Top Banner
6

The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units

Oct 01, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units
Page 2: The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units
Page 3: The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units
Page 4: The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units
Page 5: The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units
Page 6: The New Yorker, Apr 14, 2014 · that refer to a now missing aenal spire, will propose an ingenious theory that the original height of the building was 1,776 of those antique units