THE INTERPRETATION OF ONLINE IDENTITY ON FACEBOOK AND SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES

THE INTERPRETATION OF ONLINE IDENTITY

ON FACEBOOK AND SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES

_________________________________________________

A Thesis

Presented to the Faculty in Communication and Leadership Studies

School of Professional Studies

Gonzaga University

__________________________________________________

Under the Supervision of Dr. John Caputo

Under the Mentorship of Dr. Mark Beattie

__________________________________________________

In Partial Fulfillment

Of the Requirements for the Degree

Master of Arts in Communication and Leadership Studies

____________________________________________________

By

Margaret D. Denninger

May 2011

2

Abstract

This study explored the interpretation of identity as it relates to the construction of

self-identity on Facebook. Academic scholarship of online identity development on

Facebook and other Social Networking Sites (SNS) revealed recent research that

juxtaposed online identity makeup within communication and psychological frameworks.

The expansion of Facebook and its design elements drew academic analyses that

questioned the authenticity and fluidity of online identities. In this meta-analysis, three

studies were discussed in depth, approximately 50 studies on Facebook identity

construction were reviewed, and professional critiques on the Facebook effect were

included. Research questions query: the prospect of true identity online; employment of

theories by Mead, Walther, Berger, and media experts; existence of the Facebook „share‟

mission; private security in public media; and Facebook‟s reliability in the media arena.

Future research suggests a reassessment of online identity and Facebook‟s credibility in

the new media space.

3

We the undersigned, certify that this thesis has been approved and that it is adequate in

scope and methodology for the degree Master of Arts in Communication and Leadership

Studies.

________________________________________________________________________

Thesis or Project Director

________________________________________________________________________

Faculty Mentor

________________________________________________________________________

Faculty Reader

Gonzaga University

MA Program in Communication and Leadership Studies

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 5

The Problem 5

The Importance of the Study 6

Statement of the Problem 7

Definition of Terms Used 7

Organization of Remaining Chapters 8

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE 9

Philosophical Assumptions and Theoretical Basis 9

The Literature 11

Research Questions 18

CHAPTER 3: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 21

Scope of Study 21

Methodology of the Study 21

CHAPTER 4: THE STUDY 26

Introduction 26

Data Analysis 26

Results of the Study 35

Discussion 40

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARIES AND CONCLUSIONS 45

Limitations of the Study 45

Further Study 46

Conclusions 47

REFERENCES 52

5

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

The Problem

According to Facebook, the mission of this social networking site (SNS) is

“giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected”

(Facebook.com, 2011). In the six years of its existence, Facebook grew from an informal

campus dating site to a popular branch of new media with more than 600 million users

estimated to date (Carlson, 2010). Mark Zuckerberg, the designated founder of

Facebook, weathered legal scrutiny of his controversial development of the open source

platform as documented in the Ben Mezrich book, The Accidental Billionaires: The

Founding of Facebook (2010) and in the acclaimed film, The Social Network (2010). The

Facebook Effect (2010), authored by David Kirkpatrick and the only Zuckerberg-

sanctioned account in print, painted a more favorable portrait and was published almost

simultaneously with the Mezrich book.

While not the only social networking site, Facebook‟s skyrocketing popularity

brought new features and graphics to users‟ personal pages, and pages dedicated to „fan‟

and „business‟ topics. All of these pages stoked current controversies regarding privacy,

advertising, and psychological concerns surrounding increased Facebook use.

The emerging use of strong user profiles by college students on Facebook drew

scholarly interest on a global level. The rapid rise in teen participation on Facebook

involved relationship updates, group links, and photo sharing that depicted exaggerated

expression structured to attract „Friend‟ lists and audience participation. Scholars

6

initiated research on the psychological and evaluated the influence of these tendencies on

societal well-being.

The concept of a self-identity conceived and executed through a SNS was worthy

of further examination in the context of communication and organizational theories as

they relate to new media communication. The practice did not necessarily reveal new

trends but supported existing communication and organizational theories where users

validated group associations as opposed to an engagement of face-to-face (F2F), real

dialogue and true interpersonal communication. Group thinking on Facebook in

particular, and combined with SNS signaled tribal trending, another movement which

could take away from open discussion and support more electronic and personalized

media delivery systems. Prominent media theorists such as McLuhan and Pauly have

warned against this process for it could destroy information exchange for the masses, a

practice that inspires democracy (Postman, p.12).

Therefore, this meta-analysis of scholarship enhanced the study of online self-

identity construction on Facebook and SNS in the context of communication theory and

to interpret the influence increased usage has on self portrayals in this new form of

computer-mediated communication (CMC) and eventually on new and mass media

venues.

The Importance of the Study

Gathering scholarly studies and professional articles about the self-identity

construction on Facebook in particular and in the SNS arena could provide new

assessment of online identity trends in society. Collected works could initiate further

examination of psychological communication theories within specific new media

frameworks and advance the overall media debate on the potential power of the Facebook

7

factor. Professional materials about the influence of Facebook in the media marketplace

could also enhance this meta-analysis as Facebook undergoes a conversion from a private

venture to a publicly traded company in the spring of 2012.

Statement of the Problem

An in-depth examination of identity composition studies directed at Facebook and

SNS found extensive user activities were only possible through the open source platform

on Facebook. The format was the impetus for users to form collectives or „groups‟ per

„Likes,‟ „Links,‟ and social associations, virtually polarizing their list of „Friends‟

according to language, culture, ethnicity, and gender and “cultivating cliques” (Ward,

2011). It would appear Facebook had abandoned its mission to share information in an

open format through its own design. Communication theorists have supported and

disputed the reality of true dialogic communication in any online new media venue and

whether or not virtual conversations would benefit and encourage communication basics

and essentials in society.

Definition of Terms Used

The following terms will be used throughout the meta-analysis:

CMC: “Computer-mediated communication” refers to communication that takes place

between human beings via computers and electronic messaging instruments (McQuail,

2005).

F2F: “Face-to-face” communication is used to describe personal interaction in real life

versus a digital or electronic communications medium (Online Dictionary of Computing,

2003).

8

“Friends”: Facebook participant designation and function on profile page where users

establish lists of users who are designated “Friends.” Designated Friends cannot share

Facebook page information without permission of the user (PCMag.com, 2011).

“Likes”: Lists on user profile page of favorite information (PCMag.com, 2011).

“Links”: Digital links on user profile page to websites posted by user (PCMag.com,

2011).

“News feed”: Facebook function on user profile page where designated updates between

designated Friends appear on user profile page in real time (Facebook.com, 2011).

SNS: “Social networking sites” defines interactive websites of virtual communities for

people to share interests or to socialize online (PCMag.com, 2011).

“Wall”: Area on user profile page where messages are posted for designated Friends to

view and comment (Facebook.com, 2011).

Organization of Remaining Chapters

This meta-analysis was divided into chapters based on the following contents: 1)

Introduction with The Problem, the Importance of the Study, Statement of the Problem,

and Definition of Terms Used; 2) Review of the Literature with Philosophical

Assumptions and Theoretical Basis, The Literature, and Research Questions; 3) Scope

and Methodology with Scope of Study and Methodology of Study; 4) The Study with

Introduction, Data Analysis, Results of the Study, and Discussion; and 5) Summaries and

Conclusions with Limitations of the Study, Further Study, and Conclusions. A list of

References follows Chapter 5.

9

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Throughout the ages, philosophers and scientists have struggled with the search

for one‟s personal identity and more recently, one‟s social identity. An individual‟s

comprehension of him or herself as a discrete, separate entity looms even larger when a

distilled list of characteristics compiled into established categories such as gender,

ethical, and cultural groupings are added to the mix. The study of personal and social

identity is an evolving process which captivates and perplexes the mind. A discussion of

the elements of self-identity within the disciplines of psychology and social psychology

plays a fundamental role in recognizing the self-identity component in communication

theories. This connection helps advance a theoretical analysis of interpersonal

communications‟ practice within new media frameworks.

Philosophical Assumptions and Theoretical Basis

Philosophy, psychology, and communication were destined to form the

foundation of humanness and its extension into relationships through dialogue. Personal

relationships frequently required the use of dialogue, a basic communicative vehicle

where two voices exchange ideas and elevate to a level of comprehension and

understanding. Early in recorded history, dialogue, as a device of interpersonal

communication, intercepted those disciplines in both the literary and scholarly tradition.

Originally a literary form in Greek, Roman, and European civilizations, dialogue

emerged a working philosophy in the writings of Hebraic theologian Martin Buber in

early 20th

century Austria. Buber revealed his “I” and “Thou” philosophy positioning

dialogue as the essence of the relationship between a person and self and the person and

10

God (Buber, 1923/1958, p. 11). He posited that without this inner communicative

exercise man could not have a relationship with the universe.

At the same period of history, psychologists explored theories that developed the

bedrock of the concept of identity in part through communication with them or by

engaging with others in a secular sense. The work of philosopher and sociologist George

Herbert Mead (1934) re-identified the definition of identity by refining the concept.

Psychologists distinguished „personal identity‟ as facets of a personality where the

process of the individual (“I”) and the stratum that compiles the self (“Me”) are formed

(Mead, 1913/1934). Social psychology, however, inverts this recipe as it posits a

personal identity is formed as a person engages its social environment (Mead,

1913/1934). Mead stated, “The process of conversation is one in which the individual

has not only the right but the duty of talking to the community of which he is a part, and

bringing about those changes which take place through the interaction of individuals

(Mead, p. 168). Here is where the social psychological tradition, as opposed to pure

psychological thinking, runs a new course through communications theory. The two

brands of psychological thinking determine how social identity emerges with the aid of

true dialogic praxis, an essential component in interpersonal communication and

eventually computer-mediated communication and social network relationships.

