The Five Basic Institutions Five Basic Tasks Church Family School Government Market Instrumental Relational.

The Five Basic InstitutionsThe Five Basic InstitutionsFive Basic TasksFive Basic Tasks

ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool

GovernmentGovernment MarketMarket

Instru

menta

lR

ela

tion

al

Buildings ReflectBuildings ReflectSociety’s Fundamental TasksSociety’s Fundamental Tasks

ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool

GovernmentGovernment MarketMarket

Fundamental NeedsFundamental NeedsOf SocietyOf Society

GoodnessGoodness& Meaning& MeaningTo MateTo Mate

& Produce the Next Generation& Produce the Next Generation

To KnowTo Know

SafetySafety& Justice& Justice Material GoodsMaterial Goods

Fundamental CapacitiesFundamental Capacities

ReflectionReflectionSexualitySexuality

IntelligenceIntelligence

Force / Force / BenevolenceBenevolence

WorkWork

Fundamental TasksFundamental TasksOf the IndividualOf the Individual

ChurchChurchFamilyFamily

SchoolSchool

GovGov MarketMarket

Fundamental TasksFundamental TasksOf the CoupleOf the Couple


SchoolSchoolGovGov MarketMarket



Fundamental TasksFundamental TasksOf the FamilyOf the Family







Fundamental TasksFundamental TasksOf SocietyOf Society









Belonging: Male + Female Belonging: Male + Female

FamilyFamily

Child / AdultChild / Adult

Father Father MotherMother

Society At LargeSociety At Large

The Non-ThrivingThe Non-ThrivingMarriage / Child RelationshipMarriage / Child Relationship

Society’s Foundational RelationshipSociety’s Foundational Relationship

Annual Rejection Ratio: For Every 100 Children Born Sources: CDC/ NCHS report series

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.060

40

20

10

0

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

1998

2000

Divorce

OWB

Belonging and Rejection Ratio for the US, 2008 Source: Am. Comm Survey 2008

45.4

54.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

BELONGING REJECTION

Index of Belonging, Ethnic GroupsSource: American Community Survey 2008

23.8%

40.2%

53.8%

62.0%

17.4%

45.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

U.S. Black American Indian &Alaskan Native

Hispanic White Asian

Index of Belonging for the StatesSource: American Community Survey 2008

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

16 32 34 37 37 38 39 39 40 40 40 41 42 42 42 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 45 45 45 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 47 48 48 48 49 49 49 49 49 50 52 52 53 54 54 55 55 57 58 59

DC

MS

LA

AR

AL

GA

SC

TN

NM

OK

FL

NV

AZ

KY

WV

MO

NC

DE

SD

MD

IN

OR

AK

MI

RI

TX

US

HI

CA

WA

VA

OH

WY

ME

KS

VT

CT

IL

NY

CO

PA

WI

MT

ID

ND

MA

IA

NE

NJ

MN

NH

UT

International Rejection Ratio

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Taiwan

Taiwan

China

China

Mac

edon

ia

Mac

edon

ia

Croati

a

Croati

a

Japa

nJa

pan

New Z

ealan

d

New Z

ealan

d

Serbia

and M

onten

egro

Serbia

and M

onten

egro

Switzerl

and

Switzerl

and

Slova

kia

Slova

kia

Portu

gal

Portu

gal

Netherl

ands

Netherl

ands

Georg

ia

Georg

ia

Lithua

nia

Lithua

nia

Slove

nia

Slove

nia

Czech

Rep

ublic

Czech

Rep

ublic

Canad

a

Canad

a

United

Stat

es

United

Stat

es

Finlan

d

Finlan

d

France

France

New C

alced

onia

New C

alced

onia

Denmark

Denmark

Sweden

Sweden

El Salv

ador

El Salv

ador

Urugu

ay

Urugu

ay

Jamaic

a

Jamaic

a

U

S

A

Belonging: Male + Female Belonging: Male + Female

FamilyFamily

Child / AdultChild / Adult

Father Father MotherMother

Society At LargeSociety At Large

Fundamental Institution: School

SchoolSchool

Need: Know & UnderstandNeed: Know & Understand

Capacity: IntellectCapacity: Intellect

Task: Learn & Teach Task: Learn & Teach

Strength: Truth & TenacityStrength: Truth & Tenacity

SchoolSchool

Educational Attainment / Life Earnings (in millions)

