Top Banner
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4
25

THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH

Chapter 4

Page 2: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS

• The Nuremberg Code

• The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United States– http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/– Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

• Do we all Abide by IRBs?

Page 3: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Do We All Abide by IRBs?

• Variations in the social work profession

• Routine evaluation research and evaluation activities in social work agencies.

Page 4: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

HEART’S IN THE RIGHT PLACE BUT HEAD ISN’T

• The case of Margaret (p. 31-32)

• Ethical social work practice “versus” ethical social work research– What’s the difference?

Page 5: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

ETHICAL PRACTICE AND ETHICAL RESEARCH

• Ethical Practice– National Association of Social Workers

(NASW), Code of Ethics

• Ethical Research– Policy and Legislation– The Belmont Report

Page 6: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Ethical Practice

• NASW Code of Ethics – Core Values– Service– Social Justice– Dignity and Self Worth of the Person– Importance of Human Relationships– Integrity– Competence

Page 7: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Ethical Research

• The Belmont Report– Part A: Boundaries Between Research &

Practice– Part B: Basic Ethical Principles

• Respect for Persons, Beneficence, Justice

– Part C: Applications• Informed consent, information, comprehension,

voluntariness, assessment of risks and benefits, nature and scope of risks and benefits, systematic assessment of risks and benefits, selection of subjects.

Page 8: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

EXAMPLES OF ETHICAL ISSUES

• Informed Consent, Privacy and Confidentiality Issues

• Informed Consent Issues

• Deception Issues

Page 9: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Informed Consent, Privacy, and Confidentiality Issues

• Example: The case of Isa (p. 41)

• Do no harm

Page 10: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Informed Consent Issues

• Example: U.S. Public Health Service syphilis study carried out in Tuskegee, Alabama.

Page 11: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Deception Issues

• Example: The Milgram Study (1974).

Page 12: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

ETHICAL DECISIONS ACROSS THE RESEARCH PROCESS

• The Research Question• The Research Design

– Equipoise, or the Uncertainty Principle– Deception

• Debriefing

• Sample Selection and Recruitment• Data Collection

– How data are collected, who is going to collect the data, frequency and timing of data collection

Page 13: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

The Research Question

• Is the research effort likely to benefit individuals (or groups) in need?

• Is the research effort likely to add to the professional social work knowledge base?

• Is the research effort likely to benefit social work students who are training to become researchers?

Page 14: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

The Research Design

• Randomly assigning research participants to experimental and control groups– Equipoise, or the Uncertainty Principle:

research studies that randomize their research participants to different treatment groups should be conducted only if there is a true uncertainty about which of the treatment alternatives is most likely to benefit them

– Deception: Is its use necessary? If so, include debriefing procedures at the end of the study.

Page 15: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Sample Selection and Recruitment

• Is your sample representative of the target population?

• Is your sample diverse enough to be representative?

• Be certain that all procedures for recruiting participants are ethically sound.

Page 16: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Data Collection

• Ethical issues are relevant for:– How data are collected– Who is going to collect the data– The frequency and timing of data collection

Page 17: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS

• Determining Competency to Provide Consent

• Providing Adequate Information

• Anonymity and Confidentiality

Page 18: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Determining Competency to Provide Consent

• Capacity or competency to give consent

• Special populations (e.g., children, prisoners, adults with mental or cognitive delays)

Page 19: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Providing Adequate Information

• Researchers hold an ethical responsibility to provide information in such a way that potential research participants fully understand the study and their involvement in it.

• Voluntary consent.

Page 20: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Anonymity and Confidentiality

• Anonymous data – there is no way for the researchers to connect any piece of information in a study to any given study participant.

• Confidential data – the researchers can associate responses with names of respondents, typically through an identification number.

Page 21: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS

• International Research

• Computer- and Internet-based Research Guidance

• Students as Subjects/Students as Researchers

Page 22: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

International Research

• The researcher must demonstrate that research methods are culturally sensitive and locally approved.

• The researcher may need to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the country, culture, and customs before IRB approval is granted.

Page 23: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Computer- and Internet-based Research Guidance

• Internet-based research must provide the same levels of protection to human subjects as traditional modes of research

• Authenticate research respondents

Page 24: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

Students as Subjects/Students as Researchers

• Students who participate in agency or university research are a vulnerable group

• Students who conduct research should have a faculty member carefully review their research proposals prior to its submission to the IRB

Page 25: THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.

SUMMARY

• Ethical social work practice includes ethical research conduct. Mindful concern for the safety and informed protection of our potential research participants is not enough. In ethical research this concern must be partnered with knowledge of best research practices and skill in methodological implementation.