Top Banner
85

The Menace of Hepatitis B

Jan 13, 2016

Download

Documents

lakia

The Menace of Hepatitis B. By Professor Dr Intekhab Alam Department of Medicine Khyber Medical University, PGMI, LRH, Peshawar. What is Hepatitis B ?. Hepatitis B is an infectious disease caused by hepatitis B virus which may lead to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and HCC. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 2: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 3: The Menace of Hepatitis B

The Menace of Hepatitis BThe Menace of Hepatitis B

By

Professor

Dr Intekhab AlamDepartment of MedicineKhyber Medical University, PGMI, LRH, Peshawar

Page 4: The Menace of Hepatitis B

What is Hepatitis B ?What is Hepatitis B ?

Hepatitis B is an infectious disease caused by Hepatitis B is an infectious disease caused by hepatitis B virus which may lead to cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus which may lead to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and HCC.hepatic decompensation and HCC.

Hepadnavirus family, DS DNA, Enveloped.Hepadnavirus family, DS DNA, Enveloped.

It is the 10It is the 10thth leading cause of death in the world leading cause of death in the world

HBV is 50 to 100 times more infectious than HIVHBV is 50 to 100 times more infectious than HIV

10% of HIV patients are co-infected with HBV10% of HIV patients are co-infected with HBV

Lavanchy D. Hepatitis B virus epidemiology, disease burden, treatment, and current and emerging prevention and control measures. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, Volume 11, Number 2, March 2004, pp. 97-107

WHO Fact Sheet. 2000Keefe MD. Pocket Guide to Hepatitis B A CME accredited program developed by members of the ACT-HBV Initiative Keefe MD. Pocket Guide to Hepatitis B A CME accredited program developed by members of the ACT-HBV Initiative (University of Wisconsin) (University of Wisconsin)

Page 5: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)Hepatitis B virus (HBV)

Page 6: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 7: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBV Genotypes and SubtypesHBV Genotypes and Subtypes

GenotypeGenotype Areas of prominenceAreas of prominence

AA NW Europe, USA, NW Europe, USA, Central AfricaCentral Africa

BB Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia, China, VietnamChina, Vietnam

CC E Asia, Taiwan, Korea, China, E Asia, Taiwan, Korea, China, Japan, VietnamJapan, Vietnam

DD Mediterranean area, IndiaMediterranean area, India

EE W AfricaW Africa

FF Central and S AmericaCentral and S America

G & HG & H France, USAFrance, USA

Stuyver et al 2000

Page 8: The Menace of Hepatitis B

The Global Impact of HBV DiseaseThe Global Impact of HBV Disease

World population

6 billion

2 billion with evidence of

HBV infection

300–400 million with

chronic HBV

25% die of cirrhosis or liver cancer

Page 9: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Global Patterns of Chronic HBV Global Patterns of Chronic HBV InfectionInfection

High(High(>>8%): 45% of global population8%): 45% of global population– Lifetime risk of infection >60% Lifetime risk of infection >60% – Early childhood infections commonEarly childhood infections common

Intermediate(2%-7%): 43% of global populationIntermediate(2%-7%): 43% of global population– Lifetime risk of infection 20%-60%Lifetime risk of infection 20%-60%– Infections occur in all age groupsInfections occur in all age groups

Low (<2%): 12% of global populationLow (<2%): 12% of global population– Lifetime risk of infection <20% Lifetime risk of infection <20% – Most infections occur in adult risk groupsMost infections occur in adult risk groups

Page 10: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B – In AsiaHepatitis B – In Asia

Of all chronically infected carriers worldwide, Of all chronically infected carriers worldwide, approximately 75% are found in Asia.approximately 75% are found in Asia.

In Pakistan In Pakistan (Intermediate prevalence area):(Intermediate prevalence area): – 5% of the population is affected by hepatitis B5% of the population is affected by hepatitis B– 67% of HCC cases are a result of HBV. 67% of HCC cases are a result of HBV.

R Mohamed et al. Practical difficulties in the management of hepatitis B in the Asia–Pacific region. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2004) 19, 958–969

Page 11: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBV vs HIV

HIVHIV HBVHBVNo. of people infected worldwide No. of people infected worldwide (WHO estimated)(WHO estimated)

19.5 million19.5 million 2000 million2000 million

No. of AIDS cases/HBV carriersNo. of AIDS cases/HBV carriers 6 million6 million 350 million350 million

Min. vol of blood required to Min. vol of blood required to transmit infectiontransmit infection

0.1 ml0.1 ml 0.0004 ml0.0004 ml

Risk of infection following needle-Risk of infection following needle-stick injury with positive patientstick injury with positive patient

0.5%0.5% 7-30%7-30%

Vaccine preventableVaccine preventable NoNo YesYes

Page 12: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Transmission of HBVTransmission of HBV

HBV is ubiquitous, highly contagious and is 100 times HBV is ubiquitous, highly contagious and is 100 times more infectious than HIV.more infectious than HIV.

Transmission isTransmission is “Sexual, Parenteral, Perinatal”. “Sexual, Parenteral, Perinatal”.

Source of infection is unknown in one third of the Source of infection is unknown in one third of the patients.patients.

HBV can survive outside the body for prolonged periods.HBV can survive outside the body for prolonged periods.

Page 13: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Concentration of Hepatitis B VirusConcentration of Hepatitis B Virus in Various Body Fluids in Various Body Fluids

High Moderate Undetectable High Moderate Undetectable

Blood Blood semen semen urine urine

Serum Serum vaginal fluid vaginal fluid feces feces

Wound exudates Wound exudates saliva saliva sweat sweat

tearstears

breast milkbreast milk

Page 14: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Transmission of HBVTransmission of HBV

Host Recipient

Horizontal transmission Vertical transmission

Mother

Infant

Contaminated needlesSexual

Health care workerTransfusion

6% infected after age 5 years become chronically infected

90% infected infants become chronically infected

Perinatal

Keefe MD. Pocket Guide to Hepatitis B A CME accredited program developed by members of the ACT-HBV Initiative Keefe MD. Pocket Guide to Hepatitis B A CME accredited program developed by members of the ACT-HBV Initiative (University of Wisconsin) . (University of Wisconsin) . CDC Fact Sheet. 2005CDC Fact Sheet. 2005

Page 15: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Spectrum of DiseaseSpectrum of Disease

