8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
1/22
The Impact of Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
Keith Good
FarmPolicy.com
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
2/22
2007 The German Marshall Fund o the United States. All rights reserved.
No part o this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any orm or by any means without permission
in writing rom the German Marshall Fund o the United States (GMF). Please direct inquiries to:
The German Marshall Fund o the United States
1744 R Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
T 1 202 745 3950
F 1 202 265 1662
This publication can be downloaded or ree at http://www.gmus.org/publications/index.cm. For more inor-
mation on biouels, please visit http://www.gmus.org/economics/template/page.cm?page_id=93.
GMF Paper Series
The GMF Paper Series presents research on a variety o transatlantic topics by sta, ellows, and partners o the
German Marshall Fund o the United States. The views expressed here are those o the author and do not neces-
sarily represent the view o GMF. Comments rom readers are welcome; reply to the mailing address above or by
e-mail to [email protected].
About GMF
The German Marshall Fund o the United States (GMF) is a nonpartisan American public policy and grant-
making institution dedicated to promoting greater cooperation and understanding between the United Statesand Europe.
GMF does this by supporting individuals and institutions working on transatlantic issues, by convening leaders
to discuss the most pressing transatlantic themes, and by examining ways in which transatlantic cooperation can
address a variety o global policy challenges. In addition, GMF supports a number o initiatives to strengthen
democracies.
Founded in 1972 through a git rom Germany as a permanent memorial to Marshall Plan assistance, GMF
maintains a strong presence on both sides o the Atlantic. In addition to its headquarters in Washington, DC,
GMF has seven ofces in Europe: Berlin, Bratislava, Paris, Brussels, Belgrade, Ankara, and Bucharest.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
3/22
The Impact of Renewable Energyon the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
A Report to the German Marshall Fund of the United States
K G
P, FP., I.1
J F, G M F U S
M 2007
A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1 FP. U.S. . U , ,v, U.S. EU .
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
4/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate1
S S 2006, k ,
v
.
-v k
,
k v v
2007 F B. C B
O j
v k . A j -
, C
---
, .
F
x k
, v
v . H k
v
z .
Abstract
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
5/22
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
6/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate3
B v z 1996
. I x x
k
v
k . Hv,
k 1997 1998,
k A ,
z
.1
A k 1990, k
. I , M 2001, C
2002, v -
k .
k $73.5
-
j v 2002 2011.2
k v,
C
2002 F B v : 1)
k ; 2) ,
x
; 3) - ,
z
1990.3
I 2006,
v . v
I A 2006 $2.15,
v $5.37. B
1 E, A B.W. U.S. F P: T F 200 Y.Economic Research Service, Agricultural Outlook, M 2000.
2 W, P; Y, C. E P, M. 2002F A: Pv I C Mk.A I B N. (AIB778), Nv 2002.
3 I.
F 2007, I j $3.86 $7.15,
v, M v
$4.0625 C
B , $1.72
10- v.4 U.S. D
A (USDA) 2006-07
k v v
$3.00 $3.40,
v v U.S.
x
$6.10 $6.50 . USDA
j x v $3.00 x 10 .
Current Market Dynamic
-, -
k v
x
. S 2004, U.S.
10
2006 .
S v j
v. S 2004, U.S.
3 2006
v v
3.18 . S A
.
S q x
.
Ex k
v. C x
2006 (2.25 )
v 1.88 v v
x (2000-01 2005-06),
v 1979-80 (2.4 ), 1980-81 (2.39
) 1989-90 (2.37 ). N,
4 R, P. E B H H C: HF P. Bloomberg News, F 9, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
7/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States4
USDA v v 1978.5
S x 2006 (1.08
), v v
v 1 v v
x (2000-01 2005-06). Lk,
v ,
x .
k
v
,
- ,
x .
V v
. A
v
v .
P q
C q
x 1990.
A
x k MBE ( -
) , x
- q.6
O v
. I 2004, C
x V E
Ex x C (VEEC) v x
2010 x $0.51 ,
v
. I ,
U S v
2.5 $0.54 x
.
5 I.
6 Nvk, N H, J. C E P R E? he Main Street Economist. FRv Bk K C, J 2007.
O
E P A 2005,
R F S (RFS) q
U S
. RFS
v 2006
2012 4.0 7.5
.7 I S U J
23, 2007, P G W. B
q 35
v
2017 v 2012
A v v k , k
. W U.S. S
C A, N F
J 10, 2007, USDA C E
D. K C x , I 2000,
1.6
U S, z
6 2000 v. I 2006,
5
, 20 2006 v.
