THE ETRUSCANS AND THEIR ANIMALS

Microsoft Word - ~~Coverpage.docxThe zooarchaeology of Forcello di Bagnolo San Vito (Mantova)
Angela Claire Trentacoste
July 2014
Typewritten Text
The results, discussions and conclusions presented herein are identical to those in the printed version. This electronic version of the thesis has been edited solely to ensure conformance with copyright legislation and all excisions are noted in the text. The final, awarded and examined version is available for consultation via the University Library.
i
ABSTRACT
The Etruscan city at Forcello was a prominent settlement in the Val Padana between the sixth
and fourth centuries BC. Located at the northernmost periphery of Etruscan influence, Forcello
lay along important trade routes connecting Etruria, the Adriatic, and central Europe. In addition
to a rich array of material culture recovered from over thirty years of excavation, Forcello has
also produced an exceptional quantity of animal remains, a volume that offers an unparalleled
opportunity to study animal exploitation in Etruscan society. Using this abundant faunal
assemblage as a starting point, this dissertation examines human–animal relationships at
Forcello and more broadly within Etruscan Italy.
To provide a foundation for further study, previous zooarchaeological research on northern and
central Italy is synthesized into a single narrative. Faunal analysis at Forcello then reconstructs
livestock husbandry strategies, assesses the contribution of wild taxa, and investigates the role
of other animals not normally consumed. Results are compared regionally and chronologically to
place Forcello in a broader context, building an inter-site picture of Etruscan animal relations.
With the evolution of Etruscan cities in the Po Plain, livestock management strategies break from
Bronze Age practices. Animal remains indicate a thriving network of northern Etruscan cities
linked to, but partly independent from, central Italy, and northern Etruscan centers embrace
swine husbandry earlier than Etruria. Within Forcello, faunal analysis illustrates well-developed
husbandry systems and the presence of non-Etruscan culinary traditions. The recovery a
significant number of perinatal human remains from the faunal assemblage is an important find.
This project produces new data on subsistence strategy and urban life in an underrepresented
region of Etruscan civilization, and it clarifies chronological and regional trends in animal
management in Etruscan Italy during the first millennium BC, creating an integrated picture of
Etruscan animal relationships that encompasses both Etruria and Etruria Padana.
ii
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 | The Etruscans and their animals 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Etruscans in North and Central Italy ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3 The Etruscan settlement at Forcello.......................................................................................................16
CHAPTER 2 | Zooarchaeology: past research and present considerations 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................29 2.2 Wild animals and the importance of hunting ..................................................................................36 2.3 A penchant for pork: changes in livestock frequencies.......................................................................40
2.4 Secondary products and specialization .................................................................................................45 2.5 Incremental improvements: animal size change ..................................................................................54 2.6 Beyond the table: other domestic animals ............................................................................................61
4.4 Pigs ............................................................................................................................................................96 4.5 Sheep/goat............................................................................................................................................. 113 4.6 Cattle ...................................................................................................................................................... 127
4.13 Summary............................................................................................................................................. 148
CHAPTER 5 | Animals on the edge: zooarchaeology at Forcello in context 5.1 Contextualizing the Forcello assemblage .......................................................................................... 151 5.2 Species representation and relative frequency .................................................................................. 153
5.3 Aims of husbandry and the role of secondary products .................................................................. 159 5.4 Trends in animal size............................................................................................................................ 164 5.5 Other domestic animals .................................................................................................................... 188
5.6 Perinatal human remains .................................................................................................................. 193
CHAPTER 6 | Beyond bones: diet, economy, and society at Forcello 6.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 197 6.2 Pigs on the periphery............................................................................................................................ 198
6.3 Secondary products, specialization, and improvement.................................................................... 207 6.4 Dogs for dinner ..................................................................................................................................... 210 6.5 Among the animals: infant human remains....................................................................................... 211
CHAPTER 7 | Summary and conclusions 7.1 Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 217 7.2 Future directions ................................................................................................................................... 219 7.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 221
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 223
APPENDIX C | Forcello faunal database.................................................................................. CD
Figure 1.1.2 Mineral resources in Italy......................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 1.3.1 Ariel view of Forcello and its surroundings .............................................................................................. 18