Acute HBV

infection

Chronic HBV

infection

Fatal progressive liver failure

Cirrhosis HCC

DeathDecompensated

cirrhosis

Fulminant hepatic failure

15–40%*

~1%

90–95% neonatal infection

50% childhood infection

5–10% adult infection

*Lok et al 2002

Ac. clinical illness (jaundice) <5 yrs: <10% Ac. clinical illness (jaundice) <5 yrs: <10% >5 yrs: 30-50%>5 yrs: 30-50%

Page 16: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Aetiology and Disease Characteristics of HBVAetiology and Disease Characteristics of HBV SummarySummary

HBV is a complex virus characterised by high HBV is a complex virus characterised by high infectivityinfectivity

Acute HBV infection usually resolves without medical Acute HBV infection usually resolves without medical interventionintervention

Chronic infection leads to increased risk of Chronic infection leads to increased risk of progressive liver disease, cirrhosis and deathprogressive liver disease, cirrhosis and death

Chronic infection is the target of therapeutic Chronic infection is the target of therapeutic interventionintervention

HBeAg-negative variant is associated with a more HBeAg-negative variant is associated with a more aggressive form of the diseaseaggressive form of the disease

Early intervention prevents development to HBeAg-Early intervention prevents development to HBeAg-negative diseasenegative disease

Page 17: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Importance of DiagnosisImportance of Diagnosis

Early diagnosis is important to prevent progression Early diagnosis is important to prevent progression and transmission, and helps to:and transmission, and helps to:

– confirm HBV infectionconfirm HBV infection– assess stage and grade of diseaseassess stage and grade of disease– monitor disease progressionmonitor disease progression

Page 18: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Require monitoring…• Inactive disease may not remain inactive• Liver damage may occur if HBV reactivates

Require treatment

40%60%

HBV is a dynamic disease!!!

Patients may develop the need for treatment later

The importance of monitoringThe importance of monitoring

Page 19: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Signs and symptoms of acute HBV AVHSigns and symptoms of acute HBV AVH

They are the same for all types of hepatitis from A to E They are the same for all types of hepatitis from A to E i.e: malaise, arthralgias, anorexia, fever, headache, dark i.e: malaise, arthralgias, anorexia, fever, headache, dark colored urine, yellow discoloration of sclerae and pain or colored urine, yellow discoloration of sclerae and pain or discomfort in RHC.discomfort in RHC.

Extraheptic findings more common in HBV AVH.Extraheptic findings more common in HBV AVH.– Arthralgia, skin rash (papular dermatitis), polyarterits Arthralgia, skin rash (papular dermatitis), polyarterits

nodosa, glomerulonephritis……..etcnodosa, glomerulonephritis……..etc

Page 20: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Acute infectionAcute infection– High ALTHigh ALT

– HBsAgHBsAg

– IgM Anti HBcIgM Anti HBc(following parameters are present but need not be tested)(following parameters are present but need not be tested)

– HBeAgHBeAg

– Elevated HBV DNAElevated HBV DNA

Resolving Resolving InfectionInfection– HBsAg seroconversionHBsAg seroconversion

– HBeAg seroconversionHBeAg seroconversion

– IgG Anti-HBcIgG Anti-HBc

Acute HBV MarkersAcute HBV Markers

Page 21: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 22: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Chronic HBV MarkersChronic HBV Markers

Chronic infection Chronic infection – HBsAg measured 6 months apartHBsAg measured 6 months apart

– Absence of IgM anti-HBcAbsence of IgM anti-HBc

– HBeAg +iveHBeAg +ive

– HBV DNA +iveHBV DNA +ive

– Raised, fluctuating ALTRaised, fluctuating ALT

Page 23: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 24: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Immuneescape

< <> >HBeAg+ve HBeAg–ve

ALT

HBV-DNA

Inactive (carrier) state

HBeAg –ve active chronic hepatitis

HBeAg +ve chronic hepatitis

Immune tolerance

Immuneclearance

Immunecontrol

Characteristic phases of CHB infectionCharacteristic phases of CHB infection

Page 25: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Outcome of HBV infection is determined by the strength of Outcome of HBV infection is determined by the strength of the immune responsethe immune response

– complex interplay between the host immune response and complex interplay between the host immune response and

– replication status of the virusreplication status of the virus

95% of adults spontaneously clear virus95% of adults spontaneously clear virus

However, 90% of newborns will develop chronic infectionHowever, 90% of newborns will develop chronic infection– 25% lifetime risk of end-stage liver disease or liver cancer25% lifetime risk of end-stage liver disease or liver cancer

The natural history of hepatitis B:The natural history of hepatitis B:the importance of immune controlthe importance of immune control

Page 26: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Importance of anti HBcAb detectionImportance of anti HBcAb detection(occult HBV infection)(occult HBV infection)

Anti HBc positive but HBsAg and HBsAb Anti HBc positive but HBsAg and HBsAb negative???:negative???:

- - CHB with BDL of HBsAg & DNA:CHB with BDL of HBsAg & DNA: commonly seen in commonly seen in individuals with HIV and HCV co infection.individuals with HIV and HCV co infection.

- - marker of immunity after acute infection:marker of immunity after acute infection: with BDL with BDL HBsAb, respond well to a single shot of HBV vaccine.HBsAb, respond well to a single shot of HBV vaccine.

- - False positive:False positive: especially in people from low prevalence especially in people from low prevalence areas respond well to routine vaccination.areas respond well to routine vaccination.

- - TThe only marker in the window period of HBV AVH.he only marker in the window period of HBV AVH.

Page 27: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Holistic approach to CHBHolistic approach to CHB ““CHB is a lifelong infection”.CHB is a lifelong infection”.

Identification of those at risk of liver disease.Identification of those at risk of liver disease.

Education (lifelong monitoring, reactivation)Education (lifelong monitoring, reactivation)

Vaccination (all household and sexual contacts)Vaccination (all household and sexual contacts)

Judicious introduction of antiviral therapyJudicious introduction of antiviral therapy

Appropriate screening for HCC.Appropriate screening for HCC.

Page 28: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Counseling after HBsAg detectionCounseling after HBsAg detectionFamily screening and vaccination.Family screening and vaccination.

Barrier protection (safe sex) for spouse till active immunity Barrier protection (safe sex) for spouse till active immunity has developed in the spouse following vaccination.has developed in the spouse following vaccination.

