The focusing mirror system The focusing mirror system Preliminary studies with mirrors (to reduce instrumented area): - focalization capabilities shown - ring patterns for positive and negative mesons at different angles and momenta reconstructed • spherical (elliptical) mirror within gap volume for backward refl. • plane mirror just beyond radiator for forward reflections Different scenarios (refractive index, radiator thickness, mirror geometry) are being explored TOF Reflecting inside direct & reflected Low material budget Minimize detector area (~1 m 2 /sector) interference with FTOF
The focusing mirror system. spherical (elliptical) mirror within gap volume for backward refl. plane mirror just beyond radiator for forward reflections. Minimize detector area (~1 m 2 /sector) interference with FTOF. TOF. Low material budget. Reflecting inside. direct & - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The focusing mirror systemThe focusing mirror system
Preliminary studies with mirrors (to reduce instrumented area): - focalization capabilities shown - ring patterns for positive and negative mesons at different angles and momenta reconstructed
• spherical (elliptical) mirror within gap volume for backward refl.
• plane mirror just beyond radiator for forward reflections
Different scenarios (refractive index, radiator thickness, mirror geometry) are being explored
TOF
Reflectinginside
direct &reflected
Low materialbudget
Minimize detector area (~1 m2/sector) interference with FTOF
Hit prob
Hit prob > 3 10-4
Unidentified events: reduced by better treatment of unwanted events (i.e. muon from meson decay)
Mismatch in number of N p.e.: wrong seed assignment
Protons weird probability: feature of the LH definition close to the threshold
Hit prob
Hit prob > 3 10-3
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
Mirror: 14-25o
PMTs: UBA
Direct ring example:
Hit prob
Hit prob > 3 10-3
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
Mirror: 14-25o
PMTs: UBA
Hybrid ring example:
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06
- thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
N p.e. > 5 for reflected ringsN p.e. > 12 for direct rings
Average N p.e. : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06
- thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
Low angles more challengingPossibly due to limited number of trials
LH-LHk,p : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA
Protons benefit the smallnumber of unfired PMTs whit expected signal(P is small when C=0)
Protons benefit the smallnumber of unfired PMTs whit expected signal(P is small when C=0)-
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06
- thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
Average N p.e. : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA
Mandatory for positive hadronsBenefit for negative hadrons at large angles and small energy
Mandatory for positive hadronsBenefit for negative hadrons at large angles and small energy
Big dot = studies show in the previous slide
Average N p.e. : PMTs: UBA
Mirror 14-25o Mirror 14-35o
Worse for positive hadronsBetter for negative hadronsWorse for positive hadronsBetter for negative hadrons
LH-LHk,p : PMTs: UBA
Mirror 14-25o Mirror 14-35o
Worse for positive hadronsBetter for negative hadronsWorse for positive hadronsBetter for negative hadrons
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06
- thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
Average N p.e. : PMTs: UBA
Mirror up to 35o:Worse for positive hadronsBetter for negative hadrons
Mirror up to 35o:Worse for positive hadronsBetter for negative hadrons
Average N p.e. : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA
n=1.06Aer. thick 2-4-6-8-10 cm
n=1.03Aer. thick 3-6-9-12-15 cm
n=1.03 gives less photons regardeless the increase thickness due to same assumed transmission lengthn=1.03 gives less photons regardeless the increase thickness due to same assumed transmission length
LH-LHk,p : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA
n=1.03 still good due to the larger Cherenkov angle separationn=1.03 still good due to the larger Cherenkov angle separation
n=1.06Aer. thick 2-4-6-8-10 cm
n=1.03Aer. thick 3-6-9-12-15 cm
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06
- thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm
Average N p.e. : PMTs: UBA
n=1.06 better for patter recognition in the presenceof backgrouns
n=1.06 better for patter recognition in the presenceof backgrouns
Hit prob
Hit prob > 3 10-3
200 trials per point
Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm