This file is part of the following reference: O’Hagan, Gretta (2014) The essence of the social work relationship: the workers 'use of self'. MSW(Hons) thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/41352/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected]and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/41352/ ResearchOnline@JCU
98
Embed
The essence of the social work relationship: the workers ... · THE ESSENCE OF THE SOCIAL WORK RELATIONSHIP . THE WORKERS ‘USE OF SELF’ Gretta O’Hagan . Bachelor of Social Work,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
This file is part of the following reference:
O’Hagan, Gretta (2014) The essence of the social work relationship: the workers 'use of self'. MSW(Hons) thesis,
James Cook University.
Access to this file is available from:
http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/41352/
The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material
included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote
http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/41352/
ResearchOnline@JCU
1
THE ESSENCE OF THE SOCIAL WORK RELATIONSHIP
THE WORKERS ‘USE OF SELF’
Gretta O’Hagan
Bachelor of Social Work, James Cook University 1995
Submitted in fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK WITH HONOURS
School of Social Work, James Cook University
Townsville, North Queensland, Australia
November 2014
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank my partner Stephen for his encouragement and support in achieving
this goal – there are two Masters in the house now! And, I can’t forget Kitty for keeping me
company in the study.
Also, I would like to thank my Mother for always believing in me, and to my maternal
Grandparents for being the people they were.
I would like to acknowledge James Cook University Graduate Research School Townsville
Campus, for the assistance provided along the way. Last, but not least, a very big thankyou
and my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Dr Anthony McMahon for never giving up on me
or the project and for being such an encouraging supervisor and mentor.
Happy retirement Tony!
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITLY
Every reasonable effort has been made to gain permission and acknowledge the owners of
copyright material. I would be pleased to hear from any copyright owner who has been
omitted or incorrectly acknowledged.
3
SELF
Your greatest gift is your deepest essence,
the one that integrates wisdom and compassion.
Your authentic self, the one that is free to BE, in fullness,
APPENDIX A ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 94
APPENDIX B ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 96
7
APPENDIX C ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 98
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants ………………………………………………………………………………………… 57
Figure 2
Ken Wilber’s Major Methodologies ………………………………………………………………………………. 59
Figure 3
Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 67
Figure 4
Ken Wilber’s Major Methodologies …………………………………………………………………….………… 68
Figure 5
Social Work ‘Use of Self’ right hand side (RHS) …..…………………………………………………………. 69
Figure 6
Social Work ‘Use of Self’ left hand side (LHS) …..……………………………………………………………. 72
Figure 7
The ‘Use of Self’ Integral framework …..………………………………………………………………………… 75
8
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION
The ‘use of self’ – the essence of the social work relationship
This thesis will explore the essence of the social work relationship from the perspective of
the social worker, that is, the social workers ‘use of self’. Whilst the ‘use of self’ denotes key
facets a worker should bring to practice including a high level of self-awareness and self-
knowledge, examination into what the ‘use of self’ or ‘self’ means is left largely unexplored.
This thesis will do two things: firstly it will critique literature to find out what is known about
the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ in social work and ‘self’ other disciplines; and secondly it will
present a universal ‘use of self’ Integral framework.
The impetus for this thesis began in the mid-late 1990’s within the first two years of my
practice as a graduate social work practitioner and interest in this topic has only
strengthened throughout my twenty years of professional experience to date. During this
time, I have worked in a broad range of work environments gaining various practice
experiences and multi-layered ways to apply social work principles, theories, methods and
perspectives. Social work roles have included, practitioner providing individual Indigenous,
non-Indigenous and cross-cultural therapeutic counselling, group work, crisis-oriented
services, case management, training and professional debriefing, and worker supervision
(case management), policy and procedure development, programme design and grant
administrative roles for State and Commonwealth departments. I have lived in urban, rural
and remote settings (including remote Indigenous communities), and worked across sectors
such as tertiary hospitals, primary health care centres, non-government agencies and
government departments (State and Commonwealth).
In my early graduate days it become acutely obvious that engaging with others within the
social work practice relationship required more than technical skill1, it actually demanded
my ‘self’ to be fully yet ethically involved. My practice experiences were inarguably
emphasising to me that a deeper awareness and understanding of the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’
was required beyond what I had learned then to date. The Australian Association of Social
1 England (1986) pointed out that social work practice is more than a technical skill, and that to be done well
engagement in practice requires something more than a superficial understanding.
9
Workers (AASW) Code of Ethics (2010) lists professional integrity as one of the three core
values and notes the profession “values … reflective self-awareness” (Section 3.3, p. 13).
Although I knew I was engaging my worker’s ‘use of self’ with a sense of purpose and
commitment, in line with core social work principles’ (e.g. beginning ‘where the client is at’),
utilising key skills (e.g. ‘active listening’) and applying relevant methods and theories, I
couldn’t articulate the ‘self’.
As my ‘self’ was involved, many questions began to surface, such as, what is this ‘self’ and
most importantly how was I to inquire into and make sense of this ‘self’. Apart from
engaging in reflective practice via personal journaling, in discussion with other colleagues
and during supervision sessions, I conceded that I did not have a suitable frame of reference
to confidently and competently articulate how I understood nor engaged my total ‘use of
self’ within practice. This led me to a period of intensive philosophical questioning about
what is this ‘self’.
During this period, I sought frames of reference outside of social work that might provide
some answers and context. In 1997 began reading into eastern and western philosophy,
phenomenology and transpersonal theory2; began engaging in contemplative practices such
as Vipassana meditation and yoga; and undertook four years of training in exploratory inner
work modalities such as sand play and symbol work, voice dialogue, mandala drawing, art
therapy, body/emotional release practices and holotropic breathwork3. It was during this
time that I had a major light bulb moment when I came across Ken Wilber’s philosophical
work and had the first intimation that the ‘use of self’ could be applied to this Integral
model (1999, 2000)4. Wilber has “further developed and transformed Integralism (Thomas,
2004, p. 8) … [which has origins] … in the Indian philosophy of Sri Aurobindo and Haridas
Chaudhuri (Thomas, 2004, p. 7).
2 Cowley (1993) points out, “Theories that do not recognise higher levels of consciousness may inhibit clients’
development and also contribute to their misdiagnosis … [nor] … take into account or validate the transpersonal nature of the spiritual dimension” (p. 530). 3 The Holotropic Breathwork modality is based on Stan Grof’s, The Cosmic Game: Explorations of the Frontiers
of Human Consciousness, 1998. 4 England suggested that, “no theory of social work has made adequately clear the essentially intuitive basis of
all social work practice … [nor] … properly shown [it] as the root of all social work’s professional knowledge and skill” (1986, p. 59).
10
During this time, I also began discussing this practice dilemma with one of the social work
lecturers, which over a period of time developed into a conceptual idea for a research
project. As the understanding of the worker’s total ‘use of self’, including ‘self’, is pivotal to
the social work practice relationship, the theme and concept of this thesis is an important
topic to address.
In Australia, the University social work degree is generally a four-year program addressing
core theories, models of practice and skills to equip future social workers for practice.
However, complexity arises when the workers’ ‘use of self’ is engaged in the learning
process as social work students come from various family compositions and experiences,
religious affiliations, cultural and educational backgrounds, and enter the social work
program at various life stages with diverse life experiences therefore bringing a range of
interpretations on the world and the people in it. Tutorials on values and ethics, practicums
on the demonstrative aspects of ‘use of self’ and the daily journal requirement to reflect on
practice during the mandatory social work placements are ways in which to highlight this
complexity and the value-laden arena of social work practice. Tutorials are a particularly
useful way for students to discuss ethical considerations and begin examining underlying
personal beliefs. However, it will be argued that this doesn’t go far enough.
Although discussions are raised about the importance of knowing oneself, the
undergraduate degree does not require students to learn about how to gain self-awareness
nor engage in practices in any ongoing and meaningful way. As noted above, students at
best are required to engage in demonstrative self-examination exercises via role playing,
journal writing and associated model and theoretical analysis sessions during class
practicums. Whilst beneficial, this exercise remains as superficial or as deep as an individual
student self-selects. It is easier, if not preferable to evade self-analysis and many would
argue that it takes a committed and disciplined individual to undertake ongoing self-
examination. It is much easier for a student to remain focused on grades and to be unaware
of or deny potentially deep unexamined responses to personal experiences, issues and
needs/longings.
11
Given the complex nature of issues which social workers’ encounter in practice, and indeed
in their personal lives, a framework for the understanding of the ‘use of self’ including the
‘self’ is rather urgent. England (1986) agrees the “use of intuition, of ‘self’, is an integral,
essential element in social work practice” (p. 61). Yet, the research suggests that western
ideas on the ‘use of self’ within social work education and practice continue to be
inadequate and contentious. It has been argued by some that this is due to the pervasive
authority of ‘Technical Reality’ resulting from the influence of the powerful philosophical
doctrine of ‘Positivism’ from the nineteenth century (Schön, 1983 and Wilber, 1993). It is
evident from the research that social work as a profession since its inception has been
grappling with how to describe the workers ‘use of self’, and as such been linked to “a crisis
in professional knowledge” (Schön, 1983, p. 11).
Schön’s (1983) work has given much to the profession of social work. Originally training as a
philosopher, however, went on to develop “reflective practice and learning systems within
organisations and communities … and … a professional’s ability to think on their feet”
(www.infed.org)5. He has been rated in importance alongside Thomas Kuhn with his treatise
on paradigms (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). In his text The Reflective Practitioner:
How Professionals Think in Action Schön (1983) states that,
the professions have become essential to the very functioning of our society … [and
that] … our principle formal institutions … are arenas for the exercise of professional
activity … [through which we seek] … the definition and solution of our problems,
and it is through them that we strive for social progress” (p. 3-4).
Whilst this goes part way in addressing the theme of this thesis, in actual fact if this view is
applied to a social workers ‘use of self’ within the client-worker relationship, it further begs
the question that workers need to be accountable for their own continued personal ‘self’
development, enabling the ‘use of self’ to be an ethical and insightful conduit for the client’s
growth6 as opposed to the workers ‘use of self’ being part of the problem.
5 Infed.org is a not for profit based at YMCA George Williams College, London.
6 For example, “under the traditional contract the professional’s accountability for his performance is mainly to
his professional peers” (Schön, 1983, p.293) however “the professional-client contract may be transformed, within a framework of accountability, when the professional is able to function as a reflective practitioner” (Schön, 1983, p. 295).
12
As a profession, social work is unique in its approach due to the emphasis placed upon the
workers ‘use of self’ within the social work relationship. However, as highlighted in the
above chapters’ the understanding of such is seen to be vague and insufficient. The impact
upon social work from the widespread influence of Positivism can be seen in the way that
attention is placed on observing and analysing the external behaviour of the ‘use of self’
within practice whilst rendering little understanding about the interior ‘self’ and its
implications within the social work relationship. For some time, the profession of social
work has continued to describe the concept of the ‘use of self’ superficially, what Wilber
(2000) terms as “flatland: the peering at surfaces without including consciousness” (p.XV).
The term ‘use of self’ has become more like a mantra and remains an underdeveloped,
elusive and, therefore, a contentious topic area because of its subjective nature making its
place within social work education unclear.
However, there are social work authors and practitioners who have sought to understand
and explain the importance of a more comprehensive concept of the workers’ ‘use of self’.
For example, in 1986 Hugh England in his text Social Work as Art: Making Sense for Good
Practice, dedicated a whole chapter entitled ‘The Persistent Mystery of the Intuitive Use of
Self’ because he sees it as,
“an issue too central, too essential, to be given only a marginal theoretical status; it
is a problem which must be solved” [and describing it as] “a stubborn ambiguity in
practice” (p. 40). He suggests it “has lacked a sufficiently developed discussion …
about the philosophical or practical implications of the use of such intuition” (p. 43)
… [and yet although] … the social workers use of self, of intuition, has been
consistently recognised as a distinct aspect of helping in social work … social work
has not been able to make any articulate link between [theory and practice]” (pp.
47-48).
Unfortunately, this research has highlighted that this still appears to be the case.
Studies have shown that the ‘use of self’ directly influences the quality of the social work
relationship and practice outcomes more than the application of any specific technique
(Howe, 1993, 2008). However, the analysis also demonstrates that the current thinking on
the ‘use of self’ isn’t very deep because it does not address the ‘self’ in its fullest expression.