2.9

2.62.6

2.5

2.6

2.5

2.30

2.40

2.50

2.60

2.70

2.80

2.90

Ave

rag

e G

PA

Enl

igsh

/Mat

h C

ombi

ned

INTACT STEP COHABIT (BOTHNATURAL)

COHABIT (ONENATURAL)

DIVORCED NEVER MARRIED

GPA English/Math by Family StructureSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

School Expulsion Source Add Health Wave II 1996

Educational AttainmentEducational AttainmentIdealIdeal

Educational AttainmentEducational Attainment

Fundamental Institution: Marketplace

MarketplaceMarketplace

Need: MaterialNeed: Material

Capacity: Work & Save Capacity: Work & Save

Task: Produce & Exchange Task: Produce & Exchange

Habit: Work & HonestyHabit: Work & Honesty

MarketplaceMarketplace

Yearly Income, 2000, Families With Children

$54,000

$50,000

$30,000

$23,000$20,000

$9,100 $9,400

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

First Marriage Second(+)Marriage

Cohabitation Divorced Separated Widowed Never Married

.

Note: Figures do not include transferred income

Average Hrs. Worked Per Yr.Source : Survey of Consumer Finance 2000

18352135 2213

13911384 1199

1891

1620

12791128

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

WIDOWED NEVER MARRIED SEPERATED DIVORCED LIVING W/PARTNER SECOND(+) MARRIAGE FIRST MARRIAGE

Tota

l Hou

rs W

orke

d Pe

r Yr

34123519

3227

Spouse; Partner

Head of Household

Median Net Worth of Families With Children Under 18, 2000Source: Survey of Consumer Finance, 2001

$120,250

$105,360

$27,800$20,540

$16,540 $14,850

$350$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

First Marriage Second(+)Marriage

Divorced Widowed Cohabitation Separated Never Married

Children in Poverty, 2000

12 13

31

39 41

67

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

FIRST MARRIAGE SECOND(+) MARRIAGE DIVORCED COHABITATION SEPARATED NEVER MARRIED

Per

cent

In P

over

ty

3.93 Million Children 3.17 Million Children

0.75 Million Children

Unmarried Parents Same Parents Married

Source R Rector: Analysis of CPS 2001

Children in Poverty

In Poverty

Out of Poverty

$100

$27

$127

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Co

mp

ara

tiv

e I

nco

me

%

Average Unmarried Male Premium Average Married Male

Marriage Premium in Male Income Source Antovics, K. & Town, R. Am Econ Review V 94, (2004) pp 317-321

+ =

Average Impact of Divorce on the Income of Households with Children Income

$54,000

$36,720

$-

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

Before Divorce After Divorce

32 %

Drop

Income: EconomyIncome: Economy

$$$

Income WithoutIncome WithoutFamily EconomyFamily Economy

GovernmentGovernment

Fundamental Institution:Government

GovernmentGovernment

Need: Protection & SafetyNeed: Protection & Safety

Capacity: Force & Law Capacity: Force & Law

Task: Common Good Task: Common Good

Virtue: Justice & GoodwillVirtue: Justice & Goodwill

Source: C. Harper and S. McLanahan, “Father Absence and Youth Incarceration,” ASA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 1998. Data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.