Figure 1.3.2 Topographic map of modern Northern Italy showing the Po catchment area ................................................ 18
Figure 1.3.3 Geomorphologic maps of the area surrounding Forcello............................................................................ 19
Figure 1.3.4 Hypothesized position of the Bagnolo lake in the Etruscan period............................................................... 20
Figure 1.3.5 Extent of the Etruscan site of Forcello (in grey) with excavated area and site features.................................... 22
Figure 1.3.6 Plan of houses F I and F II at Forcello ...................................................................................................... 23
Figure 1.3.7 General plan of the Etruscan city of Marzabotto ....................................................................................... 24
Figure 1.3.8 Etruscan finds from the 5th and 4th centuries BC
in the territory between the Oglio and Mincio Rivers .................................................................................................. 25
Figure 1.3.9 Principal commercial routes from the Mediterranean
to central Europe during the early 5th century BC ....................................................................................................... 26
Chapter 2
Figure 2.1.1 Map of Italy showing the location of comparative Bronze Age sites ............................................................. 33
Figure 2.1.2 Map of Italy showing the location of Forcello and comparative Iron Age/Etruscan sites.................................. 34
Figure 2.2.1 Tomb of Hunting and Fishing................................................................................................................. 38
Figure 2.3.1 Northern species frequencies for the Bronze Age and Iron Age/Etruscan period ........................................... 40
Figure 2.3.2 Pig frequencies from sites in Emilia-Romagna, Lombardia, and the southern Veneto .................................... 42
Figure 2.3.3 Species frequencies from northern Etruscan sites from the 8th 4th centuries BC .......................................... 42
Figure 2.3.4 Central species frequencies for the Bronze Age and Iron Age/Etruscan period.............................................. 44
Figure 2.3.5 Pig frequencies from central sites for the Bronze Age and Iron Age/Etruscan period ..................................... 44
Figure 2.4.1 Cattle age stages from central sites between the Bronze and Iron Ages ....................................................... 46
Figure 2.4.2 Cattle metacarpal shape from Barche and Canar ....................................................................................... 47
Figure 2.4.3 Cattle metacarpal shape from Isolone ..................................................................................................... 47
Figure 2.4.4 Cattle metapodial measurements from central sites .................................................................................. 48
Figure 2.4.5 Sheep/goat kill-off curve for northern Middle Bronze Age sites.................................................................. 49
Figure 2.4.6 Kill off pattern for sheep/goat for central sites......................................................................................... 50
Figure 2.4.7 Kill off pattern for sheep/goat from Rome - Velia..................................................................................... 50
Figure 2.4.8 Kill off pattern for sheep/goat from central Etruscan sites ......................................................................... 51
Figure 2.4.9 Sheep/goat kill-off curve from Santorso and Padova................................................................................. 52
Figure 2.4.10 Sheep/goat kill-off curves for northern Etruscan sites............................................................................. 52
Figure 2.5.1 Average cattle astragalus length (GLl) for northern sites
between the Neolithic and Roman Period................................................................................................................... 55
Figure 2.5.2 Average cattle 1st phalanx length (Glpe) for northern sites
between the Neolithic and Roman period................................................................................................................... 55
Figure 2.5.3 Cattle distal tibia size from central sites between the Bronze and Iron Age .................................................. 57
Figure 2.5.4 Cattle astragalus shape from central sites between the Bronze and Iron Age ................................................ 57
Figure 2.5.5 Cattle astragalus size for central sites between the Bronze Age and 3rd century BC ...................................... 58
Figure 2.5.6 Average sheep metacarpal proximal breadth (Bp) for northern sites between
the Neolithic and Roman period ............................................................................................................................... 59
Figure 2.5.7 Sheep/goat withers height for central sites between the Bronze and Iron Age .............................................. 59
Figure 2.5.8 Sheep/goat distal metacarpal size from central sites between the Bronze and Iron Age ................................. 60
Figure 2.5.9 Average pig distal humerus width (Bd) in northern Italy between
the Neolithic and Roman period ............................................................................................................................... 61
Figure 2.5.10 Pig astragalus length (GLl) from Canar................................................................................................... 61
Chapter 3
Figure 3.2.1 Species frequencies by phase at Forcello from the Scarpa report ................................................................ 69
Figure 3.2.2 Species frequencies by context at Forcello from the Scarpa report .............................................................. 70
vi
Figure 4.2.1 Unfused metapodial diaphysis and epiphyses........................................................................................... 86
Figure 4.2.2 Relative frequencies of adjacent small and large bones ............................................................................. 87
Figure 4.2.3 Bone surface preservation by period ....................................................................................................... 88
Figure 4.2.4 Relative frequencies of bones with butchery marks by period..................................................................... 89
Figure 4.2.5 Relative frequencies of bones with gnawing marks by period ..................................................................... 90
Figure 4.2.6 Relative frequencies of burnt bones period .............................................................................................. 91