13
As such, the following definition of ‘self’ will be used, “the ‘self’ is that which attempts to
integrate or balance all of the components of the psyche at any given level of consciousness
development including: body, mind, soul” (Wilber, 2000, p.4).
The research highlights that the notion of the workers ‘use of self’ within the client-worker
casework relationship is of particular significance to social work education and practice. The
interest can be traced to the professionalisation of social work itself. Given this significance
it is important to be clear on what is meant by the term ‘use of self’ and ‘self’. It is
interesting to note that although the ‘use of self’ within the social work relationship is of
high importance, there remains limited research on the subject and as Lindsay (2002) notes
the “support for ‘use of self’ has been very superficial” (p. 150). As will be shown, social
works inception of the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ remains a phenomenon which is at once both
central and yet nebulous.
During the shift from pre-professional to professional social work, the ‘use of self’ was
shaped by the influences and changing environments of religion, the notion of befriending
and charity, modernisation (e.g. industrialisation, technological innovation, philosophical
and sociological changes), and human rights movements7. As such, the workers’ ‘use of self’
came about in a context of extraordinary evolutionary changes (Reid, www2.uncp.edu).
During this period, which included the rise of the professions such as medicine, law, and
sociology, social work struggled to become recognised as a complete profession (Flexner,
1915). Research suggests that in light of this social work strived to be scientific and as such
embraced the Positivist epistemology, effectively shifting away from its religious basis.
Jordan (1988) suggests that befriending and charity is intertwined with the notion of the
‘use of self’ and its
… key [was] the development of a leisured class. Particularly significant was the
emergence of the educated middle-class woman. It is important to emphasise that
7 “During the early to mid-nineteenth century the social order was being challenged and a new philosophy was
emerging, imbued with ideals of liberty, personal freedom, and legal reform. Black slavery was … abolished, and working class men demanded that the right to vote... [and] women … began to think [they] … deserved to be emancipated from their enslaved status” (Wojtczak, www.hastingspress.co.uk/history/19/overview).
14
this tradition contributed only one element, but a very important one – the notion of
the importance of personal relationships to the process of social rehabilitation (p.
32).
The legacy of this can be seen in social works essential features, that is, the importance of
the workers’ effective ‘use of self’ within the social work relationship.
With regards to religion, Lindsay (2002) suggests that although at the time social work was
founded in America and England it was committed to both a religious doctrine and Positivist
ideology, “in many ways [the approaches were] in direct conflict with each other” (p. 16).
McMahon (2002) discusses the influential role religion played in the pre-professional social
work era in Australia as many of the organisations established to assist people in need were
indeed run by religious sisters belonging to various faiths (p. 3). Interestingly, as social work
became more committed to proving its scientific status (under the influence of Positivism),
the distancing from religion became evident to the point that “one of the dominant dualistic
themes in the historiographies of Australian social work … is the contrast between secular,
professional social work [vs] religious ‘amateur’ charity” (Hughes, 2008, p.227).
The authors’ document that as a result of Positivism and striving for professional status,
social work became increasingly influenced by the newly established scientific reasoning
and rational analysis (Lindsay, 2002). Schon (1983) suggests that the Positivist doctrine8
produced a time of ‘significant and tremendous upheaval’ and writes of this influence,
…positivism, the powerful philosophical doctrine that grew up in the nineteenth
century as an account of the rise of science and technology and as a social
movement aimed at applying the achievements of science and technology to the
well-being of mankind (p. 31).
8 Positivism is a philosophy of science that became influential in 19th Century France however it roots can “be
traced back … [to] the British empiricist school of the 17th and 18th Centuries” (A Dictionary of Philosophy,
1984, p. 283). The positivist approach “primarily developed by Saint-Simon and by [sociologist] Auguste
Comte” (A Dictionary of Philosophy, 1984, p. 283) continues to be a recurrent and dominant theme in Western
thought. It was maintained that “all genuine knowledge is contained within the boundaries of science … [and
that philosophy] … must abandon the claim to have any means of attaining knowledge not available to
science” (A Dictionary of Philosophy, 1984, p. 283).
15
This led to continued widespread distortions on the nature of balance within the
relationship to self and others, and therefore impacted upon the understanding and
engagement of the workers’ ‘use of self’ within practice. As Thomas (2004) suggests, it has
been “at crucial junctures of development … [through the premodern, modern and
postmodern periods and influences of science and philosophy] … different schools of social
work and their related methods have stepped outside of its proper domain and attempted
to operate as an absolute worldview” (p. 7). Wilber would see this as “overreach of the
domain’s epistemic warrant” (Thomas, 2004, p. 7).
As there was enormous pressure for social work to prove itself as a profession,
…social casework became committed [to Freud’s psychoanalytic casework]. … By
emphasising the rigour of detached objectivity, social work research devalued
subjective constructs such as morality, spirituality, and cultural or personal belief
systems. In the teaching of social work practice, the spiritual aspect of human
development came to be largely ignored (Lindsay, 2002, p. 17-18).
Notwithstanding the striving towards scientific status, in 1970 social work was downgraded
to a ‘minor profession’9 along with ‘librarianship, education and divinity’ (Flexner, 1915).
Typically, the formative years of the workers’ ‘use of self’ were heavily influenced by an
objectivity and quantitative science, with a clear shift to dismiss subjectivity and qualitative
knowledge. Sheldrake & Fox suggest that “the kind of knowledge of the world that scientists
had was essentially disembodied. … This imaginative disembodying was essential to the
scientific revolution” (1997, p.17). What this means for the workers’ ‘use of self’ is a reduced
ability to understand and articulate first-person phenomenological experience and the
relationship to cultural awareness, despite social workers describing practice as intuitive.
Due to the competing ideologies of these influences, the authors’ indicate that a division
resulted from social works’ research and practice which profoundly contributed to the
difficulty in reconciling the elusive intuitive ‘use of self’ (England, 1986). Despite this
9 Minor professions were described as to “suffer from shifting, ambiguous ends and from unstable institutional
contexts of practice, and are therefore unable to develop a base of systemic, scientific professional knowledge” (Schon, 1983, p. 23).
16
disparity remaining, there is an increasing inclusiveness and robust rigour around
experiential qualitative research and practice (Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009, 2010, 2014). This
thesis is intent on drawing out the essential elements requisite for a workers’ Integral ‘use
of self’ framework and what knowledge from other disciplines is required to meet this task.
Western social work education pays a good deal of attention to the workers’ ‘use of self’ in
practice, and social work undergraduate education dedicates time to discussing topics such
as values and ethics and practicing the demonstrative ‘use of self’ via practicums. Whilst the
‘use of self’ is a significant theme, the reality is that what constitutes the workers ‘use of
self’ is not clearly understood, and as such is left largely theoretically unexamined and
experientially unexplored. The ‘use of self’ is considered by the researcher as its own
discrete practice realm distinct from, yet underpinning, social work theories and practice
models. The way this will be highlighted will be to establish from the examined texts what is
and what is not known about the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’, and to discuss the finding by
presenting a ‘use of self’ Integral framework. An Integral framework essentially means
encompassing both the subjective and objective perspectives of the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’.
The research suggests that a significant contributing factor to the lack of a ‘use of self’
Integral framework can be traced to the powerful influence of Positivism (Schon, 1983;
2002; McMahon, 2002; Pembroke, 2004) and the inclusion of Eastern philosophy for
example to assist in mitigating compassion fatigue upon workers (McGarrigle et al, 2011)
and mindfulness (Doxdator, 2012; Kornfield, 1993). Although this type of subjective
experience is being explored, little is written about the workers ‘use of self’ or ‘self’ and its
impact on the practice relationship. Most importantly, there appears to be limited if any
advancement towards a consensus of what is the ‘use of self’ in practice, let alone the
development of a universal ‘use of self’ Integral framework. However, through my research I
found two social workers who acknowledge that an Integral application to social work
practice would be useful (Garner 2011; Thomas, 2004).
In order to address the lack of consensus on what is the ‘use of self’, a universal ‘use of self’
Integral framework will be proposed based upon the critiquing of social work and other
disciplines literature and viewed through an Integral lens. The aim is to establish a beginning
baseline of knowledge showing where social work currently is, and to suggest other
disciplines knowledge for the understanding of and engagement of the ‘use of self’ in
practice. The Integral model being utilised is Ken Wilber’s (1996, 2000) model who is one of
the worlds’ current leading Integral theorists. The aim of this thesis is to enable the social
work profession to have a more defensible and comprehensive understanding of the ‘use of
self’ within the practice relationship inclusive of both subjective and objective aspects. The
Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) is being utilised as the methodological framework and
the chosen method is textual analysis. Both of these will be explained along with the
process of text selection and analysis in chapter two titled ‘Developing an Integral
Framework’.
As the results of the analysis will show, the lack of a ‘use of self’ Integral framework is a
systemic issue within the social work profession10. For example England (1986) wrote that,
10
This is supported by McGarrigle, T., & Walsh, C. A. Ph.D. (2011), “Social workers are guided by a Code of Ethics (Canadian Association of Social Workers, 2005) that demands self-awareness, self-monitoring of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors and attention to self-care and wellness, yet limited educational or
18
beyond the shift to a philosophical emphasis … [social work] requires that some form
of framework be established which will enable social workers to be articulate and
critical about personal experience (1986, p. 55). He suggested, “the problem of the
‘nature of knowledge’ and its clarification clearly is primarily linked to social work’s
proper grasp of the intuitive use of self” (p. 56).
My research demonstrates that from social work’s inception there has been assertions put
forward that the ‘use of self’ is significant but not sufficiently understood. This thesis will
address this by presenting a framework for the ‘use of self’ by firstly examining social work
and other disciplines literature and secondly, by applying the findings to the chosen Integral
model (Wilber, 1996, 2000).
There are ways in which the social work profession and social workers’ have sought to
increase worker accountability within practice. Some examples of this include mindfulness
practice (McGarrigle & Walsh, 2011; Doxtdator, 2012) and critical reflectivity (Fook, 1999).
Others have incorporated into their writing and practice what has been termed as ‘missing
elements’ in social work theory and practice such as spirituality (Biestek, 1957; Canda, 1986,
2004) and transpersonal theory (Cowley, 1993; Cowley & Derezotes, 1994). Others have
written on the post-modern notions of critical practice (Camilleri, 1999; Ife, 1997; Pease &
Fook, 1999) and radical casework (Fook, 1993). Canda (1986, 1999) an American social
worker identified in the mid 1980’s that spirituality was lacking in contemporary western
social work practice and noted that, “spirituality involves understanding the
interconnectedness of all people … and the realisation that self and others are inseparable”
(p. 1). Lindsay (2002) an Australian social worker commented that spirituality was making an
overdue resurgence.
While debates continue to this day, England’s observations remain correct in emphasising
the following,
If there are grounds for thinking that intuitive knowledge and behaviour are a
persistent presence in social work, there are also grounds for concluding that their professional supports and few theoretical models are available to support this work” (see ‘Mindfulness, Self-Care, and Wellness in Social Work: Effects of Contemplative Training’ in Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 30:3, pp. 212-233).
19
role is not clear, and that their value is disputed … social work is in fact often under
attack because of its intuitive character, and social workers collude with this criticism
by their silence or apology (1986, p. 42).
The theoretical and skill based applications with which social workers are equipped during
an undergraduate degree, whilst essential and valid, are in many ways the surface layer of
the depth necessary workers’ need to develop if they are to be effective in practice.
Outside of social work, individuals from various disciplines are currently undertaking
research, practice and contemplation on the ‘self’ such as, energy anatomy (Myss, 1997,
2001), theologians (Durkheim, 1915; Lonergan as cited in Coghlan, 2008, Helminiak, 2013, &
Kim, 2010; Sheldrake & Fox, 1997), Buddhists (His Holiness the Dalia Lama, 2001; Engler,
Merchant, 1989; Schon, 1983; Wilber, 1996, 2000, 2006, 2012) and others into the
subjective facets of the human experience. These authors assert in a myriad of ways that
human beings are engaged in what has been described as a process of ‘evolutionary
unfoldment’, have a remarkable capacity to become conscious about unconscious aspects
within themselves and to tap into inherent latent capacities inclusive of higher states of
consciousness (Gebser, 2011; Wilber, 2006, 2012).
