Women and Natural Resource Management Craig Leisher Senior Social Scientist The Nature Conservancy
Jul 12, 2015
Women and Natural Resource ManagementCraig LeisherSenior Social ScientistThe Nature Conservancy
Women and men use forests differently
2000 - 2006 % change in forest condition in 64 locally
managed forests in India
77.4
87.9
70 75 80 85 90
Men-only (1 or zero woman) on mangement board
Women on management board
Improvement in forest coverSource: Agarwal 2009
12.5%
15%
22%
No women on executive committee
Women on executive committee
Return on equityEurope and BRIC companies, 2007-2009
n = 279Source: McKinsey & Company 2010
41%
11%
15%
No women on board of directors
Women on board of directors
Return on equityUS Fortune 500 companies, 2004-2008
n = 524Source: Catalyst 2011
46%
12%
16%
No women on board of directors
Women on board of directors
Return on equityGlobal companies, 2005-2011
n = 2,359Source: Credit Suisse 2012
30%
Why gender diversity makes a difference
• The majority group improves its own performance in response to minority involvement
• Better conflict resolution
• Fewer high-risk strategies are selected
• Fosters a better balance in leadership skills
• Able to tap into the widest possible pool of talent
More sustainable resource use = Less time to collect resource and more consistent income for women = More long-term investments in areas such as education =More boys and girls in school.
Select countries’ total fertility rate by education level
7.26.7
6.1 5.9
4.9
3.6
7.0
5.55.1
4.33.8
3.1
4.8
3.2
2.02.4 2.2 2.5
0
2
4
6
8
Niger 2006
Kenya 2003
Ethiopia 2005
Haiti 2005
Philippines 2005
Bangledesh 2004
Tota
l fe
rtili
ty r
ate
No education Primary Secondary or higherSource: Population Reference Bureau