Arrange HBIG and vaccine for the newborn in HBsAg +ive Arrange HBIG and vaccine for the newborn in HBsAg +ive mothers diagnosed during pregnancy.mothers diagnosed during pregnancy.

Regarding performing exposure prone procedures by Regarding performing exposure prone procedures by HCWs ???HCWs ???

Risk of blood transfusion and non-hepatic and hepatic Risk of blood transfusion and non-hepatic and hepatic transplant donation.transplant donation.

Sharing of tooth brushes and razors.Sharing of tooth brushes and razors.

Cover open cuts and scratches.Cover open cuts and scratches.

Should receive 2 doses of HAV vaccine 6-18 months apart.Should receive 2 doses of HAV vaccine 6-18 months apart.

Page 29: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Don’t…………..Don’t…………..Impose any dietary restriction.Impose any dietary restriction.

Restrict physical activities.Restrict physical activities.

Isolate them in schools and daycare centers.Isolate them in schools and daycare centers.

Separate their utensils.Separate their utensils.

Stop marital relations.Stop marital relations.

Stop them from kissing their near and dear ones.Stop them from kissing their near and dear ones.

Page 30: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Clinical terms used in HBV infectionClinical terms used in HBV infectionChronic Hepatitis B (CHB):Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB): can be further subdevided intocan be further subdevided intoHBeAg Positive HBeAg Positive disease( Harbouring Wild type HBV) or HBeAg negative disease (Seen in those with longer disease( Harbouring Wild type HBV) or HBeAg negative disease (Seen in those with longer infection with precore/ core HBV variant).infection with precore/ core HBV variant).

Inactive HBsAg carrier state:Inactive HBsAg carrier state: HBsAg +ive, anti HBc +ive with normal rest of the HBsAg +ive, anti HBc +ive with normal rest of the markers.markers.

Resolved Hepatitis B:Resolved Hepatitis B: a known HBV AVH patient who has cleared HBsAg and has a known HBV AVH patient who has cleared HBsAg and has developed Anti HBs Antibodies.developed Anti HBs Antibodies.

Acute Exacerbation or flare of hepatitis B:Acute Exacerbation or flare of hepatitis B: intermittent elevation of ALT to 10X intermittent elevation of ALT to 10X ULN or 2X the baseline value.ULN or 2X the baseline value.

Reactivation of Hepatitis B:Reactivation of Hepatitis B: Reappearance of active necroinflammatory disease in a Reappearance of active necroinflammatory disease in a known inactive carrier.known inactive carrier.

HBeAg seroconversionHBeAg seroconversion:: appearance of anti HBe Ab with loss of HBeAg. appearance of anti HBe Ab with loss of HBeAg.

HBeAg clearance:HBeAg clearance: loss of HBeAg without appearance of HBeAb. loss of HBeAg without appearance of HBeAb.

HBeAg reversion:HBeAg reversion: reappearance of HBeAg in a patient who was known to have reappearance of HBeAg in a patient who was known to have seroconvertedseroconverted

Page 31: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Inactive CarriersInactive Carriers(previously Healthy stable carriers)(previously Healthy stable carriers)

Persons who have HBsAg and Anti HBc IgG positive for > 6 months Persons who have HBsAg and Anti HBc IgG positive for > 6 months with normal ALT, HBeAg –ive, HBeAb +ive, serum DNA levels with normal ALT, HBeAg –ive, HBeAb +ive, serum DNA levels <2,000 IU/ml (in up to 67-80% pts) and normal liver histology.<2,000 IU/ml (in up to 67-80% pts) and normal liver histology.

4-20% carriers may revert back to HBeAg positivity. ~30% of them 4-20% carriers may revert back to HBeAg positivity. ~30% of them have raised ALT with high HBV DNA levels.have raised ALT with high HBV DNA levels.

10-20% of carriers may reactivate and develop serious sequelae 10-20% of carriers may reactivate and develop serious sequelae from chronic hepatitis B in their lifetimefrom chronic hepatitis B in their lifetime

Spontaneous HBsAg clearance rate is 0.5% per year.Spontaneous HBsAg clearance rate is 0.5% per year.

Take home message:Take home message:

•Lok and McMahon. AASLD guidelines on chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology vol. 34, no. 6, 2001

Follow up with serial testing is mandatory to confirm maintenance of inactive carrier stateFollow up with serial testing is mandatory to confirm maintenance of inactive carrier state

Page 32: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 33: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Immuneescape

< <> >HBeAg+ve HBeAg–ve

ALT

HBV-DNA

Inactive (carrier) state

HBeAg –ve active chronic hepatitis

HBeAg +ve chronic hepatitis

Immune tolerance

Immuneclearance

Immunecontrol

treat treatmonitor monitor

Who should be considered for treatment?Who should be considered for treatment?

Page 34: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Role of liver biopsyRole of liver biopsy

It is important to note that liver histology improves It is important to note that liver histology improves significantly in patients with sustained response to significantly in patients with sustained response to treatment or spontaneous seroconversion to HBeAb.treatment or spontaneous seroconversion to HBeAb.

Liver histology is most useful in patients who do not Liver histology is most useful in patients who do not meet clear cut guidelines for treatment e.g; if ALT is meet clear cut guidelines for treatment e.g; if ALT is 1-2 ULN with +ive HBeAG and DNA levels of > 20000 1-2 ULN with +ive HBeAG and DNA levels of > 20000 IU/mlIU/ml

Revised upper limit of ALT should be 30U/l for men and Revised upper limit of ALT should be 30U/l for men and 19U/l for women.19U/l for women.

Decision to do liver biopsy should take into consideration Decision to do liver biopsy should take into consideration the age, new suggested ULN for ALT, HBeAg status, the age, new suggested ULN for ALT, HBeAg status, HBV DNA levels and other clinical features suggestive of HBV DNA levels and other clinical features suggestive of CLD.CLD.

Page 35: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Time to abandon liver biopsy?Time to abandon liver biopsy?

Major issues:Major issues: cost, patient acceptability and anxiety, cost, patient acceptability and anxiety, invasive nature of the procedure, inherent complications, invasive nature of the procedure, inherent complications, 80% accurate in staging liver fibrosis, must be 25mm 80% accurate in staging liver fibrosis, must be 25mm long piece to avoid sampling error long piece to avoid sampling error (only 20% liver biopsies (only 20% liver biopsies fulfill this criteria).fulfill this criteria).