In order to develop a ‘use of self’ framework applicable to the social work profession, I have
taken Ken Wilber’s Integral model (1996, 2000) and used it as a lens and framework to
discuss and develop a ‘use of self’ Integral framework. The ‘use of self’ must aim to achieve
the best professional practice possible and therefore needs to be examined in depth. As a
way of demonstrating the underpinning ‘missing’ philosophical knowledge and practice
base, a selection of other disciplines which address subjective experience have been
selected and analysed. Quadratic models are not new to the social sciences as sociologists
20
have previously development models to address organisational analysis (Burrell & Morgan,
1979), as have social workers’ utilised quadratic models as a way to understand for
example, social work theory (Howe, 1993) and power dynamics within organisations and
management structures (Wittington and Holland, 1981, 1985; Ife, 1999).
A ‘use of self’ Integral framework will highlight the components of the ‘use of self’ which
experienced, new and student social workers can utilise. It is through my own direct
experience as a student, practitioner and supervisor that I understand how useful a ‘use of
self’ framework is. The advantage of this framework is that is it not prescriptive in so far as
the type of methodologies and/or practices a worker chooses to employ. What the
framework does do is to outline the essential core features of the ‘use of self’ by bringing
clarity to which has been obscure. This introductory chapter has situated the purpose of this
thesis initially in my own knowledge and practice dilemmas of ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ within
social work practice, and secondly in my process of researching and writing about this topic.
The textual analysis’ are outlined in chapter’s two and three. Chapter two focuses on the
social work literature and chapter three on the other disciplines literature. Chapter four
outlines the theoretical model, research methodology and method of inquiry and
establishes the usefulness, scope and central principles of all three. The chapter also
discusses the rationale for the chosen texts and other literature reviewed for this thesis.
Chapter five discusses the results of the research findings in more detail and explains the
‘use of self’ Integral model. The ‘use of self’ Integral framework is applicable for all social
workers including Indigenous and multicultural social workers’ as the selection/choice of
methodologies, methods and social practices is at the discretion of the individual worker.
The conclusion draws together the analysis and proposes some considerations for the ‘use
of self’ in social work practice whilst also acknowledging the limitations of the study. It is
anticipated that the findings will be of particular interest and value to the social work
profession, including theory, research, education and practice.
21
CHAPTER 2
Textual analysis on the ‘use of self’ – Social Work Texts
This chapter will analyse what is known about the ‘use of self’ in the selected social work
texts. As the introduction outlined, little is understood about the ‘use of self’ in social work
practice, and even less is known about the ‘self’ within it. Historically, social work developed
from a ‘twin heritage’ stemming from the work of Mary Richmond (1917, 2009, 2013) who
established the casework tradition, and Jane Addams who began the community movement
(Scott, 2011; Younghusband, 1981). Overall the ‘use of self’ discussions are found in the
casework texts therefore, the analysis will draw from the casework texts. This chapter will
address the social work texts including seven foundational texts and one journal article, ten
influential texts, and eleven more recent commentaries.
The results show that every examined social work author (Appendix A) recommends that a
workers self-knowledge and self-awareness is not only necessary but is of the utmost
importance for workers’ engaging the ‘use of self’ in the practice relationship. It is said that
the worker’s qualities are central to effecting genuine practice. In various ways, the writings
discuss the ‘use of self’ of the worker as a key aspect of the social work relationship
alongside technique and theoretical knowledge. Harriet Bartlett even called it ‘the social
work method’ (1958). Showing these results may be repetitious for the reader, but it is
important to identify in the authors’ own words what is and what is not said in the
examined literature through the use of quotes. It is essential that what is said is told through
the voice of the original author.
Social casework pioneer
Mary Ellen Richmond11 (1861-1928) is credited with pioneering “the advance which social
work had to make if it was to begin to emerge as a profession which could be practised in
any agency – or independently” (Younghusband, 1981, p. 21; The Social Welfare History
11
According to The Social Welfare History Project (2014), “her grandmother [from an early age exposed Richmond to] … discussions of suffrage, racial problems, spiritualism, and a variety of liberal religious, social and political beliefs” (p. 1).
22
Project, 2014, p. 1)12. Richmond’s foundation book ‘Social Diagnosis’ (1917), “constructed
the foundations for the scientific methodology development of professional social work13 …
[with the first principle focusing on the person within her or his situation for] … she believed
in the equal importance of advances in the welfare of both the individual and society”
(Younghusband, 1981, p.21).
As part of her model, Richmond (1917) eloquently links an individual’s diversity as seen in
their mental life to an underlying philosophy of social case work, firstly “the fact of
individual differences14; the second the theory of ‘the wider self’” (Richmond, 1917, pps.
367-368). With regard to the concept of the wider self Richmond suggests it
seems to lie at the base of social case work. We have seen how slowly such work has
abandoned its few general classifications and tried instead to consider the whole
man. Even more slowly is it realising that the mind of man (and in a very real sense
the mind is the man) can be described as the sum of his social relationships
(Richmond, 1917, p. 368)
Richmond (1917) encouraged social workers too always cultivate self-knowledge and self-
awareness, including both personal and social awareness to benefit the ‘use of self’.
Second wave social casework pioneers
(Amy) Gordon Hamilton’s (1892-1967)15 most important work ‘The Theory and Practice of
Social Case Work’ (1940, 1951) remained a basic text in social work education over many
years. The first edition in 1940 represented the first full effort since Mary Richmond's 1917
text to define and examine the process of social casework. According to the American
National Association of Social Workers (2004), ‘person-situation’ and ‘knowledge-values’
12
Richmond was Internationally known for “her development of casework practice. … It was Richmond who systematically developed the content and methodology of diagnosis in the period around 1910” (The Social Welfare History Project, 2014, Richmond, p. 1). The methodology of diagnosis, which she labelled ‘social diagnosis’ was built on extensive research which became “a precursor of the system theory that was so popular in 1970’s social work” (The Social Welfare History Project, 2014, Richmond, p. 1). 13
Richmond’s (1917) model taught the process of systematically gathering relevant facts about the client including social, legal and medical information as the method for a worker to understand the intervention required. 14
‘Individual differences’, Richmond is referring to the fact that people have different traits (Younghusband, 1981, p.368). 15
A social work educator and with other faculty developed a doctoral program in Social Work Education (American National Association of Social Workers, 2004).
23
were the two foci of her theory of practice in casework, and she taught that the integration
of scientific knowledge (philosophy) and social values (ideology) were the basics of practice.
Hamilton suggests that the workers’ ‘use of self’ is an influential aspect within the client-
worker relationship, that is, “in any of the professions, especially those concerned directly
with human beings, the total self must be fully and deeply engaged” (1951, p. 27) and that
“insight and self-awareness are prerequisites in an ethical use of relationship” (1951, p. 40).
Hamilton believed that a “genuine warmth” (1951, p. 28) coupled with an ability to “listen
attentively” (1951, p. 30) enabled a worker to be “willing to go patiently along with [the
client] in his struggles for a solution” (1951, p. 28). Furthermore, Hamilton cautioned
workers’ on being overly rational and removed, however at the same time being able to
experience the client-worker relationship in a way that acknowledges that the client’s
feelings are distinct (1951, p. 41). In therapeutically orientated casework she advised that
“greater are the demands upon [the worker] for self-knowledge and for the more complete
use of self” (1951, p. 43).
Through the lens of Hamilton, it is evident that the workers’ ‘use of self’ is considered
important. She outlines the necessity for a worker to demonstrate appropriate engagement
skills and speaks about the prerequisites of ‘insight, self-awareness and self-knowledge’.
However, as it is unknown what Hamilton actually expected from workers in this regard and
given the minimal discussion it is determined from the setting of her text that the level of
insight would be aimed at an awareness of a worker’s personal relationship dynamics.
Reverend Felix Paul Biestek (1912-1994)16 was another key leader in the field of social
work17 who authored several books including The Casework Relationship in 1957 (Loyola
University Chicago, University Archives, Biestek’s Biographical Sketch, p. 1). Although Jesuit
teachings are influential throughout his work, he taught that “a knowledge of the science of 16
Attended Loyola University, Chicago (a Jesuit Catholic University) undertaking a Bachelor of Arts degree, held two master’s degrees, one in sociology in 1940 and one in social work in 1949 . In between he received his ordination in 1945. In 1951 Biestek received a Doctor of Social Work and during this same year was appointed to Loyola’s School of Social Work, were he remained on the faculty for 25 years. 17
E.g. served as Chair of the Commission on Accreditation for the Council on Social Work Education; on the Board of Directors and Ethics Committee for the National Association of Social Workers; as a member of Loyola University Chicago’s board of trustees for 17 years and as Superior of the Jesuit Community at Loyola, and later at Xavier University (Loyola University Chicago, University Archives, Biestek’s Biographical Sketch, p. 1).
24
human relations is necessary because the caseworker deals intimately with people” (1957,
p. 4). He recognised that “knowledge alone without skill in relationship, is inadequate”
(1957, p. 4) and concluded that “in general, the purpose of the relationship is a part of the
overall purpose of the entire casework process” (1957, p. 12).
A particular area of interest for Biestek (1957) were his ‘casework concepts’ some of which
he considered as ‘requisite qualities’ belonging solely to the caseworker which included,
“self-awareness, objectivity, and the professional attitude” (p. 18). One of the key features
of Biestek’s approach to the social work relationship was the distinction between what he
saw as ‘subjective interactions’ which he called the “soul of casework” (1957, p. 18) and
‘objective interactions’ which he named the “body of casework” (1957, p. 18). Biestek refers
to the relationship interaction as “primarily internal” (1957, p. 18) and refers to the “study,
diagnosis, and treatment … [as being] … primarily external (1957, p. 18).
Looking through Biestek’s lens, he states that the requisite qualities of a worker include,
‘self-awareness, objectivity, and the professional attitude’. He also draws attention to what
he suggests as the internal, subjective interactions (i.e. within the relationship) and external,
objective interactions (i.e. workers’ assessment of the clients’ issue). Similar to Hamilton, he
distinguishes between the ‘relationship skill’ and the ‘knowledge component’ of social work
practice. In applying his approach to the ‘use of self’, Biestek identifies the importance of
both self-awareness and theoretical knowledge in the application of the ‘use of self’ within
the client-worker relationship, however does not clarify what is meant by self-awareness.
Helen Harris Perlman (1906-2004)18 is probably best known for her work carrying forward
and integrating concepts that emerged from diverging schools of psychoanalytic thought.
18
According to the American NASW Foundation, she graduated in 1926 from the University of Minnesota, America with a B.A. in English, however at that time it was difficult for Jewish graduates to obtain a job in the humanities so she found a job working as a summer caseworker for the Chicago Jewish Service Bureau (now the Jewish Child & Family Services). She continued in the field of social work after receiving one of four Commonwealth Fund scholarships for students to attend the New York School of Social Work, now the Columbia University School of Social Work in America. Later, she joined the faculty of the School of Social Service Administration at the University of Chicago in 1945 and later became the Distinguished Service Professor Emerita. When she turned 90 the School of Social Service announced the establishment of the Helen Harris Perlman Visiting Professorship (American National Association of Social Workers, 2004).
25
Her most widely read work, ‘Social Casework: A Problem Solving Process’19 (1957) is still
used and has been translated into more than ten languages. Her thinking diverged markedly
from the then-current popularity of long-term psychotherapy as she didn't think that people
always needed in-depth therapy. The concept of short-term therapy is today a common
form of help (American National Association of Social Workers, 2004).
In an earlier article titled ‘Content in Basic Social Case Work’ Perlman (1947) identified that
in order for social work students to be effective in case work they must be taught “how to
understand” and “how to feel” (p. 78). She writes,
He must learn to understand intellectually and feelingly, to think about and analyse
the significance and meaningfulness of his knowledge. He must make his own certain
concepts and precepts which will affect his behaviour and relationships. And he must
learn to do – to act effectively – as a helping person (1947, p. 76).
Continuing,
“specifically, he must be helped to experience his feelings freely, to recognise and
gain some understanding of his own subjective reactions, and then be taught to
subject them to control and discipline. … [This] involves not only an intellectual but
also an emotional shift [and] this kind of modification or change takes place almost
unconsciously” (1947, p. 78).
Through Perlman’s lens, like the authors before, she encourages a worker to understand
both the social work knowledge and the ‘subjective’ nature of interactions which arise as a
result of engaging in a practice relationship. She suggests that these ‘subjective reactions’
are to be understood and managed by the worker. In this context, the ‘use of self’ is
focusing on the element of the interaction between the client and the worker, aside from
understanding social work knowledge.
