Property redevelopment can be a tricky business. This is especially true for sites with a history of industrial use that are impacted by uncontrolled fills, construcon materials, abandoned structures and ulies, and industrial waste. Put those materials near or below the groundwater surface and you’ve got quite a brew. Dealing with such impacts is not cheap, but many projects incur unnecessary costs because they aren’t coordinated from a shared environmental and geotechnical perspecve. Excess costs come from two sources: basic site invesgaon rework and failure to leverage both environmental and geotechnical experse when evaluang site redevelopment alternaves. Rework is generally the product of poor logiscs or inexperience and can be limited through beer planning. Leveraging environmental and geotechnical experse requires more experience, a solid understanding of regulaons governing design and construcon, and industry savvy. Collaboration during site investigation In the early days of environmental remediaon, environmental professionals were faced with a multude of large contaminant plumes on properes where there was no thought of redevelopment for future use. There was no need to characterize such sites from a geotechnical standpoint. But risk-based closure and brownfield redevelopment are no longer just concepts, and available financing opportunies connue to drive developers to take on difficult sites. Environmental professionals have always done a good job characterizing environmental site contaminaon and developing and performing remediaon plans. It’s what they were trained to do. But many environmental site invesgaons come up short on difficult sites. Redevelopment cannot happen at these sites without characterizing subsurface condions from environmental and geotechnical perspecves. Yet site contaminaon is oſten characterized with lile or no thought regarding how the braunintertec.com 1 VOL 16, ISSUE 2 SUMMER 2013 PRACTICAL AND ENTERTAINING SINCE 1997 Leveraging Environmental & Geotechnical Partnerships Manage risk and cost to master difficult sites continued on next page … By Michael Beck, PE [email protected]Subgrade preparation for new structures isn’t always just a geotechnical issue. Existing infrastructure, especially when it is expected to remain in place below new construction, can present a variety of geotechnical and environmental challenges. In this case, challenges included pipe integrity, soil contamination, backfill method and subgrade uniformity.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Property redevelopment can be a tricky business. This is especially
true for sites with a history of industrial use that are impacted by
uncontrolled fills, construction materials, abandoned structures and
utilities, and industrial waste. Put those materials near or below the
groundwater surface and you’ve got quite a brew.
Dealing with such impacts is not cheap, but many projects incur
unnecessary costs because they aren’t coordinated from a shared
environmental and geotechnical perspective. Excess costs come from
two sources: basic site investigation rework and failure to leverage
both environmental and geotechnical expertise when evaluating site
redevelopment alternatives. Rework is generally the product of poor
logistics or inexperience and can be limited through better planning.
Leveraging environmental and geotechnical expertise requires more
experience, a solid understanding of regulations governing design
and construction, and industry savvy.
Collaboration during site investigationIn the early days of environmental remediation, environmental
professionals were faced with a multitude of large contaminant
plumes on properties where there was no thought of
redevelopment for future use. There was no need to characterize
such sites from a geotechnical standpoint. But risk-based closure
and brownfield redevelopment are no longer just concepts, and
available financing opportunities continue to drive developers to
take on difficult sites.
Environmental professionals have always done a good job
characterizing environmental site contamination and developing
and performing remediation plans. It’s what they were trained
to do. But many environmental site investigations come up short
on difficult sites. Redevelopment cannot happen at these sites
without characterizing subsurface conditions from environmental
and geotechnical perspectives. Yet site contamination is often
characterized with little or no thought regarding how the
braunintertec.com 1
V O L 1 6 , I S S U E 2 S U M M E R 2 0 1 3P R A C T I C A L A N D E N T E R T A I N I N G S I N C E 1 9 9 7
Leveraging Environmental & Geotechnical PartnershipsManage risk and cost to master difficult sites
Subgrade preparation for new structures isn’t always just a geotechnical issue. Existing infrastructure, especially when it is expected to remain in place below new construction, can present a variety of geotechnical and environmental challenges. In this case, challenges included pipe integrity, soil contamination, backfill method and subgrade uniformity.