Alternatives:Alternatives:

– Serum biomarkers: Serum biomarkers: 80-85% specific, better at extreme of stages80-85% specific, better at extreme of stages

– Fibroscans/Stiffness scans/Elastographs:Fibroscans/Stiffness scans/Elastographs: 95% specific. 95% specific.

Page 36: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Aims of Therapy for Chronic HBV InfectionAims of Therapy for Chronic HBV InfectionShort-term goals of treatment dependent on HBeAg statusShort-term goals of treatment dependent on HBeAg status– HBeAg-positive: sustained* ‘e’ seroconversion/HBV DNA HBeAg-positive: sustained* ‘e’ seroconversion/HBV DNA

suppression/ALT normalisationsuppression/ALT normalisation

– HBeAg-negative: sustained* HBV DNA suppression/ALT HBeAg-negative: sustained* HBV DNA suppression/ALT normalisationnormalisation

Ultimate goalUltimate goal– HBsAg SeroconversionHBsAg Seroconversion

Overall goalOverall goal– prevent/stop/reduce liver damage and progression to cirrhosis prevent/stop/reduce liver damage and progression to cirrhosis

and/or HCCand/or HCC– prolong survivalprolong survival

“ “HBV never ‘cured’ but controlled”HBV never ‘cured’ but controlled”Though the sharks are circling but the lifeboats are outThough the sharks are circling but the lifeboats are out

*treatment response maintained beyond end-of-treatment during a follow-up period of 6 months or more

Page 37: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Anti-HBV therapy and HBV DNA suppressionAnti-HBV therapy and HBV DNA suppression

Balance between viral replication and host immune Balance between viral replication and host immune responseresponse

Aim is to reduce viral replication in order to facilitate Aim is to reduce viral replication in order to facilitate sustained host-mediated immune control of virussustained host-mediated immune control of virus

Antiviral activity alone is not always sufficient to achieve Antiviral activity alone is not always sufficient to achieve this aimthis aim– Particularly in patients with relatively inactive immune responses Particularly in patients with relatively inactive immune responses

(e.g.. low or normal ALT levels) (e.g.. low or normal ALT levels)

Page 38: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Treatment strategiesTreatment strategies

Initiate and maintain remissionInitiate and maintain remission

Sustain suppressionSustain suppression

Prevent reactivationPrevent reactivation

Prevent progression to liver failure/HCCPrevent progression to liver failure/HCC

Timely treatment which is safe and cost effective. Timely treatment which is safe and cost effective.

Page 39: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Factors associated with progression of HBV Factors associated with progression of HBV related liver disease.related liver disease.

Host and viral risk factors Host and viral risk factors for cirrhosisfor cirrhosis

Old ageOld age

HBV genotype C.HBV genotype C.

High levels of HBV DNA.High levels of HBV DNA.

Alcohol consumption.Alcohol consumption.

Co infection with: Co infection with: HCV HCV HDV or HIV.HDV or HIV.

Smoking.Smoking.

Host and viral risk factors Host and viral risk factors for HCCfor HCC

Male gender.Male gender.

Family H/O HCC.Family H/O HCC.

Older age.Older age.

H/O HBeAg reversion.H/O HBeAg reversion.

Presence of cirrhosis.Presence of cirrhosis.

HBV genotype C.HBV genotype C.

Core promotor mutation.Core promotor mutation.

Co infection with HCV.Co infection with HCV.

Page 40: The Menace of Hepatitis B

ALTALT HBV DNAHBV DNA

≤≤2 x ULN2 x ULN <100,000 <100,000 cp/mLcp/mL

20,000 IU/mL20,000 IU/mL

Observe, consider treatment when ALT becomes Observe, consider treatment when ALT becomes elevatedelevated1,2,31,2,3

Consider liver biopsy if ALT 1–2 x ULN or Consider liver biopsy if ALT 1–2 x ULN or intermittently elevated, age >40yrsintermittently elevated, age >40yrs11, family history , family history HCCHCC11

If moderate/severe inflammation or advanced fibrosis→ If moderate/severe inflammation or advanced fibrosis→ treatmenttreatment11

>2 x ULN>2 x ULN >100,000 >100,000 cp/mLcp/mL

20,000 IU/mL20,000 IU/mL

Observe for 3–6 months, treat if no spontaneous Observe for 3–6 months, treat if no spontaneous HBeAg seroconversionHBeAg seroconversion1,2,31,2,3

Immediate treatment if overt hepatic Immediate treatment if overt hepatic decompensationdecompensation1,31,3

1. Lok and McMahon Hepatology 2007 (AASLD Guidelines) 2. EASL Consensus Statement J Hepatol 2003 (EASL Guidelines)3. Liaw et al Liver International 2005 (Updated APASL Guidelines)

Treatment recommendations for Treatment recommendations for HBeAg-positive patientsHBeAg-positive patients

Page 41: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Treatments and molecules approved or licensed or Treatments and molecules approved or licensed or in late-stage development for CHBin late-stage development for CHB

Interferon-αLamivudine

Adefovir

Telbivudine

PEG-IFNα-(2a)EntecavirApproved 2005/6: Approved 2005/6:

Approved pre-2005:Approved pre-2005:

Clevudine(approved in Korea)

ApprovedApproved

Phase II/III–ongoing:Phase II/III–ongoing: Pradefovir

Active against HBV and Active against HBV and approved for HIV:approved for HIV:

Tenofovir

Emtricitabine

In developmentIn development

Page 42: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Subcutaneous

Less potent DNA suppression

Antiviral and immunomodulatory

Frequent side effects

No resistance

HBsAg seroconversion more common

Finite duration of therapy

Direct antivirals Interferon-based

Oral administration

Potent HBV DNA suppression

No immunomodulatory effects

Few side effects

Risk of resistance

HBsAg seroconversion rare

Indefinite Rx – drug fatigue

Pros and cons of each approach?Pros and cons of each approach?

Page 43: The Menace of Hepatitis B

The primary aim of antiviral therapy with The primary aim of antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues…nucleos(t)ide analogues…

……is suppression of HBV DNA below the level associated with diseaseis suppression of HBV DNA below the level associated with disease

The primary aim of interferon-based therapy…The primary aim of interferon-based therapy…

……is is to allow host-mediated immune control of the virusto allow host-mediated immune control of the virus

Page 44: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Direct antivirals Interferon-based

Patient/physician preferenceConsider risk of drug resistance

Length of treatmentSide effects

Immunocompetent

Compensated liver disease

Younger patients

Immunosuppressed

Advanced liver disease

IFN/PEG-IFN non-responders

High ALT

Low HBV DNA

Liver histology

Who should be treated with what?Who should be treated with what?