Figure 4.3.1 Relative frequencies from NCSP by period................................................................................................ 92
Figure 4.3.2 Relative frequencies from NCSP by phase ................................................................................................ 93
Figure 4.3.3 Relative frequencies from NCSP and MAU for all archaeological periods....................................................... 93
Figure 4.3.4 Relative frequencies from MAU by period ................................................................................................ 93
Figure 4.3.5 Relative frequencies teeth and bones from MAU by period ......................................................................... 94
Figure 4.3.6 Relative frequencies of cattle, sheep/goat and pig by context type ............................................................. 94
Figure 4.3.7 Relative frequencies from sieved NCSP .................................................................................................... 94
Figure 4.4.1 Pig body part distribution for all archaeological phases ............................................................................. 97
Figure 4.4.2 Pig body part distribution by period........................................................................................................ 98
Figure 4.4.4 Pig body part distribution by context type ............................................................................................... 99
Figure 4.4.5 Total number of pig elements from Scarpa (1988) and adjusted NISP ........................................................ 101
Figure 4.4.6 Pig bones with butchery marks............................................................................................................. 102
Figure 4.4.7 Percentages of pig bones with butchery marks by period......................................................................... 102
Figure 4.4.8 Pig mandible wear stages for all archaeological periods .......................................................................... 104
Figure 4.4.9 Pig mandible wear stages for the Late and Early periods .......................................................................... 104
Figure 4.4.10 Pig fusing/fused vs. unfused bones for all archaeological per iods........................................................... 104
Figure 4.4.11 Fusing/fused vs. unfused pig epiphyses for Late and Early period........................................................... 105
Figure 4.4.12 Pig pelvis measurements ................................................................................................................... 106
Figure 4.4.13 Pig canine sex by period.................................................................................................................... 106
3 width (WA) from the Late and Early periods ................................................................................ 107
Figure 4.4.16 Pig lower molar widths ...................................................................................................................... 108
Figure 4.4.17 Pig dP
Figure 4.4.18 Pig humerus height of the trochlea condyle (HTC)................................................................................. 108
Figure 4.4.19 Pig humerus: BT vs. HTC ................................................................................................................... 109
Figure 4.4.20 Pig humerus: BT vs. HTC ................................................................................................................... 109
Figure 4.4.21 Pig tibia: Dd vs. Bd ........................................................................................................................... 109
Figure 4.4.22 Pig tibia: Dd vs. Bd............................................................................................................................ 109
Figure 4.4.23 Pig astragalus: GLm vs. GLl ................................................................................................................ 109
Figure 4.4.24 Pig astragalus: GLm vs. GLl ................................................................................................................ 109
Figure 4.4.25 Pig humerus BT for this project compared to the earlier Scarpa report..................................................... 110
Figure 4.4.26 Pig tibia Bd for this project compared to the earlier Scarpa report ........................................................... 110
Figure 4.4.27 Pig astragali from this project compared to the earlier Scarpa report....................................................... 110
Figure 4.4.28 Pig calcanea from Forcello ................................................................................................................. 110
Figure 4.4.29 Pig calcaneum with exostosis around the fusion zone ........................................................................... 111
Figure 4.4.30 Pig scapula with exostosis and evidence of breakage ............................................................................ 111
Figure 4.4.31 Pig scapula with lipping on the articulation .......................................................................................... 111
Figure 4.4.32 Pig proximal radius with exostosis...................................................................................................... 111
Figure 4.5.1 Frequencies of sheep and goats by period ............................................................................................. 114
Figure 4.5.2 Frequencies of sheep and goats by phase.............................................................................................. 114
Figure 4.5.3 Sheep/goat body part distribution all archaeological phases.................................................................. 115
Figure 4.5.4 Sheep/goat body part distribution by period.......................................................................................... 115
Figure 4.5.5 Total number of sheep/goat elements from Scarpa and adjusted NISP....................................................... 116
Figure 4.5.6 Sheep and goat NCSP for various elements ............................................................................................ 116
Figure 4.5.7 Goat horncore from Forcello ................................................................................................................ 117
Figure 4.5.8 Sawn goat horncores from Forcello ....................................................................................................... 117
Figure 4.5.9 Sheep/goat mandible wear stages for all archaeological phases ............................................................... 119
Figure 4.5.10 Sheep/goat mandible wear stages for the Late and Early periods ............................................................ 119
Figure 4.5.11 Sheep/goat fusing/fused vs. unfused bones ........................................................................................ 119
Figure 4.5.12 Sheep/goat fusing/fused vs. unfused bones by period .......................................................................... 120
Figure 4.5.13 Sheep vs. goat mandible wear stages .................................................................................................. 121
Figure 4.5.14 Relative proportions of mandibular sheep, goat and sheep/goat teeth .................................................... 121
Figure 4.5.15 Sheep/goat M3 width (WA) for all archaeological periods ....................................................................... 122
vii
Figure 4.5.17 Sheep and goat humerus: HTC vs. BT .................................................................................................. 122
Figure 4.5.18 Sheep/goat astragalus: Bd ................................................................................................................ 123
Figure 4.5.19 Sheep and goat astragalus: Bd vs. GLl ................................................................................................. 123
Figure 4.5.20 Sheep and goat tibia: Dd vs. Bd .......................................................................................................... 123
Figure 4.5.21 Sheep/goat metacarpal condyle ratios................................................................................................. 123
Figure 4.5.22 Sheep/goat tibia Dd vs. Bd for the Early and Late periods ...................................................................... 123
Figure 4.5.23 Sheep/goat astragalus from this project and the earlier report ............................................................... 123
....................................................................................................... 124
Figure 4.5.25 Sheep mandible with abscess ............................................................................................................. 124
Figure 4.6.1 Bones identified to the general taxa cattle/red deer ................................................................................ 128
Figure 4.6.2 Cattle body part distribution all archaeological phases.......................................................................... 128
Figure 4.6.3 Cattle body part distribution including cattle/red deer specimens all archaeological phases ...................... 128
Figure 4.6.4 Total number of cattle elements from Scarpa (1988) and adjusted NISP..................................................... 129
Figure 4.6.5 Cattle horncores from Forcello ............................................................................................................. 130
Figure 4.6.6 Cattle mandible wear stages for all archaeological phases ....................................................................... 131
Figure 4.6.7 Cattle fusion stages for all archaeological phases ................................................................................... 131
Figure 4.6.8 Cattle M
3 width (WA) ........................................................................................................................... 132
Figure 4.6.9 Cattle M
3 width (WA) v. length (L) by period............................................................................................ 132
Figure 4.6.10 Cattle and red deer tibia: Dd vs. Bd ..................................................................................................... 132
Figure 4.6.11 Cattle and red deer astragalus: GLm vs. GLl ......................................................................................... 132
Figure 4.6.12 Cattle metacarpal: b vs. a .................................................................................................................. 133
Figure 4.6.13 Cattle metatarsal: b v. a..................................................................................................................... 133
Figure 4.6.15 Cattle P2 with lipping ........................................................................................................................ 133
Figure 4.6.16 Cattle P3 with lipping and exostosis.................................................................................................... 133
Figure 4.6.18 Cattle cranium with horncores............................................................................................................ 134
Figure 4.7.2 Dog M
Figure 4.8.1 Joining red deer calcaneum, astragalus and scafocuboid ......................................................................... 140
Figure 4.8.2 Red deer antlers with evidence of sawing .............................................................................................. 141
Figure 4.8.3 Red deer calcaneum: D vs. GL .............................................................................................................. 142
Figure 4.8.4 Red deer metacarpal condyle depth ...................................................................................................... 142
Figure 4.8.5 Red deer metatarsal condyle depth ....................................................................................................... 142
Figure 4.8.6 Deer antler tine sawn at the base.......................................................................................................... 142
Figure 4.8.7 Modern red deer with detail of antlers................................................................................................... 142
Figure 4.9.1 Swan humerus with man-made hole ..................................................................................................... 145
Figure 4.11.1 Number of worked bones by phase ..................................................................................................... 147
Chapter 5
Figure 5.2.1 Worked deer antler from Marzabotto, sawn similarly to those from Forcello............................................... 153
Figure 5.2.2 Species frequencies sites dated from the 9th-2nd centuries BC ................................................................ 155
Figure 5.2.3 Species frequencies from northern Etruscan sites from the 8th-4th centuries BC........................................ 156
Figure 5.2.4 Pig frequencies from Bronze and Iron Age
sites in Emilia-Romagna, Lombardia, and the Veneto arranged chronologically ............................................................ 157
Figure 5.2.5 Changes in species frequencies within settlements between the 9th-4th centuries BC................................. 157
Figure 5.3.1 Sheep/goat mortality curves from northern Bronze Age sites and Forcello ................................................. 161
