Top Banner
The Problem The Problem Section One Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz
33

The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Breana Lester
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

The ProblemThe Problem

Section OneSection One

Grace Gu and Nancy DiazGrace Gu and Nancy Diaz

Page 2: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

About the Author: About the Author: Susan Blackmore Susan Blackmore

Degree in Psychology and Physiology Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.Parapsychology.

She has studied the paranormal, and She has studied the paranormal, and now she is involved with the study now she is involved with the study of meme of meme (A unit of cultural (A unit of cultural information, such as a cultural practice information, such as a cultural practice or idea, that is transmitted verbally or or idea, that is transmitted verbally or by repeated action from one mind to by repeated action from one mind to another)another)

Susan Blackmore had a dramatic out-Susan Blackmore had a dramatic out-of-body experience that convinced of-body experience that convinced her that consciousness could leave her that consciousness could leave the body, and made her determined the body, and made her determined to become a Parapsychologist. She to become a Parapsychologist. She is now skeptical about the is now skeptical about the paranormal.paranormal.

Resides in England with her partner Resides in England with her partner Adam Hart-Davis and two children.Adam Hart-Davis and two children.

Page 3: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

What is Consciousness?What is Consciousness?

““Consciousness poses the most baffling problems in Consciousness poses the most baffling problems in the science of the mind. There is nothing that we know the science of the mind. There is nothing that we know more intimately than conscious experience, but there is more intimately than conscious experience, but there is nothing that is harder to explain.” -Chalmersnothing that is harder to explain.” -Chalmers

Consciousness is not synonymous with the “mind.” Consciousness is not synonymous with the “mind.” This confusion has led to the loss of some of it’s This confusion has led to the loss of some of it’s mysteries.mysteries.

Throughout history, mysteries that have plagued Throughout history, mysteries that have plagued scientists’ minds have dwindled away and we have lost scientists’ minds have dwindled away and we have lost interest. Inversely, the mind/body problem continues to interest. Inversely, the mind/body problem continues to grow and capture our interestsgrow and capture our interests..

Page 4: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

When are you Conscious?When are you Conscious?

Are you conscious?Are you conscious? Are you conscious when you use the restroom?Are you conscious when you use the restroom? Are you conscious when you drive?Are you conscious when you drive? Are you conscious when you sleep?Are you conscious when you sleep? Or dream?Or dream?

Page 5: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Consciousness is your own Consciousness is your own private experience. private experience. The colors you perceive in your mind are your property. The colors you perceive in your mind are your property. There is no way to publicly share the same experience.There is no way to publicly share the same experience.

Some monist theories Some monist theories emphasize just the mental and emphasize just the mental and believe objects are just believe objects are just perceptions of the individual’s perceptions of the individual’s mind.mind.

Problems arise as to how two Problems arise as to how two human beings can agree to a human beings can agree to a physical object when the physical object when the object is outside their mind. object is outside their mind.

Materialist monist theories say Materialist monist theories say that there is only matter and that there is only matter and everything is just a physical everything is just a physical state. state.

However, this takes away from However, this takes away from the thought that humans have the thought that humans have control over their fate and control over their fate and futurefuture. .

Page 6: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Other beliefsOther beliefs

Epiphenomenalism: the idea that mental states Epiphenomenalism: the idea that mental states are produced by physical events, but have no are produced by physical events, but have no causal role to play.causal role to play.

Physical events cause mental events but in Physical events cause mental events but in turn, mental states don’t have any causal turn, mental states don’t have any causal effects on the physical future.effects on the physical future.

But then how can we speak about But then how can we speak about consciousness if our conscious thoughts don’t consciousness if our conscious thoughts don’t have any influence over our physical outcomes?have any influence over our physical outcomes?

Page 7: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Panpsychism:Panpsychism:

The view that mind is fundamentalThe view that mind is fundamental All matter has associated mental aspects or All matter has associated mental aspects or

properties; however primitive.properties; however primitive. But then is a rock aware? But then is a rock aware? How about it’s contributing atoms?How about it’s contributing atoms? Why should there be mental and physical Why should there be mental and physical

properties to everything?properties to everything?

Page 8: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Cartesian DualismCartesian Dualism

Substance dualism is a widely known theory. The best-Substance dualism is a widely known theory. The best-known form is from Rene Descartes. known form is from Rene Descartes.