Page 45: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBe Ag loss or seroconversion.HBe Ag loss or seroconversion.

HBsAg loss/seroconversionHBsAg loss/seroconversionConstitutes the outcome closest to a ‘cure’ of CHB in clinical practiceConstitutes the outcome closest to a ‘cure’ of CHB in clinical practice

HBV DNA suppressionHBV DNA suppression– Usually follows HBeAg seroconversionUsually follows HBeAg seroconversion– Relevant in the context of nucleos(t)ide analogues – Relevant in the context of nucleos(t)ide analogues –

to prevent resistance developmentto prevent resistance development

ALT normalisation.ALT normalisation.

Improved histology.Improved histology.

What are the most relevant markers of What are the most relevant markers of therapeutic success in HBeAg-positive CHB?therapeutic success in HBeAg-positive CHB?

Page 46: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBeAg seroconversion (%)

HBV DNA loss* (%)

HBsAg loss (%)

*Hybridisation or bDNA assays for LAM, PCR for ADV and ETV¥HBeAg loss, not seroconversion

EASL consensus statement. J Hepatol 2003 Lok and McMahon. 2004;

Dienstag et al. N Engl J Med 1999;Lau et al. N Eng J Med 2005;

Marcellin et al. N Engl J Med 2003; Chang et al. N Engl J Med 2006;

Lai et al. AASLD 2005

Histology (%)

PLB

23–25

16

4–6

LAM

49–56

44

16–19

≤ 1

ADV

53

21

12

0

ETV

72

67

21

2

LdT

70

60

26¥

On-therapy response to approved On-therapy response to approved NAs at 1 year in HBeAg-positive CHBNAs at 1 year in HBeAg-positive CHB

Page 47: The Menace of Hepatitis B

1. Chang T-T, et al. NEJM 2006; 354:1000–1010. 2. Marcellin P, et al. NEJM 2003; 1. Chang T-T, et al. NEJM 2006; 354:1000–1010. 2. Marcellin P, et al. NEJM 2003; 348(9):808348(9):808––816 816 33. Lau G, et al. NEJM 2005; 352:2682–2695 . Lau G, et al. NEJM 2005; 352:2682–2695

Comparison of treatments at 1 year in Comparison of treatments at 1 year in antiviral-naïve HBeAg(+) patients*antiviral-naïve HBeAg(+) patients*

Peg IFN Peg IFN [3][3]

Lamivudine Lamivudine [1][1]

Adefovir Adefovir [2][2]

Entecavir Entecavir [1][1]

% HBV DNA % HBV DNA UndetectableUndetectable

2121

3636

2525

6767

00

2020

4040

6060

8080% HBeAg % HBeAg

SeroconversionSeroconversion

27272121

12121818

00

2020

4040

6060

8080

**Collation of currently available data – not from head-to-head studiesCollation of currently available data – not from head-to-head studies

LLOQLLOQ Assay Assay LLOQLLOQ Assay Assay (copies/mL)(copies/mL) (copies/mL) (copies/mL)ETVETV 300300 Cobas Amplicor HBV PCR Cobas Amplicor HBV PCR ADVADV 400400 Amplicor HBV DNA PCRAmplicor HBV DNA PCRLVDLVD 300300 Cobas Amplicor HBV PCR Cobas Amplicor HBV PCR Peg IFNPeg IFN 400400 Cobas Amplicor HBV PCRCobas Amplicor HBV PCR

Page 48: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBeAg seroconversion: Comparison of treatments HBeAg seroconversion: Comparison of treatments at 1 year in nucleoside-naïve HBeAg(+) patients*at 1 year in nucleoside-naïve HBeAg(+) patients*

*Collation of currently available data – not from head-to-head studies

27

21

12

18

22

0

10

20

30

40

HB

eAg

ser

oco

nve

rsio

n

(% p

atie

nts

)

Peg IFN

Lamivudine

Adefovir

Telbivudine

Entecavir

Lai CL, et al. Hepatology 2005; 42:748A (AASLD abstract LB01).Lai CL, et al. Hepatology 2005; 42:748A (AASLD abstract LB01).Lau G, et al. NEJM 2005; 352:2882–2695. Lau G, et al. NEJM 2005; 352:2882–2695. Chang T-T, et al. NEJM 2006; 354:1000–1010.Chang T-T, et al. NEJM 2006; 354:1000–1010.Marcellin P, et al. NEJM 2003;Marcellin P, et al. NEJM 2003;348:808348:808––816.816.

Page 49: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBeAg seroconversion: Comparison of HBeAg seroconversion: Comparison of treatments at 2 years in nucleoside-naïve treatments at 2 years in nucleoside-naïve

HBeAg(+) patients*HBeAg(+) patients*

**At 72 weeks (6 months post-treatment follow-up); **At 72 weeks (6 months post-treatment follow-up); ††Through last observation (on- and 6-months off-treatment)Through last observation (on- and 6-months off-treatment)

Lau G, et al. NEJM 2005; 352: 2682–2695.Lau G, et al. NEJM 2005; 352: 2682–2695.Gish R, et al. Hepatology 2005; 42 (Suppl 1) 267A–268A (abstract 181). Gish R, et al. Hepatology 2005; 42 (Suppl 1) 267A–268A (abstract 181). Marcellin P, et al. J Hepatol 2005; 42:31–32 (Abstract 73).Marcellin P, et al. J Hepatol 2005; 42:31–32 (Abstract 73).Lai C-L, al. Hepatology 2006; 44 (Suppl. 1): 222A (abstract 91). Lai C-L, al. Hepatology 2006; 44 (Suppl. 1): 222A (abstract 91).