This viewpoint of Mead laid the groundwork for the symbolic interactionist

theory, which is the lynchpin between the sociological principles of how we label

ourselves together with the paths we take to communicate. Mead believed we craft an

image of our own likeness through the images of others. How we appear to another

person was considered vital because he believed “our behaviorism is a social

behaviorism” (Mead, 1934, p.1). He stated “the whole (society) is prior to the part (the

11

individual), not part of the whole” (p. 7). He believed that meaning, language, and

symbolism naturally occur through social interaction, allowing people to group and

develop a sense of self by banding together with common interests (p. 14). The

principles of meaning, language, and thought illustrate how communication theory is

rooted in Mead‟s writings and is the net result of “the study of relating individual

organisms to the social group which we belong” (p. 2).

Further interpretation of Mead indicated that there is “no me at birth” and that

“me is formed through continual symbolic interaction” with family, „Friends‟, and

colleagues (Griffin, 2006, p. 62) and with dialogic interaction where people “bond in

thought and spirit” without necessarily responding in agreement or disagreement

(Kohlrieser, p.37). As others in our circles cultivate them, we progress or digress. Our

identity may be a self-fulfilling prophecy (Griffin, 2006, p. 63) as our expectations are

revealed and validated by the company we keep.

The Literature

Many basic tenets of self and social identity are the mainstay of other

communication theories that crisscross social psychological paths. Charles Berger (1975)

pioneered the uncertainty reduction theory of interpersonal communication, which

attempts to explain how people use the human exchange of ideas to foresee and

determine why people do what they do. At the risk of running into negative

determinants, humans will try to predict if the interaction will be successful or not and

why or why not (Griffin, 2006, p.132). Berger believed we try to reduce doubt naturally

in trying to create understandable relationships and, in all likelihood, help people to opt in

or opt out of desirable or less desirable groups (Berger and Calabrese, 1975, p. 101).

12

Berger and fellow researcher Richard Calabrese (1975) recognized that reducing

uncertainty was a “central motive in communication” (p. 100). They said that people

couldn‟t always understand why people acted the way they did (Berger and Calabrese, p.

100) but uncertainty, a due cause of stress and anxiety, was best alleviated anyway

(Berger and Bradac, 1982, p. 7). With the ability to decrease uncertainty, people could

“establish predictable patterns of interaction,” engage in a “regular communication

vehicle,” and form relationships bound by supportive concepts such as similarity and

liking among them (Berger and Calabrese, 1975, p. 101). This roll out of communication

patterns begins to show the strong application of communication theory to new media

and social media technologies.

At the time of Mead‟s writing, the foundation of the social psychological thinking

as it relates to interpersonal communication largely relied on face-to-face (F2F)

interaction. Enter the computer-mediated communication (CMC) era and Berger,

Calabrese, Bradac and others began to study the emergence of cyberspace

communication. Web-based and electronic media presented more interactive waters,

much of which was believed to be fleeting in as much as communicating through

electronic media was typically data-based and out of context.

Theorists such as Joseph Walther, however, who wrote in the early 1990s,

believed CMC could be as successful as F2F when user inspired. Walther‟s social

information processing theory declared that when motivated “to form impressions and

develop relationships” communicators will use interactive tools to make the connection

(Walther, 1992, p.248). He believed that the continuous upgrade of electronic

communication allows connections through multiple channels and that these channels

offer more time to reflect and craft the contents of conversation. As CMC advances real

13

time communication platforms, specifically new media such as Twitter and other instant

messaging systems, this finding may be an excellent topic for conversation content

research.

Walther took social information processing one step further by saying a

“hyperpersonal” perspective allows users to communicate online on a closer level than if

they met in person by way of an “anticipated future interaction” (Walther, 2002, p. 245).

Response and actual writing time, tone, and language context allows parties to extend

“psychological time” and “the shadow of the future” invites possibilities for future

meetings electronically (p. 248). Verbal behavior provides the most essential clue and

most likely will “create an idealized image of the sender” (Griffin, 2006, p. 145). This

pleasure portrait, commonly based on “selective self-presentation” of oneself in a

favorable light, implies that most people communicate electronically when they have

interests in common (Lea and Spears, 1992, p. 323) for they do not have real verbal

connections with online acquaintances. They bond online with images they like (p. 324).

During the early 1950s, British psychologist John Bowlby (Holmes, 1951)

presented his landmark attachment theory study which suggested that people, through

their infant relationship with their caregiver, became attached to people who are sensitive

and responsive during the course of social interaction (p. 89). He believed that the ability

to create good relationships was more reliant on environmental controls and not in the

Freudian terms prevalent at the time.

Bowlby‟s social and scientific reasoning paralleled emerging technologies that

enjoy standard usage in today‟s society. In the 1990‟s, the online vehicle progressed; e-

mailing led to instant chats which led to telephone texting which led to web pages which

led to social online networks mania. Technological platforms have permitted shorter,

14

crisper, and even free form writing in quicker illustrative formats. This technological

capability unveiled a global contemporary world of instantaneous talk that still resonates

communication tenets echoed in the works of Mead, Berger, Walther, and others. Studies

indicated that people would communicate and bond either in person or electronically with

those whom they share the same issues and answers.

Scholars submit that media culture is at the heart of postmodernism thinking

(Griffin, 2006, p. 354), a formal rejection of the modernism movement prevalent in the

mid-nineteenth century through the early 20th

century. Modernist philosophy is defined

as a “socially progressive trend of thought in philosophy, the arts, and science that

rejected the age of industrialization and encouraged experimentation through new

knowledge” (Berman, 1988, p.11). Followers rejected traditionalism, bourgeois society

and the sameness of the industrialized society (Trifonas, 2007, p. 10).

After World War II, the promise of modernism in the form of mass production,

nationalistic imperialism, and the destructive remnants of another world war emerged a

rejection of the modernistic ideal through the postmodernism movement (Griffin, 2006,

p. 354). Philosophers Jean-Francois Lyotard coined the term, offering a skeptical view of

the expansion of a “meta-narrative” belief in the “classifications of society as a whole”

(Lyotard, 1984, p. xxiv) that is created by the compilation of “knowledge that is created

as a commodity to be sold for profit” (p. 4) and not for the general welfare of the public.

Postmodernist philosopher Jean Baudrillard advanced those thoughts as he later wrote

about the impounding media influence of the time, that media images can emerge more

important than their subjects, suggesting society is “the mirror of television” and not vice

versa (Baudrillard, 1988, p. 166). For postmodernists, “the media have become reality”

(Griffin, 2006, p. 355).

15

Postmodernist claims are evidenced in new media construction, where people

who alternate styles to create new identities are able to do so within a “new economic

order” of media and technology conglomerates such as Facebook. It is these companies

who generate digital vehicles that sell information and features to feed new identities in a

consumerist society (Griffin, 2006, p. 356). These venues are comprised of people who

group electronically in communities of „Likes” and „Dislikes‟ which augur the new tribal

age of communication. The axiom of Marshall McLuhan, “the medium is the message”

(McLuhan, 1964, p. 19), is now reborn in the new media context.

With the establishment of self-identity via electronic channels, current scholars

began to compare and contrast emerging psychological conceptions of identity

construction and group associations in new media with a focus on social networking sites.

A theatrical vein runs through the core of many of these analyses. With users as both

identity maker and audience participant, users set trends and play important roles on and

off the stage in executing participation on social network sites.

For example, the notion of performance online, particularly in social network

sites, is an extraction of language used, photos posted, and web page construction in the

context of forming user identity. The idea of an individual person distributing private

information in a public way online presents a performance factor that affects the end

product. According to Erika Pearson (2009), the idea of a performance explains how

social interaction on social networking sites is a “discursive activity that straddles public

and private spheres so as to simultaneously maintain individual online identities” (pg. 2).

She believes the benefits of sharing “outweigh” the negatives and does not pose

miscommunication risk even though “online performers shift” between different stages

and “adapt to multivariate users” on different social networks.

16

Ervin Goffman (1959) developed the performance theory before the digital age

but envisioned disconcerting issues when “expressive bias of performance,” the act of

people exaggerating personal characteristics for the sake of presentation, occurs in any

environment or stage setting (p. 124). Goffman said the “audience” which in this case is

a fellow SNS viewer, may be also be at fault (p. 127). They might encourage identity

risk because they “accept the self projected [identity] by individual performers [who

subsequently operate] in groups or team associations” (p. 127). In another study, Zita

Pappacharissi (2009) negated and contrasted any comparison of online social interaction

with the “static rationality” of offline presentation. She said that assessment reflects

“imperialist” colonial thinking (p. 19).

Recent studies have reinforced scholarship on the use of theatrical expression in

online identity construction. Leonardi (2010) stated that the development of a virtual

self-identity through SNS interaction constitutes a rhetorical performance (p. 24). In a

recent study by DeAndrea, Shaw, and Levine (2010), language used in creating online

identities was a tool of self-expression largely influenced by cultural factors (p. 430).

Later studies recognize and analyze negative personality traits that appear as a

result of customized online performance making. Narcissism and poor self-esteem in the

real self frequently fuel the need for overly strong and boosted identities on social

network sites (Mehdizadeh, 2009, p. 34). A self-identity itself may have to be

“negotiated” (Farquhar, 2009, p. 149) with oneself in these forums in order to dictate

desired use and audience allegiance.

The predominant action, however, remains relationship making among group

identification strata versus individualistic identity portrayals that display outcast

characteristics and recurring negativity. The user audience tends to avoid the latter and

17

as the „Friends‟ list decreases so does viewership and friend lists, a sure sign to a user that

their portrait is an unfavorable one. This digital regard for cyber-resemblance reflects the

application of the tribal culture organizational theory that explains how employees band

together as tribes with habitual opinions about work, impact, and goals.

According to theorists David Logan, John King, and Halee Fischer-Wright

(2008), the five stages of tribal culture provide a snapshot view of common group

schemata in order for leaders to implement best practices for improved employee

productivity. An informal observation of social network practices indicate that most

users align themselves within the “I‟m great and you‟re not” stage or “We‟re great and

the other group isn‟t” classification. This is based on formal studies that show similar

traits and „Likes” are the basis for clusters both online and in the social network sphere.