Cartesian dualism was founded by the intention of basing Cartesian dualism was founded by the intention of basing the philosophy only on firm foundations that were beyond the philosophy only on firm foundations that were beyond doubt. doubt.

““I think, therefore I am.” Descartes concluded that the I think, therefore I am.” Descartes concluded that the thinking self was immaterial and did not take up space like thinking self was immaterial and did not take up space like the mechanical body.the mechanical body.

This view consisted of two entities – the extended stuff This view consisted of two entities – the extended stuff which bodies are made of and the unextended, thinking which bodies are made of and the unextended, thinking stuff of which minds are made. stuff of which minds are made.

How do they interact?How do they interact? Descartes’ solution was through the pineal gland in the Descartes’ solution was through the pineal gland in the

center of the brain.center of the brain.

Page 9: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Fall of DualismFall of Dualism

Few contemporary scientists and philosophers agree that dualism Few contemporary scientists and philosophers agree that dualism works. works.

Gilbert Rule argued that when we talk of the mind as an entity that Gilbert Rule argued that when we talk of the mind as an entity that does things, we are making a mistake. Instead, he saw mental does things, we are making a mistake. Instead, he saw mental activities as processes, or as the properties and dispositions of activities as processes, or as the properties and dispositions of people. people.

““Minds are simply what brains do.” – MinskyMinds are simply what brains do.” – Minsky The mind carries out the functions of the brain. The mind carries out the functions of the brain. The two notable dualists are Sir Karl Popper and The two notable dualists are Sir Karl Popper and

Neurophysiologist Sir John Eccles who give us a modern theory of Neurophysiologist Sir John Eccles who give us a modern theory of dualist interactionism. dualist interactionism.

They argue that the critical processes in the synapses of the brain They argue that the critical processes in the synapses of the brain are so finely poised that they can be influenced by a non-physical, are so finely poised that they can be influenced by a non-physical, thinking and feeling self, thus the self really controls the brain. thinking and feeling self, thus the self really controls the brain.

This however asks for a miracle. This however asks for a miracle.

Page 10: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Try defining Try defining ConsciousnessConsciousness

Page 11: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

PsychologyPsychology

The term psychology popped up in the 18The term psychology popped up in the 18 thth century to describe the century to describe the philosophy of mental life.philosophy of mental life.

It was towards the 19It was towards the 19thth century that it became a science. century that it became a science. William James dismissed the dualist concepts of “mind-stuff.” William James dismissed the dualist concepts of “mind-stuff.” He pointed out that consciousness can be abolished by injury to He pointed out that consciousness can be abolished by injury to

the brain, or altered by taking alcohol, opium or other substances. the brain, or altered by taking alcohol, opium or other substances. Certain amounts of brain physiology must be included in Certain amounts of brain physiology must be included in psychology. psychology.

James coined the term “stream of consciousness” to describe the James coined the term “stream of consciousness” to describe the ever changing flow of thoughts, images and feelings. ever changing flow of thoughts, images and feelings.

Psychophysics was the study between physical stimuli and Psychophysics was the study between physical stimuli and reportable sensations; your outer and inner experiences. reportable sensations; your outer and inner experiences.

Ernest Weber and Gustav Fechner studied the relationships Ernest Weber and Gustav Fechner studied the relationships between physical luminance and perceived brightness; weight and between physical luminance and perceived brightness; weight and sensations of heaviness; or sound pressure and loudness.sensations of heaviness; or sound pressure and loudness.

Page 12: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Hermann von Helmholtz Hermann von Helmholtz was a German physicist was a German physicist and physician.and physician.

Helmholtz made the first Helmholtz made the first measurement of the measurement of the speed of conduction of speed of conduction of nerve signals. Popularly nerve signals. Popularly referred to as the referred to as the “velocity of thought.” “velocity of thought.”

Helmholtz proposed the Helmholtz proposed the idea of “unconscious idea of “unconscious inferences” based off the inferences” based off the tricks our senses and tricks our senses and visual illusions can make. visual illusions can make.

German philosopher German philosopher Edmund Husserl wanted Edmund Husserl wanted to focus on “the things to focus on “the things themselves.”themselves.”

This was based off of This was based off of Brentano's idea that Brentano's idea that every subjective every subjective experience is an act of experience is an act of reference. reference.

Conscious experiences Conscious experiences are are aboutabout objects or objects or events, while physical events, while physical objects are not about objects are not about anything. anything.