Family Structure: Comparative Rates Family Structure: Comparative Rates Of Youth IncarcerationOf Youth Incarceration

1

2.07

2.71

3.7

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Raised in Intact Married ParentFamily

Raised in Mother-Only Family Raised in a Mother andStepfather Family

Raised in a Stepmother Family

Co

mp

arat

ive

Rat

es o

f In

carc

erat

ion

Adolescent Cocaine Use By Family Structure Source Add Health Wave II 1996

Runaway Children in UK

0%

Step-Families

One-Parent Families

Two-parent Families

Percentage of children running away overnight before the age of 16

10%5% 15% 20% 25%

Relative Rates of Physical Abuse by Family Structure Source NIS-4, 2010

1.0

5.2

4.3

10.3

3.13.6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Always IntactMarried Family

Step MarriedFamily

Intact CohabitingFamily

Step CohabitingFamily

Single ParentFamily

Not living witheither parent

Relative Rates of Sexual Abuse by Family Structure Source NIS-4, 2010

1

5

19.8

4.8

10.68.6

0

5

10

15

20

25

Always IntactMarried Family

Step MarriedFamily

Intact CohabitingFamily

Step CohabitingFamily

Single ParentFamily

Not living witheither parent

U.S: Partner / Spouse Violence Against Mothers Over 20 With Children under 12

Source DOJ Nat Crime Victimization Survey 1999

46

15

33

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Married Widowed Married+Div+SepCombined

Never Married

Ra

te P

er

1,0

00

Good Law and OrderGood Law and Order

Diminished Law and OrderDiminished Law and Order

Fundamental Institution: Church

ChurchChurch

Need: Good vs. Evil, & GodNeed: Good vs. Evil, & God

Capacity: ReflectionCapacity: Reflection

Task: Worship & PrayerTask: Worship & Prayer

Habit: Piety & RepentanceHabit: Piety & Repentance

ChurchChurch

2.9

2.8

2.7

2.6

2.45

2.50

2.55

2.60

2.65

2.70

2.75

2.80

2.85

2.90

Av

era

ge

GP

A E

nli

gs

h/M

ath

Co

mb

ine

d

WEEKLY+ MONTHLY+ <MONTHLY NEVER

GPA (English & Math) by Religious PracticeGPA (English & Math) by Religious PracticeSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

6.4%

7.3%

10.3%

11.5%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Per

cen

t W

ho

Had

Eve

r R

un

Aw

ay


Running Away by Church AttendanceRunning Away by Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

19.1%

31.9%

39.3%

35.2%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%


Times Drunk / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

7. 72%

11. 22%

16. 22%

17. 99%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Perc

ent W

ho H

ave

Used H

ard

Dru

gs


Hard Drugs / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

0.61

0.92

1.41

1.55

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

Num

ber o

f Sex

Par

tner

s


Girls: Number of Sex Partners / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

Ideal Impact of WorshipIdeal Impact of Worship

Impact of Lessened WorshipImpact of Lessened Worship

Fundamental Institution: Family

FamilyFamily

Need: The FutureNeed: The Future

Capacity: Sex & AffectionCapacity: Sex & Affection

Task: Procreation Task: Procreation

Strength: Chastity & Strength: Chastity & KindnessKindness

FamilyFamily

Number of Non-Marital Sexual Partners Versus Percent in an Intact Marriage

Source NSFG 1995

The More Sexual Partners the More Likely to Abort Source NSFG 1995

8

12

1819

25

3134

3943

52

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21+NUMBER OF NON MARITAL SEXUAL PARTNERS IN LIFETIME

Pe

rce

nt

wh

o h

av

e a

bo

rtio

ns

la

ter

Non-Marital Sexual Partners and Out-of-Wedlock BirthsSource: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth, 1995

1.71%

16.29%

32.89%

40.02%

44.02% 42.66%

49.45% 49.99%47.55%

55.21%

49.89%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Virgin atTime of

FirstMarriage

Had Pre-Marital Sexwith FirstHusband

1 2 3 4 5 6-10. 11-15. 16-20 21+

Number of Lifetime Voluntary Non-Marital Sexual Partners

Pe

rce

nt

of

Se

xu

all

y A

cti

ve

Wo

me

n A

ge

d 1

5-4

4 w

ith

Ch

ild

ren

Non-Marital Sexual Partners And Single MotherhoodSource: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth, 1995

