Responsibility – May use Generator Knowledge of the waste – Analytical Testing (Characteristic Waste Only)
• CESQG* – Generate less than 100 kg/month – No accumulation limit up to 1,000 kg
• SQG* – Generate between 100-1,000 kg/month – 180-day accumulation limit
• LQG* (most stringently regulated) – Generate greater than 1,000 kg/month – 90-day accumulation limit
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 7
Characteristic Hazardous Waste (testing or generator knowledge)
• Flammable (D001) – Flashpoint < 140˚ F – Acetonitrile
• Corrosive (D002) – pH < 2 or > 12.5 – Glacial acetic acid – Sodium hydroxide
• Reactive (D003) – Nitroglycerine
• Toxic (D004 – D042) – Arsenic – Chloroform
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 8
Listed Hazardous Waste • F-Wastes – Non-specific sources • K-Wastes – Specific sources • P- & U-Wastes – Unused, discarded
commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues
• Example Pharmaceuticals – epinephrine (P042) – nicotine (P075) – phenol (U188) – uracil mustard (U237)
2/27/2013 9 US Environmental Protection Agency
RCRA Universal Waste • Used Batteries
– SLABs – NiCd
• Pesticides • Mercury Containing Equipment
– Thermostats
• Used Lamps – Fluorescent – High Pressure Sodium – Mercury Vapor
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 10
Proposed Regulation of Pharmaceutical Hazardous Waste
• December 2008 Proposed Rule • To Primarily Affect:
– Hospitals – Pharmacies – Long-term care facilities – Reverse Distributors of Pharmaceuticals
• Agency received significant comment (about 100) • While most generally supported the rule, there were
several concerns.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2/27/2013 11
Proposed Regulation of Pharmaceutical Hazardous Waste
• Commenters’ Concerns Included: – Security due to lack of notification and manifest
requirements – Lack of education and enforcement – The status of reverse distribution facilities – Confusion over point of waste generation – Outdated CCP waste listings
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 12
Proposed Regulation of Pharmaceutical Hazardous Waste
• Resource limitations and other priorities prevented progress during 2009 and 2010
• Workgroup was reconvened and initiated meetings in July 2011
• Many health care facilities are not in compliance with RCRA because they: – Are not aware of the requirements; or – Are having difficulty complying with regulations designed for
industrial facilities
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 13
Proposed Regulation of Pharmaceutical Hazardous Waste
• Rational for Rulemaking – New rules will ensure that Hazardous Waste pharmaceuticals are properly
managed: • Regulations will be tailored to health care facilities • Education and outreach will be provided
• Next Steps – EPA is moving forward with a new proposal for healthcare facility-specific
regulations for the management of hazardous waste pharmaceuticals – Will provide a regulatory scheme to address the unique issues that
healthcare facilities face – The new proposal is anticipated to be published and available for public
comment in August 2013
• Contact: Lisa Lauer; [email protected]; 703.308.7418
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 14
Inspection Targeting • National & Regional
Initiatives – Sector Based
• Foundries • Mineral Processing
– Regulatory Based • New Regulations • New Waste
– Risk Based • Potential for releases
• Regional Initiatives – Referrals/Tips
• State • Public
– History of Non-Compliance
– Risk Based • TRI Inventory
– Geographical • Chesapeake Bay
Watershed
US Environmental Protection Agency 2/27/2013 15
Compliance Inspections
• Most common type of inspection • Conducted by EPA or State
• If EPA is lead agency, will notify and invite state in advance
• Usually unannounced, exceptions include • NEIC Process Based Inspections • NEIC Multimedia Inspections • Certain Programs (i.e., UST inspections)
• State inspection usually takes 1 day; EPA inspection can last between 1day and 2 weeks (normally 1-5 days).
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 16
Conducting an Inspection • Opening Conference
– Explain purpose of inspection and what to expect.
• Tour Facility – Entire facility and operations or specific areas.
• Records Review – Program Specific
• Closing Conference – Discuss findings of the inspection and next steps.
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 17
After the Inspection • Draft Inspection Report
– Documents inspector’s observations & statements made by facility representatives
• Additional Information Gathering – Formal
• Information Request Letter (i.e., 3007, 9005)
– Informal • Email • Telephone
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 18
Non-Compliance Determination
• Notice of Violation (NOV) – Informal – Covers relatively minor violations
• Administrative Penalty Order (APO) – Formal – Assessment of monetary penalty – Facility identified as Significant Non-Complier (SNY) – Examples
• Request to Show Cause • Complaint
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 19
RCRA Civil Penalty Policy Gravity-Based Penalty Matrix
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 20
Major Moderate Minor
Major $37,500 to
$28,330
$28,330 to
$21,250
$21,250 to
$15,580
Moderate $15,580 to
$11,330
$11,330 to
$7,090
$7,090 to
$4,250
Minor $4,250 to
$2,130
$2,130 to
$710
$710 to
$150
Potential for
Harm
Extent of Deviation
RCRA Civil Penalty Policy Multi-Day Penalty Matrix
Major Moderate Minor
Major $7,090 to
$1,420
$5,670 to
$1,070
$4,250 to
$780
Moderate $3,120 to
$570
$2,230 to
$360
$1,420 to
$220
Minor $850 to
$150
$430 to
$150
$150
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 21
Potential For
Harm
Extent of Deviation
Cost of Non-Compliance • Count 1: Undated, unlabeled containers of
HW stored for greater than 90-days – Moderate/Major = $12,250 – Multi-day = 179 days @ $600 per day – Total Penalty = $119,650
• Count 2: Open Containers of HW – Minor/Minor = $500
2/27/2013 22 US Environmental Protection Agency
Cost of Non-Compliance
• Count 3: Failure to Conduct Weekly Inspections – Minor/Moderate = $1,933 – Multi-day = 156 weeks @ $165 per week =
$25,740 – Total Penalty = $27,673
2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 23
Cost of Non-Compliance • Count 4: No Hazardous Waste Training
Program – Moderate/Moderate = $8,300 – 2 years of non-compliance ($8300 x 2) – Total Penalty = $16,600
• Count 5: Failure to Maintain Hazardous Waste Training Records – Minor/Major = $3,000
2/27/2013 24 US Environmental Protection Agency
Cost of Non-Compliance • Count 6: Failure to Make a Waste
Determination – Moderate/Major = $14,184
• Count 7: Improper Management of Universal Waste Lamps – Moderate/Major = $14,184
• Total Proposed Penalty = $195,791
2/27/2013 25 US Environmental Protection Agency
Negotiation & Settlement • Negotiation Meetings to Discuss
– Violations and Associated Penalties – Compliance Tasks – Settlement
• Settlement Agreement – Consent Agreement and Final Order – Supplemental Environmental Project – Civil Penalty – Press Release
2/27/2013 26 US Environmental Protection Agency
Compliance Tips • Know your facility’s operations and the
people responsible for those operations. – Process operations – Waste management – Wastewater treatment – Laboratories
• Know and understand the environmental regulations that apply to your facility (i.e., CAA, CWA, RCRA). 2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 27
Compliance Tips (Cont.) • Explain importance of compliance to operators. • Become familiar with your state regulators. • Conduct internal or 3rd party audits. If violations
discovered, may be disclosed under EPA’s Self-Disclosure Policy.
• Training, training and more training! • Discover the wealth of information available from
EPA. 2/27/2013 US Environmental Protection Agency 28