The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1) Final Report 4-8 (2) Traffic at Screen Line The total number of vehicle trips passing Rimac river and Av. Panamericana Sur are 632 thousand and 144 thousand, respectively, at both directions per day. Figure 4.2-2 Traffic Volume Crossing Screen Lines Figure 4.2-2 through Figure 4.2-6 show the traffic volume counted at each station on the screen lines. On the screen line on Rimac river, the traffic volume at Del Ejercito bridge is highest at 114 thousand vehicles (559 thousand passenger trips), followed by Faucett bridge at 75 thousand (400 thousand passenger trips) and Huascar bridge on the Av. Panamericana Sur, at 75 thousand (392 thousand passenger trips). In the case of Av. Panamericana Sur, the highest volume (62 thousand vehicles/day or 428 thousand passenger trips) is observed at Atocongo bridge where Traffic observed at each survey station can be summarized in Table 4.2-2. In general, all station has a very low value in terms of peak ratio, except a few stations. This means that there is no concentration of traffic and congestion observe all day. The ratio of public transport traffic ranges 20% to 40%, except three stations where the public transport is prohibited to operate. Hourly fluctuation of traffic counted both two-screen lines is illustrated in Figure 4.2-7 through Figure 4.2-11. 320 (1,737) 312 (1,777) 71 (380) 73 (461) Vehicle (person) Unit: 1,000 / day
9
Embed
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...Final Report 4-13 Traffic Volume(veh/hr) Figure 4.2-9 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Vehicle/day)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-8
(2) Traffic at Screen Line The total number of vehicle trips passing Rimac river and Av. Panamericana Sur are 632 thousand and 144 thousand, respectively, at both directions per day.
Figure 4.2-2 Traffic Volume Crossing Screen Lines
Figure 4.2-2 through Figure 4.2-6 show the traffic volume counted at each station on the screen lines. On the screen line on Rimac river, the traffic volume at Del Ejercito bridge is highest at 114 thousand vehicles (559 thousand passenger trips), followed by Faucett bridge at 75 thousand (400 thousand passenger trips) and Huascar bridge on the Av. Panamericana Sur, at 75 thousand (392 thousand passenger trips).
In the case of Av. Panamericana Sur, the highest volume (62 thousand vehicles/day or 428 thousand passenger trips) is observed at Atocongo bridge where Traffic observed at each survey station can be summarized in Table 4.2-2. In general, all station has a very low value in terms of peak ratio, except a few stations. This means that there is no concentration of traffic and congestion observe all day. The ratio of public transport traffic ranges 20% to 40%, except three stations where the public transport is prohibited to operate. Hourly fluctuation of traffic counted both two-screen lines is illustrated in Figure 4.2-7 through Figure 4.2-11.
320 (1,737)312 (1,777)
71 (380)
73 (461)
Vehicle (person) Unit: 1,000 / day
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-9
Figure 4.2-3 Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Vehicle/day)
Figure 4.2-4 Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Passenger/day)
Pte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa Rosa
Pte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del Ejercito
Pte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. Nuevo
Pte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa Rosa
Pte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del Ejercito
Pte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. Nuevo
SL-13 Puente Huachipa 20 104 7.2 28.1 18.6 SS-01 AV. Pachacutec 6 17 7.1 18.7 22.4 SS-02 AV. Sol 5 8 9.5 0.7 12.6 SS-04 AV. Vargas Machuca 40 211 7.2 35.4 6.4 SS-06 AV. Pachacutec 62 428 6.5 38.4 2.6
South Pan-American Highway
SS-07 AV. ROSA LOZANO 30 176 7.2 29.5 6.8
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-12
Figure 4.2-7 Hourly Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Vehicle/day)
Figure 4.2-8 Hourly Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Passenger/day)
Hourly Traffic Volume on Screenline Rimac River
25,217
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
06:0
0 - 0
7:00
07:0
0 - 0
8:00
08:0
0 - 0
9:00
09:0
0 - 1
0:00
10:0
0 - 1
1:00
11:0
0 - 1
2:00
12:0
0 - 1
3:00
13:0
0 - 1
4:00
14:0
0 - 1
5:00
15:0
0 - 1
6:00
16:0
0 - 1
7:00
17:0
0 - 1
8:00
18:0
0 - 1
9:00
19:0
0 - 2
0:00
20:0
0 - 2
1:00
21:0
0 - 2
2:00
22:0
0 - 2
3:00
Hour
Traf
fic V
olum
e(ve
h/hr
)
N-SS-N
Hourly Passenger Volume on Screenline Rimac River
189,486
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
06:0
0 - 0
7:00
07:0
0 - 0
8:00
08:0
0 - 0
9:00
09:0
0 - 1
0:00
10:0
0 - 1
1:00
11:0
0 - 1
2:00
12:0
0 - 1
3:00
13:0
0 - 1
4:00
14:0
0 - 1
5:00
15:0
0 - 1
6:00
16:0
0 - 1
7:00
17:0
0 - 1
8:00
18:0
0 - 1
9:00
19:0
0 - 2
0:00
20:0
0 - 2
1:00
21:0
0 - 2
2:00
22:0
0 - 2
3:00
Hour
Traf
fic V
olum
e(ve
h/hr
)
N-S
S-N
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-13
Figure 4.2-9 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Vehicle/day)
Figure 4.2-10 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Passenger/day)
Hourly Passenger Volume on Screenline P.A.S.