Practical and Entertaining Since 19972
contaminated material(s) can be avoided, relocated, repurposed,
etc., to support redevelopment. As a result, geotechnical
consultants often redrill sites at additional cost to obtain
geotechnical information that should have been gathered during the
environmental investigation.
Similarly, while geotechnical engineers understand what it
takes to characterize subsurface geologic conditions to support
construction of buildings and pavements, they often fail to recognize
potential impacts to projects related to environmental issues
that may be evident in surface features (abandoned fuel pumps),
borehole samples (odorous or discolored soil), or test pits (entrained
demolition debris). Whether environmental or geotechnical, such
omissions can kill a project.
Intertwined designOnce a site has been characterized, it is critical to understand
all environmental and geotechnical constraints, how they affect
each other, and how they affect the project’s bottom line and the
risk of future structural problems. Unfortunately, the traditional
environmental investigation and remediation process doesn’t do this
well on its own, nor does conventional geotechnical engineering.
For example, environmental consultants can rigorously delineate
limits and estimate the volume of uncontrolled fill impacted
with chemicals at concentrations above applicable regulatory
standards, but what are the disposal options once it’s excavated?
Are there options for on-site relocation of the fill that won’t limit
redevelopment options or prevent redevelopment from occurring
at all? And what about sites with uncontrolled fill impacted by
contaminated groundwater? Is there a ground improvement
or building support alternative available to reduce or eliminate
groundwater management costs associated with dewatering?
These questions can pose complex challenges. This is where
experience and industry savvy come into play. For instance, it may be
possible to place fill containing construction debris outside foundation
oversize planes and/or at depth below pavements to reduce potential
impacts to building or pavement performance. Many times, additional
excavation work can be performed to accommodate placement of
contaminated soils at depth below buildings or pavements to prevent
off-site disposal of contaminated soils.
For budget-sensitive projects, design of site remediation and
development plans can be an iterative process, not unlike a shell
game. Clean closure is not typically affordable for difficult sites, and
redevelopment often hinges on designing to the least of several
site “evils.” This might mean shifting building locations, expanding
green areas, thickening pavements and assuming more long-term
maintenance responsibilities.
Move construction obstacles with experienced staffNo matter how well a site is characterized, unforeseen conditions
are possible, even typical, during redevelopment of sites with
a history of industrial use. Most building contractors are not
used to thinking about environmental issues, but are focused
on the myriad of details related to construction of the new
structure and associated infrastructure. That’s why it is critical
to have experienced field staff present during construction who
understand both the environmental regulatory framework and
plans for building construction. The presence of experienced field
staff facilitates prompt resolution of minor issues and proper
assessment and communication of larger issues to appropriate
members of the project team. Whether the unforeseen condition
consists of unknown building foundations or buried debris,
forgotten underground storage tanks, an unexpected amount of
contaminated organic soils, or any other unexpected challenge,
successful resolution requires collaboration between the building
contractor, environmental and geotechnical professionals, and the
site owner. Experienced field personnel are the first line of defense
when these issues arise in the field.
It’s critical to bring environmental and geotechnical professionals
together early in the planning process for redevelopment sites.
Working together, these professionals can design field investigations
that capture as much environmental and geotechnical information as
possible to more effectively evaluate remediation and development
alternatives, produce cost-effective and practicable designs, and
help anticipate construction issues. Implementing this approach will
maximize the performance of new structures while minimizing total
project costs. ■
… Leveraging Environmental & Geotechnical Partnerships continued
Experienced field staff who understand both the environmental regulatory framework and plans for building construction is critical to the success of complex projects.
braunintertec.com 3
Regulatory NavigationSteering a course to resource preservation and risk management
Braun Intertec is involved in the
planning and execution of
construction projects
that range from simple
to very complex. Our
role is usually in the
upfront stage, defining
characteristics of
project sites that
will affect design and
performance of structures,
and then during and after
construction to verify
the structure was
constructed properly and
is performing as intended. You may
be familiar with some of the work that
Braun Intertec has been involved in over the last 56 years: soil
type, soil density, ability to withstand applied loads and predicted
I attended a presentation you gave at my high school this spring on engineering, and I am hoping that you can offer more advice on pursuing an engineering-related career. You talked about the traditional four-year university programs, but I understand you also teach at Dakota County Technical College in Rosemount, Minn., and I’m actually interested in a two-year program that will allow me to support engineers from the field doing some kind of testing, surveying, etc. Can you tell me more about what such a program includes, and what I can do as a student to prepare to learn and look forward to employment?
