Top Banner
The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement Simon Taylor
16

The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Jan 16, 2016

Download

Documents

Carl

The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement. Simon Taylor. Overview. Starting points Culture and Global mindedness Definitions Intercultural sensitivity Measurement instruments Introduction to IDI IDI use in education IDI use at MIS The pros and cons of the IDI. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

The notion of intercultural sensitivityand its measurement

Simon Taylor

Page 2: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Overview

Starting points Culture and Global mindedness

Definitions

Intercultural sensitivity Measurement instruments Introduction to IDI IDI use in education IDI use at MIS The pros and cons of the IDI

Page 3: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

My Starting Points 1

Why?

“Excellence in education for globally minded students”

Faculty and staff need to understand, feel and live “global-mindedness” if we are to help students.

Page 4: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Global mindedness

heidisparkle.com

Page 5: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

My Starting Points 2

Culture

IS

A valid concept

Global –mindedness

IS NOT

International- mindedness

Global-mindedness and culture

ARE

Linked

Page 6: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Definitions

Intercultural

… Awareness

Learning

Sensitivity

Competence

Understanding

Education

“Intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity and intercultural competence form the cognitive, affective and behavioural aspects of intercultural communication” Chen 1997

Page 7: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Intercultural SensitivityMeasurement

Page 8: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Intercultural SensitivityMeasurement

4types Abbe, Gulick & Herman

(2007)

Self Reporting

Behavior87Fantini 2007

Multi dimensionalDevelopmentalTrait based

Observational

Page 9: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI)

Developmental

1986 DMIS developed (Bennett 2004)1998 IDI – based on DMIS developd (Hammer, Bennett and Wiseman (2003)

Denial

Defense

Minimization Acceptance AdaptionPolarization

Reversal

Ethnocentrism Ethnorelativitism

55 145100

Page 10: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

IDI v3 – 50 questions and self reportingHammer (2011)

“4763 individuals from 11 distinct, cross cultural samples” Different languages

Conclusions Perceived (PO) and Developmental Orientation (DO) Readability (Grade 10) Language transferability Predictive validity

Page 11: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

IDI use in Education

Research results with teachers

Fretheim, Bayles and Westrick and Yeun cited in Davies 2010

Page 12: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

IDI at MIS 1

50 members of staff at MIS (Random)

Perceived orientation 125.85

Developmental orientation of 103.94.

8 members of staff at MIS - Intercultural awareness Committee (Self selecting group)

Perceived orientation 131.99

Developmental orientation of 114.68

Page 13: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

IDI Pros and Cons

Grounded theory

Measures intercultural sensitivity

Identifies development

Raises cultural awareness

Potential

Differential validity- Bias in introduction and questions

50 questions

Self reporting

“How do I answer?” questions

Face validity -Ambiguity of questions

Minimization bias

Linearity

The good The not so good

Page 14: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

IDI use at MIS 2Raising Intercultural Sensitivity

Approaches

■ Recruit the right people■ Offer professional development –

Personal■ Set the right culture – Systems and

policies

Page 15: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

References

Abbe, A., Gulick, L., & Herman, J., 2007. Cross-cultural competence in Army leaders: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Washington, DC. U.S. Army Research Institute.

Bennett, J. 2004. Becoming Interculturally Competent [pdf]. Available at: http://www.newonline.org/resource/resmgr/mcw_ppt/becominginterculturallycompe.pdf [Accessed 25.2.12].

Davies, A., 2010. The Applicability of the intercultural development inventory for the measurement of intercultural sensitivity of teachers in an international school context. Thesis (Doctor of Education (EdD)), University of Bath.

DeJaeghere, J. and Zhang, Y., 2008. Development of intercultural competence among US American teachers: Professional development factors that affect competence. Intercultural Education. 19(3), pp. 255-268

Fantini, A.E., 2005. About intercultural communicative competence: a construct [Electronic version]. Brattleboro, VT: School for International Training. [Accessed 20 December, 2011] http://www.sit.edu/SITOccasionalPapers/feil_appendix_e.pdf.

Page 16: The notion of intercultural sensitivity and its measurement

References 2

Hammer, M., Bennett, R and Wiseman, R., 2003. Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27 (2003), pp. 421-443.

Hammer, M., 2011. Additional cross-cultural validity testing of the intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35 (2011), pp.474-487.