36,363
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
06:0
0 - 0
7:00
07:0
0 - 0
8:00
08:0
0 - 0
9:00
09:0
0 - 1
0:00
10:0
0 - 1
1:00
11:0
0 - 1
2:00
12:0
0 - 1
3:00
13:0
0 - 1
4:00
14:0
0 - 1
5:00
15:0
0 - 1
6:00
16:0
0 - 1
7:00
17:0
0 - 1
8:00
18:0
0 - 1
9:00
19:0
0 - 2
0:00
20:0
0 - 2
1:00
21:0
0 - 2
2:00
22:0
0 - 2
3:00
Hour
Pass
enge
rs/h
r
W-EE-W
Hourly Traffic Volume on Screenline P.A.S.
4,887
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
06:0
0 - 0
7:00
07:0
0 - 0
8:00
08:0
0 - 0
9:00
09:0
0 - 1
0:00
10:0
0 - 1
1:00
11:0
0 - 1
2:00
12:0
0 - 1
3:00
13:0
0 - 1
4:00
14:0
0 - 1
5:00
15:0
0 - 1
6:00
16:0
0 - 1
7:00
17:0
0 - 1
8:00
18:0
0 - 1
9:00
19:0
0 - 2
0:00
20:0
0 - 2
1:00
21:0
0 - 2
2:00
22:0
0 - 2
3:00
Hour
Traf
fic V
olum
e(ve
h/hr
)W-EE-W
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-14
Figure 4.2-11 Modal Share on the Screen line
(3) Traffic at Principal Road Sections Figure 4.2-12 through Figure 4.2-15 show traffic volume counted in periods from 6:00 to 10:00. The following can be obvious:
a) In time period from 6:00 – 7:00 and 7:00 – 8:00, there is traffic generated in the north part of the Study area, which is going to the central area.
b) In time period from 8:00 – 9:00, there is a generation in the central and south area, and the congestion in the central area starts.
c) The congestion in the north area and south area are relieved and the congestion in the central area still remains.
Modal Share of Screenline-Rimac Riverby Vehicle (Total)
M/C1.9% Car
28.6%
Taxi36.4%
Combi13.9%
Microbus8.2%
Bus4.4% Truck
6.6%
Modal Share of Screenline-Rimac River by passenger (Total)
M/C0.3%
Car10.3% Taxi
7.3%
Combi26.7%Microbus
29.9%
Bus24.2%
Truck1.2%
Modal Share of Screenline-P.A.Sby Vehicle (Total)
M/C3.7% Car
24.2%
Taxi32.9%
Combi18.0%
Microbus10.9%
Bus4.6%
Truck5.7%
Modal Share of Screenline-P.A.Sby passenger (Total)
M/C0.5%
Car7.5%
Taxi5.5%
Combi29.7%
Microbus33.2%
Bus22.6%
Truck1.0%
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-15
Figure 4.2-12 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 6:00 to 7:00
Figure 4.2-13Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 7:00 to 8:00
Traffic Volume(7:00 - 8:00)
2,500 - 9,9991,500 - 2,5001,000 - 1,500
500 - 1,0000 - 500
Traffic Volume(6:00 - 7:00)
1,500 - 2,5001,000 - 1,500
500 - 1,0000 - 500
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)
Final Report
4-16
Figure 4.2-14 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 8:00 to 9:00
Figure 4.2-15 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 9:00 to 10:00