The Impact of IT on Processes Return on Investment in RE/AEC November 16, 2001 John D. Macomber Harvard Design School BuildingVision.net George B. H. Macomber Company RECI_2001 Harvard Design School
Jan 11, 2016
The Impact of IT on ProcessesReturn on Investment in RE/AEC
November 16, 2001
John D. MacomberHarvard Design School
BuildingVision.net
George B. H. Macomber Company
RECI_2001 Harvard Design School
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 2
John Macomber Background
• Construction CEO – George B. H. Macomber Co., $250 mm GC
• Cisco, MIT Media Lab, Children’s Hospital
• Real Estate Partner– 2,000,000 SF
• Academic Thought Leader– Harvard: E-Commerce and the Internet in Real Estate and Construction– MIT: Strategic Management in the Design and Construction Value System
• Dot.com Entrepreneur– Collaborative Structures, Inc. (sold to e-Builder)
• Consultant, Director, and Angel Investor– BuildingVision - Pursuing industry transformation
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 3
Objectives Today
• Identify a problem with respect to Information Technology in Real Estate, Architecture, and Construction
• Propose a way to break the problem down into smaller pieces
• Share research and Return on Investment (ROI) models from other industries
• Stimulate your thinking
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 4
The Productivity Paradox
“We see computers everywhere except in the productivity figures.”
- Robert Solow, MIT, 1987 (subsequently awarded Nobel Prize in economics)
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 5
Personal Effectiveness Example
• My assistant and me in 1991
• My assistant and me in 2001
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 6
RECI: Four Themes
RECI Topics• Business Models for Owners• Building as Computer• e-Learning and Knowledge
Management• 3D Object Oriented Models
Other construction efforts and research centers
• CIFE CII Lean CIRT
ROI and TEI in other industries• Giga, IBM, Accenture,
PriceWaterhouseCoopers
About AEC / RE in particular
• Large• Fragmented• Project based; one of a kind output• Many entities per project• Few economies of scale• Few barriers to entry• Hi risk, low margin• Lack of standards• Hostile to technology
So what’s the problem?
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 7
Where’s the Overlap?
Solutions Seeking Markets
“Computers are cool”“We could do _______”
“Get rich quick”
(vendors, entrepreneurs,academics)
Business Issues
TimeCost
QualityCompetition
(new and established principals at risk)
Query: Can anything of value emerge out ofthis intersection where we can describe a process tochange and an ROI to measure?
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 8
Analytical Framework # 1:The Construction Value System
Owner/Operator
Labor Subcontractor
Engineer
Constructor
Designer
Sponsor
Distributor
End User
Permanent Finance
Project Finance
Land and Permissions
Consultant
Labor
Material
Material
Building ProductManufacturer
CASH FLOW
PRODUCT
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 9
Who gets paid to think about the whole system?
• Many rational types are upset that the whole system is not optimized from the point of view of information flow.
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 10
ROI Example: Life Cycle Info Management
Plan & Design
Procure & Construct Operate Dispose
Nominal Sums
Duration of Phases 1 yr 2 yr 10 yr 1 yr 14 yrBaseline Costs - Old way 10 100 1000 5 1115
PROPOSED BENEFITAbility to use information from prior phase 0 5 15 1 21Add to asset value 0 0 0 5 5 Total Benefit 0 5 15 6 26
PROPOSED COST
Added cost to embed info which benefits other phases 2 3 2 0 7
Net Benefit of Info per Phase -2 2 13 6 19
Minor impact
Long Payback
11ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECINovember 16, 2001
Analytical Framework # 2: Why Bother? Or,
Who Retains the Value from Innovation?
Closed Book Open Book
Non Traditional:
Design - Build Build - Operate - Transfer Design - Build - Finance Engineer - Procure - Construct -
Operate - MaintainTraditional:
Design - Bid - Build - Claim
Basis of Payment:
Form ofContract:
e.g. ChipFab
e.g.School
Objective:Control; look out for single firm
Objective:Coordinate andoptimize system
User trend???
Opportunity for higher
margins
Capture theValue
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 12
Where is the Leverage?
Follow the money. What kinds of projects and owners will realize the most leverage from investment (by someone) in information sharing?
Volume of Projects in Transition ($ size x quantity) (proxy for impact in size or repeatability)
Owner/Operator Sensitivity to “Time to Revenue”(proxy for likelihood to accelerate)
High
High
Low
Low
Rigorous market segmentation would also analyze by:
• Political sensitivity• Affinity for (or hostility toward) technology• Size of market• Complexity of deals• Interest in life cycle cost data
Pharmcos
Power
Manufacturing
MuseumSmall volumeHomebuilder
Large volumeHomebuilder
Office Developer
Bridge
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 13
The Opportunity Depends…
• On who you are• O/O, Prop Mgr, GC, AE, Sub, Distrib, BPM, Investor, SW or IS
provider, Fin Services firm (Bank, Equity Fund, Insurance Co.)
– On what you are trying to do– Strategic: Restructure the industry– Tactical: Reposition the firm for sust comp advt– Operational: Grow revenue or decrease cost
• On what’s hot in the project portfolio» Time to revenue» Repetition of processes» Reduction of Cost
– On what you are talking about
PSWS, CAD, Accounting, Scheduling, more
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 14
Hard to Measure
General Purpose Technology
“Information technology is best described not as a traditional capital investment, but as a ’general purpose technology.’…Such technologies are economically beneficial mostly because they facilitate complementary innovations.”
