Top Banner
The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not without forests. S.T. Dana
68

The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not without forests.

S.T. Dana

Page 2: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• What are the major forest types, how do they differ, and how do they relate to wildlife populations?

• How do forest structure and composition affect wildlife?

• What are the pros and cons of forest management practices for wildlife?

Page 3: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• How does forest ownership (private v. public) affect wildlife management?

• How have forests and their management changed?

• What are the major issues related to forests & wildlife?

• Who cares?

Page 4: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Forest v. rangeland

– >40 cm/yr rainfall– Vegetation structure

• Layers & closure

– Dominant vegetation: trees*• Florida confusing

– Overstory tree density• Basal area (ft2/acre; m2/ha)

– DBH (4.5 ft/1.37 m)

• Coniferous v. deciduous – Softwood v. hardwood

• Evergreen

Page 5: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Forest types of U.S. & Canada

– Tropical moist broadleaf– Tropical dry broadleaf– Temperate broadleaf & mixed– Temperate coniferous– Boreal/taiga

Page 6: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Tropical moist broadleaf

• Tropical dry broadleaf– Puerto Rico

• Mahogany, ebony, mamey, mangrove, Spanish cedar, Sierra palm

• Acacia, yucca, cacti, royal palm

– Hawaii• Ohia• Koa

Page 7: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Temperate broadleaf & mixed

– Eastern U.S. & Canada• Oaks, hickories, maples, beech, basswood,

buckeye, birches, (chestnut)• Ashes, elm, cottonwood, sweetgum, water tupelo,

sycamore• Hemlock, pines, red cedar, spruces, firs

• Best fall foliage

Page 8: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Temperate coniferous

– Southeastern, Middle Atlantic, & Florida Sand Pine• Gum, cypress, bald cypress, oaks, magnolia, ashes, elm• Pines

– Piney Woods• Oaks• Pines

– Rocky Mountain & Pacific Coast• Oaks• Firs, spruces, hemlock, red cedar, cedar,

pines, sequoia

Page 9: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Boreal/taiga (northern coniferous)

– Canada & Alaska• Aspen, birch• Spruces, firs, tamarack/larch (Smokey Gold), pines

Page 10: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Major forest types of the Southeast (Dickson 2001)

– Pine plantation (often slash in FL)– Natural pine (longleaf, slash, shortleaf, loblolly)– Oak-pine– Upland hardwood (oaks)– Bottomland hardwood (tupelo, cypress, sycamore)

David J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, www.forestryimages.org

Page 11: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Forest Wildlife

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

Page 12: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• History of the forests– Dynamic

• Fire• Wind• Floods• Ice• Insects & Disease• People

Dave Powell, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Andrew J. Boone, South Carolina Forestry Commission, www.forestryimages.org

Page 13: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• History of the North American forests– Regional differences in trends

Page 14: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• History of the Southeast forests (Dickson 2001)

Upland Hardwood

Natural Pine

Bottomland Hardwood

Oak-Pine

Pine Plantation

Page 15: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Status of the North American forests

Page 16: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Status of the North American forests– ~25-38% of U.S. (~200-307 million ha)

• 75% east of 100th meridian• 64% commercial (v. industrial)

– >1.4 m3 of wood/ha/yr– Not in park, wilderness, or other non-timber uses

– ~45% of Canada is forest (401 million ha)• 50% commercial

Page 17: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Status of the Southeast forests (Dickson 2001)

– ~50% of land is forest (~87 million ha)• 94% commercial timberland

– Composition• 37% upland hardwoods• 15% bottomland hardwoods• 14% oak-pine• 18% natural pine• 16% pine plantation

– Age/size• 29% seedling-sapling• 26% poletimber• 45% sawtimber

William D. Boyer, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org Bob Farrah, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 18: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Forest ownership in U.S. (Yonce 1983)

– Public: 55.3 million ha• Federal: 42.8 million ha• State: 9.6 million ha• Local: 2.9 million ha

– Private: 142.2 million ha• Forest industry: 27.5 million ha• Other: 114.7 million ha

Page 19: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Forest ownership in Southeast (Dickson 2001)

– Public: ~8.5 million ha

– Private: ~72.5 million ha• Forest industry: ~16.6 million ha• Other: ~55.9 million ha

• Ownership affects management & use

Page 20: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife• Federal

– National Forest System• USDA Forest Service

– Multiple-use

– USDI-BLM• Multiple-use

– Others: parks, refuges, etc.

• State Forest System– Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services

(FDACS)• Forest Service (Division of Forestry)

– Others: parks, etc.

Page 21: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Economic value of forest products– Saw logs, veneer, pulpwood, fuelwood, charcoal,

Christmas trees, maple syrup, medicinal plants, other non-wood products, & others

– Nationwide• Billions/yr!

– Southeast (Dickson 2001)

• 1984: $6,100,000,000– 10% of economy– 10% of workforce

• Replacing Northwest as largest producer today

Page 22: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

David J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

Page 23: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Jamie Welsh, , www.forestryimages.org

Page 24: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

North Carolina State University Archives, North Carolina State University, www.forestryimages.org

Page 25: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

David J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

Page 26: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Chuck Bargeron, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

Page 27: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

David J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

Page 28: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho, www.forestryimages.org

Page 29: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

David J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

Page 30: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeIssues & Management

• Wood products

• Disease & insects

• Roads

• Recreation – Off-road vehicles (ORV’s)

Billy Humphries, Forest Resource Consultants, Inc., www.forestryimages.org

Page 31: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeIssues & Management

• Grazing livestock– Silvopasture & agroforestry

• Overabundant herbivores

• Fire– Fuel loads

• Water

• Ownership

Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho, www.forestryimages.org

Page 32: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Forestry– Silviculture