Page 13: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

IntrospectionIntrospection

Wilhelm Wundt is often called the father of modern Wilhelm Wundt is often called the father of modern psychology.psychology.

studied the subjective experience by introspection.studied the subjective experience by introspection. He wanted to be able to build a psychology based on He wanted to be able to build a psychology based on

studying from the inside.studying from the inside. Wundt claimed that there are two kinds of “psychical Wundt claimed that there are two kinds of “psychical

elements”: the objective elements, or sensations such as elements”: the objective elements, or sensations such as tones, heat or light; and the subjective elements or simple tones, heat or light; and the subjective elements or simple feelings. feelings.

Every conscious experience depended on a union of these Every conscious experience depended on a union of these two.two.

Introspection fell out of favor because one person’s claim to Introspection fell out of favor because one person’s claim to an experience can be quite different form another person’s an experience can be quite different form another person’s experience. There was no agreement.experience. There was no agreement.

Page 14: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

BehaviorismBehaviorism

Behaviorism became popular because this branch Behaviorism became popular because this branch could be measured much more reliably.could be measured much more reliably.

John B. Watson argued that psychology did not need John B. Watson argued that psychology did not need the methods of introspection and indeed could do the methods of introspection and indeed could do without the concept of consciousness altogether.without the concept of consciousness altogether.

Many of Watson’s ideas are built on the ground works Many of Watson’s ideas are built on the ground works of Ivan Pavlov, whose works included the study of of Ivan Pavlov, whose works included the study of reflexes and classical conditioning.reflexes and classical conditioning.

Skinner’s studies of rats and pigeons shaped the Skinner’s studies of rats and pigeons shaped the history of reinforcements.history of reinforcements.

These new findings led to a period of abolishing These new findings led to a period of abolishing consciousness. Behaviorism's success led to the consciousness. Behaviorism's success led to the avoidance of “consciousness.”avoidance of “consciousness.”

Page 15: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Cognitive PsychologyCognitive Psychology As the popularity of behaviorism was fading, cognitive As the popularity of behaviorism was fading, cognitive

psychology came into play.psychology came into play. However, consciousness was still discarded. It was not However, consciousness was still discarded. It was not

welcome in psychology because of the looseness of the term.welcome in psychology because of the looseness of the term. In different sentences, consciousness conveyed completely In different sentences, consciousness conveyed completely

different things.different things. As we have more information from research on mental As we have more information from research on mental

imagery, altered states of consciousness such as sleep and imagery, altered states of consciousness such as sleep and drug-induced states, hypnosis, computer science, drug-induced states, hypnosis, computer science, consciousness began creeping back into our vocabulary.consciousness began creeping back into our vocabulary.

Many problems that have plagued us in the past have been Many problems that have plagued us in the past have been solved either through new inventions or thinking. solved either through new inventions or thinking.

Consciousness is one that remains as much a mystery as it Consciousness is one that remains as much a mystery as it has throughout history.has throughout history.

Page 16: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Close your eyes and Close your eyes and imagine what it’s like to imagine what it’s like to be…….be…….

A BAT !!!

Remember : You use sound of ultrasound for echolocation, you fly, you are nocturnal, you live with thousands of other bats and you can hang upside-down….

Page 17: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

But can we ever know what is would But can we ever know what is would reallyreally be like be like for the bat?for the bat? Question was posed in 1950 by American Philosopher Question was posed in 1950 by American Philosopher

Thomas Nagel.Thomas Nagel.

“ “ Consciousness is what makes the mind-body problem Consciousness is what makes the mind-body problem really intractable”-Nagelreally intractable”-Nagel

“ “ There is something it is like to BE that organism…There is something it is like to BE that organism…something it is like FOR the organism”….something it is like FOR the organism”….

Hofstadter and Dennett, “ What is it like from the inside?”Hofstadter and Dennett, “ What is it like from the inside?”

Consciousness = Subjectivity = “ What it is like to be…”Consciousness = Subjectivity = “ What it is like to be…”

Page 18: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

QualiaQualia

Private qualities. You only experience it, privately, Private qualities. You only experience it, privately, incapable of being expressed because only you incapable of being expressed because only you experience it in your own way.experience it in your own way.

A quale is what something is like…our conscious A quale is what something is like…our conscious experience consists of qualia.experience consists of qualia.