19
The model is a cognitively orientated and client-centred problem-solving process (Perlman, 1957).
26
Florence Hollis (1907-1987) was known for her pioneering work in social work writing and
education20 and taught at the Columbia School of Social Work, New York for 25 years
(National Association of Social Workers America:2004). Mary Woods (1902-1998) was an
educator, certified social worker, and Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA)
administrator21 22. Hollis and Woods in their text ‘Casework: A Psychosocial Therapy’23
(1964) focus on the particular facets of casework practice that works with individuals
experiencing interpersonal relationship problems.
The text focuses on the potential of the caseworker in the helping role and suggests it is ‘far
reaching beyond the limitations of psychologists, psychoanalysts and psychiatrists’ (Danzig,
1965, p. 504). One of the core notions is that “basic to psychosocial casework treatment,
and one of its most powerful tools, is the relationship between worker and client” (p. 201).
The authors identified that the worker requires certain characteristics24, and that “the
worker’s self-awareness is crucial to effective casework” (p. 201). They also taught about
the “four significant aspects of a treatment relationship, a means of communication, a set of
attitudes, a set of responses expressed in behaviour and a mutual effort” (p. 202).
Through the lens of Hollis and Woods the ‘use of self’ is believed to be important to the
functioning of the relationship and how this lends itself to the success of counselling. Aside
from identifying that self-awareness is important there is no further elaboration of what this
means for these authors. However, in light of their focus on the ‘treatment relationship’ it is
suggested that a worker would be required to have an awareness of their own relationships.
20
Hollis received a master's degree from the Smith College School of Social Work, Northampton, Massachusetts, America and a doctoral degree in Social Work from Bryn Mawr College (a women’s only undergraduate College), Pennsylvania, America (National Association of Social Workers America, 2004). 21
Woods received her M.A. in Community Organization from New York University in 1946 (Iowa Women’s Archives, 1996). 22
She was also the only African-American in her graduating class at high school and Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, America (a private, co-educational university) from which she graduated 1924. 23
This was Hollis’s last book (co-authored with Woods) and is thought of as outstanding in social work theory and practice. 24
That is, “non-possessive warmth and concern, genuineness, empathy, and nonjudgmental acceptance … worker’s optimism, objectivity, professional competence, and capacity to communicate” (Hollis & Woods, 1964, p. 201).
27
Charlotte Towle (1896-1966)25 deeply influenced the profession of social work in North
America through the development of a client-centred casework curriculum (with a focus on
the relationship between the inner life and the social environment), through the
development of a human growth and behaviour sequence, and through the development of
a theory of professional education.
As a result of her understanding of human growth, Towle was another advocate for a
worker having self-knowledge as she understood that it “is basic in knowing people” (Towle,
1969, p. 29). Towle was clear about a worker taking self-responsibility suggesting that a
worker “be directed toward a pursuit of self-understanding, rather than encouraged to
escape himself through the acquisition of more technical knowledge at a time when he is
unable to assimilate and utilise it” (1969, p. 43-44). She believed that “increasingly as
caseworkers realise growth one may expect a growing freedom in the utilisation of concepts
and a more effective use of their professional orientation” (1969, p. 45).
Looking through Towles’ lens, the implication of ‘self-knowledge’ is broadened by her
understanding and application of human growth to the counselling arena. Although the
model is not discussed in relation to a worker, taking the human growth concept and
applying it to a workers ‘use of self’ suggests that growth of the person is involved.
Harriet Bartlett (1897-1987) like the above pioneers is particularly difficult to summarise
due to her long and distinguished career26 27. Her practice experience and writing focused
25
Towle received a BA in Education from Goucher College, Baltimore, Maryland, America, a selective, private, coeducation, liberal arts college dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, international education (Goucher College website). However accepting a job with the American Red Cross after graduation strengthened her interest in social work. With the aid of a Commonwealth Fund fellowship, she attended the New York School of Social Work, completing her studies in psychiatric social work in 1926. Established by the Commonwealth Fund as a model clinic, the Institute was in the forefront of psychiatric social work theory and practice. In 1932, she became a full time faculty member at the University of Chicago, School of Social Service where she taught until her retirement in 1962. 26
Bartlett was professor of social economy at the Simmons College School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts from 1947-1957. She developed the curriculum and led the medical practice sequence. During this period, she also served on the Council of Social Work Education and chaired the inception of the Hollis-Taylor Report. Harriett Bartlett retired to an active life of writing and to committee service to National Association of Social Workers (America) and other organisations. She received an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters degree from Boston University in 1969. During her 30 years of active retirement, Harriett Bartlett's seminal thinking, her publications, and her ongoing work with organizations continued to benefit the social work profession (National Association of Social Workers, America, 2004).
28
on the area of medical social work, however, her aim was ‘one of finding the commonalities
of the various strands of social work practice’. The evidence of this can be seen in ‘The
Common Base of Social Work Practice’ published in 1970 which is still utilised by social
workers (National Association of Social Workers, America, 2004).
Within this text, Bartlett acknowledges that, “skill, self-awareness, and defined method are
essential for a profession” (1970, p. 51). Bartlett states that although by the 1950’s,
Teachers and practitioners of high calibre were writing with great self-awareness
about their practice and teaching in social work journals … [it was] … other observers
[who] noted that practicing workers lacked awareness of the knowledge on which
their practice rested (1970, p. 53).
In response to this lack of awareness, Bartlett (1970) identified a number of limitations and
gaps in social work which essentially stemmed from two areas, ‘skill and method’ and the
‘anti-intellectual attitude’28 (p. 37). Earlier on she had written that “the social work
method29 is the responsible, conscious, disciplined use of self in relationship with an
individual or group” (1958, p. 269).
Through the lens of Bartlett, she labels the ‘use of self’ as the ‘social work method’. She
identifies the question about the skill and knowledge base upon which the ‘use of self’
method is situated. Linked to this, Bartlett also identifies an ‘anti-intellectual attitude’ which
she believed underpinned the lack of skill and knowledge base. Looking through Bartlett’s
lens she finds a lack of and resistance to gaining skill and knowledge regarding the ‘use of
self’.
27
Bartlett received her BA in 1918 from Vassar College, a private, coeducational liberal arts college in the town of Poughkeepsie, New York; a Certificate in Social Science Administration from the London School of Economics in 1920; and an MA in Sociology from the University of Chicago in 1927. She worked as a caseworker, supervisor, and consultant at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 1921 and 1940, taught at the University of Southern California and in 1943 worked as a medical social work consultant at the US Children's Bureau in Washington (National Association of Social Workers, America, 2004). 28
Bartlett (1970) traced the anti-intellectual attitude to the focus on the ‘whole individual’ and the delay in the development of theory (p. 37) and suggests that “under these circumstances a rigorous intellectual approach associated with scientific thinking is resisted, whether consciously or unconsciously” (p. 38). 29
Social work method includes systematic observation and assessment, continuing evaluation, and professional judgment (Bartlett, 1958, p. 269).
29
In summary, the social work pioneers’ understanding of the ‘use of self’ consists of
demonstrated skills required for the client-worker relationship, knowledge of theory and
method, and requires self-awareness and self-knowledge. Whilst all the authors agree that
self-awareness and self-knowledge are essential, there is no consensus nor is it evident
what is truly meant beyond a worker’s own personal relationship awareness and
personality. Additionally, there is no discussion with regard to the ‘self’ to be made use of.
Yet, while the ‘use of self’ is incomplete and the ‘self’ unarticulated, their emphasis on the
‘use of self’ and the fact that it has a felt sense quality generated such an interest that it is
still evident in social work texts today.
Influential social work texts
Throughout his social work practice career Bill Jordan maintained a constant theme, that is,
to educate on the impact of a worker within the social work relationship and explore what it
means to truly help. He does this by sharing his understanding of the importance of a
worker having self-discipline to enable a reliable ‘use of self’ within the social work
relationship, alongside a solid foundation in social work technique and theory.
In one of his earlier works, ‘Helping in Social Work’ (1979), Jordan advocated for social work
to reorientate itself back towards the subjective aspects of social work practice. Jordan
reads, “being a good social worker … requires a kind of self-knowledge and self-discipline”
(1979, p. 12) and that “true empathy … demands much more self-discipline” (1979, p. 21).
He continues, “helping is not simply a skill or expertise or technique. Helping is a test of the
helper as a person. It involves the disciplined use of the whole of the personality” (1979, p.
26). This theme continues in a subsequent text ‘Invitation to Social Work’ (1986) where
Jordan cautions the reader that “the personal qualities of the worker may be as important
as the knowledge he or she possesses; in which how the social worker acts and
communicates may be as significant as what he or she decides to do” (p. 1).
Jordan through his lens of a workers’ ‘use of self’ is referring to skill, expertise and
technique and the workers use of ‘the whole of the personality’. It is not evident though
what this fully encapsulates as it is left unexplored.
30
England (1986) recognises that social work situates “considerable personal demands” (p. 40)
upon workers and suggests that intuition is a phenomenon within practice although it is
generally not described as such. He states that,
…institutional recognition of intuition is by no means secure; its presence seems
somehow inevitable but unwelcome, and in some quarters under explicit assault. …
The intuitive use of self in social work seems neither to go away nor to become clear;
like those grand social work objectives – with which it is evidently and inextricably
linked – it haunts the institutions of social work as an embarrassment or a puzzle
rather than the necessary source of creative professional energy. It is an inevitable
presence, but social workers do not know how to deal with it. … Not surprisingly, this
is reflected in its treatment in the social work literature (p. 42-3).
England through naming the existence of intuition within practice is highlighting a potential
genuine developmental capacity in a worker. However, as intuition remains awkward for
social work due to not being underpinned by a knowledge base, it is not clear how he would
address intuition to build up a knowledge base within social work.
David Howe is a prolific writer and key influencer within the social work profession. In his
text ‘An Introduction to Social Work Theory: Making Sense in Practice’ (1993) he recognises
that although “the relationship and the use of interpersonal skills has received a good deal
of attention in social work practice” (p. 6), the ways in which it is theorised to enable
understanding and articulation has been less scrutinised. In the text ‘On Being A Client:
Understanding the Process of Counselling and Psychotherapy’, Howe acknowledges several
reviews which have reinforced that overall “the personality of the therapist is more
important than [their] techniques” (1993, p. 11).
Howe further continues the above themes within the text ‘Attachment Theory for Social
Work Practice’ (1995) where he urges that “it is … neither an indulgence nor an irrelevance
for those who work in the fields of health and social welfare to become ardent students of
personal experience and social relationships” (1995, p. 7). In ‘The Emotionally Intelligent
Social Worker’ Howe (2008) counsels on the importance of social workers needing to
understand the ‘use of self’ “at the level of feeling” [suggesting by doing so] “the wiser we
31
become … [and the] socially more skilled” (p. 1). He adds that social work “is emotional work
of a high order … [and, therefore] emotional intelligence30 is … a core skill without which
practice would not only be ineffective, it would lack humanity” (2008, p. 2). Howe (2008)
agrees with Goleman (1999) that the ‘intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences’ are not
only necessary but “need[ed] in good measure” (p. 2) as the “emotions may, in fact, be vital
to intelligent action” (Evans & Cruse, 2004 as referenced in Howe, 2008, p. 7).
Through Howe’s lens, he acknowledges that a workers personality is important. He suggests
that a worker become a student of personal experience and cultivates emotional
intelligence as the basis for developing wisdom. Having recommended this, Howe does not
suggest or address ways in which to do so.
