The Real Cost of Inadequate Patient Access Processes Presented by: Tim Raimey Date: October 31, 2012
Mar 29, 2015
The Real Cost of Inadequate Patient Access Processes
Presented by: Tim Raimey
Date: October 31, 2012
2
Heading – Ariel 40
• One of the largest healthcare consulting firms in North America.
• We develop strategies and deliver services that support the latest industry trends such as ICD-10 strategy, Meaningful Use, EHR implementations, ACO readiness, HIE planning, physician-hospital alignment and much more.
• We’re focused on helping healthcare leaders improve operational, clinical and financial performance, ultimately leading to increased patient safety and better outcomes.
Who is Beacon Partners?
3
Heading – Ariel 40
Many claims are denied due to
inadequate patient
registration processes
Why are claims denied?
4
Heading – Ariel 40
• Missing Social Security Numbers• Incomplete or Missing Guarantor
Information• Incomplete or Missing Employer
Information• Policy Identification number incorrect
Common Registration Errors
5
Heading – Ariel 40
• Patient not eligible• Charges are not covered in the plan• No authorization or no precertification on
file• Wrong payer identified• Benefit reached maximum allowable under
plan
Common Reasons for Denials
6
Heading – Ariel 40Cost to Rework a Claim: Physician
Item CostStaff Time $10.67
Supplies $ 1.50
Interest $1.75
Overhead $1.00
TOTAL $14.92
Assumptions:- Staff Time includes 20 minutes of
billing staff time at $22 per hour, plus 10 minutes of another staff member’s time(ex: front office) valued at $20 per hour
- Supplies include telephone, paper, envelope postage
- Interest is calculated on $200 at 10%, compounded monthly for 30 days
- Overhead includes management, equipment, space and other fixed costs
Source: Walker, Woodcock, Larch, 2009
7
Heading – Ariel 40Cost to Rework a Claim: Hospital
Item CostStaff Time $15.30
Supplies $ 4.50
Overhead $5.20
TOTAL $25.00
Assumptions:- Staff Time includes 30 minutes of
billing staff time at $24 per hour, plus 10 minutes of at least another staff member’s time(ex: front office) valued at $20 per hour
- Supplies include telephone, paper, envelope postage
- Overhead includes management, equipment, space and other fixed costs for hospital
Source: HFMA Executive Roundtable, Nov 2010Zimmerman and Associates 2009
8
Physician Practice Stories
9
Heading – Ariel 40
• Pulmonary and Sleep Study Practice with offices in 4 locations:
;̵ Five providers seeing an average of 80 patients per day collectively;̵ Sleep studies account for about 45 of the 80 patients per day;̵ Sleep studies tend to be costly
Pulmonary and Sleep Study Practice
10
Heading – Ariel 40
• Pulmonary services for this practice typically have a 95% success rate with claims paid
• Sleep study services average 78% success rate with claims paid
Claims Payment
• Front desk staff minimally experienced
• Claims denied for sleep study are very costly to the patient, provider, and provider staff
11
Heading – Ariel 40Looking at the Real Costs
A closer look at the costs of a denied sleep study claim:
Office visit $1,550, plus $1,500 for medical equipment and supplies =
$3,050
$3,050 x 10 patients(22% x 45 patients) =
$30,500
Add 40 minutes of the provider’s time explaining to an angry patient about
the claim
12
Heading – Ariel 40
Ophthalmology practice, one provider:• Averages 15 patients per
day• Patients tend to be older
population• Success rate for claims
paid in this practice 95%• Experienced front desk
staff
Ophthalmology Practice
13
Heading – Ariel 40Looking at the Real Cost
A closer look at the Ophthalmology Practice:
Office visit for new patient, Level IV $225
Provider sees 15 patients per day for 4 days a week total 60 patients
On average 3 patients per week claims are denied (5% x 60)
Weekly average loss in claims(3 patients x $225) =$675 or
($2,700 per month)
14
Heading – Ariel 40
But dig a bit deeper…..• Add 2 to 3 hours of the front desk staff’s
time investigating the reason claim denied• Add 1 hour to the provider’s time
explaining the denial to his elderly patients• Add the potential of write offs• Add the potential of “he’s a good doc,
don’t worrying about paying”
Opportunity Costs
15
Hospital Story
16
Heading – Ariel 40
General Hospital in Midwest with 340 beds• Emergency Department (ED) capable of providing
services for all levels of care, including critical• ED averages 65 patients per day
Hospital in the Midwest
• Patients are billed for ED services based on categories of care provided
• Category 1 (lowest) to Critical Care (highest)
17
Heading – Ariel 40Looking at the Real Costs
A closer look at the costs:
Category 3 charge is $441(majority of patients)
This hospital reports the success rate for claims paid for ED charges is about
75%
Assuming 25% of 65 patients can’t or won’t pay, loss would be
(16 patients x $441) =$7,056 per day
18
Heading – Ariel 40
Let’s look even deeper….• $7,056 per day x 7 days = $49,392 a week• $49,392 x 4 weeks = $197,568 a month• Add in the hours the billing staff spend
with insurance companies, patients, and medical records staff
Additional Time and Effort
19
Heading – Ariel 40
• Reduceclaims denial
• Increasecash flow
• Improve patientexperience
• Decrease bad debt• Reduce provider and staff time spent on
discussions about why claims denied
What’s the goal?
20
Heading – Ariel 40
• Adequately train front desk staff to get registration right the first time
• Assign enough staff for registration activities
;̵ It’s better to capture the data right the first time, than to spend time investigating what was missed
• Use integrated systems to assist staff in registration and verification
• Pre-register as many patients as possible
How do we get there?
21
Heading – Ariel 40
• Pre-verify insurance eligibility, authorizations, pre-certifications
• Audit registration outcomes and processes• Track denials by payer, reason, financial
impact• Communicate denial rates back to front
end staff• Collect copayments• Collect self pay
How do we get there? (continued)
22
Heading – Ariel 40
• Error rates due to front end billing:̵; < 2%
• Time of service collections:̵; Copayments: 100%̵; All other time of service
payments: 75%
Leading Performance Indicators
Source: Walker-Keegan, Woodcock, Larch, 2009
• Number of patients cleared prior to visit:̵; 90 %
• Claim edits and denials due to registration and referrals:̵; < 2%
• Percentage of insurance verified:̵; 98%
23
Heading – Ariel 40
• Clean claim submission rate – 90%
• Medicare return to provider denial rate – 3%
• Bad debt write off as a % of gross income – 3%
• Charity write off as a % of gross income – 2%
• Overall final denial rate after appeals – 1%
Leading Claims Submissions Rates
Source: 2010 HIMSS Financial Systems Steering Committee
24
Heading – Ariel 40
If all of these processes are being addressed, then you will have one less challenge as your organization moves toward achieving Meaningful Use and preparing for ICD-10 implementation.
Healthcare Reform Impact
25
Heading – Ariel 40Light at the end of the tunnel
1.800.4BEACON │ BeaconPartners.com
BOSTON · CLEVELAND · SAN FRANCISCO · TORONTO
Thank You
26
Thank YouFor more information
please contact: