Page 1
1 © Wärtsilä
The Oil Gas Tipping Point & Great Laker Business Case Economics…
SNAME Great Lakes SectionMarriott Downtown Key Center11 February 2016Cleveland, OH
John Hatley PE LNG Initiatives ( MBA, MSE)
Americas VP Ship PowerWartsila North America, Inc.
Cell +1 281 221 [email protected]
Page 2
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Keys
Global Energy Policies, market gamesmanship ?
Future Ahead, structural shifts?
As a vessel owner, all I want to knowis the tipping point…
What fuel strategy do I choose to to boost my bottom line?
2 © Wärtsilä
A “Commodity Play” on fuel energy costs seeking competitive advantage for market share.
Page 3
Agenda
3 © Wärtsilä
What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy
Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG
Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views1000 Ft. Great LakerInvestment Returns
Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test
Conclusions Business Case Appendix
Page 4
Agenda
4 © Wärtsilä
What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy
Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG
Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views1000 Ft. Great LakerInvestment Returns
Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test
Conclusions Business Case Appendix
Page 5
Quiz…. Fuel Price ?
a) HFO 290.83 $ / ton ….
b) MDO 314.68 $ / ton .…
c) LNG 363.01 $ / ton ….
5 © Wärtsilä
Which is the lowest price ?
Page 6
The Price Paid for what it Cost
6 © Wärtsilä
: the amount of money that you pay for something
: the price of something : the amount of money that is needed to pay for or buy something
Page 7
Quiz… Fuel Answer Key
a) HFO 290.83 $ / ton ….
b) MDO 314.68 $ / ton .…
c) LNG 363.01 $ / ton ….
7 © Wärtsilä
Which is the lowest price ?
Key concept… purchase energy, not tons or gallons, which is the lowest cost per unit of energy?
7.77 $ / million BTU
7.77 $ / million BTU
7.77 $ / million BTU
Reference Common Values that will vary…HFO 37,430 BTU/kg MDO 40,500 BTU/kg LNG 46,720 BTU/kg density 980 kg/ m3 850 kg/ m3 430 kg/ m3
Page 8
Agenda
8 © Wärtsilä
What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy
Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG
Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views1000 Ft. Great LakerInvestment Returns
Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test
Conclusions Business Case Appendix
Page 9
Emission Control Areas
9 © Wärtsilä
Page 10
2015 ECA 0.1% Sulfur
10 © Wärtsilä
Works with high S HFO Low total lifecycle cost Use everywhere
Scrubber targets SOx, Selective Catalytic Reducer targets NOx, LNG targets CO2, NOx, PM, SOx.
Source: 2015 Exhaust Gas Cleaning Scrubbers Dec 2015 011415.pptx
Page 11
How clean is Natural Gas compared to Diesel ?
DF Natural Gas Engine
DieselEngine
0
20
40
60
80
100
Emissionvalues [%]
CO2
NOx
SOx
Particulates
-25%
-85%
-99%
-99%
Gas = ULTRA CLEAN
LNG provides significant emission reductions compared to traditional diesel engines
Page 12
No. Am. ECA Fuel Sulfur Limit
12 Wärtsilä
Source:http://www.dnvusa.com/industry/maritime/publicationsanddownloads/publications/newsletters/technical_regulatory/2012/north_american_emission_control_area.asp
Fuel Sulfur 0.10 % limit commences 1 January 2015
Page 13
North America ECA SOx & NOx
13 © Wärtsilä
Fuel Sulfur2012… 1% Limit2015… 0.1% Limit
EPA Category 3 2016… NOx Tier III & EPA Category 2 … NOx Tier 3, 4
Page 14
Decision Tree… New Build Vessel
14 © Wärtsilä
New Build
Diesel
HFO
LNG
Scrubber … Fuel Sulfur Compliance
LNG Compliance
ECA January 2016 multiple emission requirements; both fuel sulfur limits (2015) and engine emissions (EPA Tier 3,4 ) requirements in effect, new builds and major conversions require new engines plus compliance methods.
New tier EPA engine + after-treatment SCR
0.1% Sulfur… Fuel Compliance
New tier EPA engine + after-treatment SCR + Scrubber
New tier EPA engine + LNG cryogenics
Page 15
New Build Attributes
15 © Wärtsilä Source: Wartsila Moss White Paper: Exhaust Gas Cleaning: How to Choose the Correct Scrubber, Jennifer Ahlback, 2014.
Excess baggage as systems require host support; chemicals, tanks, waste stream sludge, piping/pumps, controls/automation, soot blowers…
Diesel + SCR
LNG
HFO + SCR + Scrubber
Page 16
Wartsila NOx Reducer System
16 © Wärtsilä
Soot Blower
Air
Pump
Mixing Duct
Dosing Unit
NOR Reactor
Controls
Urea Tank
CompressedAir
Urea Mixing & Injection
Page 17
LNGPac System
17 © Wärtsilä
Source: http://www.wartsila.com/media/news/26-08-2014-wartsila-launches-new-technical-solution-for-fuel-gas-handling
Page 18
18 © Wärtsilä
Exhaust Gas Fan
Alkali Feed Module
Bleed-Off Treatment
Process Tank
Alkali Storage Tank
CW Pump
Heat Exchgr
Scrubbing Water Pump
Exhaust Gas Analyzer
Sludge Tank
Water Measurement
Water Measurement
De- Plume Unit
Holding Tank
Page 19
Decision Tree… Retrofit Existing Vessel
19 © Wärtsilä
Existing Vessel
Diesel
HFO
LNG
Scrubber … Fuel Sulfur Compliance
LNG Compliance
ECA January 2016 multiple emission requirements; fuel sulfur limits (2015) and engine emissions (EPA Tier 3,4 ) requirements in effect, however existing retrofits may avoid major conversions & qualify without new tier engines or SCR.
New tier EPA engine + after-treatment SCR
0.1% Sulfur… Fuel Compliance
New tier EPA engine + after-treatment SCR + Scrubber
New tier EPA engine + LNG cryogenics
Page 20
2015 ECA + 2016 NOx Refit Existing Vessel Choices
1. Consume compliant Low Sulfur Distillate… champagne fuel + Selective Catalytic Reduction for NOx
2. Switch to LNG fuel: safe, clean, abundant, affordable, & available natural gas LNGReduction: CO2, NOx, SOx, PM
3. HFO Alternative Compliance… install scrubber for Sox + Selective Catalytic Reduction for NOx
4. Abort the Port
3 May 2023
ECA & EPA force timely choices existing retrofit vessels
Page 21
Agenda
21 © Wärtsilä
What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy
Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG
Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views1000 Ft. Great LakerInvestment Returns
Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test
Conclusions Business Case Appendix
Page 22
Cautionary Remarks
Each investment case requires careful analysis, inclusion, and weighing a broad variety of issues stemming from technical, financial, operational, regulatory, and other areas.
The purpose of this exercise is to illustrate a Business Case example and how a few of many key considerations may be transcribed into financial modeling as an aide to decision making.
Readers are advised that neither the Author nor Wartsila nor it’s subsidiaries are responsible for any errors, omissions, or updates to this information contained herein or assumptions or derivations whatsoever.
22 © Wärtsilä
This presentation is no substitute for your good and responsible decision making. Please utilize prudence and caution when making investment decisions along with securing the advice and guidance of professionals.
Page 23
4 Viewpoints
23 © Wärtsilä
SHIP OWNER
BANKER
PUBLIC
Transport safely at
optimal cost reliably
At fair return capturing
risks
Are risks understood
& I’m repaid !
Ultimate Environment
Safety
CARGO OWNER
Page 24
4 Key Metrics
24 © Wärtsilä
SHIP OWNER
BANKER
PUBLIC
All In Charter
Freight rate $ / ton
Return on Investment:
ROIC, EBITDA, cash flows
EBIT, Times Burden Cover,
cash flows
Ultimate Environment
Safety
CARGO OWNER
Page 25
The Route… Duluth to Gary
25 © Wärtsilä
100% “ECA” Bound route, 136 hour 1464 nm round trip includes locking & maneuvers & 0.5 days load/unload per port, 269 operating days per year, seasonal 59,800 tons taconite average load
Source: http://www.vesseldistance.com/
Page 26
Business Case Vessel
US Corporation, US Flag, Jones Act
Great Lakes 1,000 Footer Self Unloader Bulker
Refit Existing Vessel in 2016 …
EPA Category 3 ( > 30 liters /cyl. ) Tier 3
74,000 Tons Capacity
Speed 14+ knots with margin, Twin Screw
Installed power 16,090 HP ( 12,000 kW )
Manning 20
Major Class Society
26 © Wärtsilä
Speed provides 47 annual round trips, … competitive vessel size transports low cost freight
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_American_Century
Page 27
Recall ?
27 © Wärtsilä
Page 28
Then… 5 August 2014
28 Wärtsilä
LS180 1% 636 $/mt… LSMGO 0.1% 971 $/mt… LNG 500 $/mt
Source: http://www.bunkerworld.com/prices/port/us/hou/
Page 29
Cargo Owner Transport safely at optimal cost reliably
29 © Wärtsilä
Cargo owner finds transport savings with LNG plus advantage captures significant emissions reductions supporting green goals.
Page 30
Cargo Owner Transport safely at optimal cost reliably
30 © Wärtsilä
Cargo owner finds 4 year charter transport savings with LNG, $2.8 million over diesel and $1.1 Million over HFO + scrubber, competitive advantage LNG with lowest freight & least emissions.
Page 31
Ship Owner A fair return capturing risks
31 © Wärtsilä
Compelling fuel payback for vessels running on LNG fuel; an initial screening tool … not a good investment metric.
Page 32
ROCE Investment Criteria
32 © Wärtsilä
ROCE: reflects the company fundamental earning power.
Source: Robert Higgens, Analysis for Financial Management, 10 th Edition, pg 53-55.
Return on Capital Employed (Return on Invested Capital, ROIC ) reflects the company fundamental earning power as it removes the distorting effects of leverage inherent with Return on Equity (ROE).
Shipping companies often target 12% ROCE
Page 33
Ship Owner A fair return capturing risks
33 © Wärtsilä
Investor finds LNG Competitive Advantage for return on capital… LNG hurdle rate is highest & yet preserves cargo owner millions transport savings and emission reduction.
Page 34
34 © Wärtsilä
Warren Buffett… World Famous Investor
EBITDA as equivalent to earnings for a company is tantamount to the Egyptian Pyramids: forever state of the art…with never a need to be replaced, improved or refurbished…
Page 35
The Pyramids
Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation Amortization
EBITDA may overstate available cash flow… when used carefully and fully understood it may indicate what is available to pay bank debt and shareholders.
Often viewed as one of many economic indicators of company performance by financiers/investors/bankers.
Is often utilized when company has significant fixed assets.
35 © Wärtsilä
Page 36
36 © Wärtsilä
LNG fuel has strongest EBITDA… + $3.6 Million over HFO+ Scrubber and + $5.0 Million atop MDO.
Years
EBITDA
MDO Fuel
HFO + Scrubber
LNG Fuel
Ship Owner A fair return capturing risks
Page 37
Banker Are risks understood & I’m repaid !
37 © Wärtsilä
Banker finds debt cover is weakest on MDO fuel, favorably stronger on alternatives, LNG is strongest.
Page 38
The Pyramids
Earnings Before Interest Taxes
EBIT = Revenue minus expenses, excluding tax & interest
EBIT may conservatively understate available cash flow… when used carefully and fully understood it may indicate what is available to pay bank debt and shareholders.
Often viewed as one of many economic indicators of company performance by financiers/investors/bankers.
EBIT nulls the effects of different capital structures and tax rates. EBIT was the precursor to EBITDA.
38 © Wärtsilä
Page 39
39 © Wärtsilä
Years
EBIT
Banker Are risks understood & I’m repaid !
LNG has strongest EBIT… Depreciation 10 Year MACRS ½ Year Convention… Dry docking years 5,10,15,20
LNG Fuel
HFO + Scrubber
MDO Fuel
Page 40
Agenda
40 © Wärtsilä
What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy
Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesAbatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG
Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views1000 Ft. Great LakerInvestment Returns
Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test
Conclusions Business Case Appendix
Page 41
US #1 Shale Resources
41 © Wärtsilä
1,161 tcf gas & 120 billion barrels oil
Development rapid with technology advances in horizontal drilling, fracking, and computer seismic abilities.
In 5 years US became world’s largest producer of gas
Strong infrastructure & know how
Source:http://www.eia.gov/conference/2013/pdf/presentations/kuuskraa.pdf
Page 42
Shale Gas
42 © Wärtsilä
Page 43
Shale Oil
43 © Wärtsilä
Page 44
28 November 2014
44 © Wärtsilä
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-idUSKCN0JA0O320141128
Key OPEC Vienna meeting sets stage for market share battle. Brent begins steep fall.
Page 45
5 January 2015
45 © Wärtsilä
Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2015/01/05/saudi-arabias-750-billion-bet-drives-brent-oil-below-54/
Exert Discipline in the Marketplace amongst OPEC and Non OPEC countries... Key focus on market share… oil prices plunging.
Page 46
Discipline Target US or Russia ?
46 © Wärtsilä
Russia suffering double whammy:
Oil rich Ukraine and Black Sea burdened by politics under imposed sanctions as oil takes severe price slide…
Ruble plunges down against USD
Source: http://online.wsj.com/articles/ruble-hits-new-low-as-oil-prices-drop-1417441184
Source: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/11/10/an-oil-price-cold-war-with-saudi-arabia-not-so-fast-experts-say
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/ruble-plunging-again-2014-12p://online.wsj.com/articles/ruble-hits-new-low-as-oil-prices-drop-1417441184
1 December 2014
December 31, 2014
Page 47
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/citi-saudi-arabia-wont-win-this-oil-standoff-2014-11 47 © Wärtsilä
Profits negative… Severe Pain
Profits squeezed…Manageable Pain
45 $/BBL
Key Oil Production Cost
40$/BBL
Total Liquids Production
Brent Breakeven Price
Page 48
2014 Production
48 © Wärtsilä
US vaults to 1st in production oil and other liquids
OPEC
OPEC
OPEC
OPEC
OPEC
OPEC
OPEC
OPEC
Source: ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_production
http://www.eia.gov/beta/international/rankings/#?prodact=53-1&cy=2014
Saudi Arabia11.6 m BBL/day
Page 49
Government Breakeven Budgets
49 © Wärtsilä
Severe shortfalls @ prices under 100$/BBL, present oil glut & soft prices challenge sustainability beyond short run
Source: https://alfinnextlevel.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/oil_breakeven_deutsche_bank_oct_14.png40 $/BBL
Page 50
Brent Crude Oil Prices
50 © Wärtsilä
Source: http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/crude-oil-brent.aspx?timeframe=1y
THEN
NOW
Oil severe price 70% price drop past 18 months as abundant supplies face weak demand from China and stagnant EU.
Page 51
What’s the impact of the steep fall in oil prices !
Is competitive advantage of LNG robust or fragile ?
