Top Banner

of 21

The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

Feb 27, 2018

Download

Documents

Waqas Afzal
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    1/21

    RESERCH&MANAGEMENT PROJECT

    Topic:The impect of capital structure an liauiit! of corporate return infirms

    Prepare "!:

    Name: M.Shahid Naseer

    Ghulam Abbas

    Class: #S Commerce

    Roll No$: %'(&%')

    Session: *'+',*'+-

    CO..EGE O/ COMMERCE

    GO0ERNMENT CO..EGE 1N20ERS2T34 /A2SA.A#A5

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    2/21

    +$ 2ntrouction:

    Capital is calle the feasi"ilit! that stron6 the 6ro7th resources4 !iel4 output4

    return4 profit4 interest rate4 ma6nitue of "usiness an finish the pro"lem of e"t of "usiness$ 2t

    impro8es the performance of "usiness$it is that "loo of the or6ani9ation an pla! 8ital role in theprouction sector for the "usiness esta"lishment$ 2t is use for purchasin6 machiner! an

    hi6hrin6 the epert persons$ ;ith the 6oo capital structure the mana6er ma+? 5escripti8e statistics an multiple

    re6ression$ 2f capital is not o7n than the short term an lon6 term e"t increases the lia"ilit! of

    the firm 7hich ecreases the loss$4 success impro8ement4 e8elopment4 hea7a! achie8ement of

    "usiness epens on the capital an capital net7or

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    3/21

    The mana6er can introuce the ne7 technolo6! an competes his "usiness in the mari? Actual resources >ii?in8estin6 capital >iii?Enterprise >i8?Technical Smanner$ 3ou people shoul "e succeein6 in the "usiness ris

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    4/21

    Prouction sector or pro"lem of financin6 !ou 7ill "e fare the name of failure$ A 6oo

    "usiness man shoul al7a!s fare the ifficulties in the "usiness line$ There are t7o 7a! of

    in8estment4 the first 7a! is calle insier in8estment an secon one is calle outsier

    in8estment$ 2n the first one the finance is in8este the emplo!ees of the compan! an in the

    outsier in8estment the finance is in8este outsier emplo!ees or not emplo!ees of the compan!$

    /or the hi6h t!pe of "usiness the Go8t$ hi6her ratio of ta 7hich has to pa! the "usiness4

    if compan! has 6oo capital 4than it can "e easil! pa! out 7ise it ma! suffer of eficienc!$ 2n the

    lar6e t!pe of "usiness4 the loan facilit! is 6i8en to the firm of poor emplo!ees for the omestic

    use$ 2t is onl! possi"le 7hen capital structure 7ill "e stron6 in orer to oin6 the "usiness of

    eport an import$ ;e shoul pa! uc< ues an custom char6es those epenents on the

    "usiness capital nature4 "ecause the capital pla! 8ital role in the "usiness sector$

    Accorin6 to philosopher BThe capital is an amount that is a8aila"le at the time of

    necessit! an "usiness 7ill "e run on the ri6ht an6le$ Some important points 7hich are more

    focuse in the capital criteria$

    +$ Etra capital shoul "e a8aila"le for "usiness oin6$

    *$ #! usin6 this capital in "etter 7a!4 the performance an amount of capital shoul

    "e increase

    $ #! usin6 this capital 7e shoul earn the profit 7hich "asic purpose of startin6 the

    ne7 "usiness$

    * .iterature Re8ie7

    Here such information are escri"e that are a"out to the literature in orer

    to pro8iin6 the literature frame7or< that practicall! ma

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    5/21

    The capital stu! consists on the theoretical frame7or< for the

    sa

    The capital structure epens on the lon6 term sources an similarl! short term

    resources if 7e 6i8e the eample of the lon6 term finance that is e"t an e=uit! an the short

    term finance is cash an reser8e etc$it is also calle the ran6e of internal an eternal financin6$

    The capital structure inclues the follo7in6 thin6s$

    >i? Rein8este Profit

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    6/21

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    7/21

    t o"li6ate the fun to their firms$ The capital structure is ac=uire the firm epens slo7l! firm

    performance profita"ilit! an a"ilit! to prouce the funs internall! an eternall! $These are

    most proper to 6i8e the chance to achie8in6 the o"@ecti8e of the or6ani9ation$ As to more the

    more in8estor the act of ma

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    8/21

    /xperimental implementation o the model will be making use o a cross)

    sectional time series data co*ering &''(0&'$& to determine the in1uence o

    capital structure *ariables on corporate profts among the fnancial sector o

    Pakistan.