*Collation of currently available data – not from head-to-head studies

0

20

40

60

80

HB

eAg

ser

oco

nve

rsio

n

(% p

atie

nts

)

303126

2932

Peg IFN**

Lamivudine†

Adefovir

Telbivudine

Entecavir†

Page 50: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Population Population DurationDuration HBeAg loss/seroconversion rates*HBeAg loss/seroconversion rates*

OverallOverall1–81–8 12–52 weeks12–52 weeks 1212––44% 44% (2–12 months f/u)(2–12 months f/u)

CaucasiansCaucasians1–41–4 12–52 weeks12–52 weeks 1919––44% 44% (2–12 months f/u)(2–12 months f/u)

AsiansAsians4–84–8 12–24 weeks12–24 weeks 1212––28% 28% (6–12 months f/u)(6–12 months f/u)

1. Di Bisceglie et al. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 2. Fattovich et al. J Hepatol 1989;3. Yalcin et al. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 4. Thomas et al. J Viral Hepat 1994;

5. Cooksley et al. J Viral Hepat 2003; 6. Lok et al. Lancet 1988; 7. Lok et al. Gastroenterology 1992; 8. Yuen et al. Hepatology 2001

* Intent-to-treat analyses

Off-therapy HBeAg response with Off-therapy HBeAg response with conventional IFNconventional IFN for HBeAg-positive CHB for HBeAg-positive CHB

Page 51: The Menace of Hepatitis B

0

10

20

30

40

32%

19%

Pat

ien

ts (

%)

PEGASYS+ placebo

PEGASYS+ lamivudine

Lamivudine

27%

87/271 74/271 52/271

p = NS p = 0.023

p < 0.001

Lau et al. N Engl J Med 2005

PEGASYS:PEGASYS: HBeAg seroconversion HBeAg seroconversion 24 weeks post-treatment24 weeks post-treatment

Page 52: The Menace of Hepatitis B

PEGASYSPEGASYS

+ placebo+ placebo

(n=271)(n=271)

PEGASYSPEGASYS

+ LAM+ LAM

(n=271)(n=271)

LamivudineLamivudine

(n=271)(n=271)

HBeAg-positive CHB n HBeAg-positive CHB n (%)(%) 8 (3%)8 (3%) 8 (3%)8 (3%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)

p = 0.004*

p = 0.004*

Lau et al. N Engl J Med 2005* Fisher’s Exact Test

Sustained HBSustained HBssAg seroconversion: Ag seroconversion: 24 weeks post-treatment24 weeks post-treatment

Page 53: The Menace of Hepatitis B

59/69 14/103

Lau et al. EASL 2006, oral

• 172 patients from the PEGASYS monotherapy arm entered the long-term study: 69 responders and 103 non responders

0

10

20

30

4039%

Pa

tient

s (%

)

69/172

50

48 weekspost-treatment

42%

73/172

24 weekspost-treatment

HBeAg seroconversion HBeAg seroconversion Long-term roll-over study: 1-year analysisLong-term roll-over study: 1-year analysis

86%

14%

Page 54: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Response to therapy – naïve patientsResponse to therapy – naïve patients

Long-term resultsLong-term results

Page 55: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Lamivudine maintenance therapy can slow disease progression – but is compromised by resistance development

0

5

10

15

20

25

% o

f p

atie

nts

Years1 2 3

Less disease progression in lamivudine-treated patients vs placebo However, response compromised by development of resistance

1 2 3 1 2 3

Years Years

Disease progression Increased Child-Pugh score HCC

Placebo (n=215) Lamivudine (n=436)

Liaw et al. N Engl J Med 2004

Page 56: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Wild-type (n=221)YMDD mutants (n=209) (49%)

Time after randomisation (months)

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 6 12 18 24 30 36

Time to disease progression according to LAM-resistant YMDD mutant status

Pa

tient

s w

ith d

ise

ase

pro

gre

ssio

n (

%)

Placebo (n=215)

5%

13%

21%

Liaw et al. N Engl J Med 2004

Page 57: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Years

39%

0%

54%

3%

57%

29%

18%11%

Pa

tient

s w

ith r

esis

tanc

e (

%) 63%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5

NA

Lok et al. Gastroenterology 2003; Hadziyannis et al. N Engl J Med 2005; Tassopoulos et al. Hepatology 1999; Santantonio et al. J Hepatol 2000; Rizzetto et al. J Hepatol 2003; Locarnini et al. EASL 2005; Colonno et al. AASLD

2004; Lampertico et al. EASL 2004; Hadziyannis et al. AASLD 2005; Zoulim, ISVHLD 2006; Gish et al. J Hepatol 2005; Lai et al. Gastroenterology 2005; Standring EASL 2006

LAM ADV ETV LdT

0%5%

0% NA

Resistance development increases over timeResistance development increases over time

6%*

*LAM-R

Page 58: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HostHostPoor compliancePoor compliance

Inadequate doseInadequate dose

High BMIHigh BMI

High ALTHigh ALT

CirrhosisCirrhosis

VirusVirusHBeAg-positiveHBeAg-positive

High HBV DNAHigh HBV DNA

Failed initial virological Failed initial virological responseresponse

Pre-existing mutationsPre-existing mutations

Drug resistance: risk factorsDrug resistance: risk factors

Page 59: The Menace of Hepatitis B

To slow development of resistance to NAs, To slow development of resistance to NAs, combination therapy appears to be preferential to combination therapy appears to be preferential to sequential therapysequential therapy

Need trials of oral combination therapy before we can Need trials of oral combination therapy before we can advocate dual therapyadvocate dual therapy

– Need to include risk of drug resistance in Need to include risk of drug resistance in cost analysiscost analysis

Is there a role for combination therapy Is there a role for combination therapy using NAs?using NAs?

Page 60: The Menace of Hepatitis B

84

Proportion of patients surviving Proportion of patients free of hepatic complications

Months Months

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

24 36 48 60 72 8412 24 36 48 60 7212

IFN-treated WITH HBeAg clearance

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

IFN-treated WITHOUT HBeAg clearance

P=0.004* P=0.018*

* According to the proportional hazards model Niederau et al. N Eng J Med 1996

HBeAg seroconversion with IFNHBeAg seroconversion with IFN therapy is therapy is associated with improved survivalassociated with improved survival

Page 61: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Cu

mu

lativ

e %

HB

sAg

loss 50

40

30

20

10

01047852260

IFN

LAM

Weeks of follow-upvan Nunen et al. Gut 2003; van Zonneveld et al. Hepatology 2004; Lau et al. NEJM 2005;

Janssen et al. Lancet 2005; Lok and McMahon. 2004;Dienstag et al. NEJM 1999; Marcellin et al. NEJM 2003; Chang et al. NEJM 2006

Rates of HBsAg loss

Immune based therapy 24 weeks post-treatment• PEG-IFN 3–7% Direct antiviral therapies one year on-treatment • Adefovir 0%• Lamivudine ≤1%• Entecavir 2%