D. C ,
USDA U.S.
250 2006, 173-
2005. F 2005-06
, 8
; 2006-07,
x 2.6
, 13
. 2.6 q
x 229 , 7 U.S.
2006.
7 Bk, A Z, Sv. E R CMk. A Wv, A 2006.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
8/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate5
As the 2002
Farm Bill is due
to expire in
September 2007
a key concern
for policymakers
in drafting the
2007 Farm Bill is
the sustainability
of these current
market condition
S 2006. I 2004,
v
$28.74 (k J 30). B A 26,
2005, v
$58.74; J 2006, v
$65.11
(k J 30).8
k
. I J 2004, v k
O, Nk $1.40 . I A 2005, v
$2.07 . B J 2006,
k v
$3.58.9
v v
x x .
I , E P A 2005
x
v x
q. A ,
MBE v
-x x q.
M MBE v
MBE
k. E P A
2005
MBE. Hv,
MBE
q . A
, S
q v v MBE
8 E I A. A C S PFOB W E Ex V (D B) 1978 2007.
9 Nk U G E Av RkP. O Nk Gv W S.
.
[E
P A 2005] k .10 A
, MBE
1990 v q
x k MBE. B q
x M [2006],
,
x k.11
MBE
-,
, -
k k,
2006.
S, M 2006,
he New York imes , [E]
$1.30 ,
v
MBE.12
Sustainability
A 2002 F B x S
2007, k k
2007 F B
k . j
k
k
k z . Mk
x v
1996 2002 F B .
v -1990 ,
10 Kk, Dv Bjj, Vk. G S CP P Dv E C. Te New Yorkimes, A 22, 2006.
11 he Wall Street Journal. A G G I. E, M 8,2006.
12 W, M L. N R G H Dv U P. he New York imes, M 6, 2006.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
9/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States6
Because corn-
based ethanol
may have to
compete with
unleaded gasoline
as a low-cost input
for fuel blenders,
as production
exceeds mandate,
ethanol demand
will be influenced
by the price of oil.
v 2002 .
k .
-
.
Brief Analysis of Corn-Based
Ethanol Production
D k k v. R
RFS E P
A 2005, 4.0 2006
7.5
2012.
q v ,
. Ev
E P A 2005
x , q
k .13 A
, x ,
-v . D
q,
x
MBE, v
,
v .14
Demand for ethanol. O
-
q x
. F
13 Nvk, N H, J. C E P R E? Te Main Street Economist. T FRv Bk K C, J 2007.
14 Nk U G E Av RkP. O Nk Gv W S.
U S k k - v k
q . E
x
RFS q x
v , v
-
. I v,
, k
x
x k v.
I
. D ,
k v
. E-
. F,
v x .
, k ,
-
U S.15 A
v , ,
k k .16
j
x 10
v k
.
S k v
10 , 7
150
.17 R F A
5.4 . Hv, J 2007,
15 Y, B D. S, R. E B-: A, I, Mk C R Ex P. CRS R C, RL 33928,M 16, 2007.
16 I.
17 F, J. W. Forbes, F 12, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
10/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate7
x U S
j 11.4
x .18 I
RFS MBE x
v, x v
v
j .
C,
q U S. S
, v
, . B -
v
- ,
x ,
. A
k k v
.
Corn and ethanol price relationships. A
x v
v
v v . I
v
x 33
v $0.51 x
.19
E v z
x k. I
$1.69 (v k
O D
2006) $2.43 (v
k O D
18 C, K. S B U.S. S A-, N F. J 10, 2007.
19 H, C; , W D, O. E E. P Ex, D 2006.
2006), v . B
x ,
x ,
0.67 ( j) $0.51 (
x ). U , -
$1.69
$1.64 .20 I ,
x k v
.
A
. A ,
kv
. E v
k
.
v
j x
v. A ,
kv .
R F Rv Bk
K C , B
, $1.55
$2.13 $2.71
$40 $60 $80
, v. I , Nvk
H
$40 , k
$3.50, 9
.
E P Uv v
20 G, D. C: S C M S D.Uv I Ex, J 7, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
11/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States8
If producers plant
more corn, the
price of alternative
program crops
such as soybeans
and wheat could
also increase.
, , . B
, H, , D
k
$60 ,
$3.96 kv.
Hv, v
v
x $0.25 ,
$4.82
kv
$60 .
C A R Dv
I S Uv
k
$60 , kv k
$4.05 . B
v
v v ,
I S kv
$2.67
$40 $5.43
$80 .21
R W I S Uv
kv ,
E $0.10
x
$0.28 v .