Barbara Okun and Gerard Egan although not social workers’ have been included as they are
foundational texts utilised in the social work undergraduate degree. Okun (1987) in
‘Effective Helping: Interviewing and Counselling Techniques’ agrees with the idea that the
relationship is a central aspect in the working relationship and states that, “strategies are
secondary to the helping relationship. In fact, research indicates that client variables and
counsellor variables are more significant than technique variables in the helping process”
(p. 13). In Egan’s31 (1990) text, ‘The Skilled Helper: A systematic Approach to Effective
Helping’, he suggests that in order to ‘use of self’, “effective helpers undertake the lifelong
task – perhaps struggle is a better word – of fulfilling the ancient Greek injunction ‘Know
thyself’. Since helping is a two-way street, understanding clients is not enough. … Helpers
30 Emotional intelligence, defined by Goleman (1999), refers to “the capacity for recognising our own feelings
and those of others, for motivating ourselves, and for managing emotions well in ourselves and in our
relationships” (p. 317). According to Goleman, “among the most influential theorists of intelligence to point
out the distinction between intellectual and emotional capacities was Howard Gardner (1983) … who …
proposed a widely regarded model of ‘multiple intelligence’. His list of seven kinds of intelligence included not
just the familiar verbal and math abilities, but also two ‘personal varieties’: knowing one’s inner world (i.e.
intrapersonal) and social adeptness (interpersonal)” (p. 317). Goleman’s (1999) also acknowledges Salovey and
Mayer’s (1990) model including its “five basic emotional and social competencies: self-awareness, self-
regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills” (p. 318). 31
Gerard Egan is Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Organizational Studies at Loyola University, Chicago. His seminal work on the skills of communication, problem solving and opportunity development, 'The Skilled Helper', is the world's most widely used textbook on counselling skills and is currently in its 10
th Edition.
32
who do not understand themselves can inflict a great deal of harm on their clients (p. 25). …
Helping, at its best, is a deeply human venture” (p. 57).
Both Okun (1987) and Egan (1990) suggest that having an understanding of what ‘self’ is and
how to apply it in the social work relationship is of primary importance. Yet although Egan
recommends that an essential requirement to be met by a worker is to “know thyself” there
is no further elaboration, for example, what does it mean and how does one go about it.
Janis Fook in her text ‘Radical Casework: A Theory of Practice’ (1993) describes ‘radical
casework’ as “plac[ing] emphasis on equality and sharing” (p. 103) as opposed to
paternalistic traditional approaches. Fook acknowledges there are a number of ways in
which to assist a ‘radical casework’ process one of which is by “reducing the social and
interpersonal distancing” (1993, p. 103) which is accomplished by “an increased use of self
in the relationship”. She suggests this can be achieved by “appropriate self-disclosure …
[and by] developing critical awareness” (1993, p. 105).
Fook’s understanding of critical awareness is through “the process of conscientisation and
consciousness-raising … [which is] … becoming more aware about the social world” (ibid, p.
96). Fook looks to Alfrero’s (1972) three staged process of ‘conscientisation’32 suggesting
the worker aims for the third stage for clients which “allows the person to see the situation
objectively, understand what causes it and work out what to do about it” (ibid, p. 97). Fook
recommends workers apply this process to themselves is order to assess and increase their
“social self-awareness” (1993, p. 156). The ‘use of self’ through Fook’s lens is the notion that
a worker requires a ‘social self-awareness’.
The next two authors have been included because they are talking about the development
of the human being beyond their personality ‘self’ which fits into the discussion on the
workers’ ‘use of self’. Both Cowley (1993) and Ife (1999) recommend that social work needs
to incorporate an understanding of spirituality / consciousness development to enable the
32
Alfrero’s three stages of ‘conscientisation’ include: “magical consciousness (fatalistic); naïve consciousness (dominate facts from the outside); and critical consciousness (awareness of facts and causal relationship to social circumstances)” (Fook, 1993, p. 97).
33
development of a more expansive understanding of the nature of ‘self’ and, therefore, the
‘use of self’ in practice.
For example, Cowley (1993) in her article, ‘Transpersonal Social Work: A Theory for the
1990s’, states it has been “recognised how important the premises held by therapists [are]
in helping determine what clients might see as their human potential ... Whether the
evolution of consciousness within individuals or societies takes place in the years ahead will
depend to a large degree on the belief systems that shape and guide us (pp. 531-533).
As another example, Ife (1999) in his text ‘Rethinking Social Work’ suggests the “the reasons
for social work’s ignoring of the sacred and the spiritual lie in its striving for scientific or
professional status, its location as a discipline within mainstream university discourse, and
its foundations in the ‘Western world view’” (p. 10). He further explains that a ‘contrary
tradition’ is a qualitative one which incorporates “intuition, practice wisdom,
phenomenology, grounded theory” etc. (1999, p. 20). Ife’s view is that a qualitative
perspective “is a very important debate” (ibid, p. 20) suggesting that there is a wealth of
important knowledge that social work is currently not tapping into.
Through Cowley and Ife’s view on the ‘use of self’, they understand that a worker’s ‘use of
self’ is more complex than the personality alone. Both suggest that the ‘use of self’ entails
the worker to develop their own consciousness beyond that of the personality through the
engagement of qualitative inner inquiry methods.
The selected second wave pioneers remain steadfast to a worker having an awareness ‘self’
to enable effective ‘use of self’ in the practice relationship. Even though author’s such as
Cowley (1993) and Ife (1999) point out suggestions of what is required, it also remains that
the overall consistent conversation is still not going deep enough.
More recent texts and commentary
O’Connor, Wilson and Setterland (2003) in their text ‘Social Work and Welfare Practice’
suggest that “the ability to make disciplined and constructive use of yourself in relationships
is a prerequisite to all the activities that constitute social work” (p. 53) and emphasise the
34
importance of self-understanding, such as ones’ own biography and why social work was
chosen as a profession. They recommend that workers “subject [their ideas and feelings] to
critical scrutiny, so that our use of self is conscious and disciplined” (2003, p. 56). The
authors describe the self as “… a concept of ‘me’ which we use to make comparisons with
things that are perceived as ‘not like me’ but which, however uncomfortable it might be to
acknowledge, do indeed reflect the way in which we operate in the world” (2003, p. 57).
These authors suggest that a worker needs to understand their background biography and
motivations to entering into social work. They also suggest that a worker understand how
they ‘operate in the world’. This view suggests the importance of having an understanding
of personal experiences within relationships and the interconnections with wider social
interactions.
Chenoweth and McAuliffe (2005) have written, “the term ‘use of self’ is somewhat vague
and many students have difficulty grasping it. ‘Use of self’ is linked to self-awareness – if
‘self’ is our mechanism for practice, then it follows that we must have a high level of
awareness about who we are and how we behave” (2005, p. 203). Again although a link has
been drawn, what does the ‘self’ consist of and mean for these authors.
Heydt & Sherman in their article ‘Conscious Use of Self: Tuning the Instrument of Social
Work Practice with Cultural Competence’ (2005) write “the realisation that social workers
themselves are the instruments of the profession usually has a sobering effect on beginning
social work students” (p. 25). Although the ‘use of self’ is a central feature of social work
practice the authors found that “a search of the current literature reveals less than
expected” (2005, p. 26). In line with this notion of a worker being ‘an instrument’ (Heydt &
Sherman, 2005, p. 25), the authors advocate for workers’ to explore the notion of self-
awareness regularly to keep the ‘use of self’ “in perfect working order … [to] … become the
most effective instrument of change possible for as many of their clients as possible” (2005,
p. 28). The author’s recommend that a social worker’s awareness must cover both ‘internal
and external perceptions’ (2005, p. 28) and that by “identifying the social worker as the
instrument of the profession … paves the way for introducing concepts related to self-
awareness of the social worker” (2005, p.26). Heydt and Sherman suggest a worker’s
35
responsibility is to engage in ongoing self-awareness exploration, however, they stipulate
that there is little written in social work about the ‘use of self’.
Reupert (2006) in her article ‘Social Worker’s Use of Self’ she discusses results from her
small qualitative study which focused on “clinicians’ personal and subjective meanings
regarding the ‘self’ that they bring to their work” (p. 108). The results essentially showed
that the majority understood their use of self in practice to be based on both personal
qualities and professional knowledge. Some definitions of ‘self’ were discussed such as
and “a filter or medium” (2006, p. 107). To view the ‘use of self’ through Reupert’s lens is to
understand that she is referring to the personality ‘self’ as constituting the ‘use of self’.
The next two examined articles discuss the notion of a ‘relational matrix’ which occurs
between the workers ‘use of self’ and the client. For example, Ganzer (2007) in her article
‘The Use of Self from a Relational Perspective’ (2007) positions her understanding in line
with the “relational matrix (i.e. relationship). She describes the way ‘psychological reality’ in
a relational matrix contains both ‘intrapsychic and interpersonal realms’33 … and that these
relationships operate in social, cultural, and political contexts (p. 118). She further explains
that for the therapist, “the struggle is toward a new way of experiencing himself and the
patient … less shaped by the configurations and limited options of the [patient’s] relational
matrix, in so doing to offer the [patient] a chance to broaden and expand that matrix
(Mitchell, 1988, p. 295 as cited in Ganzer, 2007, p.118).
Similarly, in Arnd-Caddingan & Pozzunto’s (2007) article ‘Use of Self in Relational Clinical
Social Work’, they similarly conceptualise the ‘use of self’ from a relational perspective as
“self as process in interaction” (p. 235). Throughout the authors stress that the qualities of
the social worker in the client relationship are crucial for a successful outcome and see the
‘use of self’ as an in-relationship-with, fluid, developmental and subjective process.
33
‘Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis’ by Stephen Mitchell (1988) as referenced in Garol Ganzer (2007). In his text Mitchell proposed a paradigm shift within psychoanalysis, arguing for the insistence on relationship as the determining feature in human psychological life. … Mitchell … insisted that the complexity and subtlety of human relations are best understood within the individual's inevitable struggle both to connect with others and yet be autonomous.
36
Through Ganzer (2007) and Arnd-Caddingan & Pozzunto’s (2007) lens’, the relationship is
influenced by social, cultural and political contexts and brings about an awareness of intra-
and inter-psychic processes. Through this lens, the relationship is what engenders the
workers’ ‘use of self’ and that it is up to the worker to not limit oneself due to the client’s
worldview and to simultaneously broaden the client’s perspective.
Urdang (2010) in her article ‘Awareness of Self – A Critical Tool’ draws attention to how
“students generally do not anticipate the psychological stress and the changes they will
undergo in developing a professional self” (p. 523). Urdang acknowledges that given the
current outcomes focus orientation, social work education has neglected its focus on
building the ‘professional self and process oriented clinical worker’ stemming from what she
sees as the “abandoning [of] its basic psychodynamic orientation” (2010, p. 524). Urdang
finds this trend problematic and sees the implications resulting in boundary problems,
burnout, secondary traumatic stress and lack of self-reflection undertaken by social workers
(2010, pp. 525-530). She suggests that to alleviate this situation the following elements are
required to be reinstated: basic psychodynamic orientation, the focus on the development
of self-awareness and provision of good supervision (2010, p. 529). Through Urdang’s lens,
she stresses that self-awareness is essentially missing from social work with implications for
the worker, the client and social work as a professional body.
Powell (2010) in her research ‘effective use of self in direct social work practice’ approaches
the examination into the notion by examining current social work theoretical perspectives
and models. By doing so her research highlights that ‘techniques and skills’, self-care
strategies and relationship skills such as ‘being present or centred’ (2010, pp. 6-7) are key
requirements for a workers’ ‘use of self’ and essentially concludes that social work does not
effectively address the ‘self’.
Garner (2011) in her article ‘Thinking Practice: The Social Work Integral Model’, suggests
that the convergence of social work values and ethics, the practitioner and the client
provides a “seat of sound social work practice” (p. 256). Analysis of the model broadly
highlights that the ‘use of self’ requires a worker to have personal awareness,
37
communication skills, empathy, and non-judgmental acceptance (Garner, 2011) which does
not really provide further reach beyond that what has been previously discussed.
Barnard (2011) in ‘The self in social work’ suggests that “western notions of the self have
emerged from diverse and contradictory social, political and cultural strands” (p. 176) based
on ‘theory, philosophy, theology and the metaphysical soul’ (p. 176). He explores a range of
positions and to simplify his conclusion he suggests that the current understanding of the
self in social work is a postmodern ‘understanding of relationship which is shaped by social
work theory and models and constructed as an anxious34 instrument of change (Barnard,
2011, p. 187).
The analysis from these examined authors essentially establishes four things:
First - the ‘use of self’ remains a topic of interest;
Second - the ‘use of self’ remains unexamined to any great depth and the ‘self’ is
virtually missing from social work discourse;
Third - the current status of how the ‘use of self’ is applied within social work is an
eclectic mix of predominantly observable, looking at approaches which produces greater
span but not greater depth (Wilber, 2000); and
Fourth - some of the more recent commentary appear to be applying feelings, thoughts
or states belonging to a client (i.e. anxiety) to an understanding of a workers’ ‘use of self’
which I consider to be very problematical and a blurring of roles. It needs to remain
recognised that whist a worker approaches the client-worker relationship in a respectful
manner, the ‘relationship’ is nevertheless an ethical and professional one through which
one person (the client) seeks to work through issues with a trained worker.