    3.1. Model Specication

    odel specifcation in which use o di2erent model and use the di2erent

    *ariables such as, *ia+ *alue o short)term debts, *alue o long)term debts,

    and domestic liuidity ratio. 3n our model we wanted to establish i uantum

    o short)term debt, long)term debt, and corporate liuidity profle will ha*e

    signifcant in1uence on business structure o fnancial sector o Pakistan.

    Thereore the need or the modifcation in our model.

    Thus the models or the study are specifed as a regression unction as

    ollows+

    Proft 4 -5apital Structure

    6ependent 7ariables+

    6ependent *ariables are those *ariable which those on the

    other *ariable is called dependent *ariables in this paper use o the

    89/-8eturn on euity are the dependent *ariable such as ollowing.

    89/4 -/arnings a*ailable to common shareholders: Total /uity ; $''

    89/4 ao here+

    89/ 4 the measure o producti*ity which is return on euity capital

    employed?

    ao 4 the regression constant -i.e. intercept o euation?

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    9/21

    e 4 the random error term which captures other explanatory *ariables not

    explicitly

    3nclude in the model.

    The general list suares euation abo*e will now be restated with the

    specifed *ariables

    Thus below?

    89/ 4 -8S6TA, 8A6TA, 8/5TA, 8A6T/5, 7ST6, 7AT6, 6A8

    -) -) -) -C -) -C -C

    >here+

    89/ 4 return on euity is the dependent *ariable. 3t is a measure o

    corporate

    Perormance and proftability.

    3ndependent *ariable+

    The 8atio o short term debt to total liability -8ST6A is the independent

    *ariable which shows the perormance o the debt in the business o the

    fnancial.

    The Dormula o the 8atio o short term debt to total liability -8ST6A

    8ST6A 4 Short term debt:Total Aiability

    8atio o Aong term debt to Total liability -8A6TA

    This ratio in which measure the long term debt

    in the total liability. This ratio shows the perormance o the long term debt.

    The ormula o the 8atio o Aong term debt to Total liability

    8A6TA4 Aong term debt:Total liability

    8atio o euity capital to total Aiability -8/5TA

    This ratio in which the measured the euity

    capital in the total liability. This ratio shows the perormance o the euity

    capital.

    The ormula o the 8atio o euity 5apital to total liability

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    10/21

    8/5TA4 /uity capital:Total liability

    8atio o long term debt to Total euity+

    This ratio measured the long term debt to calculate

    among the euity o capital.

    Dormula

    8A6T/54 long term debt : euity capital

    6omestic liuidity 8atio+

    This ratio show the domestic o the use o cash and reser*e

    in the frms

    Dormula+

    6A84 5ashC all reser*e:5urrent liabilities E$''

    7alue o long term debt -7AT6+

    These ratios show the long term debt *alue o the frm in

    the frm and sector and recei*e the all o debt in the frm

    7alue o short term debt+

    This *ariable shows the *alue o the short term debt o the frm and also

    measured the *alue o the short term debt in the frm"ter all the estimated the euation o the 89/

    89/ 4 ao ) b$ 8S6TA ) b& 8A6TA ) b# 8/5TA C bF 8A6T/5 ) b% 7ST6 C bG

    7AT6 C bH 6A8 C e

    3.2. Data Requirements and SourcesThe study samples are frms listed on the Karachi Stock /xchange. There #$

    banks were selected co*ering the fnancial sector o the Pakistan. They

    include the all the o cash and reser*es are stored in this sector all the

    fnancial transaction are in*ol*ed in this sector. The data used or the study

    include annual reports and statement o accounts o #$ banks or the years

    &''( 0 &'$&, retrie*ed and completed by the many research paper. These

    orm the secondary data or the study, which were generated rom balance

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    11/21

    sheets and accounts o this fnancial sector. This period was chosen because

    o accessibility to the fnancial statements.

    F. Estimation of Results and Discussions:This section pro*ides the

    details o the model and fndings o the study. Beore mo*ing towards ormaldiscussion o results, an analysis o descripti*e statistics is presented.