2.8 .
C, v
-
I
I USDA A Mk
21 E, A; kz, S; H, D J.; Bk,B A. H, C E. T L-R I C-B E G, O, Lvk S: AP A. CARD B P 06-BP 49. C- A R Dv, Nv 2006.
Sv (AMS). D v ,
. A
F 9, 2007, v
$1.89 v
$3.73 $2.68.
S, v $1.79
v $3.66
$2.48 F 2.
Corn supply. F
. A v, U.S. x .
v
j k .
S k
v ,
. Y k
. Av U.S.
2004 160.4
149.1 2006. A
v v 30 ,
v .
I v k
,
, k
.
I ,
v
. I
Bz A
k
, , .
U.S. .
Federal policy. A -
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
12/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate9
. C, v j -
. I S U
J 23, 2007, P G W. B
v . P
q v
v
-
. I , $0.54 x
x 2009. S v
v . S
v ,
U.S. k v
. v
j v.
E v C
x 2009,
$0.51.22 v
k
v .
Technological change. v -
-
,
v k
, k, v k
. A v k
v ,
k, k
, v . S
v
110 .
22 D J N Sv. Ex: C. M ED. F 23, 2007.
, C,
84 .23
Hv, F 2007, U.S.
G v
.24 v
v k,
k ,
- .
I j,
F 2007, USDA , C U
S x 200910,
q . B
j, x 12
, 4.3
. j
E P A
2005, MBE v,
,
v v .
USDA , L
j
v x v . Rv
v
, v
v v
x
.
Federal Budget Considerations
v 2007 F B
H S B C. Pj
CB O (CBO) v
23 J, Dv. T C T. National Review, F 22,2007.
24 C, D. G P P W E-. he Atlanta Journal-Constitution, F 8, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
13/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States10
BC . CBO ,
J, M, A,
v -
,
j k ,
, .
A x
k
- k
. S
k , v v
.
B C M CBO
v A
C . S B
C v
, CBO
B C v
F B
. P BC x CBO
, v
1994, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2005. Hv,
B C
,
A C x
.
A k
B C x CBO
C P--- , PG. U v
, H
S B C,
x x
v
q
, x .
CBO M 2007
j C C C (CCC)
x $27.5
FY2008-2016 (S F 2) CBO
M 2006. CBO
j $4.2
FY 2007, $3.9 FY 2008, $2.9
FY 2009 . I
, $15
$27.5 j CCC .
,
v
.25
A x
, k v
. O M
30, 2007, USDA , Dv
, U.S. 15
2007
90.5 ,
1944 12.1
2006.26
k
, ,
. A
,
. A USDA,
C
B G P, x
D S.U.S. 67.1
25 Mk, J. F C P: P I C. C R Sv, RS21999, M8, 2007.
26 USDA P R. C A Ex S 2007,USDA S. M 30, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
14/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate11
A simple extensi
of the 2002 Farm
Bill would not
only be one of
the lowest-cost
options available
to lawmakers, bu
it might also be
one of the only
ways for farm
policy to fit within
a low budget
baseline for
spending on the
2007 Farm Bill.
, 1996
8.4 11
2006. A x
12.1 , 20 2006.27
U
CCC
v .
I ,
v ,
, -
,
k . A k
, j
. G ,
.28
27 I.
28 Mk, R Aq, P.I. C S SA. B O, A 2, 2007.
Implications
R
v v
U.S.
. S v v
x . A
x 2002 F B
- v
k,
2007 F B. I ,
x 2002 F B v
-k ,
. A ,
k k v
- v
, .29
A CBO ,
z v
29 Bk, B A. F P A H P: WD W W k? Iowa Ag Review, F 2006.
Figure 2: Ethanol demand impact on commodity program costs: 2007 Baseline minus 2006 Baseline
Source: CBO March 2006 and 2007 Baselines
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6-7
$billion
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Fiscal year
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Other commodity and conservationCorn payments
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
15/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States12
.
z,
A F B F (AFBF),
2007 F B
v z 2002
F B, j. AFBF
x k
CBO , q
v .30 M,
, N A
W G (NAWG) A SA (ASA), v
x F B
k .31
O , N
C G (NCGA R), v
k v
-
v v
(NCGA). Oz C
C G A (CCGA)
A F (AF) v
v
-v
v v
k .32
O J 31, 2007, U.S. S A
USDA 2007 .
A , 65
30 A F B F (AFBF) P R.AFBF U F Nx F B 2002 Lv. D7, 2006.
31 N A W G (NAWG) P R-. NAWG B Av 2007 F B P. O- 5, 2006. A S A (ASA) P R.USDA A A W S G NB I S N 2007 F B. O 12, 2006.
32 C C G A (CCGA) R. M-z A F F P. S 27, 2006;A F (AF) R. A 2007: A NFk D U.S. F P. M 2006.
2002 ,
, ,
v .
I USDA :
Strengthendisasterreliefbyestablishinga
v- - ,
v v , k
,
;
Provide$1.6billioninnewfundingfor , v
,
, $2.1
j
$500 -
- v, ;
Increaseconservationfundingby$7.8billion,
v
, Ev
Q Iv P R
W E P.33
M , C
R Sv R ,
A 2007
A . ,
USDA S Mk J, k
-
k q, ,
. 34
v k ,
v
33 USDA P R. J Uv 2007 F B P-. J 31, 2007.
34 J, R. F B P Lv A 110 C. C R Sv, RL 33934,M 22, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
16/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate13
Future ethanol-
industry growth
will require
increased
investment in
technologies tha
use cellulosic
feedstocks.
. N v j I
,
F B
k PG x
.
Lk, v
, k
v v
v v ,
k q v
PG .
A
W Oz
(WO) U.S.
x
. A
C R Sv x
, P x 1990
k
,
v v
. Fx v
v ( )
( , not
v). F v
v v
v,
k v v .35
W ,
USDA , I M
2005, WO U.S.
, x ,
35 Mk, J. F C P: P I C. C R Sv, RS21999, M8, 2007.
v.36
S v v
k
.37
B WO ,
x
v ,
v 2005,
k v
.38 I , 108
C
( S C
Cv A 2004, P.L. 108-465).39
M v v ,
k v S
v v,
,
x
2007 F B . Hv, v
x
q .
S v v
k v
j v -,
36 J, D; K, B; Y, E; Hf,L; L, G B, V. E F V P R: H W Mk B
Af? USDA-ERS, Nv, 2006.37 Mk, J. F C P: P I C. C R Sv, RS21999, M8, 2007.
38 H, S J. Sz A F. he Chicagoribune, M 16, 2007.
39 R, J M. S C I 109 C.C R Sv, RL32951, O 24, 2006.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
17/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States14
. P EvQ Iv P, Cv Rv
P, W Rv P,
Cv S P, x
2007 F B, v
, -
, z .
A j -,
-
v
v
. A ,
. A
, L
[Cv Rv]
v
,
A D
z.40 Pk
j
v
Cv Rv P.
A , vk v
-v Cv
Rv P
. S
vk , , k, k,
v
k xz v
v k v
. I ,
40 B, P. S C P F USDA BP F Cv L. Te Des MoinesRegister, M 24, 2007.
k v v,
x .
N vk v
. I
v
(x )
x k
k.
M, k k k
x 2007 F B.
S, H A C
C C P , F
- q
v
k. A
k x v
. F B
x
v
.41 S, S R L (R-IN)
, W
,
xv ,
. F
z , I
2000,
x .42 F v
k v
.
v H
Rv v
2007 F B.
41 P, U.S. R. C (D-MN). C .T H, M 13, 2007.
42 L, U.S. S. R (R-IN). E O CN F P P. T H, M 13, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
18/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate15
Budgetary
pressures
stemming from
high market
prices, brought
on in large part
by the increased
use of renewable
fuels, will impact
the policy
direction of the
2007 Farm Bill.
Healthy Farms, Foods, and Fuels Act of 2007(H.R.1551) k j v
v A
, v, v
,
. [Act]
v
, x
.43
A , Equitable Agriculture oday for
a Healthy America Act (EA Healthy Act)
k,
,
v .44
I S Uv P B Bk
z C
. D. Bk
, A z
C k ,
x z
C .
k C :
1. D v v k
j v -v.
2. K
v .
3. C v
,
v .
43 K, R. R. R. K G, S MzI Mj F B R L. N R,M 15, 2007.
44 Cz, D R. R. Cz, P, Sz, K,L, MC I B B P SC. N R, M 20, 2007.
I , k v z
. USDA
v C-C P k
v- -
x . H,
v
U S.45
Hv, k
v U.S. x
v , k k
v ;
v k
. ,
k k
, ,
, v
j v k v
, ,
v , k
, v
.46
D
, k
v k
z,
v v
,
. B
k ,
,
2007 F B.
45 D, C; E, A Ck, N. T20 C U.S. A FP. USDA E R Sv, J 2005.
46 I.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
19/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States16
Bibliography
A F B F (AFBF) PR. AFBF U F Nx F B
2002 Lv. D 7, 2006.
A F (AF) R. A
2007: A N Fk D U.S.
