Top Banner
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004 David R. Law May 23, 2005 age: A. Siemiginowska, M. Weiss (APOD 031128)
17

The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Britney Smith
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

The Evolution of Quasars andMassive Black Holes

“Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004

“The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004

David R. LawMay 23, 2005 Image: A. Siemiginowska, M. Weiss (APOD 031128)

Page 2: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Quasars: Introduction and Low Redshifts

• Quasars are high-luminosity AGN (MB < -23), LX >1044 erg/s• AGN distinguished by broad SED and strong emission lines.

Permitted lines (Ly,H,C IV, Mg II, etc) 5000 km/s wide, prominent forbidden lines ([O I], [O II], [O III], [S II]). Broad Fe II emission.

• Above a certain luminosity, AGN only hosted by massive elliptical galaxies, disk components occur only at low luminosities

• HST imaging indicates hosts of low redshift quasars almost entirely massive ellipticals with Mv < -24, L > L*

• Host galaxies appear to be similar for both active and quiescent quasars

Page 3: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

We can observe local structure well, consistent with de Vaucoleurs r1/4 profile.

(Dunlop 2004)

Page 4: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

The Black Hole - Spheroid Connection

• Detected systems probably not result of mergers: although disk galaxy mergers can produce r1/4 profiles the light is inconsistent with a nuclear starburst, and Scoville et al. (2003) detected no molecular gas in most luminous quasars (though some gas in disky hosts)

• All spheroids appear to contain black holes with masses given by a fairly precise mass ratio (Magorrian et al. 1998, et al)

• Mass relation in nearby quasars is the same as that in quiescent galaxies: MBH = 0.0012 MSph

Page 5: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Observed correlation between nuclear luminosityand bulge/total light fraction

(Dunlop 2004)

Page 6: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

(Dunlop 2004)

Page 7: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Finding Quasars at High Redshift

• In local universe, exploit spectral differences between quasars and stars.

• Search methods: UV excess, slitless spectra, color selection criteria, spectroscopic surveys (e.g. Steidel survey of z = 3 Lyman Break Galaxies).

• Large digital surveys like 2dF and SDSS revolutionized quasar searches, using population synthesis showed weak AGN emission in almost all early and mid-type galaxies.

• Seems that quasars are still too few to account for ionization of IGM at high redshift- more out there?

Page 8: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Estimating Black Hole Mass

• Standard method involves virial theorem applied to broad line emission regions: Mbh = R v2/G

• Empirical correlation between radius of the broad line region and the 5100 continuum flux.

• In local universe, H the line of choice• Beyond z = 1 this gets shifted into NIR, so use Mg II (2799)

, another low ionization line.• C IV also used, but correlation with H less well understood.• Reverberation mapping. What is this?

Page 9: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

(Dunlop 2004)

Page 10: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Estimating Host Mass

• Tricky- search methods at high redshift preferentially select bright quasars, which outshine hosts

• Some use of [O III] to trace velocity dispersion in central regions of host galaxy

• Predict most luminous high z quasars require elliptical hosts (or their progenitors) of L ~ 10 L*

Page 11: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Dunlop (2004) disparages the usefulness of this relation?

Page 12: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Population Evolution

• Most luminous quasars are emitting at near Eddington limit• Space densities increase dramatically with redshift-

population density increased by more than 2 dex from z=0 to 2. (This is seen in even smallest original samples of 20 objects- Schmidt 1968).

• Either space density increasing by factor of over 100, or characteristic luminosity increasing by factor of 30. These models give very different results for quasar lifetime- 107 vs. 109 years.

• Schmidt- power law and exponential forms could both fit data trend with redshift.

Page 13: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

(Dunlop 2004)

Page 14: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

(Osmer 2004)

Page 15: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

(Dunlop 2004)

Assuming passive evolution, hosts of luminous quasars almost unchanged in mass between redshift z = 2 and today

Page 16: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Population Evolution: Conclusions

• At least 10% of present massive ellipticals were active quasars at z = 2.

• Almost every spheroidal system had an AGN phase• No evident chemical evolution in quasars from z = 3 to today• Quasars appear to have built up their mass early: over 109

solar masses at redshifts z > 3.6 (Fan et al. 2001)• Therefore low redshift Seyfert galaxies and AGN have

achieved a large fraction of their final black hole growth.• What shuts off the accretion?

Page 17: The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.

Future Work

• Want to match observations of AGN over a range of redshifts to the local mass function of black holes in galaxies.

• High angular resolution studies are necessary so the morphology of host galaxies can be analyzed

• Adaptive optics with integral field spectroscopy could allow such high resolution studies and suppress the central source flux to probe faint host galaxy.