    .1 Descripti!e Statistics:There are ollowing show the and measured thedescripti*e statistics

    "a#le 1 Descripti!e Statistics

    8S6TA 89/ 8A6TA 8A6T/5 8/5TA 6A8

    ean )'.$(I$G '.'$GG$( '.(IG$(I '.$FF$G( $'.GH'HF $H''.$&

    edian '.'%G% '.'$'F(& '.IFG'# '.$'&HF$ H.'I%&H( (GF.$($$

    aximum

    '.&IF# '.(HG%FH '.I(G'HF #.'($F% #&(.%HGG %FHI#.#G

    inimum )$F.HF&H '.'''## '.$GFI&% )'.(%I'F )FI.%HH$ &'.'#&(G

    Std. 6e*. $.%#F#FH '.'H'F#I '.$G'&F# '.##%%G% &I.'$GF$ %'%I.%'G

    Table $ pro*ides the descripti*e statistics or all the *ariables. 3t shows $%%

    the number o obser*ations o all *ariables, their ean *alues and edian

    and their standard de*iation. 3t shows the minimum and maximum *alues as

    well which can be attained by these *ariables. The descripti*e statistics show

    that all the *ariables ha*e $%% obser*ations. The dependent *ariable returns

    on /uity ha*e the ean *alue o '.'$GG$( and edian *alue '.'$'F(&. 3t

    has a minimum *alue o '.'''##. "nd a maximum *alue o '.(HG%FH. The

    standard de*iation or return on euity is '.'H'F#I.

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    12/21

    To check the working capital in*estment policy o these Banks, 8S6TA is

    included, it has ean 7alue o '.$(I$G and itJs the edian *alue is '.'%G%.

    inimum *alue o 8S6TA is '.'.'%G%. "nd its maximum *alue is '. '.&IF#. To

    check the fnancing policy adopted by the selected fnancial sector or the

    management o working capital and its relationship with proftability, Aong

    term debt to total Aiabilities -8A6TA is used. 3t has a ean *alue o '.(IG$(I

    and its median *alue'.IFG'#. >hile the standard de*iation o'.$G'&F#. The

    minimum *alue or 8A6TA is '.$GFI&% and the maximum *alue or it is

    '.I(G'HF. The independent *ariable 8atio long term debt to total /uity

    -8A6T/5 has a maximum *alue o#.'($F% and a minimum *alue o

    )'.(%I'F. 3t has a ean *alue o '.$FF$G( and its edian *alue is'.$'&HF$.

    >hile standard de*iation o '.##%%G%. To determine the frm sie and its

    impact on working capital management, 8atio euity capital to total liability

    -8/5TA is included. ean *alue o this *ariable is $'.GH'HF and its median

    *alue is H.'I%&H(.The maximum *alue or -8/5TA is #&(.%HGG and the

    minimum *alue or this is )FI.%HH$.3t has a standard de*iation o &I.'$GF$.

    To check the le*erage o these frms, -6A8 is used. 3t has the ean *alue

    o $H''.$& and its edian *alue is(GF.$($$. >hile standard de*iation o

    %'%I.%'G.The minimum *alue is &'.'#&(Gor -6A8 and its maximum *alueis %FHI#.#G.

    4.2 Correlation Analysis:There are follo7in6 ta"le sho7 an measure the correlation

    anal!sis of the epenent an inepenent 8aria"les$ 2n this ta"le use the ifferent 8aria"les$

    Such as > RS5T.?4>ROE?4>R.5T.? >R.5TEC?4>RECTE.?$>5.R?

    "a#le $o. 2 correlation %nalysis

    8S6TA 89/ 8A6TA 8A6T/5 8/5TA 6A8

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    13/21

    8S6TA $

    89/ '.'# $

    8A6TA '.'$IF%$ )'.'(%H& $

    8A6T/5 )'.'$'IG )'.((FG# '.$'%GF& $

    8/5TA '.'$'HGF '.'%F'%G '.'(F%'F )'.'GG#I $

    6A8 )'.'F%F( '.'$#&G( '.'&'( )'.'%H&% '.%$&$#($

    5orrelation analysis explains the relationship between two *ariables. 3t shows

    change in one *ariable because o any change in other *ariable. Table &

    shows the correlation analysis. This analysis helps to locate the relationshipthat exists among the independent or illustrati*e *ariables. 3t means the

    occurrence o mutli)colinearity among the independent *ariables. ulti)co

    linearity can in1uence the results, so a good model should not ha*e any

    multi)nonlinearity among the analysts. Dirst o all correlation between

    dependent *ariable which is return on /uity -89/ and independent *ariable

    8atio o short term debt to Total liability -8S6TA, is analyed. The results o

    correlation analysis show a positi*e correlation between them ha*ing a *alue

    o '.'#. This correlation indicates that these two *ariables ha*e a positi*e

    relationship with each other i.e. i there will be an increase in ratio o short

    term debt to total liability then the dependent *ariable return on euity will

    also increase and *ice *ersa. 8eturn on /uity -89/ has a negati*e

    correlation with independent *ariable ratio o long term debt to total liability

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    14/21

    -8A6TA. The *alue o this correlation is a 0'.'(%H& ha*ing p)*alue . The p)