F P. M 2006.
A S A (ASA) P
R. USDA A A W
S G N B I S N
2007 F B. O 12, 2006.
Bk, B A. F P A H P:W D W W k? Iowa Ag Review,
F 2006.
Bk, A Z, Sv. E R
C Mk. A Wv, A 2006.
B, P. S USDA
v .
he Des Moines RegisterM 24, 2007.
B, P G W. S U
A, J 23, 2007.
Cz, D R. R. Cz, P,
Sz, K, L, MC I
B B P S C. N
R, M 20, 2007.
C, D. G P P W
E. he Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
F 8, 2007.
C C G A (CCGA)
R. Mz A F F
P. S 27, 2006.
C, K. S B U.S. S
A, N F. J 10, 2007.
C B O. M B
B Pj.
D, C; E, A Ck,N. 20 C U.S.
A F P. USDA E
R Sv, J 2005.
D J N. Ex: C. M
E D. F 23, 2007.
E O. B F.
F 18, 2007.
E, A; kz, S; H, D J.;
Bk, B A. H, C E. L-
R I C-B E G,O, Lvk S: A P
A. CARD B P 06-BP 49.
C A R Dv,
Nv 2006.
E, A B.W. U.S. F P: F
200 Y. Economic Research Service, Agricultural
Outlook, M 2000.
E I A. A C
S P FOB W E Ex
V (D B)1978 2007.
E P A 2005. P L 109-58,
A 8, 2005.
F, J. W. Forbes, F 12,
2007.
G, D. C: S C M S
D. Uv I Ex, J
7, 2007.
H, S J. Sz A F. he
Chicago ribune, M 16, 2007.
H, C; , W D, O.
E E. P Ex,
D 2006.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
20/22
he Impact o Renewable Energy
on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate17
J, Mk. S B H BC. F 15, 2007.
J, D; K, B; Y, E;
H, L; L, G B,
V. E F V P
R: H W Mk B A?
USDA ERS, Nv 2006.
J, R. F B P
Lv A 110 C.
C R Sv, RL33934, M
22, 2007.
J, Dv. C . National Review,
F 22, 2007.
K, R R. R. K G, S
Mz I Mj F B R
L. N R, M 15, 2007.
Kk, Dv Bjj, Vk. G
S C P P Dv E
C. he New York imes, A 22, 2006.
L, U.S. S. R (R-IN). E
O C N F P
P. H, M 13, 2007.
Mk, J. F C P: P
I C. C R
Sv, RS21999, M 8, 2007.
Mk, R Aq, P.I. C
S S A. B O,
A 2, 2007.
N A W G (NAWG)
P R. NAWG B Av 2007 FB P. O 5, 2006.
N C G A (NCGA)
R. F N D F P.
O 19, 2006.
Nk U G E AvRk P. O Nk Gv W S.
Nvk, N H, J. C
E P R E? he Main
Street Economist. F Rv Bk
K C, J 2007.
P, U.S. R. C (D-MN). C
B. H, M 13, 2007.
R, J M. S C I
109 C. C R Sv,
RL32951, O 24, 2006.
R, P. E B H H
C: H F P. Bloomberg News,
F 9, 2007.
he Wall Street Journal. A G G I.
E, M 8, 2006.
he Wall Street Journal. G F.
E, M 28, 2006.
USDA. A Pj 2016. F
14, 2007.
USDA. C A Ex S 2007,
USDA S. N R, M 30, 2007.
USDA. C V. N A
S Sv, F 15, 2007.
USDA. I A Mk Sv. I
E C & C-P P V
(F) S D, R# NW_GR212.
USDA. N A S Sv.
P Rv. J 31, 1007.
USDA. N A S Sv.
Pv P M 30, 2007.
USDA P R. J Uv 2007 F
B P. J 31, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
21/22
he German Marshall Fund o the United States18
USDA. S J B Pv. F5, 2007.
W, M L. N R F G
H Dv U P. he New York imes,
M 6, 2006.
W, P; Y, C. E P, M.
2002 F A: Pv I
C Mk. A I
B N. (AIB778), Nv 2002.
W, R. G U: Mk R C O P, C A N. Iowa
Farm Outlook, F 2, 2007.
W Ok B. W A S
D E. M 9, 2007.
Y, B D. S, R. E
B: A, I,
Mk C R Ex
P. CRS R C, RL33928,
M 16, 2007.
8/8/2019 The Impact of Renewable Energy on the U.S. Farm Policy Debate
22/22