These two stages resonate negativity and tend to discourage positive workplace practice.

Because social network site groupings dictate similar and inclusive points of view, it is

the subject of further study whether increased tribal-like groupings on these sites are

productive and hamper the mission of open discussion.

Studies have begun to segment social networking sites, and particularly Facebook,

because of the capabilities of the technologies themselves. Personal alliances bridged on

Facebook could create “social capital,” benefits users receive from tracking social

relationships with those of similar interests on Facebook (Ellison, Steinfeld and Lampe,

2008, p. 14). This study indicated that campus Facebook user time doubled during the

same period from 2006 to 2007 with users who said it is “part of their daily routine to log

onto Facebook” (p. 11). Further analysis indicated a strong association between

respondents designated to be of “low-esteem” to have remarked that Facebook increased

their socialization and networking (p. 17).

18

All media were developed to transport information but new applications, open

platform architecture, and content creation of new technologies arise and are marketed at

warp speed. As a result, digital media is an evolutionary type of media that even

modifies its features more than other media technologies ever have (Lunenfeld, 2001, p.

6). Despite constant reinvention, new media remains under the microscope in terms of its

basic mission and the sociological and psychological repercussions of its increased usage

in society.

McLuhan believed “warfare mentality” ushered in the digital age because of the

customized and personalized nature of digital technology. As mentioned, tribal

groupings via digital media congregate around specialized interests (Griffin, 2006, p. 8)

and the mass consciousness of previous media becomes eroded. Despite his negativist

bent, McLuhan believed in the power of people as artists who would be able to

“encounter technology with impunity” (McLuhan, 1964, p. 10) and withstand the forces

of an encroaching media environment. Postman continued the march against letting the

power and omnipresence of media overrun human behavior, learning, and thinking within

the societal realm. He claimed that we win and we lose when a new technology takes

center stage and affects meaning through its interpretation of the world (Postman, 1985,

p. 10).

Research Questions

The digital age presents daily discussion due to its near constant release of new

technology, global market penetration, and delineation of uses in all parts of the globe.

Facebook, as a social network device, is currently the most popular SNS vehicle

presenting new opportunities for engagement at a skyrocketing rate. Despite its new

applications and presence among legions of users, social networks such as Facebook

19

remain a medium that will, like other media and interactive mediums before it, incite

debate concerning its validity, necessity, and psychological effects it could impose on a

society who have chosen to embrace it. A review of scholarly dialogue has opened the

door to further research in an attempt to keep pace with the streaming popularity of social

networking sites.

The purpose of this study is the interpretation of identity as it relates to the

construction of self and social identities composed on Facebook. Specific questions to be

put forward include:

RQ1. Whether the concept of personal identity and social identity on Facebook is

real?

RQ2. Whether or not a fluid exchange of identities on Facebook or the online

environment is possible as it applies to Mead, Walther, and Berger?

RQ3: Whether we need Facebook or any media vehicle in the online public

sphere that permits people to refuse access to groups already in the online public

sphere?

RQ4: Whether sanctioned polarization and privatization of information in the

public sphere of Facebook is ethical and true to the open and shared mission of

Facebook?

RQ5: Whether or not social networking and especially Facebook is media in the

true sense or a growing representation of a new media sphere of amusement?

The contrast of how users react to and approach Facebook and social networking

versus current studies of Facebook communicative practice comprise the premise of this

paper. As we have witnessed how identity is a vital organ of SNS practice, established

communication and organizational theories explain how that identity in new media

20

formats replays traditional theory while simultaneously seeds negative customs in

Facebook. A meta-analysis research method will be used and in the next chapter, this

decision will be explained. In that context, this study will delve into the scope and

methodology of the research materials that juxtapose the historical context of identity

with rising Facebook and SNS usage.

21

CHAPTER 3: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

Scope of Study

Growing interest in Facebook has spurred media interest and academic

scholarship in its psychological and communication effects on identity construction.

While mass media coverage of Facebook participation has been significant, scholarly

research has been more focused on its relationship to self-identity construction and

communication theory. Academic studies have kept pace with the quick growth of

Facebook, revealing supportive and dissenting views on identity development and group

association. This paper explores research regarding the development of multiple identities

online and the symbiotic engagement of Facebook users as participants and audience in a

meta-analysis of the literature.

Methodology of the Study

The methodology for this thesis is a qualitative meta-analysis. Rubin (2010)

stated, “A recent trend in communication research is analyzing published studies to

examine trends in the literature or in the results of research studies” (p. 214). Meta-

analysis is a research technique credited to scholar Gene Glass where raw data from

many studies on a single topic is analyzed in order that all information from data analyses

could be utilized (Glass, 2000). A meta-analysis of academic studies of Facebook usage

and identity issues was chosen due to the volume of studies published from 2009 as

Facebook‟s popularity increased from its inception in February, 2004. A few studies

before 2009 are included due to their discussion of online identity construction in general.

Non-academic media materials were included due to the escalating popularity of

22

Facebook and its upcoming spring 2012 IPO (initial public offering) into the stock

market.

The purpose of this meta-analysis is the interpretation of identity as it relates to

the construction of self and social identities composed on Facebook. This research study

explored identity construction in an effort to understand communicative effects of

Facebook. It also emerged from an experiment in creating a profile page on Facebook

and other social network sites (SNS).

Strategic communication components and media culture concepts were researched

for their logical extension into the creation of identity profiles per SNS usage. Key word

searches combined the terms identity construction, online communication, and new

media with theories relating to psychology, social psychology, communication, and

organization. Specific terms include: computer-mediated communication, dialogue,

identity, Facebook, media culture, performance, psychology, social network sites, social

psychology, tribal association, and theorists Berger, Buber, Mead, McLuhan, Postman,

and Walther. Peer-reviewed journals, books, online resources, and other materials were

found using Communication & Mass Media Complete, PsychInfo, Computer Source, and

Dissertations and Theses databases. Web searches via Google books and Google Scholar

were used to find source materials in non-academic online catalogs.

Approximately 50 sources of relevant work included academic and professional

studies and reviews of Facebook and its personal web page applications. Fifteen

academic studies focus on self-identity construction. Studies of the effect of Facebook

business pages and increased advertising were not explored in depth in order to focus on

personal page construction, which is the foundation of self-identity development on

Facebook.

23

Ten academic studies across several disciplines focused on identity construction

in terms of Facebook. Multi-media capabilities in profile development with the

intersection of ethical culture, language, and photos on personal pages were evaluated

(DeAndrea, Shaw, and Levine, 2010). Five of the ten focused either directly on Facebook

or electronic communication and offered data examining profile criteria selection

stemming from campus and young adult usage (DeAndrea et al., 2010, Papacharissi,

2009, Rybas, 2008, Leonardi, 2009, Farquahar, 2009).

Five studies provided theoretical discussions of identity formation and ran full

circle through different aspects of communication tactics in an online versus offline

venue. A sense of self, personality, performance identity (Pearson, 2009), early stage

identity creation and group selection (Patterson, Bigler & Swann, 2010), and new

frameworks of electronic communication were explored via interactive communication

studies.

The online environment extended discussion of personal communication

processing. Thesis research earmarked the social psychological theory of George Herbert

Mead (Mead, 1913/1934), its foundation in true identity, and its path to interpersonal

communication. Core principles of the uncertainty reduction theory of Berger (1988) and

the social attachment theory of Walther (1992) form a basis for understanding how the

identity mechanics of Facebook could alter or enhance the communicative capacity of

users.

Academic disparities about traditional identity construction include: identity

negotiation on Facebook (Farquahar, 2009); macro-level versus micro-level identity

(Leonardi, 2009); and self-deceptive identity profiling (Donath, 2005). The user as

profiler, audience, and performer is another aspect of identity reconstruction examined

24

through peer review journals. Erika Pearson (2009) asserted a reliance on sites such as

Facebook for “social ties which engage in playful” identity construction and defends

Facebook‟s metaphoric constructs of stage and settings as a “playful place” where “those

who refuse” to participate with fluid identities run the risk of online “atrophy”

(FirstMonday.org, 2009). Her insight is contrasted with Judith Donath (2005) who

warned of Facebook‟s eventual demise due to its lack of reliability.

With a pending 2012 introduction into the stock market and advertising

opportunities on the rise, Facebook generates much business media coverage. Articles

about its 600-million membership and mounting use as a search engine (Renganayar,

2011) and its model digital architecture and page design for future social networks

(Shuman, 2011) are the focus of increasing technoculture coverage. Facebook photo

usage has popular image sharing sites such as Flickr (Kopytoff, 2011) taking notice and

considering website redesign. Each of these themes involves practical applications of

user and audience identity on Facebook.

To develop critical thinking about Facebook‟s astonishing popularity and impact

on self- identity constructs online, material in the next chapter examines the future of

Facebook not only in terms of its process but also in view of media purpose and meaning.

Topics include: the negative effects of communication overload (Swartz, 2011); being

reliant as a “technology and not an interpersonal connection” that “measures success in

size and wealth” (Pauly, 2004); being resistant to communication tenets in terms of true

dialogue (2004); exercising deception with disregard to privacy (BBC, 2011); and

growing skepticism of the mission of Facebook to share and inform. Theoretical

applications of tribal communication (McLuhan, 1964) and technological intrusion

(Postman, 1985) of “the Facebook tsunami” (Renganayar, 2011) launch a broader

25

discussion of ethical and philosophical considerations for Facebook and its identity

frameworks.

Chapter Four will explore and explain the full scope of this qualitative meta-

analyses‟ research, theory, and results.

26

CHAPTER 4: THE STUDY

Introduction

The concept of self identity or a person‟s perception of himself and the challenges

of how people handle identity has had a long history in philosophical thought and in

social science (Sherwood, 1965, p. 66). Turner and Oronato (2010) stated that in

research studies the concept of social identity has hinged on the paradigm that the “social

categorization of people into distinct groups” has created “intergroup behavior” in which

participants favored group thinking over others outside the group (p. 319).

This idea reflected the action that in group dynamics “there is a need for positive

social identity” through a desire to develop “ingroups” where “people defined and

evaluated themselves in terms of their group memberships” (Turner and Oronato, 2010,

p. 320). This would achieve a positive self-evaluation of that identity in the form of

„collective self esteem‟ as a collective sense of worth (Crocker and Luhtanen, 1990, p. 2).

This thinking could be emulated in the share philosophy of Facebook which thrives on

group preference features that help develop multi-level user identity across personal

pages.

Data Analysis

Approximately 50 sources of research materials covering academic studies,

theoretical discussion, and professional commentary on the development of self-identity

on Facebook and SNS were analyzed to cover the scope of this meta-analysis. The sheer

volume of interest in Facebook and SNS as a computer-mediated activity (CMC)

indicated a strong corollary between awareness and concern about Facebook usage and

27

its ramifications. Three studies executed during the short time period of 2009 through

2010 alone provided solid timely sources for an examination of self identity construction

on Facebook and SNS through the lens of psychological and communication patterns.

They were presented in depth here in chronological order to offer a sampling of

scholarly, progressive accounts of the Facebook self identity topic.

Lee Keenan Farquhar (2009) wrote “Identity Negotiation on Facebook.com” and

conducted a two-phase dissertation. First, he analyzed the negotiation of identity

construction on Facebook by studying the website‟s basic components that determine

identity performance. He said usage of those features support symbolic interaction

theory where anticipated responses predict future activity. These actions helped to create

predicted “exaggerated performances that serve to distinguish in-groups from out-

groups” and “reduce misinterpretations” (p. 1). Second, through a qualitative study

involving 349 Facebook college student users and 48 follow-up interviewees, Farquhar

(2009) analyzed how identities were fluid, stemming from strict profile outlines to group

affiliations and preferences which required different identity construction.

Farquhar (2009) stated that identity fluctuations could be “enmeshed in

overlapping contexts” and that “diverse social onlookers may constrain individual action”

(p. 48). Farquahar also stated that opportunities through online features could allow for

“strategic maneuvering within a network,” resulting in a drop in deep or intimate

relationships and an increase in acquaintances (p. 48). Though identities merge in a fluid

fashion, Farquhar stated that Facebook as an entity tries “to enforce a single identity,” (p.

59) opposing symbolic interactionist thinking (Mead, 1938) which perpetuates the ebb

and flow of face-to-face social communication over time.

28

Notions of Facebook community, consumption, and isolation were compared and

contrasted with an “expanded citizenry” capability on the web (Farquhar, 2009, p. 48).

Farquhar stated that identity performance is not “stable or singular, but rather shifts based

on social context” (p. 49). Facebook users have chosen specific text and imagery

“components” (p. 6) that create identity performances with an appeal for many audiences.

Farquhar said this practice reflected a performance that “is a negotiation between

performer desires and audience expectations and reactions” (p. 6).

Farquhar discussed how, based on his results, Facebook and then in turn the user,

“exercised control over presentation but could not control message interpretation” (2009,

p. 57). His research questions delved into: “exaggerated performances” promoted on

Facebook to bolster feedback and “best in group” selection; how users and audiences

digested much information through Newsfeed features such a “pegs and cues;” and how

pop culture imagery culled from mass media group identities shaped the “nuanced self”

(p. 212). A significant observation indicated Facebook users accepted profile

information as “more or less accurate;” they were able to glean “a good understanding of

others based on profiles” though they admitted their own profiles “are not complete or

accurate representations of themselves” (p. 230). Facebook‟s allowance of blocking

profiles, or in a sense, private information in a public venue, supported the theatrical

metaphor of “staging” (p. 211) and according to Farquhar, casts a user as an actor

continually performing (p. 212).

The respondents were split evenly between male-female genders with 48

consenting to follow-up interviews but only if conducted online (Farquhar, 2009, p. 228).

According to Farquhar, most respondents found Facebook to be a link between online-

offline relationships. Most respondents considered Facebook discussions superficial, with

29

content geared toward “social status and desirability” and photos, largely depicting pure

party themes, focused on “physical body of the performer” to trigger conversation (p.

212).

Moving toward online technology‟s effect on society, Farquhar examined the

potential of individualistic thinking in online vehicles and particularly Facebook in an

effort to gauge societal impact as individuals and group affiliations (2009, p. 38). He

concluded that online engagement creates a “technological seam” (p. 38) where people

shift online and offline worlds and are ultimately affected by the transmissions. He

believed that potentially Facebook “allowed for deeper development of the self, the other,

and relationships” and its resources were rich due to “all sorts of metadata” available

through the site (p. 38).

“Networked individualism, isolating effects of technology, and the collapse of

context” (Farquhar, 2009, p. 32), a predicament he described where individuals at the

center of large networks socialize little and their contextual world is created through

minimal network content, were then discussed. The author noted prior research believed

this practice, where people with small offline networks gradually align themselves online

with fewer networks, ultimately reduced personal areas of knowledge and could have

devastating effects on society (p.42).

Overall, the Farquhar dissertation provided comprehensive and timely data about

Facebook through raw text, original photos, and continuing conversations with study

respondents. His ability to thread themes between a popular, contemporary online

vehicle and established theorists such as George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman

permitted a connective discussion of Facebook within traditional communication

concepts of self-identity formulation.

30

Negative comments about the study included a mental struggle to link facetious

Facebook editorial material quoted from the author‟s research with the serious effects of

online technology on societal norms and the cultivation of Facebook use in the political

arena and in the democratization process. This was the result of confined demographics

for the study. Only college age students from the Midwest without categorizing any

cultural, ethnic, geographic, or economic demographics were part of the study. The

author did not delineate any comments by gender, eliminating other possible threads

The purpose of the DeAndrea, Shaw, and Levine‟s study “Online Language; the

Role of Culture in Self-Expression and Self-Construal on Facebook” (2010) was to

analyze through language used online the intercultural effects on self-expression and self-

identity construction on Facebook. Actual Facebook pages of 120 Caucasian American,

African American, and Ethnic Asian Americans were categorized according to the multi-

faceted linguistic analyses (DeAndrea et al., p. 430) criteria. Half men and half women

were divided equally among the three ethnic categories. Four hypotheses were tested,

with most results for each question indicating culture influenced the presentation of

individuals‟ self-identity online, and that profile similarities fell into cultural patterns

which were categorized after the study. Scholars stated that intercultural issues were a

significant research theme because people do not develop identity “in a universal

fashion” (Markes & Kitayama, 1991, cited in DeAndrea et al., p. 428).

Caucasian Americans and African Americans were grouped in the Western

culture and Ethnic Asian Americans composed the Eastern culture. Self-descriptive

language in the new online context revealed differences between accepted beliefs of

traditional groupings such as independent (Western culture) and interdependent (Eastern

culture) self-construal. Word patterns overall indicated that Western culture users were

31

more individualistic in description and personal pronoun usages versus Asian users who

more often aligned themselves through language with goals, groups, or relevant

relationships minus personal pronouns.

Facebook page results indicated that African Americans offered the most

individualistic descriptive language through text and features and highlighted religious

affiliations more than the other two groups. Ethnic Asians wrote most of social

affiliations while Caucasian Americans posted three times more profile photos. Because

Facebook is currently most popular in the U.S., U.K., and Canada, it was suspected that a

propensity for individualistic expression was expected.

The study was valued because it surveyed actual Facebook data or “free write

text” from the “About Me” section. Researchers posited that this section had “high face

validity” though it did not follow accepted coding of the Kuhn and McPartland (1954)

Twenty Statements Test about self-concept which the authors termed “forced” and

“nonmeaningful” (DeAndrea et al., 2010, p. 433). The study did not incorporate other

features on said pages nor did it give specific examples of text usage to support their

hypotheses. They did describe coding categories and some terminology usage such as

frequency of personal pronouns and relationship terms. It did not differentiate users on

any other basis such as geographic or economic demographics but did determine that the

Ethnic Asian Americans were residents of the United States. The researchers were

enthusiastic about pursuing cultural influence through language with online self-construal

and the disparity between Caucasian Americans and other groups regarding photo usage

on Facebook.

In Narrative as Self Performance: The Rhetorical Construction of Identities on

Facebook Profiles, Marianne Leonardi (2010) studied the shaping of self-presentation

32

online via Facebook. Within the structure of Goffman‟s (1959) presentation of self and

Burke‟s (1951) conception of rhetoric, user identity formation using narrative

“fragments” in profiles and the online effect of “these narrative performances” are

shown. Leonardi (2010) argues that “narratives are a type of rhetorical performance, and

that both narratives and identities have symbolic meaning and rhetorical components”

(p.vi).

The author devised a three-tier approach to a narrative performance of self

construction study: to bulk data via her self-developed Narrative Performance Model;

conduct follow-up focus groups; and to clarify micro- versus macro-level activities

behind feature use on Facebook profiles, along with the results of those options, and the

role of culture in those selections.

Actual text from 100 Facebook profiles indicated students “use both linguistic and

paralinguistic features” such as non-traditional forms of grammar and writing” to present

their narrative performance of identity online and to convey five types of identity profiles

(Leonardi, 2010, p. vii). “Cultural capital” was the foundation of these “narrative

selves,” enabling a “hierarchical arrangement of society by highlighting class

differences” (p. vii).

