The Need for Electric Transmission Improvements in Dane County
Dec 28, 2015
The Need for Electric Transmission Improvements in Dane County
Background
Dane County has experienced major economic growth in the last 25 years.
Three of Wisconsin’s top five fastest growing communities are in Dane County.
– Verona– Cottage Grove– Sun Prairie
Electric usage in Dane County is expected to increase each year through 2020.
Background (continued)
American Transmission Company (ATC) is a regulated public utility with a duty to provide an adequate and reliable transmission system.
ATC’s planning analyses and system-reliability models indicate new transmission lines are needed in Dane County.
Growth In Dane County 1980 to 2007
Existing transmission system is aging
Only three 345-kV transmission lines:– Columbia – No. Madison 1 1975– Paddock to Rockdale to Columbia 1978– Columbia – No. Madison 2 upgrade 2006
Only four 138-kV transmission lines:– Femrite – Sprecher 2007– Rockdale to Fitchburg 1965/1967– No. Madison to West Middleton 1972– No. Madison to Sycamore 1983
Dane County projects: Recent and planned
Project Voltage Status/Inservice
Femrite to Sprecher 138kV Complete 2007
North Madison to Waunakee 138kV Approved by PSC 07/07Proposed In-service Date 2009
Fitchburg to Verona 138kV Under regulatory reviewProposed In-service Date 2009
Paddock to Rockdale 345kV Under regulatory review Proposed In-service Date 2010
Rockdale to West Middleton 345kV Filed 10/15/07 In-service 2013
Rockdale – West Middleton NeedThe upgrade in 2006 of the 138-kilovolt line from the Columbia Plant to the North Madison substation is the only new 345-kilovolt line to be built in the County since the 1970s.
A new 345-kV transmission line is needed to: reinforce the entire transmission network in Dane County
solve a critical electrical reliability problem; help to prevent the threat of system outages
Increase efficiency of power lines, reducing energy lost in transit
Eliminate the need for multiple new, less-efficient, lower voltage lines in the future
provide the necessary power for continued business growth and to support a growing population
Rockdale – West Middleton Project: At a glance
Length of line: 32 - 55 miles
End points: Rockdale Substation
near Christiana, and West
Middleton Substation.
Voltage: 345 kilovolts
Type of pole: Steel single pole,
single circuit
Cost: $213 million to $250 million
In-Service: 2013
Rockdale – West MiddletonProposed route options
Issues and challenges
ATC’s forecasts and studies…are they accurate? Is underground construction an option? Are there alternatives? Conservation? Upgrades to
existing lines? Is the Beltline Highway a viable route? Should additional generation in Dane County be
considered?
All of these issues are addressed in ATC’s regulatory application and will be subjected to the PSC’s rigorous review.
Reliability is critical
– The capacity of the transmission system must meet the needs of a growing population and increased electrical usage.
– Blackouts, brownouts, and even momentary interruptions can cause substantial financial impacts to businesses.
– Reliable power is essential for Dane County’s energy consumers/employers and for attracting new businesses.
Improved Access leads to cost savings
Access to lower cost energy sources:
– The existing transmission system limits access to and transmission of cost-effective regional sources of energy, including renewable energy.
– Planned transmission improvements will increase access to lower-cost sources of power outside of Dane County and reduce the need for new generation sources in the county.
A strong transmission system benefits the economy
Transmission is basic infrastructure investment.– As necessary to a growing economy as transportation,
water and sewer, and telecommunications infrastructure.
A reliable and robust transmission system is fundamental to a growing economy. – Allows businesses to plan expansions with confidence.– Encourages new business development.
Next steps for Rockdale-West Middleton Project
Regulatory application: filed 10/15/07 Regulatory review: Throughout 2008/09 Technical and public hearings: February 2009 PSC decision expected: Summer 2009 Proposed Start of construction: 2010 Proposed In-service Date: 2013