Now the problem becomes : “How are qualia related to Now the problem becomes : “How are qualia related to the physical world, or how an objective physical brain the physical world, or how an objective physical brain can produce subjective qualia”can produce subjective qualia”

Page 19: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Dualist believe that qualia are part of a separate mental world from physical objects

Epiphenomenalists believe that qualia exist but have no casual properties

Idealists believe that everything is ultimately qualia

Page 20: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

The problem with The problem with qualia…qualia…

They do not have physical properties that can be They do not have physical properties that can be measuredmeasured

Are qualia something separate from the brain?Are qualia something separate from the brain?

Do qualia make any difference?Do qualia make any difference?

Does a quale contain information above and beyond the neural Does a quale contain information above and beyond the neural information it depends on?information it depends on?

This is where Mary can help us out……This is where Mary can help us out……

Page 21: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Mary the Color ScientistMary the Color Scientist•Lives in far far future, when everything there is to know about the physical processes in the brain and how they produce behavior is known.

•Knows absolutely everything about : color perception, the optics of the eye, the properties of colored objects in the world, the processing of color info.in the visual system, etc.

•BUT she has been brought up all her life in a black and white room, observing the world through a b/w TV monitor…

•She has never seen any colors at all

• Suddenly she is let out of her black and white room and sees colors for the first time….

Page 22: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

What happens?

Will she just shrug and say, “That’s red, that’s green, nothing new of course”?

Will she gasp with amazement and say “Wow-I never realized red would look like that!”

Page 23: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

The Mary Thought The Mary Thought ExperimentExperiment Developed by Frank Jackson devised the Mary thought experiment as an Developed by Frank Jackson devised the Mary thought experiment as an

argument against physicalismargument against physicalism

SURPRISED:SURPRISED:

When Mary sees color, she will obviously learn something fundamentally new – what red is like.

She now has qualia as well as the physical facts about colorNo amount of information could have prepared her for the raw feel of it is

like to see color (Chalmers)You believe that consciousness,subjective experience, or qualia are

something additional to knowledge of the physical world.

NOT SURPRISED:NOT SURPRISED:Dennett argues that we fail to allow Mary to know everything there is

not know about color.She already knew what kind of impressions color would induce.You believe that knowing all the physical facts tells you everything there

is to know– including what it is like to experience something.

Page 24: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

The Philosopher’s Zombie

•Someone who looks like you…behaves exactly like you BUT is not conscious.

•There is nothing it is like to be this creature (No view from within…no qualia)

•To many thinkers a zombie is easy to imagine and obviously possible, at least in principle.

•Zombie earth

•Same as us, but are not able to understand conscious terms in the way we do because they have no conscious experience(language, thinking, imagining, dreaming, believing, etc, but could talk of these!)

•Conversations with them would seem natural and normal.

•It would think it was conscious, even if it wasn’t.

•What do you think ???

Page 25: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Is there a hard problem?Is there a hard problem? How do we find the solution?How do we find the solution?

Page 26: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

1. The hard problem is 1. The hard problem is insolubleinsoluble

The problem of subjectivity is The problem of subjectivity is hopeless – Nagelhopeless – Nagel

Our human kind of Our human kind of intelligence is wrongly intelligence is wrongly designed for understanding designed for understanding consciousness – British consciousness – British Philosopher Colin McGinnPhilosopher Colin McGinn

Our own awareness is ‘the Our own awareness is ‘the ultimate tease…forever ultimate tease…forever beyond our conceptual grasp’ beyond our conceptual grasp’ – American evolutionary – American evolutionary psychologist Steven Pinkerpsychologist Steven Pinker

Page 27: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

2. Solve it with drastic 2. Solve it with drastic measuresmeasures

Rethink all that we know Rethink all that we know about the universeabout the universe

We can only understand We can only understand consciousness when we have consciousness when we have a new theory of informationa new theory of information

Fundamental rethink of he Fundamental rethink of he nature of the universe is a nature of the universe is a MUST !MUST !

Page 28: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

3. Tackle the easy problems3. Tackle the easy problems

Tackle the easy problems first Tackle the easy problems first and eventually we’ll pump into and eventually we’ll pump into the answer (about attention, the answer (about attention, learning, memory or learning, memory or perception).perception).

Why? We need to start with Why? We need to start with something reasonably something reasonably tractable such as visual tractable such as visual binding.binding.

Those who work on the easy Those who work on the easy problems, come close to problems, come close to arguing that there is no arguing that there is no separate hard problem.separate hard problem.

