1 1 st International Symposium on Marine Fisheries Management in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities Brasília 6-8 July, 2015, 2014 The Fisheries Management Experience in the United States: History, Legal Instruments and Performance Steven Murawski University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 [email protected]
47
Embed
The Fisheries Management Experience in the ... - Oceana Brasil · The Fisheries Management Experience in the United States: History, Legal Instruments and Performance Steven Murawski
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
1st International Symposium on Marine Fisheries Management
“….try to imagine a mobile and completely self-contained timber-cutting machine that could smash through the roughest trails of forest, cut down trees, mill them, and deliver consumer-ready lumber in half the time of normal logging and milling operations. This was exactly what factory trawlers did – this was exactly their effect – in the forests of the deep. It could not long go unnoticed.”
Distant Water William Warner
Distant Water Fleets – 1960-1976
12
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act History
Originally Passed in 1976 (signed by President Ford)
Congressional Sponsors were:
Senate: Warren Magnuson & Ted Stevens
House: Don Young (AK) and Gerry Studds (MA)
Intent: Get control of foreign fishing to “Americanize”
USA fisheries and create incentives to rebuild USA
fisheries
13
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (1976-present)
• Eight Regional Councils defined:
- New England (ME, NH, MA, RI, CT)
- Mid-Atlantic (NY, NJ, DE, VA, MD, NC)
- South Atlantic (NC, SC, GA, FL)
- Caribbean (VI, PR)
- Gulf of Mexico (FL, AL. MS, LA, TX)
- Pacific (WA, OR, CA, ID)
- North Pacific (AK, WA)
- Western Pacific (HA, SA, NMI, GA)
“…individuals who, by reason of their occupational or other experience,
scientific expertise or training, are knowledgeable regarding the
conservation and management, or the commercial or recreational
harvest, of the fishery resources of the geographical area concerned”.
f
14
8 Regional Fishery Management Councils
15
Fishery Management Councils
• Membership of each Council:
- 1 state marine fisheries official from each state
- at least one representative from each state
(fisher, scientist, NGO person)
- several “at large” members (including tribal if
appropriate)
- NMFS Regional Administrator
- non-voting members from USFWS, USCG, DOS
• Role: develop fishery management plans (FMPs) for each
major fishery in the region, develop appropriate plan
amendments, collaborate with contiguous councils, assure
that plans meet the 10 “national standards”, monitor and
modify their plans accordingly
…XI-XV How to Implement
Fisheries Management
There is no manual for what we are attempting!
17
10 USA National Standards for
Fishery Management Plans
#1 – Conservation and management measures shall prevent
overfishing while achieving, on a continuing basis, the
optimum yield from each fishery for the United States fishing
industry (optimum yield is “…maximum sustainable yield as
reduced by any relevant economic, social or ecological
factor…”) this standard has primacy over all others
#2 – Conservation and management measures shall be
based upon the best scientific information available
#3 – To the extent practicable, an individual stock of fish shall
be managed as a unit throughout its range, and interrelated
stocks of fish shall be managed as a unit or in close
coordination
18
National Standards for Fishery Management Plans
#4 – Conservation and management measures shall not
discriminate between residents of different states. …allocations
shall be (A) fair and equitable to all such fishermen, (B)
reasonably calculated to promote conservation, and (C) carried
out so no entity acquires and excessive share…”
#5 Conservation and management actions shall, where
practicable, consider efficiency in the utilization of fishery
resources; except that no such measure shall have economic
allocation as its sole purpose
#6 – Conservation and management measures shall take into
account and allow for variations in, fisheries, fishery resources
and catches.
19
National Standards for Fishery Management Plans
#7 – Conservation and management measures shall, where
practicable, minimize costs and avoid unnecessary duplication
#8 – Conservation and management measures shall, consistent
with the conservation requirements of this act (including the
prevention of overfishing and rebuilding of overfished stocks),
take into account the importance of fishery resources to fishing
communities by utilizing economic and social data and meet the
requirements of (#2) in order to (A) provide for the sustained
participation of such communities, and (B) to the extent
practicable, minimize adverse economic impacts on such
communities
20
National Standards for Fishery Management Plans
#9 – Conservation and management measures shall, to the
extent practicable, (A) minimize bycatch and (B) to the extent
bycatch cannot be avoided, minimize the mortality of such
bycatch
#10 – Conservation and management measures shall, to the
extent practicable, promote the safety of human life at sea.
The Fishery Management Plan (FMP) Cycle
• Evaluate Proposed FMPs for NS Consistency
• Approve Measures
• Implement FMP Measures
• Enforce regulations
• Develop FMPs that meet the 10 National Standards
• Recommend Allocations among sectors
• Public Process and Transparency
• Estimate ACLs
• Evaluate Success and options for management
• biological, social, and economic perspectives
Council Scientific and
Statistical Committees
Regional Fishery
Management Councils
National Marine
Fisheries Service
(NMFS)
NMFS, States, Coast
Guard
Ecosystem Goal Team & Technology, Planning and Integration Program Office Ecosystem Goal Team & Technology, Planning and Integration Program Office
Science Supporting Fisheries
Management • Basic science questions:
- what is the current biomass relative to the target?
- what is the current harvest rate relative to the target?
- what Annual Catch limit is required to stay under the
maximum fishing mortality rate limit (MFML)
- what combination of ACLs is required to rebuild the
stock (if required) by the end of the rebuilding plan?
• Basic science requirements:
- estimates of the current harvest rate
- estimates of the current stock size
- estimates of the size of “recruit” age classes
- robust projection methods for years t+1, t+2…..
TRENDS IN
RELATIVE
ABUNDANCE
YIELD/RECRUIT
SSB/RECRUIT
RESEARCH
VESSEL
SURVEYS
FISHERIES:
• LANDINGS
• EFFORT
• SAMPLING
INDICES OF
STOCK
ABUNDANCE
AND
RECRUITMENT
FISHERY
CATCHES
OBSERVER
SAMPLING
•DISCARDS
•KEPT
SEQUENTIAL
POPULATION
ANALYSIS
TRENDS IN
RELATIVE
ABUNDANCE
INDICES OF
STOCK
ABUNDANCE:
CPUE/LANDINGS
BIOLOGICAL
DATA • GROWTH
• MORTALITY
• etc.
EVALUATION OF
MANAGEMENT
OPTIONS
CALIBRATION
SCIENTIFIC ADVICE
CATCH AND
ABUNDANCE
PROJECTIONS
CATCH-AT-AGE
MATRIX
(NUMBERS)
• AGE-LENGTH KEY
• SIZE COMPOSITION
• LENGTH/WEIGHT
ESTIMATE CURRENT
ABUNDANCE AND
FISHING MORTALITY
AT AGE (MODELS)
HISTORICAL
ABUNDANCE AND
FISHING MORTALITY
AT AGE
BIOLOGICAL
DATA • GROWTH
• MORTALITY
• etc.
Fishery-
Independent
Data
Fishery-
Dependent
Data
Making a Fish Stock Assessment
Science is the Cornerstone
of Good Management
President Bush signs reauthorization of the M-S FCMA in 2007
Some Highlights from the 2007 Reauthorization of
the Magnuson Stevens Act
End Overfishing in two years for all stocks (2010, 2011)
Annual Catch Limits (ACL) and accountability measures
Strengthen International management (IUU – illegal,
unregulated and unreported)
Improve Fishery-Dependent Data, National Data collection
Programs & Recreational Registration Program in absence
of State Licenses, improved Social & Economic Data