The examination of the chosen social work literature highlights that the authors’ claim in
one way or another that the workers ‘use of self’ is pivotal to social work practice; there is
no disagreement on this. What is significant however is that although declared essential
there remains little agreement on what constitutes the ‘use of self’ and no real discussion
on the ‘self’ to be made use of. The research shows that the ‘use of self’ is limited to social
34
Dewane (2006) suggests that the “use of self can be operationally defined as: use of personality; use of belief system; use of relational dynamics; use of anxiety; and use of self-disclosure” (p. 543).
38
work knowledge, practice models and the recommendation that a worker should examine
their personal relationships and feelings. What also became evident during the analysis was
the recognition that the worker’s personality is potentially a more powerful influence on
counselling outcomes than the social work technique and theory themselves. Although the
social work authors’ suggest that self-knowledge and self-awareness are important, the
dialogue inevitably remains at a superficial personality level.
Having highlighted what was found in the social work texts and before moving to the next
chapter which explores other disciplines, is it important to acknowledge that this thesis is
not suggesting that the ‘self’ is reducible or can be pinned down to a location. On the
contrary, it is anticipated that the other disciplines texts will acknowledge that the ‘self’ is
ineffable, not fully understood and far more complex than what is currently understood by
social work (particularly western social work). As Wilber and Walsh suggest,
the first step toward a genuine theory of consciousness [the ‘self’] is the realisation
that consciousness is not located in the organism … a good part of consciousness
exists not merely in physical space, but in emotional spaces, mental spaces, and
spiritual spaces, none of which have simple location and yet all of which are as real
(or more real) than simple physical space (2000, pp. 316-317).
There is always the danger that any discussion regarding something as deep as the ‘self’
could lead to ‘reductionism’. However, the Integral model (1996, 2000) invites increased
understanding due to the inclusion of “at least four irreducible perspectives (subjective,
intersubjective, objective, interobjective) ... that can be taken on any phenomena [and] four
irreducible dimensions that all individuals have” (Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009, p. 2-7).
39
CHAPTER 3
Textual analysis on the ‘self’ – Other Disciplines Texts
This chapter critiques texts and journals from other disciplines outside of social work as a
way of expanding upon the current thinking on the ‘use of self’ through exploring the
notions of ‘self’. The chosen texts are a very small representation from a vast and extensive
body of knowledge. As such, the texts are not considered all there is to know on the subject
of ‘self’, however, are being drawn upon to clarify the distinction between the ‘use of self’
and ‘self’ and to provide examples of how a worker can understand and develop their ‘self’.
The chosen perspectives are also of particular interest to the author, however, each
individual worker will have their own preferences. The important thing is that whatever
perspectives or methods of inquiry are utilised, they belong to and are validated by the
relevant knowledge community. What the examination of the chosen texts highlights is that
there is an extensive and dynamic body of knowledge on this topic area of ‘self’.
A selection35 of twenty-three phenomenological and consciousness
disciplines/contemplative inquiry texts and journals were critiqued (Appendix B). The
common themes of the chosen disciplines include “types of experimental,
phenomenological, left-hand paths36 of knowledge acquisition” (Wilber & Walsh, 2001, p.
314). The research shows that during the past two to three decades there has been an
increase in interest and research into first-person practices such as phenomenology and
consciousness disciplines/contemplative inquiry. To explain,
Philosophically, first-person practice means that rather than observing ourselves as
objects from the outside, we experience ourselves as subjects with direct awareness
of how we act and learn to grasp our own interiority. … At its core, first-person
practice means that our own beliefs, values, assumptions, ways of thinking,
strategies and behaviours and so on are afforded a central place of inquiry”
(Coghlan, 2008, p. 352).
35
The full list of other disciplines texts can be found at Appendix B (p. 86). 36
The Integral model includes both left-hand paths (i.e. subjective) and right-hand paths (i.e. objective).
40
Overall, the research highlights that seeking an understanding of the ‘self’ it not new and
has been pursued through the “practice of consciousness disciplines” [such as] “perennial
psychologies, perennial wisdom, spiritual practices … including aspects of meditation, yoga,
and contemplation derived from diverse systems such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Sufism,
contemplative Christianity, Taoism, and others” (Walsh, 1983, p. 28). Wilber (2012) suggests
that “human beings, over the decades and sometimes centuries, have developed time-
honoured methods of inquiry that enact … basic dimensions of being-in-the-world” (p. 1).
The research also found various terms used in the literature when discussing the ‘self’ for
example, consciousness, intuition, wisdom, soul, spirit; and based “on the fact that
consciousness evolution seems to show evidence of higher stages of growth” (Wilber &
Walsh, 2000, p. 313) terms like “Self, Mind, Spirit … pure consciousness, Buddha Nature”
(Walsh, 2000, p. 5) are used. At is deepest, the ‘self’ has been described as “knowing God …
to point to our ineffable subjectivity, to the unimaginable potential which lies within each of
us” (Bugental as cited in Walsh & Vaughan, 1980, p. 60).
The term ‘soul’ is often equated with ‘self’ which is under voluntary control as the “ancient
psychologists taught that our own souls are inseparable from the world’s soul, and that both
are found in all the many things that make up nature and culture. … ‘Soul’ is not a thing, but
a quality or a dimension of experiencing life and ourselves” (Moore, 1992, p. 4-5). Another
description offered by Patanjali, who drew together the system known as yoga37, suggests
that the controlled mind, intellect and self is equal to ‘poise of the soul’ which can then be
absorbed into the spirit within him (Iyengar, 1991, p. 19). He further explains that “in Indian
thought, everything is permeated by the Supreme Universal Spirit … of which the individual
human spirit is a part (Iyengar, 1991, p. 19). Jung (1964) believed “man has developed
consciousness slowly and laboriously, in a process that took untold ages to reach the
civilised state … [yet] large areas of the human mind is still shrouded in darkness. …
Whoever denies the existence of the unconscious is in fact assuming that our present
knowledge of the psyche is total” (p. 6).
37
“Yoga is one of the six orthodox systems of Indian philosophy” (Iyengar, 1991, p. 19).
41
The literature will now be discussed beginning phenomenology, then moving onto the
consciousness disciplines/contemplative inquiry texts and journals.
Phenomenology (branch of Philosophy)
The word philosophy comes from Ancient Greek – philosophia – which literally means ‘love
of wisdom’ and has been likened to ‘the picking apart of a rose’ (Gebser, 2011). Philosophy
is described as “a mind science” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy–Phenomenology,
2008), and as “a mode of existing-in-the-world, which had to be practiced at each instant
and the goal of which was to transform the whole of the individual’s life” (Hadot as cited in
Coghlan, 2008, p. 352). The discussion about the ‘self’ can be traced to early philosophical
questioning into the nature of existence with philosophers believing “there is a difference
between mere knowledge of things and wisdom” (Bali, 1989, p. 2).
The discipline of phenomenology is one branch of philosophy38. The idea of phenomenology
is to develop a process by which subjective experience, or consciousness, can be understood
as a valid form of knowing. Phenomenology39 is described as, “the study of consciousness as
it immediately appears. A first-person approach to first-person singular realities. Describing
the inside view of the interior of an individual as it is. … [It sits] along with other approaches
like meditation and introspection (Rentschler, 2006, p. 24).
Similar to the criticism levelled at social work for being an unscientific ‘intuitive’ practice, so
too has phenomenology been “misunderstood as a form of irrational mysticism … [due to] …
the prevalence of notions of intuition as a kind of spiritual sympathy with the object of
knowledge” (Moran, 2000, p. 10). Yet when phenomenology is considered as a discipline of
relevance, it yields rich subjective data necessary to understand first-person and second-
person experiences which the objective methods are not designed to elicit. After all
38
It is “distinct from but related to other key disciplines in philosophy, such as otology, epistemology, logic and ethics. … [It is] the study of structures of experience, or consciousness” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy–Phenomenology, 2008, p. 1). 39
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy outlines that “classical phenomenologists practiced some three distinguishable methods”. These include, first, “we describe a type of experience just as we find it in our own (past) experience”. Second, “we interpret a type of experience by relating it to relevant features of context”. Third, “we analyse the form of a type of experience” (2008, p. 4).
42
“conscious experiences have a unique feature: we experience them, we live through them or
perform them” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy-Phenomenology, 2008, p. 3).
Moran (2000) in his text Introduction to Phenomenology provides an in-depth overview into
the origins and themes of phenomenological thought and notes that phenomenology “was
one of several strong currents … at the outset of the 20th century” (p. 1). Introduced by
Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), he spoke of “the phenomenology of the experiences of
thinking and knowing” (2000, p. 1). Currently, however, Moran acknowledges that
phenomenology is not that well understood in the mainstream, due to “various subsequent
movements, including structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstruction, and more recently,
concerns with multiculturalism and postmodernism … as well as analytic philosophy” (2000,
p. 3).
The textual examination into phenomenology reviewed Husserl’s methods of how to know
subjective experience as it is originally given. Husserl essentially believed that ‘experience
was the source of all knowledge’ and in 1906 developed the method of bracketing
(phenomenological epoché) (Moran, 2000). This means that an accurate phenomenological
description can only be arrived at if it has been performed from a first-person point of view
to ensure that the respective item is described exactly as is experienced. This is very
different to positive science which utilises a third-person account to ascertain a subjective
meaning.
To provide an accurate explanation of Husserl’s perspective Moran (2000) reads,
Husserl’s critique of knowledge is driven by his recognition that the truly human
dimension – that is, the dimension of knowing subjectivity – had been excluded for
reasons of method by the positive sciences. The interconnecting web of human
performances – the whole architecture of cognising subjectivity – depends on the
essential correlation between a knowing subjectivity and an object known. …
Husserl’s mission was to do justice to what he terms the essential ‘two-sidedness’ of
knowledge. … phenomenology would always approach objectivity as correlated to a
corresponding subjectivity. … For Husserl, philosophy gave birth to the very ideal of
objectivity that drives the sciences in their pursuit of objective knowledge, but these
43
sciences have lost the essential truth that objectivity is precisely an achievement of
subjectivity, and hence are ignorant of their foundation, and hence uncertain of their
final validity (pp. 49-50).
Husserl’s phenomenology provides depth to understanding and identifies intuitions
essential for an understanding of the ‘self’. He distinguishes between “many different forms
of intuition [that] underlie our judgements and our reasoning processes” (Husserl as cited in
Moran, 2000, p. 11). For example, “givenness” is,
the view that all experience is experience to someone, according to a particular
manner of experiencing. There is a ‘dative’ element in the experience, a ‘to whom’ of
experience. Intuitions … occur in all experiences of understanding; but in cases of
genuine knowledge, we have intuition with the highest kind of fulfilment or
evidence” (Husserl as cited in Moran, 2000, p. 11).
Although this is a small sample of what Husserl’s phenomenology has to offer, it
nevertheless provides insight for an understanding of the ‘self’ enriching what is currently
known about the ‘use of self’ is social work.
Bernard Lonergan was classed as a phenomenologist and also a methodologist, theologian-
philosopher and Canadian Catholic Jesuit priest who worked towards bridging subjectivity
and objectivity, science and religion (Coghlan, 2008). Lonergan developed a process by
which subjectivity can be cognitively understood and authenticated. This was detailed in
one of his two major books, Insight: A Study of Human Understanding published in 195740
and “builds on the medieval tradition of Thomas Aquinas [that] explores the process of
knowing, drawing on mathematics, physics and psychology, as well as philosophy” (Coghlan,
2008, p. 353).
Lonergan is noted for adopting a “first-person inquiry approach … called ‘self-appropriation’
… [and places significance on the] structure of knowing” (cited in Coghlan, 2008, p. 354).
This means that one can come to “terms with oneself as a knower [through] personal
40
Bernard Lonergan’s second book is titled ‘Method in Theology’ and was published in 1972. This book “explores how theology reflects on religion” (Coghlan, 2008, p. 353).
44
appropriation of the dynamic and recurrent operative structure of cognitional activity”
(cited in Coghlan, 2008, p. 354). As Coghlan (2008) acknowledges,
Appropriation of our own knowing process does not happen in one single leap; it is a
slow painstaking developmental process that is founded on our attention to the
operations of knowing in the unfolding of our own experience” (p. 355).