Figure 5.3.2 Sheep/goat mortality curves from northern Etruscan sites ....................................................................... 161
Figure 5.3.3 Sheep/goat mortality curves from northern non-Etruscan sites and Forcello .............................................. 162
Figure 5.3.4 Sheep/goat mortality curves from central sites and Forcello..................................................................... 162
Figure 5.4.1 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle astragalus distal width (Bd) vs. greatest lateral length (GLl).............................. 165
Figure 5.4.2 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle tibia distal depth (Dd) vs. width (Bd) ............................................................. 165
Figure 5.4.3 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle distal tibia width (Bd).................................................................................. 165
Figure 5.4.4 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle metacarpal distal width (Bd) vs. greatest length (GL) ....................................... 166
Figure 5.4.5 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle metatarsal distal width (Bd) vs. greatest length (GL)........................................ 166
Figure 5.4.6 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle distal metacarpal width (Bd) ........................................................................ 166
Figure 5.4.7 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle distal metatarsal width (Bd) ......................................................................... 166
viii
3 width (W) vs. length (L) ........................................................................... 166
Figure 5.4.9 Iron Age and Etruscan cattle M
3 length (L).............................................................................................. 166
Figure 5.4.11 Bronze Age cattle tibia distal width (Bd)............................................................................................... 169
Figure 5.4.12 Bronze Age cattle astragalus greatest lateral length (GLl) ....................................................................... 170
Figure 5.4.13 Bronze Age cattle metacarpal distal width (Bd) vs greatest length (GL) ..................................................... 170
Figure 5.4.14 Bronze Age cattle metatarsal distal width (Bd) ...................................................................................... 171
Figure 5.4.15 Bronze Age cattle M
3 lengths (L) ......................................................................................................... 172
Figure 5.4.17 Sheep astragalus distal width (Bd)....................................................................................................... 174
Figure 5.4.18 Sheep metacarpal distal width (Bd) vs. greatest length (GL) .................................................................... 174
Figure 5.4.19 Sheep tibia distal width (Bd) from Forcello and Colognola ai Colli/Castelrotto........................................... 174
Figure 5.4.20 Sheep/goat tibia distal depth (Dd) vs. distal width (Bd) .......................................................................... 174
Figure 5.4.21 Log ratios for sheep/goat post-cranial bones....................................................................................... 175
Figure 5.4.22 Sheep tibia distal widths (Bd) from Forcello, Isolone and Canar............................................................... 177
Figure 5.4.23 Sheep/goat M
Figure 5.4.25 Sheep astragalus measurements from Forcello, Isolone, and Canar ......................................................... 179
Figure 5.4.26 Sheep metacarpal distal width (Bd) vs. greatest length (GL) .................................................................... 179
Figure 5.4.27 Sheep metatarsal distal width (Bd) vs. greatest length (GL) ..................................................................... 179
Figure 5.4.28 Sheep metacarpal shape .................................................................................................................... 179
Figure 5.4.29 Sheep metatarsal shape..................................................................................................................... 179
Figure 5.4.30 Iron Age goat astragalus lateral depth (Dl) vs greatest lateral length (GLl) ................................................ 180
Figure 5.4.31 Bronze Age goat tibia distal width (Bd) ................................................................................................ 180
Figure 5.4.32 Iron Age pig tibia distal width (Bd) ...................................................................................................... 181
Figure 5.4.33 Etruscan pig tibia distal depth (Dd) vs. width (Bd) from Forcello and Populonia ......................................... 181
Figure 5.4.34 Pig astragalus greatest lateral length (GLl) from Iron Age/Etruscan sites .................................................. 182
Figure 5.4.35 Etruscan pig astragalus greatest medial length (GLm)
vs. greatest lateral length (GLl) from Forcello and Populonia ...................................................................................... 182
Figure 5.4.36 Pig metacarpal IV greatest lengths (GL) from Iron Age/Etruscan sites ...................................................... 181
Figure 5.4.37 Etruscan pig M
3 width (WA) vs. length (L) ............................................................................................. 183
Figure 5.4.38 Log ratios from pig post-cranial bones ............................................................................................... 183
Figure 5.4.39 Pig M
Figure 5.4.41 Pig tibia distal widths (Bd).................................................................................................................. 187
Figure 5.4.42 Pig astragalus length (GLl) ................................................................................................................. 187
Figure 5.4.43 Pig calcaneum length (GL) from Forcello and Canar ............................................................................... 187
Figure 5.4.44 Pig humerus BT from Forcello and Isolone ........................................................................................... 187
Figure 5.5.1 Dog mandible size through time .......................................................................................................... 190
Figure 5.5.2 Dog tibia size through time ................................................................................................................. 190
Figure 5.5.3 Dog distal humerus breadth (Bd) through time....................................................................................... 191