According to Leonardi, relationship issues suffered from media effects on

Facebook usage in the focus group transcript analysis. The respondents believed users

had to keep Facebook relationships “real”, “official,” within “friending” boundaries, and

within “relational boundaries: friends and family” (2010, p. 148). Leonardi pointed out

that it was essential to study the effects of self construction online due to an increasing

number of cybercrimes resulting in self destruction offline. This was because people now

live in both real and virtual worlds (p. 2), a practice that leads to disorientation,

33

insecurity, and a lack of “understanding of life.” Thus, Leonardi believed we needed to

understand the “self” in relation to living in these two worlds (p. 2).

Leonardi (2010) focused on how virtual identities present new ways to interrelate

self performance through word and imagery. She refuted prior thinking that forms of

rhetoric must be “one-dimensional and stable,” for the virtual context expanded this

presentation (p. 5). Leonardi asserted that research methods of “interpretive” versus

“post-positivist” scholars prove that reality, and in effect, virtual identity construction,

would be effected at the local level by a person‟s culture. This refutes the latter scholar‟s

thinking that the individualistic identity formation is only possible through the demolition

of “large systems” (p. 6). She asserted that virtual self is created through the philosophy

of Kenneth Burke (1951/1969, 1966) where language represents symbolic action and

identity is “performed” (p. 11). Her Facebook profiles‟ analysis mirrored this theme as

users identify themselves through group and pop culture affiliations, and share “cognitive

schema” through online messages in group narrative form (p. 10). She claims that

profilers “construct narratives of their idealized selves” and use a “multitude of

impression management [website] features” (p. 12) as self certification.

Leonardi (2010) asserted that scholars must view virtual identity as the “re-

imagined virtual self” and envision virtual identity as the process of transforming and

reconstructing the “offline-persona into an online-persona” (p. 18). According to her,

this concept of virtual self realizes its identity as it functions through “virtual simulation

and social interaction” (p. 24). The text and imagery constituted a rhetorical performance

online where users “control the actions and outcomes” (p. 26) to meet their desires and

this manipulation of information can lead to “sincere” or “deceptive” identities (p. 26).

She stated the human narrative on Facebook is viewed in “fragmented forms” of symbols

34

and text, counter to the strict format of a non-virtual narrative. Leonardi stated that this

approach was valid because storytelling on this website involved the “rhetor [user]

starting their story” (p. 28) and the users continuing the story by filling in more

“fragments” per Facebook format.

Leonardi‟s profile page (2010, p. 9) analysis provided five categories of the „self‟

of profilers: 1) Essential Self (“worthwhile”); 2) Desired Self (“fulfillment”); 3)

Preferential Self (“choices”); 4) Dynamic Self (“activity”); 5) Demanding Self

(“concealment”). The Focus Groups offered follow-up data in the form of spontaneous

conversations.

Leonardi (2010) offered a comprehensive and new approach to understanding

identity construction online and on Facebook. She dismissed established thinking that

traditional identity narratives are not possible on the website, noting fragmented text and

Facebook features make identity construction possible (p. 15, 206). She provided a

Narrative Performance Model (p. 8, p. 82) and graphic to explain her critical thinking.

She launched a new debate on the role of the user-reader as interpreter, contributor, and

influencer of narrative identity construction online. Her profile research analysis was

supported by raw text data and buttressed by qualitative, focus group research which

magnified Facebook‟s media effects on relationships and networking (p. 148).

While the study asserted the practice and fluidity of identity construction on

Facebook had merit, the study did not include any calculation of user time spent

continuously changing these applications versus the offline version. Leonardi (2010)

denied that online identities under constant change could be falsehoods while established

interpretations consider them deceptive. This contrasted her study‟s strong allegations

against cybercriminal activities as noted in her Introduction. Her descriptions of selected

35

language in the study embellished Facebook application text. Branding Facebook badges

and tags to be “paralinguistic features” (p. 9, 191, 192) lent contemporary gloss to a lack

of real word interpretation and description. Though her argument stemmed from

language usage and its relationship to meaning, Leonardi limited her photo analysis

which is a vital part of the fragment form of narrative identity construction online and a

popular Facebook feature. In addition, unlike other identity researchers, her concept of

cultural capital relied on artistic pursuits while other researchers interpreted culture to

mean ethnic background and related demographics.

Results of the Study

The remaining studies regarding online and Facebook identity focused on parallel

or convergent themes as they related to self identity construal in the online arena and its

relationship to offline identity formation. Many had differing approaches disputing

online integration with offline living but included similar themes. A sampling of

significant studies that centered on self identity construction, communication, and social

psychological themes on Facebook and SNS is outlined on Table 1. The vertical list

includes study content, author, and year of publication. Horizontal headings mark the

focus in the context of self identity discussions that were covered in each study.

Overlapping themes prove that in its short lifespan Facebook has ignited extensive

dialogue about its presentation, its communicative effects on society, and its continual

flow of free data about users around the world.

Though traditional self identity is the foundation of its scholarship, Facebook has

ushered in a distinct portfolio of studies where its premier establishment in the online

environment is the lynchpin. Studies shown in Table 1 probed that topic and either added

new or reinforced traditional perspectives on Facebook and technocultural connections to

36

everyday life. Recurring themes involved study of Facebook raw data found on profilers‟

personal pages and the use of Facebook features that provided the tools to create identity,

absorb reaction, and develop group links to advance audience traffic. For example,

Rybas‟ (2008) asserted that Facebook was in essence responsible for relationship activity

with diverse ramifications. Rybas argued that Facebook participation created a new

playbook in relationship tactics “for the sake of a uniform representation of a network

member” (p. 99).

Table 1

Sampling of Facebook/SNS studies shows increasing number of Facebook/SNS studies

on self-identity formation, performance, self-presentation, and culture concerns.

FB/SNS

Study

Authors

Year

Of

Publication

Self-Identity

Construction

College

Age

Performance

& Self-

Presentation

Culture

Lea & Spears 1992 x

Donath & boyd 2005 x x x

Ellison et al 2007 x

Miller 2008 x x x

Rybas 2008 x

Patterson et al 2008 x x

Bryant & Marmo 2009 x x x

DeAndrea et al 2009 x x x x

Papacharissi 2009 x x x

Pearson 2009 x x x

Ellis 2010 x x x

Farquhar 2010 x x x x

Leonardi 2010 x x x x

Mehdizadeh 2010 x x x

37

Ngyuen 2010 x x x

Taylor & Usborne 2010 x x x x

Note: Studies published in the same year are listed in alphabetical order and not in order

of other significance.

Ellison, Steinfield, and Lampe wrote in 2007 that their survey of 236

undergraduates on Facebook revealed a positive effect on “social capital” where students

gained self-esteem and psychological health as a result of Facebook engagement. Group

associations with people viewed in a positive light was deemed a Facebook basic and

considered the essence of SNS communication. It was assumed the result of decreased

uncertainty through increased identity with a unit (Lea and Spears, 1992, p. 324;

Patterson, Bigler, and Swann, 2008, p. 666). Nguyen (2010) analyzed making meaning

and identity through ethnic and symbolic style trends evident on Facebook pages of

Hmong youth living in Wisconsin. Miller (1995) believed his study of the presentation

of self in “electric life” would inevitably force “new frames of interaction and identity” in

all online communicative vehicles.

Mehdizadeh (2010) analyzed 100 student Facebook users aged 18-25 and

confirmed the notion that narcissists, according to the traditional National Personality

Inventory (NPI-16) coding (2010, p.359), had engaged in more Facebook activity than

those users who demonstrated low self-esteem (Mehdizadeh, 2010, p.359). The author

was one of few researchers who delineated male-female profile page indicators, noting

that men displayed more self-promotion in text versus women who parlayed more self-

promotion in photos (Mehdizadeh, 2010, p. 360). Usborne & Taylor (2010) proposed a

theory of self that emphasizes the primacy of collective cultural identity versus individual

cultural creation for personal identity construction and psychological well-being.

38

Papacharissi (2009) found SNS self-presentation styles and the cultivation of taste

performances in spaces described as privately public and publicly private, was a mode of

sociocultural self identification in social networking communities such as Facebook. A

study presented at the 2009 National Communication Conference study by Bryant and

Marmo (2009) posited that Facebook had emerged as a “social utility” (p. 13) where

offline relationships and friendships were largely maintained online among college

students, a group with high daily usage rates. Donath and boyd (2005) cited SNS

networking to be a burgeoning part of life, noting that networks can act as a “boundary”

to extend our world or limit its guests. Its value depended not on “increasing social

girth” (2005, p. 13) but on the “expenditure of energy” needed to maintain personal

networks and reap its benefits regardless of size (2005, p. 14).

Many studies cited relied on the social psychological guidance of George Herbert

Mead (1913/1934) and his excavation and construction of a modernist, social self identity

blueprint in order to create a foundation within the communication discipline. Facebook

features could appear to have reincarnated what Mead outlined to be the need for

“gesture” that “calls out for a response” (p. 97) in order for thought to exist and

communication to ensue. Farquhar noted that though written prior to the digital age,

Mead‟s theoretical framework still “provided a good analytic utility” for studying

Facebook as a “descriptor of social life” (2010, p. 60). The communication philosophies

of Charles Berger (1988) regarding his uncertainty reduction theory and John Walther

(1992) concerning his social attachment theory did much to substantiate and envision the

Facebook effect on self presentation as self identity evolves.

Moving away from academic research, Facebook has generated much business

and consumerist coverage because of its rapidly increasing user rate. Because more users

39

will generate more communicative interaction and multiple identity handling, it is

essential to update the state of Facebook in the media marketplace. Current articles

indicate Facebook has a 600-million global membership rate, though the majority resides

in the United States, Canada, the U.K, and parts of Europe. Global usage outside these

countries has stepped up against MySpace.com, even though Facebook has been blocked

intermittently in several countries, including Pakistan, Syria, and People‟s Republic of

China, Vietnam, Iran, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, and Bangladesh. It has also been banned

at many places of work to discourage employees from wasting time (Renganayar, 2011,

para. 9).