• Silvics

– Sustained yield of wood products• Pinchot & Roosevelt

– Multiple-use

USDA Forest Service - Rocky Mountain Region Archives, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 33: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Forests & Management– Structure

• Vertical• Horizontal

– Composition

– Scale• Spatial• Temporal

Bob Farrah, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 34: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Silvicultural– Harvest– Regeneration– Tending/Intermediate Treatments

Page 35: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Harvest– None (preservation)– Even-aged– Uneven-aged (selective)

– Other considerations• Rotation time• Cutting cycle• Species

– Shade tolerant v. intolerant species

– Product

• Site index

Page 36: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Even-aged harvest management– Clearcuts– Shelterwood cuts– Seed tree cuts

Page 37: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Philip McDonald, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 38: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Scott Roberts, Mississippi State University, www.forestryimages.org

Page 39: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

John D. Hodges, Mississippi State University, www.forestryimages.org

Page 40: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Uneven-aged (selective) harvest management– Single-tree selection cut– Group-selection cut

Page 41: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Bob Frank, www.forestryimages.org

Page 42: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Dave Powell, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 43: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

Even-aged

Uneven-aged

Stands

Page 44: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

Even-aged

Page 45: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

Uneven-aged

Page 46: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeComparison of Management Techniques

Characteristic Even-Aged Uneven-Aged

Harvest Method Clearcut

Shelterwood

Seed tree

Single-tree selection

Group selection

Type of trees Usually shade intolerant Shade tolerant

Stand appearance Uniform tree height

Often aesthetically unattractive

Variation in tree height

Aesthetically acceptable

Forest appearance Patchwork of various ages Aesthetically acceptable

Large expanse of uniformly mixed sizes of trees

Type of wildlife use Mobile species adapted to early successional and mixed successional stages

Species adapted to mature forest conditions

Page 47: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Regeneration– Natural (advance)

• Even-aged harvest management– Clearcuts– Shelterwood cuts– Seed tree cuts– Coppice

• Uneven-aged harvest management– Single-tree selection cut– Group-selection cut– Coppice

James N. Long, Utah State University, www.forestryimages.org

Edward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, www.forestryimages.org

Page 48: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Regeneration– Artificial

• Site preparation– Mechanical– Chemical– Prescribed fire

• Site Improvement– Fertilizer– Drainage & irrigation

• Direct seeding• Propagule

• Monocultures & disturbance

John D. Hodges, Mississippi State University, www.forestryimages.org

James H. Miller, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 49: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeManagement Techniques

• Tending/Intermediate Treatments– Herbicides– Pesticides– Thinning– Pruning– Prescribed fire– Sanitation cuts– Salvage cuts

– Timber Stand Improvement (TSI)

USDA Forest Service - Rocky Mountain Region Archives, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 50: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Evergreen cover– Thermal & escape cover

• E.g., deer yards

William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, www.forestryimages.org James Denny Ward, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 51: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Live den trees, wolf/legacy trees, snags, logs, & course woody debris

Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho, www.forestryimages.org

Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho, www.forestryimages.orgJerry A. Payne, USDA ARS, www.forestryimages.org

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Archives, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, www.forestryimages.org

Page 52: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Mast, browse, & forage plants– Selective cutting– Coppice

– Hard v. soft mast

Jerry A. Payne, USDA ARS, www.forestryimages.orgDavid J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

David J. Moorhead, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org

Page 53: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Forest edges & “brushy” areas

Billy Humphries, Forest Resource Consultants, Inc., www.forestryimages.org

Page 54: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Rights-of-way

Max Williamson, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 55: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Openings

Ronald F. Billings, Texas Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 56: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeSpecial Habitat Features

• Water & riparian areas

Dave Powell, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org Dave Powell, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 57: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeLarge Managed Forests

• Generally managed at the landscape scale– Cut size, type, shape, amount of edge,

fragmentation, interspersion, & connectivity

80 year old forest New cuts40 year old forest

Page 58: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Large managed forests v. woodlots– Scale

Page 59: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• What about old growth?– Unique– Irreplaceable?

Page 60: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• What about old growth?– Core areas & corridors– Soften fragmentation

OldGrowth

Age = 60

Age = 70

Age = 0

Age = 10 Age = 40

Age = 50

Age = 20

Age = 30

After Harris 1984

OldGrowth

Age = 60

Age = 20

Age = 50

Age = 10 Age = 40

Age = 0

Age = 70

Age = 30

Page 61: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Forest fires– Smokey the Bear v. Let it burn

Dale Wade, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org

Page 62: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Single species v. biodiversity management?

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

Page 63: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Heterogeneity in the forest landscape– Ruffed grouse v. ovenbirds & spotted owls

Page 64: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Heterogeneity in the forest landscape– Plantations & even-aged management

as monocultures

William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, www.forestryimages.org

Page 65: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Can wildlife and the production of forest products coexist?

• Do we need forestry?

• The case of the Tropics– Are Protected Areas enough?

Page 66: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeIncentive Programs

• Federal/Farm Bill– USDA Forest Service

• Community Forest & Open Space Program (CFOSP)• Healthy Forest Reserve Program (HFRP)

• Cooperative Forest Innovation Partnership Grants (CFIPG)• Cooperative Conservation Partnership Initiative (CCPI)

• Other “farm” programs

Page 67: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & WildlifeIncentive Programs

• Federal– USDA Forest Service

• Forest Stewardship Program (FSP)– Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act (1978)– Farm Bill?

• State– Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

• Landowner Assistance Program (LAP)

Page 68: The importance of nontimber values [of forests] is dramatized in the provocative assertion that modern civilization could get along without wood, but not.

Forests & Wildlife

• Food, cover, water, & space

• Interspersion & connectivity

• Disturbance

• So what?