    *alue shows the meaning o the relationship between return on euity and

    ratio o long term debt to total liability at di2erent le*el o signifcance. This

    correlation is good or the study as it shows a signifcant relationship

    between independent *ariable ratio o long term debt to total liability and

    dependent *ariable return on euity. The correlation outcomes or ratio o

    short term debt -8S6TA ratio o long term debt to total liability -8A6TA show

    that they ha*e a positi*e correlation o '.'$IF%$ with each other. This means

    that an increase in the *alue o independent *ariable ratio o short term debt

    total liability will cause an decrease in ratio o long term debt to total liability

    and *ice *ersa. . The correlation o return on euity and long term debt to

    total liability is )'.'$)IG. This correlation has a negati*e *alue so this

    relationship is also positi*e as the pre*ious one. 8atio to short term debt to

    total liability -8S6TA and ratio o the long term debt to total euity -8A6T/5

    has a correlation *alue o )'.'$'IG. The correlation results or ratio o short

    term debt to total liability and long term debt to total euity o show a

    negati*e relationship between them.

    8atio o short term debt to total liability has a positi*e relationship with ratio

    o euity capital to total liability. The *alue o correlation coe!cient betweenthem is '.'$'HG.

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    15/21

    This correlation signifes that a raise in ratio o short term debt to total

    liability is accompanied by an increase in ratio o euity capital to total

    liability and *ice *ersa. 5orrelation determines a negati*e relation between

    ratio o short term debt and ratio o 6omestic liuidity ratio -6A8.

    5orrelation coe!cient or these is )'.'F%F(. Legati*e relation shows that an

    increase in ratio o short term debt to total liability subseuently causes a

    decrease in 6omestic liuidity ratio 6A8. The positi*e relationship shows

    between ratio o long term debt to total liability and ratio o long term debt

    to euity capital. 5orrelation or this is '.$'%GF& ha*ing to showing positi*e

    and signifcant relationship between these two *ariables. 5orrelation ratio o

    long term debt to liability with ratio o euity capital to liability is '.'(F%'F.

    8atio o long term debt to liability has an signifcant but positi*e relationship

    with domestic liuidity ratio. 3t has a correlation is '.'&'(. The negati*e

    relationship shows between ratio o long term debt to euity capital and ratio

    o euity capital to liability. 5orrelation or this is )'.'GG#I. The negati*e

    relationship shows between the ratio o long term debt to euity capital

    -8A6T/5 and domestic liuidity ratio -6A8. 5orrelations show *alue is)

    '.'%H&%. The ratio o euity capital to liability and domestic liuidity ratio

    ha*e the '.%$&$#( correlation between them. Drom table & it is rather strongthat all the independent *ariables ha*e correlation coe!cient *alues less

    than $.

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    16/21

    F.# 8egression "nalysis+There is ollowing table show the and measured regression

    analysis and in this table show the 8eturn on euity is dependent *ariable

    and other is the independent *ariables.

    F.# Table 8egression "nalysis

    6ependent 7ariable+ 89/

    ethod+ Panel /MAS -5ross)section

    weights

    &aria#le 'oe(ci

    ent

    Std.

    Error

    t)Statistic

    *ro#.

    ' )'.&(F$ '.'H(( )#.G'#& '.'''%

    RSD"+ )'.'&'H '.'FI$ )'.F&$# '.GHF#

    R+D"+ '.H&$( '.'($$ (.(IHH '.''''

    RE'"+ )'.#II$ '.$(F' )&.$GI& '.'#&$

    R+D"E' )'.'FF( '.''$' )F%.$&%% '.''''

    D+,R '.'''' '.'''' )'.H&I# '.FGH#R)squared '.IG#H ean dependent *ar '.F$HF

    %d-usted R)

    squared

    '.I%&( S.6. dependent *ar &.&&(%

    S.E. of regression '.F#F% Sum suared resid &$.(I(

    I)statistic (H.IIH# 6urbin)>atson stat $.H&&%

    *ro#/)statistic0 '.''''