Lonergan emphasised the importance to “thoroughly understand what it is to understand”,
and not only will you understand the broad lines of all there is to be understood but also
you will possess a fixed base, an invariant pattern, opening upon all further developments of
understanding” (cited in Coghlan, 2008, p. 355). Essentially this means that if “I understand
myself correctly, I can understand the structure of the universe correctly and not reduce the
world to … science and neuro-biolog[y] … empirical sciences … fundamentalism, or be
seduced by slogans” (Coghlan, 2008, p. 355). Lonergan’s model of knowing is presented “as
a dynamic, heuristic three step process: experience, understanding, and judgment”41
(Coghlan, 2008, p. 355). Introspection (for Lonergan) is limited as it refers to “taking an inner
look” and reinforces the dualism between subject and object; whereas he suggests that
“subjectivity and objectivity are complementary, not opposed” (Coghlan, 2008, p. 356).
Lonergan further clarifies that we “try to know the world of human behaviour and social
structures. This world is mediated by meaning which constitutes human living. We learn to
construct our respective worlds by giving meaning to data that is continuously impinging on
us from within ourselves and as well as from without” (Coghlan, 2008, p. 358). This process
is undertaken “within ourselves as first-person practice, with others as second-person
practice, and to influence a broader impersonal audience as third-person practice”
(Coghlan, 2008, p. 358). One of Lonergan’s central messages in all of our activities is
“authenticity” (Kim, 2010, p. 2) and characterised it by “four transcendental precepts: be
41 Slightly paraphrased: “Experience – attend, ask questions and receive an insight (understanding). Reflect
and weigh up the evidence to determine whether the insight fits the evidence - judgement. Without
judgement they remain mere insights. Judgement is where we say ‘yes/no/maybe/I need more evidence’. To
reject or dismiss this pattern involves the three steps of experience, understanding, and judging” (Coghlan,
2008, p. 355).
45
attentive; be intelligent; be reasonable; and be responsible. They are transcendental in that
they take us beyond egocentrism into collaboration and include ethics; authenticity is at the
heart of being human” (Coghlan, 2008, p. 360).
As it can be seen phenomenology provides a process for learning about our own subjective
awareness or consciousness as a valid form of knowing. Walsh (2000) suggests that if
phenomenology is applied systematically as an experiential tool, it has the potential to assist
in the deeper understanding of consciousness by bypassing for example, personality
likes/dislikes since it “reveal[s] these errors” (p. 5). If a worker was to undertake to learn
about their consciousness in this way for example, it would elicit rich data for the worker to
understand their ‘self’, their thinking and experiential patterns, and the ways in which it
influences their ‘use of self’.
Consciousness disciplines and contemplative inquiry
Consciousness disciplines and contemplative inquiry essentially relate to practices that assist
in bringing the mind and, therefore, emotional responses under more voluntary control.
Contemplative inquiry such as “perennial psychologies42, perennial wisdom, spiritual
practices43” (Walsh, 1983, p. 28) are methods aimed at “deepening acceptance of the …
millennia-old claims regarding nature, cause, and cure of human suffering” (Walsh, 1983, p.
28).
For example, the question of wisdom44 “is an ancient question, and the earliest recorded
answers are found in India’s Vedas and the proverbial advice of Egyptian, Hebrew and
Mesopotamian literature” (Walsh, 2012, p. 2). Wisdom is also related to religions
“contemplative or mystical branches” (Walsh, 2012, p. 2) and has been related to
“authenticity” and more recently “scientific and psychological research” (Walsh, 2012, p. 3).
42
“Perennial philosophy [is] a universal doctrine as to the nature of man and reality lying at the very heart of every major metaphysical tradition; … [and] “perennial psychology [is] a universal view as to the nature of human consciousness, which expresses the very same insights as the perennial philosophy but in more decidedly psychological language” (Wilber, 1975, p. 105, Psychologia Perennis: The Spectrum of Consciousness). 43
Spiritual practices include for example, “mediation, yoga and contemplation derived from diverse systems such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Sufism, contemplative Christianity, Taoism, and others” (Walsh, 1983, p. 28). 44
“Wisdom is vitally important to individual and collective well-being yet has been almost completely ignored in the modern Western world” (Walsh, 2012, p. 1).
46
Looking at the notion of wisdom, Walsh (2012) has discovered that there is “little overlap
between contemporary definitions or between them and earlier views” (p. 3). He further
clarifies, “a contemplative’s introspection, a philosopher’s conceptual analysis, and a
scientist’s objective measurements are very different methods, will yield different data, and
may imply different ‘wisdoms’ (Walsh, 2012, p. 4).
Walsh (1983) in his teaching of cultivating wisdom also suggests that one key way to address
human suffering is by “bringing the mind under greater voluntary control … for enhancing
our well-being and for enabling us to contribute effectively to the well-being of others (p.
28). Walsh believes that wisdom is “informed and motivated by the ‘Basic Moral Intuition’
[which] is the intuition and motive to protect and promote the greatest depth for the
greatest span” (Walsh, 1983, p. 18). These areas of inquiry have been termed ‘consciousness
inquiry, which incorporates a type of practice, a “discipline of cultivating a crucial capacity of
mind, such as wisdom or concentration” (Walsh, 2000, p. 14). There are many methods of
inquiry and below includes Buddhism, meditation, yoga, an energy anatomy method, Jung’s
transpersonal psychology and existential practice. These will be examined one at a time.
Buddhism
One of the central themes of Buddhist thought is that meditation is essential for controlling
and cultivating the mind and addressing harmful/negative thoughts and emotions.
Buddhism is described as a “non-aggressive, moral and philosophical system … that guides a
disciple through pure living and pure thinking to the gaining of supreme wisdom … called
the Dhamma” (Thera, 1975, p. 7). It is taught that “the base of Buddhism is morality, and
wisdom is its apex” (1975, p. 17). The “Dhamma, or the universal moral Law … is summed
up in the Four Noble Truths: the Truths about the universal sway of Suffering, about its
Origin, its Extinction, and the Path leading to its extinction” (Nyanatiloka, 1968, p. 3) and as
“suffering, its cause, its end, and the Middle Way” (Thera, 1975, p. 19).
In the text In the Buddha’s Words (Bodhi, 2005) it is explained that after Buddha’s
enlightenment “he saw that sentient beings [were at] various stages of growth” with a vast
majority “deep below the surface” (p. 71). This concept is similar to Jung’s notion of the
47
‘undiscovered self’ (Jung, 1958) whereby Jung taught that the ego self is only a very limited
aspect of the totality of the ‘self’. Buddhism suggests that spiritual development requires a
long-term approach as it takes time for “mind-streams to become mature enough to attain
direct realisation” (Bodhi, 2005, p. 3).
According to Buddhist teachings, it is important to develop and live a life of wholesome
kamma45 due to the spiritual benefits. Buddhists believe that there are ten pathways of
unwholesome and wholesome kamma. Subdivided into ‘three doors of action – body,
speech and mind’, the importance in on cultivating ‘right view’46 in all three areas. As such,
Buddhism is a practical method with the aim of developing effectual thinking and emotional
awareness (philosophical) within the relationship of something larger than oneself (Buddhist
cosmology) (Bodhi, 2005).
Lama Anagarika Govinda, a German-born Buddhist monk explains that in Tibetan Buddhism
the body, the psychic and the spiritual functions parallel each other and demonstrated in
the ‘doctrine of the five sheaths’ (kośa)47 of human consciousness. Lama Govinda
elaborates,
[This doctrine of human consciousness] … which in ever-increasing density
crystallise[s] from or around the innermost centre of our being. According to
Buddhist psychology this centre is the incommensurable point of relationship upon
which all our inner forces converge, but which itself is empty of qualification and
beyond all definitions. These ‘sheaths’ … are mutually penetrating forms of energy
beginning with a person’s body up to universal consciousness (1960, p. 148).
45
Kamma means ‘action’ but technically refers to ‘volitional action’ (Bodhi, p. 3). 46
Right view is about having an understanding of rebirth and that our actions directly influence an individual’s life in this and subsequent lifetimes. Note that rebirth is not the same as reincarnation (Bodhi, 2005, p. 5). 47 The five sheaths are described as follows: The densest and outermost of these sheaths is the physical body,
built up through nutrition (anna-maya-kośa); The next is the subtle, fine-material sheath (prāna- maya-kośa), consisting of prāna, sustained and nourished by breath, and penetrating the physical body. We may also call it the prānic or ethereal body; The next-finer sheath is our thought body (mano-maya-kośa), our ‘personality’, formed through active thought; The fourth sheath is the body of our potential consciousness (vijñāna-maya-kośa), which extends far beyond our active thought, by comprising the totality of our spiritual capacities; and The last and final sheath, which penetrates all previous ones, is the body of the highest, universal consciousness, nourished and sustained by exalted joy (ānanda-maya- kośa). It is only experienced in a state of enlightenment, or in the highest states of meditation (dhyāna). It corresponds in the terminology of the Mahāyāna to the ‘Body of Inspiration’ or ‘Body of Bliss’: the Sambhoga-Kāya (Lama Anagarika Govinda, 1960, p. 148).
48
His Holiness the Dalai Lama recognises that Buddhism is known by some disciplines as “the
science of the mind … [and] in order to practice Buddhism, you first have to know about the
mind” (2001, p. 3). He outlines that,
If we analyse our own mental attitude, we may find it quite unbearable. Therefore, a
well-balanced mind is very useful and we should try and have a stable mental state.
… Mental training is crucial for good health [and for dealing with negative emotions].
… Without inner mental stability, or right mental attitude, one cannot be happy,
calm or at peace. … Some technique or method for training the mind should be part
of everyone’s daily life (His Holiness the Dalai Lama, 2001, pp. 3-4).
The Dalai Lama also educates on the importance of human connection “since human beings
are social creatures, we depend heavily on one another in order to survive” (2001, p. 7). He
explains that the proper channel of human communication is based on sharing sincere
motivations, and “not mere lip service” (2001, p. 9) and that “the basic structure of human
society requires a sense of responsibility based on altruism (the ultimate source of
happiness) and compassion” (His Holiness the Dalai Lama, 2001, p. 10). He further explains
that “according to Buddhist philosophy, every sentient being who has a mind and
consciousness has the potential to become a Buddha” (His Holiness the Dalai Lama, 2001, p.
13).
Meditation
There are many methods of meditation. One method, Vipassana Meditation in the Tradition
of U Ba Khin, is non-sectarian and “has had a profound appeal to people of all backgrounds,
of every religion and no religion, and from every part of the world” (Vipassana Meditation,
www.dhamma.org, no page number). Goenka calls Vipassana meditation “an experiential
scientific practice, through which one can observe the constantly changing nature of the
mind and body at the deepest level, a profound understanding that leads to a truly happy
and peaceful life” (Vipassana Meditation, www.dhamma.org, no page number). This
practice has been used in health care, prisons, schools, businesses and meditation centres
across the globe (Vipassana Meditation, www.dhamma.org, no page number).
49
Yoga
Yoga is described as “a timeless pragmatic science [that has] evolved over thousands of
years dealing with the physical, moral, mental and spiritual well-being of man as a whole”
(Iyengar, 1991, p. 13). Iyengar explains,
the word Yoga is derived from the Sanskrit root yuj meaning to bind, join, attach and
yoke, to direct and concentrate one’s attention on, to use and apply. It also means
union and communion … of our will with the will of God (1991, p. 19).
Yoga is not a religion and teaches that a “yogi does not look heavenward to find God. He
knows that HE is within, being known as the Antaratma (the Inner Self)” (Iyengar, 1991, p.
21).
The Sage Patanjali acknowledged in his teachings that the problem of “controlling the mind
is not capable of easy solution” (p. 21), and taught that the word chitta denotes the mind in
its total or collective sense as being composed of three categories, mind, intelligence and
ego48 (Patanjali cited in Iyengar, 1991, p. 21). Patanjali said it was important that “the yogi
understands the faults of others by seeing and studying them first in himself. This self-study
teaches him to be charitable to all” (Sage Patanjali cited in Iyengar, 1991, p. 27).