A keen eye has been kept on user numbers due to Facebook‟s pending IPO

(Initial Public Offering) into the stock market in spring 2012 with the website‟s net worth

currently estimated at $65 billion. The website‟s mounting advertising inclusion is a

marketer‟s delight because user preferences are clearly categorized, paving the way for

merchandisers to find and entice customers. The blend of “real validated identity

information and extensive information about individuals” could produce unparalleled

thought (Kirkpatrick, 2010, p. 143). Professionals note Facebook‟s user rate has far

surpassed 275-million Yahoo and 40 million-AOL peak e-mail participants in far less

time (Ashton, 2011).

Consumerism is just one of future appeals for Facebook. The addition of business

pages and links to commercial ventures has earmarked even more Facebook usage as a

search engine. Renganayar reported that Facebook was emerging the search engine of

choice in Asia because it provides “a warm personal experience compared with Google's

`cold' search results” (2011, para 8). Companies responded to the intimate Facebook

40

atmosphere and create a presence, “whether it's a fan page, a business group, or even

through purchased advertising, giving face to any “faceless business” (para.8).

Customers are „fans‟ and „friends‟ and may reach companies directly “without having to

go through an impossible bureaucratic maze" (2011, para. 9). For example, Yahoo

recently partnered with Facebook to include their „Share‟ and „Like‟ applications on the

Yahoo site. This move was made in an effort to distribute Yahoo content to Facebook

contacts and to drive multiple searches (Efrati, 2011, para 2).

According to industry experts, the Facebook advantage is largely due to its open

digital architecture. Its media platform and page design has made more facile functions

available and eliminated the fear of creating a personal website. As a result, the

architecture has not gone unnoticed by competitors and is now the bedrock of new design

for future social networks (Shuman, 2011). There have been many lucrative partnerships

between Facebook and technology giants such as Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo

(Kirkpatrick, 2010, p.178) for software advertising linkups. The Facebook photo

blueprint recently surpassed photo-sharing site Flickr (owned by Yahoo) in terms of user

visits and Flickr is now remodeling its page design format to parallel Facebook image

capabilities of specialty tags, higher resolution, and storage servers (Kopytoff, 2011).

Discussion

Beyond the commercial hoopla of Facebook is its expanding role in the media

cosmos. A philosophical and ethical examination of Facebook in terms of media purpose

and meaning will be needed, a discussion that does not emerge from its new media

underpinnings but rather from its execution, function, and responsibility as a media

vehicle. Minus its technical and profitable bearing is a media vehicle that will exert

41

influence on the populace and place Facebook under the microscope as a media venue

shaping communication and identity characterization on both personal and collective

levels. It is clear that Facebook has enhanced relationship-making and research- seeking

activities but the discussion begs further examination of its position as a powerful media

entity, its goals, and the responsibility it now holds.

Facebook is interactive but performs in a non face-to-face context, forcing it to be

recast from a singular media vehicle to hybrid media classification. Without original

editorial content, Facebook is a purveyor of processed information which, even with

personal data linked to that data, could then be treated as public information. Though

Facebook allows the transfer of original and previously published print and moving

editorial content, its control over page construction techniques and subsequent identity

creation mechanisms blurs the demarcation between its existences as real media with

responsibilities versus its subsistence as an unfiltered transfer station. Deception and

privacy concerns have become an overriding issue especially for older Facebook

members and online entities in general, and there is a groundswell of rejection being

recorded (BBC podcast, 2011).

Scholars and professionals contend that the Facebook effect and interference in

virtual identity creation raised the identity construction issue to a new level.

Communication overload has been interfering in user tasking at such a rapid pace that

scholars note chronic media multi-taskers suffer from severe distraction (Swartz, 2011,

para. 22). To combat user fatigue and future user drop-off, Facebook recently hired

psychologists, sociologists, and user-researchers to be part of „social‟ redesign efforts to

42

streamline user processing and information integration in accordance with better brain

function (Swartz, 2011, para. 30).

The Facebook mission as dictated on its website is to share and inform. Facebook

founder Mark Zuckerberg has also stated that a goal of the website was “to help people

understand the world around them” (Kirkpatrick, 2011, p. 143). For understanding to

exist, media theorists posit that dialogue must be present in order for human

communication to function through thought and meaning. Martin Buber (1958) wrote

that man can only become “whole” in the virtue of a relation to another self (p. 168) and

true conversant dialogue plays part in this exchange, a position which leaves open the

possibility of communicating and understanding through thought and meaning via virtual

dialogue online.

Robert Arnett wrote that there is “tension between modern media and dialogic

theory and praxis” (2004, p. xvi) where dialogue relies less on self-expression than on

responsiveness. Media scholar John J. Pauly posed a negative outlook on the subject of

dialogue through mediated communication; he believes talking and dialogue is a “direct

people to people encounter” (2004, p. 244). Because the media sends information in a

“messaginated” fashion to group audiences, Pauly stated that most media “rely on

technology rather than interpersonal commitment” (p. 244); and that dialogue requires

“depth” while the audience delivery system lets media “settle for shallowness” and rely

on success measured “in size and wealth” (p. 244). He asserted that media is not

dialogistic in nature despite efforts to involve audiences through technology.

Media as an exigent agent posed issues for dialogue from an informational

standpoint. Pauly stated that it is incorrect to extract media from dialogue because both

43

media and audiences are grafting information from “media-driven materials of mass

produced books and Internet sources” in a mass-produced symbolic form (2004, p. 245).

He believes these factors affect group identities ideologies because they have turned to

the mass media to find symbolic discourse in the tradition of democracy but have not

found true dialogue which is the essence of democracy (p. 246).

A debate about a possibility of virtue in virtual dialogue on Facebook and SNS

resurfaced regarding philosophy and ethics in media construction. Pauly wrote that

“cultural approaches alter the discussion” of dialogue in media and he turned down the

notion of “human symbol-making” where reality co-construction is accepted and

“multiplicity and fluidity of the self” is recognized (2004, p. 251).

The responsibility of media to inform and to be in the public interest may not be

established in the purveyance of information alone but in the effects it has on society and

the creation of meaningful self-identity. Marshall McLuhan‟s public probe into

understanding media in the electronic age reverberates in new media operations. He

believed the daily use of technology dominates society‟s unconscious yet “sensory

experience” with a popular medium (Griffin, 2006, p. 2) and that technology emerges “an

extension of ourselves” (p. 2). McLuhan‟s belief that these media-life extensions cause

“cultural change” (p. 4) supports scholarly recognition of the Facebook and SNS effect

on multiple identities, relationships, and group association. McLuhan's insight was that

any medium affects its society not by its editorial product content, but by the media

forum itself (1964, p. 22). In addition, his electronic age of media could have included

digital advances; the customization of digital media and group affiliations resonate on

44

Facebook with the emerging “tribal warfare mentality” of exaggerated personal branding

and tastes (Griffin, 2006, p. 6).

Media scholar Neil Postman frequently challenged the media with moral

positioning of its product and the shape of technology as entertainment and amusement.

Echoing McLuhan, he said media form dictated the content it can offer. Facebook could

offer variety through its website features but the features themselves would have created

“a symbolic code as a piece of technology” and thereby would have developed a machine

which people now use to reinvent their identities per the dictates of the Facebook format

(Griffin, 2006, p. 14). In describing this premise in Technolopy, Postman forecast the

Facebook function of creating identities via their profile format when users adapted

themselves “to the requirements of new technologies” (Postman, 1992, p. 70).

Summaries and conclusions of the academic studies, professional commentaries,

and research questions are presented in Chapter Five.

45

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARIES AND CONCLUSIONS

Limitations of the Study

The basis for this meta-analysis was the interpretation of identity as it relates to

the construction of self and social identities composed on Facebook and SNS. The

extensive popularity of communicating through the latest new media vehicle generated an

upsurge of research on how people composed their identity through Facebook. Scholarly

concern for psychological well-being, healthy communication, and media influence on

society prompted much academic research and professional review on new directions of

self-identity construction online and offline. The global success of the Facebook social

networking site also initiated specific research on its usage and identity profile

generation.

Academic research into studies about Facebook and SNS, therefore, was limited

to the self-identity function, its attachment to communication and organizational theories,

and to Facebook‟s emerging role as a media function. Scholarship analysis was centered

on Facebook because of its rapid rise in global users which industry analysts estimate at

600-million. Facebook was also the main concern because features such as Profiles,

Newsfeed, photo albums, and Links helped to form self-identity frameworks that fueled

the site‟s popularity and gave rise to its new role in relationships. The focus on Facebook

was also conducted to highlight the volume of self-identity research generated since the

Facebook user rate expanded. Despite the success of other SNS, these sites directed their

site‟s design and growth to target audiences, prompting their exclusion from this meta-

analysis.

46

Scholarly debate regarding the communication and organizational theoretical

connection to online identity construction was included, providing a basis for concern

about Facebook and SNS effects on societal communication. Commentaries regarding

the media theories of established scholars were included and analyzed in order to support

or deflect criticisms and connections of self-identity composition as experienced through

a new media lens. Discussions of self-identity issues through traditional, offline media

were excluded in order to focus on specific online concerns.

Expert commentary of Facebook in the marketplace was included in order to

explain the magnitude of possible effects of SNS on global discourse and human

communication in new media in general. Professional review of SNS did not include

other sites (Twitter, LinkedIn) or uses for political causes, humanitarian efforts, business

objectives, or other endeavors. These subjects would have involved disciplines not in the

scope of the study. Material chosen should not be read as bias but as a balanced study on

the growing significance of self-identity composition in online and offline ventures. The

topic portends to be of great interest as Facebook approaches a public stock offering and

a conversion from private enterprise to public company.

Further Study

Interactive technologies such as Facebook will continue to stimulate interest

because of their vast potential for amusement and profit. The open source digital

architecture of Facebook has become the model for online entities outside the SNS

framework, indicating other media entrepreneurs will mirror their practices and attract

wider demographics. This prompts the need to research how self-identity variations affect

the general public.