51 © Wärtsilä
Page 52
Recent … 28 January 2016
52 © Wärtsilä
Port Houston Delivered Price
LS380 1% Sulfur 139 $ / ton
LSMGO 0.1% Sulfur 333 $ / ton
Source: http://www.kpibridgeoil.com/
LS180 1% 139 $/mt… LSMGO 0.1% 333 $/mt…
Page 53
LNG Price 08 February 2016
Fixed Liquefaction Charge 4.60 CAD $/ GJVariable Sumas Gas Basis + 3.00 CAD $/ GJTotal FOB LNG Price 7.60 CAD $/ GJ
conversion to million BTU x 1.05435 LNG FOB price 8.02 CAD $/ mm BTU
exchange rate x 0.72 USD $ / CAD $ Price LNG FOB 5.77 US $ / mm BTU
53 © Wärtsilä
Allow 2.00 US $/mmBTU transport = 7.77 or LNG 363 $/mt
Page 54
Owner A fair return capturing risks of oil fall 28 Jan 2016
54 © Wärtsilä
LNG emissions and millions transport savings remains for shipper but returns narrow for investor amidst oil glut steep price dive.
Page 55
Fuel Stress Test: 100% ECA
THEN 5 August 2014
12.20% @ LNG 500 $/mt 4.34% @ MDO 971 $/mt 7.76% @ HFO 636 $/mt
55 © Wärtsilä
Deviation
ROCE
NOW 28 January 2016
13.94% @ LNG 363 $/mt 17.96% @ MDO 333 $/mt18.15% @ HFO 139 $/mt
LNG robust despite steep crude drop; today choose HFO scrub for best ROCE, but sustainable? Most volatile returns MDO, then HFO, least LNG… holds cargo share with compelling emissions + transport savings. Overall HFO + Scrubber often 2nd place.
Page 56
Agenda
56 © Wärtsilä
What ? Fuel Price vs. CostEnergy
Why & How ? No. Am ECA & EmissionsOwner ChoicesSCR, Scrubber, LNG Abatement
Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views185K BBL ATBInvestment Returns
Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?Stress Test
Conclusions Business Case Appendix
Page 57
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Keys
Global Energy Policies, market gamesmanship ?
Future Ahead, structural shifts?
As a vessel owner, all I want to knowis the tipping point…
What fuel strategy do I choose to to boost my bottom line?
57 © Wärtsilä
A “Commodity Play” on fuel energy costs seeking competitive advantage for market share.
Page 58
APPENDIXBusiness Case Details
58 Wärtsilä
Page 59
Financials
59 Wärtsilä
Page 60
Key Values
60 Wärtsilä
Page 61
Key Values
61 Wärtsilä
Page 62
Fuel Attributes
62 © Wärtsilä
Utilize fuels specific for regional case... As fuels widely vary, the historic dollars per ton or gallon is challenging to use as differing fuels host widely varying energy content, density, value... These values shown are generally representative.
Page 63
EBITDA
63 © Wärtsilä
Page 64
EBIT
64 © Wärtsilä
Page 65
Weight Average Cost Capital WACC
65 © Wärtsilä Source: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-finance/5/cost-capital/wacc.aspx
WACC may be used as a hurdle rate against which to assess ROIC (ROCE) performance.
Page 66
Cost of Capital - Divisional & Project Costs ( WACC cont. )
66 © Wärtsilä Source: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-finance/5/cost-capital/wacc.aspx
WACC must be adjusted up or down to properly reflect project risks that differ from those of the overall firm.
Page 67
Net Present Value & Internal Rate of Return
67 © Wärtsilä Source: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-finance/5/cost-capital/wacc.aspx
Page 68
Selection Guide Measures of Merit
68 © Wärtsilä
Source: Fundamentals Ship Design Economics, Lecture Notes, Professor Harry Benford, Revised June 1981
Page 69
Measures of Merit ( continued )
69 © Wärtsilä
Source: Fundamentals Ship Design Economics, Lecture Notes, Professor Harry Benford, Revised June 1981
Page 70
Measures of Merit ( continued )
70 © Wärtsilä
Source: Fundamentals Ship Design Economics, Lecture Notes, Professor Harry Benford, Revised June 1981