– 2013: The Class with Class!
Civil technicians perform many important roles on construction projects – surveying, excavation observations and materials testing, and record keeping, among others.
braunintertec.com 7
Groundwater CheckupUsing groundwater monitoring wells to examine site wellbeing
Most people are familiar with getting regular dental or health
checkups, but another type of “checkup” often associated with
construction sites is the installation of groundwater monitoring
wells and regular monitoring. When conducting environmental
site investigations, it’s all too common for an unknown source of
contamination to be discovered on a site. And when there are
multiple property owners involved, investigations and remediation
can get complicated very quickly. Finger pointing often results as
those involved try to limit their own liability and cost. The installation
of monitoring wells along with groundwater sampling and the
appropriate analysis is a common way to mitigate risk associated with
a given site or operation.
Oftentimes, businesses that have operations with a potential
to release a hazardous substance into the environment choose to
install monitoring wells both as a
preventative measure and in order
to help document the conditions at
their site for future reference. Some
examples of these types of businesses
include oil and gas operations, landfill
operations, and wastewater disposal
and soil treatment facilities. A small
spill or release of oil or other material
can turn into a large and potentially
expensive liability if it’s undiscovered
over a period of months or years.
To minimize risk and exposure, such
operations commonly install wells
and collect regular water samples
to monitor site conditions. Ideally,
sampling efforts would begin prior to
any site development or operations
to provide baseline data or a
“before” picture reflecting the site’s
environmental health.
With a minimum of three
monitoring wells, the groundwater
flow direction can be identified. If contamination is discovered,
the direction of groundwater flow across a site becomes critical
to identifying potential contaminant sources, which may be an
adjacent site or some other off-site source. Regularly scheduled
monitoring events are a vital piece of the puzzle. This data helps
a property owner identify a problem and quickly deal with a
potential release. Addressing contamination in a small area, before
it spreads, is usually much more manageable and less expensive.
In addition, early identification of a release may be the key to
preventing the spread of contamination to an adjacent property. To
do this, facilities typically conduct two monitoring events each year,
one in the spring and one in the fall.
In a typical monitoring event, static groundwater levels are
measured to assess flow direction and recorded prior to sampling
activities. Although each sampling event is generally tailored to
address a specific site and its contamination of concern, common
sampling might include volatile organic compounds, total petroleum
hydrocarbons or chloride.
As Benjamin Franklin said, “An ounce of prevention is worth
a pound of cure.” Franklin understood that the effort necessary
to prevent a problem is far less than what would be required
to fix it. Relating his insight to groundwater contamination, the
installation of monitoring wells and regular monitoring can be far
more cost effective than a complex groundwater investigation after
This newsletter contains only general information. For specific applications, please consult your engineering or environmental consultants and legal counsel.
Detect a Leak in a Ground Heat Exchanger with 90% Less ExcavationOperational problems due to pressure drop or fluid loss within ground source heat pump piping systems can occur for many reasons. Often, the problem is located within the building and results from an interior leak or trapped/recently released air in the system. But if the interior has been ruled out as the culprit, there can only be one other place to look – the ground heat exchanger.
The leaking circuit(s) has been isolated and it’s time to start digging, right? Not necessarily. Narrowing down the location(s) of the leak prior to any excavation can greatly reduce site disruption, operational downtime, and unnecessary rehabilitation expenses. With Braun Intertec’s proprietary leak detection process, we can help achieve this goal. The process uses an environmentally-safe gas that is introduced into the affected portion of the system. Due to the lighter than air properties of the gas, sensitive detection equipment is utilized to identify the gas as it naturally travels upward through the soils at the leak point. The end result is isolation of the problem area(s) and a greatly reduced excavation area, approximately 90 percent less than would otherwise be required.
For more information about this leak detection service or other geothermal consulting services contact Braun Intertec Geothermal at 952.995.2414.