47

More specific studies of gender usage, age groups, ethnic trends, and cultural

styles as they relate to identity formation should be conducted. Most of the academic

reports focused on college age participants who constitute most but not all Facebook

users, and centered on U.S. participants, even though Facebook user rates are higher in

Westernized countries. The use of multi-variant identities should also be studied to

expose potentially deceptive practices and to question the psychological need to compose

multiple identities online.

It is recommended that photo usage on Facebook and on SNS be studied. SNS

servers with greater photo capabilities have been documented and future analyses should

focus on photo selection and identity portrayal according to gender, age, and other

groups. Few studies tapped photo usage as a separate entity or referred to them through

photo captions and „tag‟ usage or they concentrated on user language alone.

More study of Facebook in its emerging media role is recommended. With its

pending stock offering in the spring of 2012, the company will be publicly owned and

entering a greater realm of responsibility. Its validation as a trustworthy resource,

credible search engine, and purveyor of ethical media practices will be on demand. With

Web 5.0 on the horizon (Kambil, 2008), Facebook activity will likely expand further and

require more examination as an accountable, ethical media vehicle.

Conclusions

Researchers and the public continue to be fascinated with Facebook and SNS,

almost as much as psychologists analyze self-identity. The latter, along with

communication theorists, have established that the two work together to create human

relationships through dialogue. According to Mead (1934, p. 2), conversation depicts

where identity is comprised as an image of ourselves that reflects the image of others.

48

Berger (1975, p. 101) utilized his uncertainty reduction theory to explain why people

bond with more desirable groups and that eliminating uncertainty was a basic

communication rite. Because most theories involved F2F activities, CMC and then SNS

discussions tried to leverage the dialogic practice from offline to online through linguistic

features, photos, and preset symbols. Walther (1992, p. 248) saw the CMC inclusion as a

communication asset, indicating online exchange encourages communication because it

offers more time and thought to respond through online dialogue. Online imagery and

symbolism, however, posed a problem for Lea and Spears (1992, p. 323) who believed

people were only bonding with images they liked and not initiating discourse with

opposing views.

Scholars accept that media culture is the core of postmodernist thinking. Lyotard

(1984, p. 4) believed the commodification of knowledge became a for-profit practice and

Baudrillard (1988, p. 166) refuted media for becoming reality itself versus an information

vehicle. New media allowed group association online, supporting McLuhan‟s tribal

concept amidst future communication. The establishment of self-identity evolved within

new media as participation grew in interactive forums such as Facebook and SNS.

Elements of performance began to intersect with online identity profile making,

thus adding exaggerated characteristics, group links, and the emergence of multiple

identities supporting rhetorical performances on and offline. All these activities sprung

from a need to attract an audience to a Facebook page, thus complicating the role of user

as participant, player, and spectator.

Scholars have continued to debate the significance of virtual identities termed

„fluid‟ by supporters of on and offline environments. While it is clear this process is

initiated through SNS participation, it has not been confirmed if this poses psychological

49

harm and whether or not this is an acceptable practice. Identity construction questions

feed group associations and tribal tactics which polarize people as opposed to enhancing

dialogic efforts. Scholars have, however, taken sides as to whether or not true dialogue

can take place in the online versus offline environment. This argument is vital for it

paves the way for SNS interaction to enhance communication and interpersonal

relationships that occur online.

The customized nature of digital communication supports McLuhan‟s tribal

approach to media technologies (Griffin, 2006, p. 4). Both McLuhan and Neil Postman

believed in a concerted effort to explain media usage to the populace in order that people

might ward off the effects of a media-run society.

A review of the study‟s research questions poses discussion of their topics. In

response to RQ1, it would appear to many scholars that the concept of personal and social

identity on Facebook is real to Facebook users. Extensive research into self identity

construction on Facebook and its frequent use confirms that more and more people are

continuously engaged in self-expression through Facebook features and format,

indicating the practice must appear authentic to them in that environment. Whether or not

a fluid exchange of identities on Facebook occurs as it applies to Mead, Walther, and

Berger is permissible yet debatable. Per RQ2, Mead and Berger‟s thinking (self-identity

as reflection of others and reducing anxiety by bonding with commonalities) do occur but

real conversation cannot occur without F2F exchange. Walther‟s theory disputed the F2F

requisite as he believed CMC enhanced online communication.

The need for a media venue in the online public sphere that blocks access to

information (RQ3) is debatable yet already in play through paid subscriptions on the

Internet. These actions have not triggered legal action against the move. The ethics of

50

the Facebook practice of privatizing user information is a contentious topic (RQ4).

Facebook boasts a shared mission yet its optional blockage and use of user data (available

in a public venue) have rattled the public. As a new media venue that is growing (RQ5),

Facebook is facing the reality of an emerging new status as a media information source

and may be forced to bear the responsibility that accompanies that role.

It is obvious that the public is fascinated with Facebook and continues to seed its

growth. Growing concern over its influence, however, may mandate usage controls, SNS

literacy campaigns, and a public effort to monitor and mitigate increased usage of such

sites that may invade the psyche. Renewed interest in drafting student social media

policies has occurred (Junce, 2011, p. 60). Recent legislation drafted by President Barack

Obama would outlaw online tracking capabilities unless permitted by a user (Valentino-

DeVries, 2011, B1).

Recent books outlined the frustration of people made dizzy by the digital age and

their attempts to commandeer online usage. A $50 million MacArthur Foundation study

on digital and media learning contended that teenagers using Facebook were being taught

to “manage their public identity” (Ito, 2008, in Maushart, 2010). In “The Winter of our

Disconnect,” author columnist Susan Maushart pulled the plug on family technology for

six months and learned that “our technologies invariably start out as responses to a need”

but eventually and subtly they “redefine that need” (p. 6).

It might be ascertained that people as the “artists” McLuhan established are

capable of demanding better and less time with technology than is defined by a data-

driven usage model. McLuhan wrote that people as artisans could “sidestep the bully

blow of new technology of any age” (Griffin, 2006, p. 10). McLuhan also believed a

reversal in the “nature of a new technology” could take place “when the new medium is

51

pressed to its limit” (p. 13). It is doubtful Facebook is at the crossroads of cutting back

its influence soon. Privacy concerns are at the forefront and scholars are increasing

demands for more control and government regulation (Hill, 2011, p.21). Industry

observers have also predicted that like a social fad, the sociable nature of Facebook could

be its demise as it would fade in popularity as the next trendy media and its open source

platform would be copied by more specialty sites, following the polarizing tribal group

theory (MacMillan, 2011) and reducing its specialty status. Psychologist Jesse Rice

(2011) commended Facebook for its “regenerative spirit” in sparking daily conversation.

Rice warned, however, that we have to learn how “to be human in it” (2011, p. 216)

because participation can “blur the lines of identity and relationships (p. 216). A new

focus on Facebook usage and effect may be mandated on a personal basis in order for self

identity interpretation to be complete, real, and honest.

52

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis. The

in-text citations to studies selected for meta-analysis are not preceded by asterisks.

Allen, B.J. (2004). : Difference matters: Communicating social identity. Ann Arbor, MI:

Waveland Press

Arnett, R. (2004). “A dialogue ethic “between” Buber and Levinas: A responsible ethical

“I” in Anderson, R., Baxter, L., and Cissna, K, (2004). Dialogue: Theorizing

differences in communication studies. London: Sage Publications.

Ashton, J. (2011). AOL's last throw of the internet dice. Sunday Times.

London. Feb 13, p. 7.

Baudrillard, J. (1988). America. London: Verso

Bauerlein, M. (2009). The Dumbest generation: how the digital age stupefies young

Americans and jeopardizes our Future. NY: Penguin.

Berman, M. (1988). All that is solid melts into air. NY: Viking Press.

Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2003) “The origins of human cooperation” in Hammerstein, P.

(2003), The Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. Boston: MIT Press.

Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human

evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Breck, J. (2010). The mob dethrones goggle: how to recognize the future when it lands

on you. Retrieved from http://www.smartmobs.com/2010/12/30/the-mob-dethrones-

google/

*Bryant, E., & Marmo, J. (2009). Relational Maintenance Strategies on

53

Facebook. Conference Papers -- National Communication Association, 1, 0p

Retrieved March 7, 2011 from Communication and Mass Media Complete.

*Bryant, e., & Marbo, J., (2009). Relational maintenance strategies on Facebook. Paper

presented at the National Communication Assocation Convention, Chicago, IL.

Buber, M. (1958/1923). I and thou. (R.G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner‟s

Sons.

Burke, K. (1950). A Rhetoric of Motives. London: University of California Press

Carlson, N. (2010). At last – the full story of how Facebook was founded

BusinessInsider.com

Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/how-facebook-was

founded-2010--3?slop=1

Carlson, N. (2011) Facebook (effectively) just announced plans to go public.

BusinessInsider.com. Retrieved from

http://www.businessinsider.com/rule-12g5-1b3-or-how-facebook-just-anno..

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, original and use. Westport, CT:

Greenwood Publishing

Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60-67. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60

*DeAndrea, D. C., Shaw, A. S., & Levine, T. R. (2010). Online Language: The Role of

Culture In Self-Expression and Self-Construal on Facebook. Journal of Language

& Social Psychology, 29(4), 425-442. doi:10.1177/0261927X10377989

Donath, J.& boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal,

22(4), 71- 82. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry. (Document

ID: 735223051).

54

Efrati, A. (2011, February 15). Yahoo makes moves to friend Facebook. Wall Street

Journal, p. B7. Retrieved from wallstreetjournal.com. (Document ID: 2266375951).

*Ellis, K. (2010). Be who you want to be: The philosophy of Facebook and the

construction of identity. Screen Education, (58), 36-41.

*Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook

"friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites

Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 1.Retrieved from

http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html

Facebook.com. Retrieved from

http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?factsheet#!/facebook

Face2Face (F2F). Retrieved from http://dictionary.die.net/face-to-face

Facebook Business page. Retrieved from

http://www.facebook.com/advertising/FacebookPagesProductGuide.pdf

Facebook Fan page: Retrieved from

http://www.facebook.com/advertising/FacebookPagesProductGuide.pdf

*Farquhar, L.K.. "Identity negotiation on Facebook.com." PhD diss.,

University of Iowa, 2009.

Retrieved from: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/289

Fincher, D. (Director). The social network. (2009). [Motion Picture]. U.S

. Columbia Pictures

Fischer-Wright, H., King, J., & Logan, D. (2008). Tribal leadership. NY: Harper Collins

Fowler, G. A. & Rappaport L. (2011, January 21). Facebook limits deal, still raises

$1 billion. Wall Street Journal (Online). Retrieved from wallstreetjournal.com

Facebook Friending. Retrieved: http:/pcmag.com/encyclopediaterm

55

/0,2542,t=friending&i60604.00.asp

Garfield , B. (2010). Curation nation. Advertising Age. November 29, 2010

Glass, G. (2000). Meta-Analysis at 25. Retrieved from

http://gvglass.info/papers/meta25.html

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. NY: DoubledayAnchor

Gonzales, A.L. & Hancock, J.T. (2008). Identity shift in computer-mediated

environments. Media Psychology, Vol 11(2), Apr-Jun 2008, p.167-185

http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&uid=2008-09549-001

doi:10.1080/15213260802023433

Griffin, Em. (2009). A first look at communication theory (7th

ed.). Boston, MA:

McGraw-Hill

Griffin, Em (2006). A first look at communication theory (6th

ed.). Boston, MA:

McGraw-Hill

Hill, Kashmir. (2011), February 28. Digital anthropologist: Dana boyd. Forbes. pp.20-21

Holmes, J. (1993). John Bowlby and the attachment theory. London: Routledge Press

Junce, R. (2011, January/February). Need for student social media policies.

Educause Review. p. 60-61.

Kambil, A. (2011). Are you ready for Web 5.0. Retrieved from http://homepage.mac.com

/akambil/KambilHome/papers/JBSweb.pdf

Kirkpatrick, D. (2010). The facebook effect. NY: Simon & Schuster.

Kohlrieser, G. (2006). The power of authentic dialogue. Leader to Leader Institute

Journal. October 1. CA: San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.

Kopytoff, V. (2011, January 31). At Flickr, Fending Off Rumors and Facebook.

New York Times. p. B.3. Retrieved http://newyorktimes.com.

56

(Document ID: 2252875311).

*Lampe, C. Ellison, N. Steinfeld, C. (2006). Facebook in the crowd: social searching

vs. social browsing. CSCW, „06, Nov 4-8

*Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perceptions in computer-

mediated communication. Journal of organizational computing Vol. 2. p. 321-341.

*Leonardi, M. E. (2010). Narrative as self performance: The rhetorical construction

of identities on facebook profiles. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts

International Section A, 71

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation:

teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression.

New Media & Society June 10: 393-411

Lunenfeld,P. (2001). Snap to Grid: A user‟s guide to digital arts, media, and

culture. Boston: MIT Press

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press

MacMillan, G. (2011). Thewallblog.com. Retrieved from: http://wallblog.co.uk/2011

/02/09/we-are-witnessing-the-beginning-of-the-end-of-facebook/

Markes, Kitayama (1991) as cited in *DeAndrea, D. C., Shaw, A. S., & Levine, T. R.

(2010). Online Language: The Role of Culture In Self-Expression and Self-Construal

on Facebook. Journal of Language & Social Psychology,

29(4), 425-442. doi:10.1177/0261927X10377989

Maushart, S. (2010). The winter of our disconnect. NY: Penguin

McQuail, Denis. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory. 5th

ed. London: Sage

Mead, G.H. (1934/1913). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

57

*Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on Facebook

CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 13(4), 357-364.

doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257

Mezrich, B. (2009). The accidental billionaires: the founding of facebook. NY: Random

House

*Miller, H. (1995, June) The Presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on

the internet. Nottingham Trent University paper presented at Embodied Knowledge

and Virtual Space Conference Goldsmiths' College, University of London.

Mitchell, G. (Host). (2010, December 21). Digital Planet [audio podcast]. London:

BBC World Service Programmes. Retrieved March 28, 2011 from

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00cgkn3

Napoli, P.M (2010). Revisiting ‘mass communication’ and the ‘work’ of the audience

in the new media environment. Media, Culture & Society, May, 32 (3), p505-516

doi: 10.1177/0163443710361658

Newsfeed. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/help/?page=408

*Nguyen, J., & Brown, B. (2010). Making meanings, meaning identity:

Hmong adolescents: perceptions and use of language and style as

identity symbols. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Blackwell Publishing

Limited), 20(4), 849-868.

doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00666.x

*Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A

comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld

New Media & Society, 11(1-2), 199-220. doi:10.1177/1461444808099577

Patel, K. (2010). How your likes are turning FB into the loyalty card of the

58

Internet. Advertising Age. 81, 23.

*Patterson, M. M., Bigler, R. S., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2010). When personal

identities confirm versus conflict with group identities: Evidence from an

intergroup paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 652-670.

Pauly, J. J. (2004). Media studies and the dialogue of democracy; in Anderson, R.,

Baxter, L., and Cissna, K, (2004) Dialogue: Theorizing differences in communication

studies. London: Sage Publications.

Pearson, E. (2009). All the world wide web‟s a stage: The performance of identity in

online social networks. Firstmonday.org. Vol 14. Number 3-2. Retrieved from

http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2162

Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly. New York, NY: Random House

Postman, N. (2004). The information age: A blessing or a curse? Harvard

International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 3-10.

Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M. (2000). Group norms in computer-mediated

communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3), July, pp. 341-371

Renganayar, C.D. (2011, February 13). The Facebook tsunami. New Straits Times, 28.

Document ID: 2265219571.

Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Press

Rice, J. (2009). The church of Facebook: How the hyperconnected are redefining

community. Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook Publishing

Richerson, P.J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University

of Chicago Press

Richerson, P.J. & Boyd, R. (2005). Tribal instincts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Rosenbaum, S. (2010). Curation nation: How to live in a world where consumers

59

are created NY: McGraw-Hill.

Rubin,R., A., Haridakis, P., Piele, L. (2010). Communication Research: Strategies

and Sources, Boston: Wadsworth.

*Rybas, N. (2008). Technoculture in practice: performing identity and difference

in social network systems. Dissertation, Bowling Green State University. Retrieved

from Dissertations & Theses: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection

(Publication No. AAT 3375048).

Sherwood, J. (1965). Self-identity and referent others. Sociometry. Vol 28, No. 1, March,

p. 66-81.

Shuman, R. (2010). Retrieved from:

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100629006832/en/

Exacq-Technologies-Joins-Physical-Security-Interoperability-Alliance

Social Network Sites (SNS). Retrieved from http://www.pcm.ag.com/

/encyclopedia term/0,2542,t+social+networking%26i=55316,00.asp

Soon, J. (2010). Did Facebook absorb free will: the role of peer pressure

in the rise of from Facebook. Retrieved from

https://ritdml.rit.edu/bitstream/handle/1850/12687/JSoon

thesis7-19-2010.pdf?sequence=1

Spohn, M. (2005). Organizational and leadership theory: An evolutionary psychology

perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology. Vol 26, p. 6.

Stoelhorst, J.W. (2005). The firm as a voluntary tribe: towards an evolutionary theory

of the firm. University of Amsterdam Business School Journal. Retrieved January 20,

2010 from http://Ebscohost BusinessPremier.

Swartz, J. (2011, February 1), p. 10. Communications overload. Gannett News Service

60

Retrieved February 20, 2011, from

http://proxy.foley.gonzaga.edu:2048/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com

/pqdweb?did=2255695251&Fmt=3&clientId=10553&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Tag. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/how_5945276_tag-people-

facebook-status.html

*Taylor, D. M., & Usborne, E. (2010). When I Know Who "We" Are, I Can Be "Me":

The Primary Role of Cultural Identity Clarity for Psychological Well-Being.

Transcultural Psychiatry, 47(1), 93-111. doi:10.1177/1363461510364569

The Economic Times (2011, January 23). (author unknown). Retrieved from:

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/6063819.cms?prtpage=1

Trifonas, P.P. Lyotard‟s Futurology. (2003) from Futures of critical theory: Dreams of

difference. Peters, M., Olssen, M., Lankshear, C. eds. Lanham, MD: Rowman &

Littlefield.

*Turner,J. & Oronato, R. (2010). “Social identity, personality and the self-concept: a self-

categorization perspective. Rediscovering social identity: key readings number 16,

pp. 315-339,

Valentino-DeVries, J. (2011, March 17). Privacy Measure Attracts Support

Wall Street Journal. (Eastern Edition), p. B1. (Document ID: 2294174341).

Wall. Retrieved from http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/

/0%2C2542%2Ct%3DFacebook+Wall&i%3D62078%2C00.asp

Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication:

Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in

Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002

Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D. and Tong, S. T. (2008)

61

The role of friends‟ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on

Facebook: are we known by the company we keep?. Human Communication

Research, 34: 28–49. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x

Ward, B. (2011). Retrieved from: http://allfacebook.com/5-tricks-to-carve-out-a-clique

Wood, J.T. (2004). Foreword: entering into dialogue in Anderson, R., Baxter, L., and

Cissna, K, (2004) Dialogue: Theorizing differences in communication studies.

London: Sage Publications.

Zimmer, M. (2008). Preface: critical perspectives on Web 2.0. Firstmonday.org;

13 (3) 3, Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/

index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2137/1943

Zweig, J. (2011, January 8). The Intelligent Investor: Why the fuss over

Facebook doesn't make it a home run. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). p. B.1

62