The Politics of Cultural Appropriation and Participatory Culture Part One: Appropriation Appropriation, n. In the arts, the adoption, borrowing, or theft of elements of one culture by another culture. Taking over another culture’s style or way of expressing itself for your own purposes. Taking something created by another person and making it your own.
33
Embed
The Politics of Cultural Appropriation and Participatory Culture Part One: Appropriation Appropriation, n. In the arts, the adoption, borrowing, or theft.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Politics of Cultural Appropriation and Participatory CulturePart One: Appropriation
Appropriation, n. In the arts, the adoption, borrowing, or theft of elements of one culture by another culture.
Taking over another culture’s style or way of expressing itself for your own purposes.
Taking something created by another person and making it your own.
Someone takes two or more songs by different artists – maybe people who would never willingly be part of one another’s music – and creates a new song based entirely on these source songs
Mashup
Listen on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJv17xpatg4
Cheekyboy, Biggie’s Last Christmas
incorporating:
Wham, Last Christmas (1984)Puff Daddy, I’ll be missing you (1997)Notorious B.I.G., Juicy (1994)
Riff from “Walking Blues”COTTON FIELDS à ROBERT JOHNSON à SON HOUSE à MUDDY WATERS
MUDDY WATERS à LED ZEPPELIN
“The Last Time”TRADITIONAL BLUES à STAPLE SINGERS à ROLLING STONES à à à ?
A capsule history of appropriationin popular American 20th century musicA montage sequence from the movie we will watch later today: RIP: A REMIX MANIFESTO (2009). This sketches the mutation of two musical motifs from their origins as anonymous African American blues to their existence today as commercial successes by white groups.
Blues starts out in the late 1800s as an organic folk creation of African Americans. Songs have their origins in the cotton fields and taverns, though church music also plays an important role. Amateur musicians trade lyrics, music, and ideas around freely. No one is wholly responsible for any particular song. No one owns any song or can claim sole authorship of it. At first, nothing is published or recorded. Music is transmitted in performance alone. Each performance is a re-creation.
Episode One:Appropriation in Blues & Jazz
Authorship and ownership are not clear-cut or considered that important
Every performance is unique; little is published or recorded; songs are not “fixed” in an original or authorized version
What you do with the material is what’s important; not who created the original or who “owns” it
Appropriation in blues and jazz
Blues and Jazz Appropriation
The earliest Ragtime songs, like Topsy, “jes’ grew.” Some of these earliest songs were taken down by white men, the words slightly altered or changed, and published under the names of the arrangers. They sprang into immediate popularity and earned small fortunes. [...]
James Wheldon Johnson, Preface to The Book of American Negro Poetry (1922) :
Appropriation in the Jes’ Grew Era
Later there came along a number of colored men who were able to
transcribe the old songs and write original ones. [...]
I remember that we appropriated
about the last one of the old “jes’ grew” songs. It was a song
which had been sung for years all through the South. The words
were unprintable, but the tune was irresistible, and belonged to
Mid-twentieth century appropriation was characterized by white musicians appropriating black styles and songs and capitalizing on them. White-owned music publishers picked up the rights to black songs, white-owned record companies recorded black artists, and white musicians adopted elements of African American style and popularized them with white audiences, sometimes making fortunes.
Episode Two: Appropriation in R&B, Rock and Roll, Electric Blues
By the second half of the century, recording is the major focus of popular music as an industry. Recordings and technology become important areas for appropriation.
Because records are mass-produced, more permanent than live performance, and major sources of wealth that are subject to copyright, legal and ethical questions about appropriation become more central.
Episode Three: Disco, hip hop, sampling, mashups
Disco re-edits (1970s - ) Remixes (1970s - ) Hip hop DJing (1970s - ) Sampling (1980s - ) Mashups (1990s - )
Technology and appropriation
Initially completely non-commercial; typically practised outdoors in parks and on the street; improvisational; for pleasure
DJs used (almost exclusively black) records, which they mixed together to create extended breakbeat backdrops for MCs to rap to and dancers to dance to
Public performances, rarely for money, almost entirely unrecorded, in which old and new records (funk, soul, jazz and disco) were used as sources for original musical experiences.
Appropriation in early hip hop
Jes’ grew. A new form of collaboratively
authored “urban folk music.”
It is only with recording and sampling that legal (and political or moral) questions of appropriation become central to hip hop practice.
Early hip hop
Pre-digital appropriation
Songs and styles are borrowed or stolen from their original context and used in a new context (typically a more commercial or mainstream one; often without much concern or understanding for the original context)
Watch on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7tOAGY59uQ
Elements of a person’s or a group’s actual recorded performance are lifted from their original context and used in a new context, sometimes without respect for the integrity of the original or even knowledge of the original in context
Sampling (1980s - ) Mashups (1990s - )
With digital technology, appropriation has never been easier – or more rampant.
What are the moral and political questions to keep in mind in a world where appropriation is practically effortless and ownership is hard to police?
Digital appropriation
I just said that appropriation has never been more rampant in culture than it is today.
But actually from an anthropological point of view, outside of the peculiar cultural arrangement known as late capitalism, some more organic form of borrowing, adoption of and variation on pre-existing creations – perhaps more akin to the products of genetic mutation – has probably been the norm in the production of culture throughout human history.
Rampant appropriation
RIP: A Remix Manifesto
Apart from intellectual property rights and monetary remuneration, what political issues are touched on, if any?