Running head: MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADER 1 The Moral and Ethical Traits of Leaders and the Effects on the Organization: A Literature Review, 2010-2014 Richard V. Jones The University of Texas at Tyler Tech 5303.60 Research Tech in HRD / TECH I embrace honor and integrity. Therefore, I choose not to lie, cheat, or steal, nor to accept the actions of those who do.
20
Embed
The Moral and Ethical Traits of Leaders and the Effects on the Organization
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Running head: MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADER 1
The Moral and Ethical Traits of Leaders and the Effects on the Organization:
A Literature Review, 2010-2014
Richard V. Jones
The University of Texas at Tyler
Tech 5303.60 Research Tech in HRD / TECH
I embrace honor and integrity. Therefore, I
choose not to lie, cheat, or steal, nor to accept the actions of those who do.
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 2
The Moral and Ethical Traits of Leaders and the Effects on the Organization:
A Literature Review, 2010-2014
Introduction
One only needs to look into the news headlines to see the devastation that can be caused
when an organizational leader lacks morals and ethics. A leader’s ability to lead is only as strong
as the moral and ethical base from which they are built. Brown and Trevino (2013) suggested
that “executive ethical leaders were frequently described as models of ethical conduct. Further,
when top managers are personally committed to ethics, their organizations’ ethics programs are
more comprehensive, have stronger aspirational orientations” (p.590). This study seeks to
examine the ethical and moral characteristics of the leader and the effects on the organization. In
addition, it seeks to look at the relevant literature that provides a road map for future training for
moral and ethical development of leaders.
Understanding ethical behavior of leaders translates into the understanding of the decision
making processes of groups within organizations. It is through this understanding that research
can develop training that will provide organizations with the tools to combat unethical behavior
and the results of this type of behavior. In their conclusion Brown and Trevino (2013) suggested
that role modeling is related to ethical leadership and that an organization that looks to hiring
employees with strong role models in life and through development of strong ethical leadership
will positively affect the organizations outcome. (p. 597)
Review of Existing Literature
Review of the relevant literature reveals aspects that support the effects of ethical vs.
unethical behavior of leadership on organizations. Brown and Trevino (2013) suggest that
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 3
organizations that view their leadership as ethical are stronger than their counterparts (p. 587). It
is through this relationship that both the positive and negative ethical behaviors between the
leader and the organization are connected.
Steinbauer , Renn, Taylor & Njoroge, (2013) implied that the ethical decisions of an
organizations leaders directly influences the decisions of a group. This implies that if a group
views the leader as ethical then the group will act in an ethical manner. Additionally, they
remarked that the ownership of the ethical action was the perceived ownership of the leader and
therefore not that of the followers (p. 381). This leads to the consideration that leadership ethics
determines the ethics of the group or organization with little to or no resistance as understood by
Hoyt and Price (2013). Furthermore, they determined that the presence of the leadership directly
influenced the decision of the group as opposed to the absence of leadership (p. 538)
Additionally, Frisch & Huppenbauer (2013) implied that organizations that educate and
equip their management teams with the tools in ethical decision making will have positive
impact on the organization when demonstrated through long term business strategy.
Strengthening this argument Lynham & Chermack (2006) implied that Ethics are measured by
what the group perceives of the leaders’ habits and that performance increases when responsible
leadership performance is translated into time, quantity, and alignment (p. 82).
Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework for this study is based on empirical indicators developed by
Dr. Susan A. Lynham and Dr. Thomas J. Chermack under the title of The Units of the
Theoretical Framework. This includes the following areas of consideration as noted in their
studies. Empirical Indicators for the Unit of Constituency, Empirical Indicators for the Unit of
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 4
Responsibleness, Empirical Indicators for the Unit of Performance, and Empirical Indicators for
the Leadership System-in-focus. Dr. Lynham and Chermack studies specified a relation to moral
and ethical behavior under the Emperical Indicators for the Unit of Responsibleness in the
framework has implied results directly related to this study. ( Lynham & Chermack, 2006, p. 82)
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate relevant scholarly literature on moral and ethical
leadership that will in turn lead to a deeper understanding of the development of the morale and
ethical leadership. It is this author hope to gain an increased amount of knowledge that will gain
a greater understanding of the source of moral and ethical leadership traits.
Guiding Research Question
The researcher is guided by the research question, According to recent peer-reviewed
literature, how are moral and ethical leadership traits developed and what are the results of the
moral and ethics of a leader on the organizational culture?
Delimitations and Limitations
This study will focus primarily on discovery and analysis of the published peer-reviewed
literature found in databases subscribed to by The University of Texas at Tyler library relevant to
this study. It is limited by the availability of literature that can be located in the UT Tyler library.
It may contain other scholarly works such as books and monographs if they are readily available
for the researcher as background information.
Significance of the Study
This review of literature is significant because it explores the traits, morals, and ethics of
leadership. Today’s society is often plagued by corruption and mistrust of organizational leaders
thus it is imperative that we gain a full understanding of the moral and ethical decisions of
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 5
leader’s and their subsequent effect on organizational culture if the direction of the of the society
is to change as a whole. “Based on prior work suggesting that third parties also make fairness
judgments and respond to the way employees are treated, this study first suggests that
perceptions of interactional justice for peers (IJP) lead employees to two different responses to
injustice at work”
Methodology
This study will utilize peer reviewed scholarly literature. Analysis of the literature will
seek to discover the moral and ethical traits of leadership and their perceived effects on the
organization as well as possible future trainings that are conducive for the moral and ethical
development of future leaders.