7.09%

30.21%

36.48%38.81%

44.16%

53.07%

48.13% 47.03%

50.30%

56.98%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10. 11-15. 16-20 21+

Number of Lifetime Non-Marital Sexual Partners

Pe

rce

nt

of

Se

xu

all

y A

cti

ve

wo

me

n A

ge

d 1

5-4

4 w

ith

Ch

ild

ren

78%

75%

59% 58% 55% 55%50%

42%

29%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

% V

irgin

sVirginity By Family Structure

Source Add Health, 1996

41.2%

25.8%

14.6%

6.3%

3.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Intact Step Cohabit Divorced Single

% R

atin

g Da

d W

arm

and

Lov

ing

Father Rated Warm and Loving Source: National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health Wave 2, 1996

Female Homosexuality

Ideal Of FamilyIdeal Of Family

Reality Of FamilyReality Of Family

ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

Church & FamilyConsidered Together

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

INTACT/COHABIT(NATURAL)

ANY REJ ECTION

2.48

2.722.75

2.94

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

Ave

rag

e G

PA

(E

ng

lish

& M

ath

Co

mb

ine

d)

GPA

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJ ECTION

46.7%

32.5%

25.5%

17.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

Expulsion & SuspensionSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

Number of Sex Partners for GirlsNumber of Sex Partners for Girls

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

1.55

0.93

1.14

0.47

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

13.1%

8.5%

8.1%

5.2%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Wh

o H

ad

Ev

er

Ru

n A

wa

y

Running AwayBy Family Structure and Religious Practice

Source: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

41.2%

24.5%

33.4%

22.4%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

Self Control: Times DrunkSelf Control: Times Drunk

<MONTHLY/ NEVER

WEEKLY/ MONTHLY+

INT ACT / COHABIT (NAT URAL)

ANY RE J E CT ION

20.1%

9.5%

14.6%

8.5%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Per

cent

Who

Hav

e U

sed

Har

d D

rugs

Self Control: Hard Drug UseSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

23.5%

15.8%

15.3%

11.7%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25P

erc

en

t W

ho

Co

mm

itte

d G

ran

d T

he

ft

Grand TheftBy Family Structure and Religious Practice

Source: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.

5 Institutions: 5 Institutions: 5 Tasks5 Tasks

Family: Next GenerationReligion: Moral Universals, WorshipSchool: LearningGovernment: Protection, BenevolenceMarketplace: Income, Property

Within all the 5 Institutions: Within all the 5 Institutions: The single most important virtue The single most important virtue nownow??

Church:Church: piety piety School:School: hard work hard work

Government: justiceGovernment: justice Marketplace: honestyMarketplace: honesty Family: chastity

Teaches Instrumentally

Teaches Relationally

Church & StateChurch & StateAs TeachersAs Teachers

Protects GoodAnd Punishes Evil

Inspires To Do GoodAnd Repent of Evil

Different Modes of TeachingDifferent Modes of Teaching

Force

Love

Animus Regarding FreedomAnimus Regarding Freedom

TWO TEACHERSTWO TEACHERS CHURCH STATE

WAYS OF RULING By Free Assent By Force

WHAT IS TAUGHT Universal MoralityGovernment Morality (Law)

WAYS OF TEACHINGInspires (Relationally) Forces (Instrumentally)

RELATIONSHIP TO GOOD AND EVIL

Inspires to do good and repent of evil.

Protects good. Punishes evil.

Society’s Foundational RelationshipSociety’s Foundational Relationship

www.marri.frc.org

Some of the studies available

• MAPPING AMERICA

• STUDIES– INDEX OF BELONGING / REJECTION – PORNOGRAPHY– EFFECT OF THE PILL ON ENVIRONMENT– RELIGIOUS WORSHIP / EDUC ATTAINMNT– EFFECTS OF EARLY ADOPTION– EFFECTS OF DIVORCE

[email protected]

The Five Basic Institutions Five Basic Tasks Church Family School Government Market Instrumental Relational.

Documents