    Table F.# determines the results o di2erent *ariables. "t less than ero le*el

    o importance, ratio o short term debt to total liability appears to be

    important in this Table. 8atio o long term debt to total liability is also maNor

    in this model but its importance le*el is $O."ll o the three control *ariables

    i.e. 8atio o euity capital to total liability, ratio o long term debt to total

    euity capital and domestic liuidity ratio are signifcant in the in the abo*e

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    17/21

    table . They do not cause any signifcant change in the independent *ariable.

    The signifcance o use all the *ariable shows its correlation with the

    dependent *ariable, return on /uity. These are predictors a2ect the

    independent *ariable. " change in any o them will defnitely cause some

    change in dependent *ariable. The

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    18/21

    and the probability *alue is '.'#&$ and this show the signifcance le*el. The

    ratio o long term debt to euity capital is the t. statistics *alue is )F%.$&%%

    and the std. error *alue is '.''$' and probability *alue is '.'''' and this is

    signifcance le*el. "ter this *alue the next *ariable is domestic liuidity ratio

    the t. statistics *alue is )'.H&I# and the std. error *alue is '.'''' and

    probability *alue is '.FGH# and this show the signifcance le*el. 3n this table

    the ean dependent *ariable then *alue is '.F$HF and the S.6 dependent

    *ariables *alue is &.&&(% and the last *alue in this table are showing and

    measured 6urbin >atson stat *alue is $.H&&%.

    %. 5onclusion+

    The 5apital structure is one o the most important fnancial

    decisions o a fnancial sector such as banks. /2ecti*e le*el o 5apital

    structure should be present or 1at running o business ne*ertheless o the

    en*ironment o business. Drom this study, it is concluded that keeping

    e2ecti*e le*el o capital is *ery important or fnancial sector as well

    corresponding all other sectors o business.

    The present study contains #$ banks or frms o Pakistan or a time extent o

    f*e years rom &''( to &'$&. 3t disco*ers the role o e2ecti*e capital

    structure in producing proftability through two main policies o capital

    structure namely capital fnancing policy. The fnancing policy is concerned

    round the managing o current liabilities such as the short term debt.

    3n destructi*e capital structure fnancing policy more current liabilities is

    using than long)term debts and iniuity or con*entional fnancing policy. The

    results o this study show that con*entional fnancing policy also results in

    more e2ecti*eness. oreo*er, the results show that the positi*e and

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    19/21

    negati*e relation between in the descripti*e statistics and the correlation and

    the regression analysis.

    3n this research paper 3 can also the di2erent research paper and fnd out the

    di2erent result. The disco*eries o this study a *ery helpul or the fnancial

    managers o the fnancial sector such as mostly banks. These sectors deli*er

    the inormation concerning the management o short)term capital and also

    inorm them about the managing strategies used by their nobles. This

    e*idence is useul or keeping a strong competition and successul own

    organiation. Qltimately it is mentioned that the managers should e2ort to

    create good relation between /uity capital and liabilities o the frm, which

    demonstrates, there is a signifcant relationship between the di2erent*ariable are using in this sector. Positi*e and signifcant relations are creating

    between degree o opposition o fnancing policy o capital structure and

    e2ecti*eness o fnancial sector o Pakistan. The results show a negati*e and

    signifcant relationship o e2ecti*eness with unit o *iolence o capital

    fnancing policy and using the di2erent *ariables.

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    20/21

    But to co*er all the extents and to include all the *ariables is Nust not

    possible. So, the results probable rom this study should be estimated kept in

    mind that there could be many other *ariables as well also the *ariables

    stated abo*e, that can describe capital structure and e2ecti*eness

    correlation and this study is incomplete only to the e2ect o selected

    *ariables in determine the e2ecti*eness o capital structure. "nother

    limitation o the proNected study is that the data are using o only % years due

    to the check o absence o obtainability o data. This study has the

    conseuence or fnancial sector only. These are *ariables can be used such

    as short term debt, long term liabilities , return on euity and euity capital

    and cash, reser*e etc. Dinancial sector is nominated or this study? uture

    research can also be done or other sectors such as the chemical sector and

    the others. 8esearch can also be made on chemical and textile sector which

    unknown with respect to capital structure. This study accomplishes that

    *iolence o capital structure policies is in*ersely related to e2ecti*eness. This

    indicates that the fnancial managers o fnancial sector should monitor

    con*entional fnancing policy o capital structure i.e. they should in*est

    more o their fnancial resources long term debts as compared to current

    liabilities and others.

  • 7/25/2019 The Impact of Capital Structure and Liquidity Corprate of Return in Firm

    21/21