Study Design and Data Collection Procedures
The basis for this study is that of a literature review. In this study, peer-reviewed
literature is located and then analyzed to develop paths for future leadership development and
literary knowledge. In the current study, data collection will involve the discovery of peer-
reviewed articles from The University of Texas library database pertaining to the above
mentioned subject matter. Search terms included ethical leadership, ethics, organizational
culture, morals, social model, leader, employee, and leadership development occurring within
article titles. Databases will include gleaned from databases at: The University of Texas at Tyler.
Results
Examination of the peer reviewed articles have pointed towards a conclusion that there is
a perceived connection between the ethics and moral behavior of leadership and the relationship
to the followers for which they lead. The following observations were noted as a result of this
perceived behavior of leaders. When employees are treated unjustly there are two ways in which
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 6
the other members of a group may respond. Deviant Workplace Behavior (DWB) or
When executive leaders are personified as ethical leaders their organizational programs in ethics are stronger than their counterparts.
Positive Direct ( Brown & Trevin˜o, 2013)
Results of Unethical Treatment
When employees are treated unjustly there are two ways in which the other members of a group may respond. Deviant Workplace Behavior or Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Non-leading versus leading roles in ethical decision making
When a group is placed under leadership the ethical decisions of the leader tends to become the ethical decision of the group with little resistance.
Both Implied (Hoyt & Price, 2013)
Role relationship in ethical decision making
The relationship of a leader’s ethical decision directly influences the decisions of the group
Both Direct(Steinbauer , Renn,Taylor & Njoroge, 2013)
Ethical leadership behavior
Leaders influence the outcome of work performance through ethical leadership both ethical and unethical behavior.
Both Direct (Demirtas, 2013)
Ethical level of leadership
Educate and equip managers with competencies used in ethical decision making.
Positive Direct(Frisch & Huppenbauer, 2013)
Moral courageMoral courage promotes ethical and pro-social behavior Positive Direct
(Hannah, Avolio, & Walumbwa, 2011)
Ethical Leadership
Investing in the ethics of our leaders and increasing ethical leadership decreases the team’s lack of caring and poor performance of team members under leadership.
Positive Direct (Taylor &Pattie 2014)
Empirical Indicators for the Unit of Constituency
The group’s needs are measured through formal and informal inputs in the evaluation of leadership.
Positive Direct (Lynham & Chermack, 2006)
Empirical Indicators for the Unit of Responsibleness
Ethics are measured by what the group perceives of the leaders habits Both Implied (Lynham &
Chermack, 2006)
Empirical Indicators for the Unit of Performance
Performance increases when responsible leadership performance is translated into time, quantity, and alignment
Positive Direct (Lynham & Chermack, 2006)
Empirical Indicators Leadership using the group’s feedback Positive Direct (Lynham &
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 11
for the Leadership System-in-focus
of what a leader should be in practice increases the effectiveness of the leadership.
Chermack, 2006)
Effects of Ethical Leadership
Employees that work within an ethical environment will tend to act in an ethical behavior
Positive Implied (Lu, & Lin, 2013)
Discussion and Future Direction
How moral and ethical leadership traits developed and what are the results of the moral
and ethics of a leader on the organizational culture? This was the driving question behind the
relevant literature review. Research implied a relationship between leadership ethics and the
decision made by the followers within the leaders group or organization. This relationship can
lead to both a positive outcome and a negative outcome based on the perceived ownership of the
behavior by the leader and the type of ethical or unethical behavior. (Steinbauer , Renn, Taylor &
Njoroge, (2013) p.381)
It is further understood that through education leadership can be developed towards
positive ethical decision that will in turn result in a positive business model if pursued over a
long term plan of development. It is understood that in an ethical environment the group or
organization will outperform another similar group within an unethical environment. (Frisch et
al., 2013)
What is not truly understood is the choice to follow an ethical vs. an unethical path. This
researcher is guided to a consideration through the evidence presented that a deeper decision
making process should be considered. Future research that further explains the reasoning behind
the individual thought process following one path or another will lead to a better understanding
of how to train the leadership in managing ethical and business decisions.
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 12
It is this researcher’s opinion that individuals making decisions daily exist within what I will
refer to as the kaleidoscope effect. This is the point in which all options good or bad are on the
table and given the available options most individuals will follow the path of least resistance
good or bad which leads to the most favorable or least involved outcome. However, there is little
research available to fully support this idea and could be examined further by this or other
researchers.
References
Brown, M., & Trevino, L. (2013). Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, (122), 587–598-587–598.
MORAL AND ETHICAL TRAITS OF LEADERS 13
Demirtas, O. (2013). Ethical leadership influence at organizations: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, (126), 273–284-273–284.
Frisch, C., & Huppenbauer, M. (2013). New insights into ethical leadership: A qualitative investigation of the experiences of executive ethical leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014(123), 23–43-23–43.
Hannah, S., Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F., & Arnold, D. (2011). Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 555-578.
Hoyt, C., & Price, T. (2013). Ethical decision making and leadership: Merging social role and self-construal perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, (126), 531–539-531–539.
Lu, C., & Lin, C. (2013). The effects of ethical leadership and ethical climate on employee ethical behavior in the international port context. Journal of Business Ethics, (124), 209-223.
Lynham, S., & Chermack, T. (2006). Responsible leadership for performance: A theoretical model and hypotheses. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4), 73-88.
Steinbauer, R., Renn, R., Taylor, R., & Njoroge, P. (2013). Ethical leadership and followers’ moral judgment: The role of followers’ perceived accountability and self-leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, (120), 381–392-381–392.
Taylor, S., & Pattie, M. (2014). When does ethical leadership affect workplace incivility? The moderating role of follower personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, (24), 4-4.
Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., & Sua´rez-Acosta, M. (2013). Employees’ reactions to peers’ unfair treatment by supervisors: The role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, (122), 537–549-537–549.