Complementary Innovations “Earlier general purpose technologies, such as the telegraph, the steam engine, and
the electric motor, illustrate a pattern of complementary innovations that eventually lead to dramatic productivity improvements….For example, the telegraph facilitated the formation of geographically dispersed enterprises; while the electric motor provide industrial engineers more flexibility in the placement of machinery in factories, dramatically improving manufacturing productivity by enabling workflow redesign.”
Erik Brynjolfsson (MIT)and Lorin M. Hitt (Wharton).
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 15
Popular Press = Research Results
“While our production function analysis does not establish causality between IT investments and output, our results seem to indicate a a substantial positive contribution of IT toward output in this product area….On the one hand, the popular press is replete with stories of successful strategic use of IT. On the other hand, the research results do not seem to bear out the positive contribution of IT. Our results seem to be consistent with a growing recognition that the prior work in this area did not contend with the difficult measurement problem involved in this area.”
- Tridas Mukhopadhyay et. al., Carnegie Mellon
“Companies using IT to change the way they conduct business often say that their investment in IT complements changes in other aspects of the organization…To be successful, firms typically need to adopt computers as part of a “system” or “cluster” of mutually reinforcing organizational changes. Changing incrementally, either by making computer investments without organizational change, or only partially implementing some organizational change, can create significant productivity losses as benefits of computerization are more than outweighed by negative interactions with existing organizational practices.”
- Brynjolfsson & Hitt
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 16
Everything is Measurable
Immeasurability is an illusion caused by three misunderstandings:
• The object of measurement is not understood.
• The concept or meaning of measurement is not understood.
• The methods of measurement are not understood.
Douglas Hubbard, CIO Magazine, 1997
Measurement is possible.
• If something is better, then it is different in some relevant way.
• If it is different in some relevant way, then it is observable.
• If it is observable, then it is countable.
• If it is countable, then it is measurable.
• If it is measureable, you can value each unit, and therefore value the benefits.
– Chip Gliedman, Giga, 2001Source: Giga Information Group
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 17
Total Economic ImpactTM (TEI)
Costs
Flexibility
BenefitsR ISK
Total Economic
Impact (TEI)
Source: Giga Information Group
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 18
Applying TEI - 1
Step 1 - Define the Scenario
• Implement new idea vs business as usual
• Compare vendors, sourcing, technologies
• Offer new solution
Step 2 - Define the Timeframes
• Over what time do the business benefits accrue?
• Giga recommends three year max for ebusiness initiatives; too much uncertainty
Step 3 - Define the Benefits (a)
• Without an analysis of the benefits, it’s impossible to know the requirements.
• Without an analysis of the benefits, the wrong technologies may be explored and quantified.
• Once the scale of benefits is known, a cap is placed on the potential IT spending.
Step 3 - Define the Benefits (b)
• User productivity• Effectiveness toward
revenue growth• Organizational efficiency• Customer satisfaction
(intangible…measure changes in behavior; tangible).
Source: Giga Information Group
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 19
Applying TEI - 2
Step 5- Quantify the Flexibility
• Additional platform capabilities
• Easier expansion• Easier
implementation of multiple interfaces
• Easier to integrate• Vendor flexibility
Step 6- Evaluate and Quantify Risk
• Vendor• Product• Architecture• Culture• Delay• Size
Step 7- Communicate the Results
• ROI - Return on Investment
• NPV - Net Present Value
• DCF - Discounted Cash Flow
• IRR - Internal Rate of Return
Step 4 - Define the Costs
• Hardware and capital equipment
• Software purchase and configuration
• Maintenance of current environment
• Financial impacts (leases, depreciation)
• Learning curve• Planning costs• Application Migration
costs• Consulting and
mentoring costs
Source: Giga Information Group
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 20
TEI example: IT Investment in Const Mgr/Des Builder
Baseline Change Extend AfterRevenue 100,000,000$ 50% 150,000,000$ Cost of Work 85% 85,000,000$ -2% 83% 124,500,000$ CM Fee, Design Fee, GC's 10% 10,000,000$ 2% 12% 18,000,000$
Gross Margin 5,000,000$ 7,500,000$ Sales General Admin 2% 2,000,000$ 0% 2% 3,000,000$ Amortize IT Investment -$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
$3mm - 3 years
Net Income 3,000,000$ 3,500,000$
Costs• Hardware, software• Populate database, build rules• Train & Hire
Benefits• Grow revenue• Reduce cost• Earn higher fees
Flexibility• Can pursue many types of work• Can play many roles
Risks• Data or rules incorrect• Customers might not care• Might not be able to keep value created
Potential TEI 50%?
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 21
IT and Economies of Scale
• More power to the big firms?– New economies of scale
– 3D object libraries
– Procurement tech
– Knowledge Mgmt
• Or more power to small entrepreneurs?– Power of individual
– Common resource base
– Entrepreneurial support
• - Both.
Expected Change in Distribution of US Construction
01020304050
Size of Firm (Ann Revenue)
Pe
rce
nt
of
Wo
rk p
ut
in
pla
ce
Now
2010
It’s about People, not Technology!
November 16, 2001 ROI - Macomber - Harvard RECI 23
Bibliography
www.buildingvision.net
web.mit.edu/1.46/www
www.gigaweb.com
www.ibm.com/e-business/overview/
Eric Brynjolfsson - MIT
Tridas Mukhopadhyay - Carnegie Mellon
The Impact of IT on ProcessesReturn on Investment in RE/AEC
John D. Macomber
Harvard Design School
BuildingVision.net
George B. H. Macomber Company
RECI_2001 Harvard Design School