Figure 5.5.4 Dog mandible basal length from Forcello and Chimney Cave Durezza ....................................................... 191
Figure 5.5.5 Tomb of the Leopards......................................................................................................................... 192
Table 1.3.1 Main occupation phases at Forcello ....................................................................................................... 252
Chapter 2
Table 2.1.1 Species frequencies from Bronze Age sites in northern Italy...................................................................... 253
Table 2.1.2 Species frequencies from Etruscan and Iron Age sites in northern Italy....................................................... 254
Table 2.1.3 Species frequencies from Bronze Age, Iron Age, and Etruscan central Italy ................................................. 255
Table 2.5.1 Cattle withers heights from northern Italy .............................................................................................. 256
Table 2.5.2 Cattle withers heights from central Italy ................................................................................................. 257
Table 2.5.3 Sheep and sheep/goat withers heights from northern Italy ....................................................................... 257
Table 2.5.4 Sheep and sheep/goat withers heights from central Italy.......................................................................... 257
Table 2.5.5 Pig withers heights from northern Italy .................................................................................................. 258
Table 2.5.6 Pig withers heights from central Italy ..................................................................................................... 258
Chapter 3
Table 3.2.1 Number and frequency of identified taxa by phase from the Scarpa report ................................................. 259
Table 3.2.2 Number and frequency of identified taxa by context type from the Scarpa report ........................................ 259
Table 3.2.4 Mollusks identified at Forcello .............................................................................................................. 210
Table 3.3.1 Forcello phases................................................................................................................................... 210
Table 3.3.2 Forcello context types.......................................................................................................................... 261
Table 3.3.3 Phases by period................................................................................................................................. 261
Table 3.5.1 Common and scientific names of animals identified at Forcello ................................................................. 262
Table 3.5.2 Tooth measurements........................................................................................................................... 262
Table 3.5.3 Post-cranial measurements .................................................................................................................. 263
Table 3.6.1 Calculation of the minimum number of animal units (MAU) for different taxa.............................................. 264
Table 3.6.2 Pig dP
Table 3.6.3 Pig P
Table 3.6.4 Pig M
Table 3.6.5 Pig M
Chapter 4
Table 4.2.1 Pig unfused metapodials and mandibular first and second molars by period............................................... 267
Table 4.2.2 Bones with butchery, gnawing and burning marks by period..................................................................... 268
Table 4.2.3 Bones with butchery, gnawing and burning marks by context type ............................................................ 269
Table 4.2.4 Total butchery marks for cattle, sheep/goat and pig................................................................................ 269
Table 4.2.5 Incidence of gnawing by rodents and digested bones .............................................................................. 269
Table 4.3.1 Number of Counted Specimens (NCSP) by period..................................................................................... 270
Table 4.3.2 Number of Counted Specimens (NCSP) by phase – mammals..................................................................... 271
Table 4.3.3 Number of Counted Specimens (NCSP) by phase – birds and other fauna.................................................... 272
Table 4.3.4 Wild and domestic taxa by period.......................................................................................................... 272
Table 4.3.5 Number of Counted Specimens (NCSP) for sieved material........................................................................ 273
Table 4.3.6 Species frequencies from contexts most affected by sieving ..................................................................... 273
Table 4.4.1 Pig skeletal element distribution all archaeological................................................................................ 274
Table 4.4.4 Pig skeletal element distribution other archaeological ........................................................................... 277
Table 4.4.5 Combined Sus scrofa mineral bone density
from Pugsley (2002) and corresponding Forcello diagnostic zone .............................................................................. 278
Table 4.4.6 Pig left vs. right body part distribution................................................................................................... 278
Table 4.4.7 Pig bones with butchery marks ............................................................................................................. 279
Table 4.4.8 Pig bones with butchery marks by context type....................................................................................... 279
Table 4.4.9 Pig bones with gnawing marks.............................................................................................................. 280
Table 4.4.11 Pig bones with evidence of burning ..................................................................................................... 281
Table 4.4.12 Burnt pig bones with by context type ................................................................................................... 281
x
Table 4.5.2 Sheep/goat skeletal element distribution Late....................................................................................... 283
Table 4.5.3 Sheep/goat skeletal element distribution Early...................................................................................... 284
Table 4.5.5 Sheep/goat left vs. right body part distribution .......................................................................................…