Page 29: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

4. There is no hard problem4. There is no hard problem

Ignore the problem…for nowIgnore the problem…for now

1. Start with the easy problems1. Start with the easy problems

2. Solutions to the easy problems 2. Solutions to the easy problems will change our understanding of will change our understanding of the hard problem, so trying to the hard problem, so trying to solve the problem now is solve the problem now is prematurepremature

3. A solution to the hard problem 3. A solution to the hard problem would only be of use if we could would only be of use if we could recognize it as such, and for the recognize it as such, and for the moment the problem is not well moment the problem is not well enough understood.enough understood.

Page 30: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

DisassociationDisassociation There is a dissociation between fast motor There is a dissociation between fast motor

reactions and conscious perception.reactions and conscious perception. Experiment with showting “Tah” when subject Experiment with showting “Tah” when subject

saw a light go on showed that there was an saw a light go on showed that there was an automatic reflex versus consciousness automatic reflex versus consciousness perception (Castiello).perception (Castiello).

Milner and Goodale argue that there is a Milner and Goodale argue that there is a distinction based on different functions of the distinction based on different functions of the brain; fast visuomotor control and less urgent brain; fast visuomotor control and less urgent visual perception.visual perception.

Much of their evidence is from patients with Much of their evidence is from patients with brain damage. brain damage.

Page 31: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

No doubt about one thing: We seem to No doubt about one thing: We seem to do some things consciously and others do some things consciously and others unconsciously. unconsciously. Divide actions into five types:

1. Are always unconscious

i.e. I can wiggle my toes or sing a song, but I cannot consciously grow my hair

2. Some actions that are normally carried out unconsciously can be brought back under conscious control by giving feedback of their effects, or “biofeedback”

i.e. We may unconsciously open the door, but we have no idea all the muscle power it takes to do so. The whole action seems to be done consciously, while the details remain unconscious.

3. Many skilled actions are initially learned with much conscious effort

i.e. You probably first learned to ride a bicycle with the utmost conscious concentration... but the it becomes automatic. Can be counter-productive: get off your bike and you might find that you cannot even walk normally.

4. Many such skilled actions, once well learned, can be done either way.

i.e. Classic example: driving a car. Every driver must have had the experience of arriving at a familiar destination without apparently having been conscious of the journey. Scary part: potentially life-threatening decisions being made correctly without, apparently, any conscious awareness.

5. Some actions seem always to be done consciously

I.e. When we have to make a difficult moral decision, we seem to be far more conscious than when deciding what clothes to put on. Tempting: To say that these kinds of thinking or decisions require consciousness.

Page 32: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

FunctionalismFunctionalism View that mental states are functional states.View that mental states are functional states.

I.e. Someone in pain = input from damage done. Other mental I.e. Someone in pain = input from damage done. Other mental states like the desire for the pain to go away, or crying = output.states like the desire for the pain to go away, or crying = output.

• Most common view: Works well for explaining mental Most common view: Works well for explaining mental sates, but cannot deal with phenomenal consciousness.sates, but cannot deal with phenomenal consciousness.

• Artificial Intelligence: If it can do the same functions as Artificial Intelligence: If it can do the same functions as a conscious system, it would also be conscious.a conscious system, it would also be conscious.

Page 33: The Problem Section One Grace Gu and Nancy Diaz. About the Author: Susan Blackmore Degree in Psychology and Physiology from Oxford, and a Ph.D. in Parapsychology.

Global Workspace Theory Global Workspace Theory (GWT)(GWT) By American Psychologist Bernard BaarsBy American Psychologist Bernard Baars

Cognitive system is built on a global workspace or blackboard Cognitive system is built on a global workspace or blackboard architecture, analogous to a stage in the theater of the mind.architecture, analogous to a stage in the theater of the mind.

Unconscious processors compete for access to the spotlight of Unconscious processors compete for access to the spotlight of attention that shines on the stage, from where information is attention that shines on the stage, from where information is broadcast globally to the unconscious audience. broadcast globally to the unconscious audience.

This global broadcast constitutes consciousness.This global broadcast constitutes consciousness.

Actions that are performed consciously are shaped by conscious Actions that are performed consciously are shaped by conscious feedback, while unconscious actions are not.feedback, while unconscious actions are not. i.e. Unconsciously make a speech error, but when you consciously i.e. Unconsciously make a speech error, but when you consciously

hear the mistake, you can make it right because consciousness creates hear the mistake, you can make it right because consciousness creates global access to further unconscious resources.global access to further unconscious resources.