IFNs or NAs..? IFNs or NAs..? HBsAg loss after HBeAg seroconversionHBsAg loss after HBeAg seroconversion

Page 62: The Menace of Hepatitis B

IFNIFN-treated-treatedpatientspatients(n=233)(n=233)

Matched untreated Matched untreated controlscontrols(n=233)(n=233)

CirrhosisCirrhosis 18%18%p p = 0.041*= 0.041*

34%34%

HCCHCC 3%3%p p = 0.011*= 0.011*

13%13%

SurvivalSurvival 98%98%p p = 0.003*= 0.003*

53%53%

Lin et al. EASL 2005 and J Hepatol 2007*p vs control

Follow-up: mean 11 years (median 6.6 years; range: 1.1 to 16.5 years)

Long-term outcome of IFNLong-term outcome of IFN treatment in treatment inHBeAg-positive CHB: 11-year follow-upHBeAg-positive CHB: 11-year follow-up

Page 63: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Response to therapyResponse to therapy

Pre-treated and/or resistant patients Pre-treated and/or resistant patients

Page 64: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Pa

tie

nts

(%

)

HBeAg loss HBeAg seroconversion

32%37%

26/71* 21/65†

PEGASYS treatment of patients previously treated with LAM and/or ADV(median treatment duration 49 weeks)

0

10

20

30

40

50

*7 patients (10%) had no assessment while on-treatment †6 patients had no available anti-HBe status at baseline and 9 patients (14%) had no assessment while on-treatment Marcellin et al. EASL 2006

PEGASYS: On-treatment HBeAg loss/ PEGASYS: On-treatment HBeAg loss/ seroconversion in patients pre-treated seroconversion in patients pre-treated withwith NAs NAs

Page 65: The Menace of Hepatitis B

0

10

20

30

5043.7%

Pat

ien

ts (

%)

End of treatment

24 weeks post-treatment

31.2%

7/16 5/16

40

* HBV DNA <105 copies/mL

HBsAg seroconversion in

13% of patients

Shi et al. APASL 2007

PEGASYS: Response in PEGASYS: Response in patients with NA resistancepatients with NA resistance

12 weeks PEGASYS + LAM followed by 12 weeks of PEGASYS monotherapyHBeAg seroconversion and virological response*

Page 66: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Non-naïve patients – SummaryNon-naïve patients – Summary

Prior treatment with LAM, ADV or both is Prior treatment with LAM, ADV or both is notnot a barrier to a barrier to treatment with PEGASYStreatment with PEGASYS

Switching patients from LAM to PEGASYS is effective in Switching patients from LAM to PEGASYS is effective in HBeAg-positive CHBHBeAg-positive CHB– Approx 1/3 LAM-R patients lost HBeAg and developed anti-HBe Approx 1/3 LAM-R patients lost HBeAg and developed anti-HBe

antibodies antibodies Some achieved HBsAg seroconversionSome achieved HBsAg seroconversion

Page 67: The Menace of Hepatitis B

NAsNAsLong-term maintenance (years)Long-term maintenance (years)

Risk of resistance, cross-Risk of resistance, cross-resistance – monitor closelyresistance – monitor closely

Use in combination?Use in combination?

Prescribe responsiblyPrescribe responsibly

Optimizing response in HBeAg-positive CHB Optimizing response in HBeAg-positive CHB through immune controlthrough immune control

InterferonesInterferonesShort-term, finite duration Short-term, finite duration (24-48 wks)(24-48 wks)

Long-term benefit in ~1/3 ptsLong-term benefit in ~1/3 pts

HBsAg seroconversion achievableHBsAg seroconversion achievable

No resistanceNo resistance

Prior exposure to NAs not a barrier to Prior exposure to NAs not a barrier to treatmenttreatment

For patients who do not respond or for whom IFN contraindicatedwe need to know how to use NAs appropriately

!

Page 68: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Limitations of Current Limitations of Current Treatments for Chronic HBVTreatments for Chronic HBV

Conventional IFNConventional IFNModest efficacyModest efficacy

Inconvenient thrice-Inconvenient thrice-weekly injectionsweekly injections

LamivudineLamivudineModest efficacyModest efficacy

Continuous/ Continuous/ indefinite duration indefinite duration of therapyof therapy

Viral rebound on Viral rebound on treatment cessation treatment cessation

High relapse ratesHigh relapse rates

Drug resistant Drug resistant YMDD mutantsYMDD mutants

Adefovir• Modest efficacy• Continuous/

indefinite duration of therapy

• Viral rebound on treatment cessation

• Potential for drug resistant mutants

• Risk of renal toxicity

• No sustained response (off-therapy) data

Page 69: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBeAg-positive HBeAg-negative/anti-HBe-positive

Natural history of HBV: Natural history of HBV: development of HBeAg-negative CHBdevelopment of HBeAg-negative CHB

Phasesof HBV infection

Replicative or immune tolerance

phase

HBeAg clearance

Low-replicative phase

HBV reactivation

Wild-type HBV

Variant HBVBrunetto et al. J Hepatol 1991

Page 70: The Menace of Hepatitis B

HBeAg-positive CHB

Cirrhosis

Decompensation

Death

HBeAg-negative CHB

EASL Consensus Guidelines. J Hepatol 2003;Lok and McMahon. Hepatology 2007 (AASLD Guidelines)

HCC

• Worst prognosis• Worst sustained

response to Rx

Long-term follow-up particularly important

Chronic HBV infection has serious Chronic HBV infection has serious long-term consequenceslong-term consequences

Page 71: The Menace of Hepatitis B

ALTALT HBV DNAHBV DNA

≤≤2 x ULN2 x ULN<100,000 <100,000

cp/mLcp/mL

20,000 IU/mL20,000 IU/mL

Normal ALT: no treatment, monitorNormal ALT: no treatment, monitor1,2,31,2,3

ALT 1–2 x ULN : consider biopsy, treat if ALT 1–2 x ULN : consider biopsy, treat if moderate/severe necroinflammation or fibrosismoderate/severe necroinflammation or fibrosis11

>2 x ULN>2 x ULN >100,000 >100,000 cp/mLcp/mL

20,000 IU/mL20,000 IU/mL

TreatmentTreatment1,2,31,2,3

1. Lok and McMahon Hepatology 2007 (AASLD Guidelines) 2. EASL Consensus Statement J Hepatol 2003 (EASL Guidelines)3. Liaw et al Liver International 2005 (Updated APASL Guidelines)

Treatment recommendations for Treatment recommendations for HBeAg-negative patientsHBeAg-negative patients

Page 72: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Durability of response after LAM therapy is limited, with relapse Durability of response after LAM therapy is limited, with relapse on treatment cessation, in patients with long-term undetectable on treatment cessation, in patients with long-term undetectable HBV DNAHBV DNA11

LAM resistance may develop during maintenance therapy, even LAM resistance may develop during maintenance therapy, even with undetectable HBV DNAwith undetectable HBV DNA22

Although ADV treatment has a lower potential for resistance Although ADV treatment has a lower potential for resistance development, virological breakthrough occurs soon after development, virological breakthrough occurs soon after treatment withdrawaltreatment withdrawal33

Long-term durability of response to ETV is, as yet, unprovenLong-term durability of response to ETV is, as yet, unproven1.Fung et al. J Virol Hepat 2004;

2. Di Marco et al. Antiviral Ther 2005; 3. Hadziyannis et al. N Eng J Med 2005

Treatment durability with NAs in Treatment durability with NAs in HBeAg-negative patients is limitedHBeAg-negative patients is limited

Page 73: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Nucleos(t)ide analoguesNucleos(t)ide analogues– Continuous therapy required to maintain responseContinuous therapy required to maintain response– Few/no side effectsFew/no side effects– Development of resistance likely Development of resistance likely – Accumulating costsAccumulating costs

Interferon-based therapyInterferon-based therapy– Provides durable, long-term benefits without the need for continuous Provides durable, long-term benefits without the need for continuous

medicationmedicationDual antiviral and immunomodulatory effectsDual antiviral and immunomodulatory effectsPotential for HBsAg clearance should not be dismissedPotential for HBsAg clearance should not be dismissed

– More side effects but well toleratedMore side effects but well tolerated– No resistance developmentNo resistance development– Cost effective over long termCost effective over long term

What is the optimal strategy for long-term response in What is the optimal strategy for long-term response in HBeAg-negative CHB?HBeAg-negative CHB?

Page 74: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Hepatitis D Virus (HDV)Hepatitis D Virus (HDV)

Defective, single stranded RNA, satellite Defective, single stranded RNA, satellite virus.virus.Mode of transmission: Parenteral. Mode of transmission: Parenteral. Coinfection with HBVCoinfection with HBV– severe acute diseasesevere acute disease– low risk of chronic infectionlow risk of chronic infection

SuperinfectionSuperinfection– usually develops chronic HDV infectionusually develops chronic HDV infection– high risk of severe chronic liver diseasehigh risk of severe chronic liver disease

Page 75: The Menace of Hepatitis B
Page 76: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Geographic Distribution of HDV Infection

Geographic Distribution of HDV Infection

HDV PrevalenceHigh

Intermediate

Low

Very Low

No Data

Taiwan

Pacific Islands

Page 77: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Repeat observationsRepeat observations– HBV DNA >~20,000HBV DNA >~20,000 IU/ml IU/ml (100,000 cp/mL)(100,000 cp/mL)– ALT ALT ≥ 2X ≥ 2X ULN.ULN.

± liver biopsy with evidence of progressive liver ± liver biopsy with evidence of progressive liver diseasedisease

ANDANDPost organ transplantPost organ transplantPre chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapyPre chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy

Who should be treated?Who should be treated?

Page 78: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Treatment strategiesTreatment strategies

Initiate and maintain remission – Initiate and maintain remission –

indefinite treatment (NAs)indefinite treatment (NAs)

Induce sustained response (IFNs) – Induce sustained response (IFNs) –

finite treatmentfinite treatment

Page 79: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Which strategy?Which strategy?

Best patients for NAs:Best patients for NAs:

Patients with contraindications to IFNsPatients with contraindications to IFNs

Those who have not responded to Those who have not responded to IFN-based therapy IFN-based therapy

Decompensated diseaseDecompensated disease

Page 80: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Which strategy?Which strategy?

Best patients for Interferones:Best patients for Interferones:

Those preferring a finite course of therapyThose preferring a finite course of therapy

Younger patientsYounger patients

NA failure or resistantNA failure or resistant

Compensated diseaseCompensated disease

Page 81: The Menace of Hepatitis B

1st choice Aiming for sustained remission

Using a treatment of finite durationeg pegylated or conventional IFN

Sustainedremission

yes

no*

2nd choice Maintained remission

Using a treatment of potentially indefinite duration

eg nucleos(t)ide analogues

*or IFN contraindicated / not tolerated

Survival

The importance of immune control in CHB: The importance of immune control in CHB: durable response without resistance – durable response without resistance –

ConclusionConclusion

Page 82: The Menace of Hepatitis B

vaccinationvaccination

Composition:Composition: recombinant HBsAg recombinant HBsAg

Efficacy:Efficacy: 95% (range 80-100%) 95% (range 80-100%)

Duration of immunity:Duration of immunity: 15 years 15 years

Schedule:Schedule: 3 doses: 3 doses:– Standard: 0,1,6 months with no booster.Standard: 0,1,6 months with no booster.– Rapid: 0,1,2,months and a booster at 12 m. Rapid: 0,1,2,months and a booster at 12 m. – Accelerated: 0,7,21 days and booster at 12 m.Accelerated: 0,7,21 days and booster at 12 m.

Dose:Dose: 10 10μμg for children, 20g for children, 20μμg for adults and g for adults and

40 40 μμg for immunocompromised patients.g for immunocompromised patients.

Page 83: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B Vaccine: Interruption of ScheduleHepatitis B Vaccine: Interruption of Schedule

““In a three-dose schedule, increasing the In a three-dose schedule, increasing the interval between the first and second doses interval between the first and second doses of hepatitis B vaccine has little effect on of hepatitis B vaccine has little effect on immunogenicity or final antibody titer.” immunogenicity or final antibody titer.”

““The third dose confers optimal protection, The third dose confers optimal protection, acting as a booster dose. Longer intervals acting as a booster dose. Longer intervals between the last two doses (4-12 months) between the last two doses (4-12 months) result in higher final titers of anti-HBs.”result in higher final titers of anti-HBs.”

CDC & Prevention. MWR 1991;40 (RR-13):1-19.CDC & Prevention. MWR 1991;40 (RR-13):1-19.

DHS/PP

Page 84: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Questions?

Page 85: The Menace of Hepatitis B

Thank you!Thank you!