Spiritual anatomy
Myss (1997, 2001) has developed a model based on spiritual anatomy by integrating her
studies into the Indian chakra system, the Christian sacraments and the teachings of the
Kabbalah. In the Anatomy of the Spirit – The Seven Stages of Power and Healing (1997),
Myss identifies that “our spirit … participates in every second of our lives. It is the conscious
force that is life itself” (p. 3). Myss teaches about “the anatomy of the human energy system
– the anatomy of our own spirits … [and suggests that] learning the language of the human
energy system is a means to self-understanding … [by identifying] the patterns of your life
and the deep inter-workings of your mind, body, and spirit” (1997, pp. 6-7).
48
Chitta’s three categories are: (a) mind - manas, that is, the individual mind having the power and faculty of
attention, selection and rejection; it is the oscillating indecisive faculty of the mind; (b) intelligence or reason -
buddhi, that is, the decisive state which determines the distinction between things; and (c) ego - ahamkara,
literally the I-maker, the state which ascertains that ‘I know’ (Iyengar, 1991, p. 21).
50
Myss (1997) acknowledges that “much has been written about the nature of the personal
spiritual journey, but one of the first works remains one of the best known: ‘The Dark Night
of the Soul’, written in the sixteenth century by Saint John of the Cross. In this classic work,
the author articulated the stages of separation from the tribal or group mind that is
necessary in order to form a fully conscious bond with the Divine” (1997, p. 268-9).
Myss in another book Sacred Contracts: Awakening Your Divine Potential (2001) develops
her model further through recognising that there are patterns of intelligence which expands
upon Jung’s notion of archetypal patterns49. Myss suggests that every individual is born with
their own ‘Sacred Contract’ that guides them throughout their entire lifetime. Myss (2001)
explains, “a Contract is your overall relationship to your personal power and your spiritual
power. It is how you work with your energy and whom you give it to. It is also how much
you are willing to surrender to divine guidance” (pp. 4-5). To borrow from Jung the
examination into the ‘self’ stems from the point of view that there ‘is more to reality than
rational systems alone can explain’ (Crowley, 1998).
Jung’s transpersonal psychology
Carl Gustav Jung (1875 – 1961) discovered transpersonal theory, proposing that there are
developmental stages beyond the adult ego, which involve experiences of connectedness
with phenomena considered outside the boundaries of the ego. In healthy individuals, these
developmental stages can engender the highest human qualities, including altruism,
creativity, and intuitive wisdom. Development is never final as Jung (1958) explains,
Most people confuse ‘self-knowledge’ with knowledge of their conscious ego
personalities. Anyone who has ego-consciousness at all takes it for granted that he
knows himself. But the ego knows only its own contents, not the unconscious and its
contents. People measure their self-knowledge by what the average person in their
49
Crowley (1998) in her text Jungian Spirituality discusses Jung’s relationship with the divine, “Jung discovered that similar mythological patterns occur across cultures widely separated in time and space [and] began formulating an idea radical to medical science at the time: that of a human group mind, the collective unconscious. … [This was a] shift from psychology to a vision of humankind as having a ‘group mind’ … [that provided] a role for spirituality (p. 16). For Jung, Freud’s attempt to rationalise the divine didn’t work … [due to the two conflicting tendencies of science and spirit]. … [In contrast] … the divine was the centre of [Jung’s] inner world” (pp. 100-1).
51
social environment knows of himself, but not by the real psychic facts, which are for
the most part hidden from them. … What is commonly called ‘self-knowledge’ is
therefore a very limited knowledge, most of it dependent on social factors (pp. 14-
15).
Crowley notes in her text Jungian Spirituality (1998) that
Jung taught to look within the self, the deeper wise person whose viewpoint
transcends the short-term demands of the ego [and] on the spiritual quest, it is
essential to admit that we cannot achieve everything through the will of the ego …
we need the insights of spiritual wisdom … [to] transform the evil and negativity
within ourselves, as well as that in the outer world (pp. 108-9). For Jung everything in
the macrocosm, the cosmos, is reflected in the microcosm, the human being … birth
of a new consciousness centred in the self is a form of spiritual rebirth (p. 115).
Existential practice
Pembroke50 in his text Working Relationships: Spirituality in Human Service and
Organisational Life presents his view of what it means “to give of one’s self in meeting the …
existential needs of others” … suggesting three things51 are required, “inclusion52 …
responsibility53 … [and] availability54” (2004, p. 19). Essentially, Pembroke explains that
inclusion is about “experiencing the other side … an entering into the experience of the
other in a deep way – with one’s body, mind and soul fully engaged” (2014, p. 20).
He suggests that inclusion is different to empathy, as with empathy the worker puts aside
their ‘self’. ‘Inclusion’ however requires a deep understanding and presence of the workers
‘self’ to enable the worker not to lose sight of either the worker ‘I’ or the client ‘I’ in the ‘I-
thou’ interaction when entering into the world of another. Responsibility, according to
Pembroke, refers to “a careful, analytical study of the other” (2014, p. 23) and availability is
50
Associate Professor Neil Pembroke is a Lecturer in Studies in Religion at the University of Queensland. 51
Based upon Martin Buber and Gabriel Marcel’s work as noted in Pembroke (2004). 52
“In including one’s-self in the inner world of other, one becomes aware of the claim she is making” (Pembroke, 2004, p. 14). 53
“The action of offering oneself in responding to that claim he called ‘responsibility’ (Pembroke, 2004, p. 14). 54
“The third key notion associated with self-communication … is ‘availability’ (Pembroke, 2004, p. 14).
52
about being receptive which is essentially “a readiness to make available one’s personal
centre” (2014, p. 24).
The examination into phenomenology and consciousness disciplines / contemplative inquiry
highlights some of the ways in which the ‘self’ can be inquired into. What the authors
suggest in one way or another is that inner inquiry leads to a disciplined ‘self’, one which has
a balanced approach to life and events and cultivates a deeper understanding of others
beyond the personality level. The authors are in agreement that engaging in inner inquiry
into the ‘self’ is a life-long practice and that the tools to explore are already available. It is
the deeper exploration of direct experiences of the ‘self’ which is suggested as missing from
the current understanding of the ‘use of self’ in social work practice. By including these
methods of inner inquiry we begin to get a sense of the ‘self’ within the ‘use of self’. The
results of the literature review will be further elaborated in chapter five.
53
CHAPTER 4
Theoretical model, research methodology and method of inquiry
In this chapter, the theoretical model, research methodology and method of inquiry will be
outlined. The selection of the theoretical model was guided by the two aims of the thesis,
that is, to find out what is and what isn’t known about the workers’ ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ in
social work and other disciplines texts and to develop a universal workers’ ‘use of self’
Integral framework for social work practice. The chosen theoretical model is Ken Wilber’s
(1996, 2000) Integral theory with is presented as the ‘Four Quadrant Integral model (AQAL)’
and grounded in an extensive theoretical, methodological, cross-cultural and social practice
base which makes it highly applicable for social work. This particular model provides a way
of “linking, leveraging, correlating, and aligning … (the cornucopia of) perspectives … [into a]
… global vision yet [one that is] also anchored in the minutiae of our daily lives” (Esbjorn-
Hargens, 2009, p. 1).
This theoretical model is explained in further detail below, however it is important to
acknowledge at this point that the chosen research methodology and method of inquiry for
this research is not indicative of the scope of the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000;
Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009, 2014). In fact, “questions about methods are going to be crucial to
the future of [‘use of self’] research. … research methods will need to extend beyond
experimental studies to include, for example, contemplative, cross-cultural, and
phenomenological approaches, and ideally Integral Methodological Pluralism … meaning
that we need to use multiple methods” (Walsh, 2012, p. 4-5) which is what the Integral
theory suggests (Wilber, 1996, 2000; Esbjorn-Hargens 2009; Walsh, 2012). However, to
establish a point of reference to enable a mixed methods approach, this research is utilising
textual analysis as the method of inquiry to establish for the reader what is and what is not
currently known, and what is potentially possible for the workers’ ‘use of self’ and ‘self’
within social work practice.
The research methodology chosen for this thesis is interpretive social science (ISS). ISS is
described as,
54
social research techniques that are sensitive to context, that use various methods to
get inside the ways others see the world, and that are more concerned with
achieving an empathic understanding of feelings and world views than with testing
laws of human behaviour (Neuman, 2000, p. 75).
As noted above, the method of inquiry is textual analysis and as McKee (2003) states,
Performing textual analysis … is an attempt to gather information about sense
making practices … It allows us to see how similar or different the sense making
practices that different people use can be … Texts are the material traces that are
left of the practice of sense-making” (p. 23).
It is acknowledged that other methods of inquiry could have been utilised, such as
questionnaires or focus groups, however the author chose that for this research it would be
best placed to thoroughly critique social work and other disciplines texts in the first instance
to establish a baseline of knowledge for the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’. The theoretical model,
research methodology and the method of inquiry will now be explored in more depth.
Theoretical model
As acknowledged in the introduction quadratic models are not new (Burrell & Morgan,
states’ refers to the temporary states of consciousness such as waking, dreaming and deep
sleep, as well as meditative and altered states and peak experiences (Wilber, 1996, 2000;
Rentschler, 2006; Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009). ‘All types’ refers to, for example, feeling, thinking,
sensing and intuiting. It also incorporates masculine and feminine types of being (Wilber,
2000; Rentschler, 2006; Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009).
Upper Left
Interior-Individual
(Intentional)
I
Upper Right
Exterior-Individual
(Behavioural)
IT
ITS
Lower Right
Exterior-Collective
(Social)
WE
Lower Left
Interior-Collective
(Cultural)
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
LEFT-HAND SIDE – INDIVIDUAL – RIGHT-HAND SIDE
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R LEFT-HAND SIDE – COLLECTIVE – RIGHT-HAND SIDE
58
Second guiding principle – Integral methodological pluralism (IMP)
Wilber (1996, 2000) suggests that the three principles of ‘non-exclusion, enactment,
enfoldment’ facilitate integral methodological pluralism (IMP), which in turns provides the
basis for the AQAL. Wilber’s (1996, 2000) IMP consists of two main parts. First, it has been
based on an existing wide range of valid methodologies as they provide a way of ‘looking
and understanding’ through a particular ‘quadratic’ lens. Each one has significant insights to
the whole picture, however, on its own is partial and incomplete. Wilber elucidates,
the paradigmatic aspect means a careful compilation of all the primary paradigms or
methodologies of presently existing modes of human inquiry – which means, the
major methodologies that are presently accepted within their own fields or
disciplines (2006, p. 12).
Social practices are essentially the second facet of the IMP which “includes a … set of
practices that weaves … [the time tested methodologies] … together or integrates … [them]
… into ways of being-in-the-world that are radically non-exclusionary (Wilber, 2006, p. 12).
Other essential features innate to the Integral model
Perspectives
One innate component of the model which is essential for the discussion on the workers’
‘use of self’ and ‘self’ includes the perspectives of ‘first-person, second-person and third-
person’ (Wilber, 1996, 2000; Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009) which are essentially the ways humans
communicate. These are explained as “a first-person has agency or intentionality … a
second-person to whom agency is directed … [and] … a third-person is any holon [person]
referred to or indicated” (Rentschler, 2006, pp. 9-33).
59
The following diagram shows the eight major methodologies in the four quadrants:
Interior Exterior
singular
structuralism empiricism
inter-subjective inter-objective
plural
cultural anthropology/spiral dynamics sociology/systems theory
*55
Figure 2: Ken Wilber’s ‘Major Methodologies’ applied to the four quadrants (1996, 2000).
Whole/part
Whole/part also termed ‘holon’ means “a whole that is simultaneously part of another
whole” (Arthur Koestler as cited in Wilber, 2000). The individual ‘holon’ and social ‘holons’
follow “twenty of the most fundamental patterns of evolution” (Rentschler, 2006, p. 34).
Individual holons “have a subjective awareness or dominant monad (an ‘I’) … [and] … social
holons have an intersubjective awareness, dominant mode of discourse, or predominant
55
Autopoiesis (from Greek auto-, meaning ‘self’, and poiesis, meaning ‘creation, production’) refers to a system capable of reproducing and maintaining itself. The term was introduced in 1972 by Chilean biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to define the self-maintaining chemistry of living cells. Since then the concept has been also applied to the fields of systems theory and sociology. For the original definition see Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living (1st edition 1973, 2nd 1980).
phenomenology
autopoiesis*
hermeneutics
social
autopoiesis*
60
mode of resonance (a ‘We’/’Its’): social holons emerge when individual holons commune”
(Rentschler, 2006, p. 13).
The twenty patterns56
The twenty patterns of holon’s as described by Ken Wilber (1996, 2000) are condensed as
follows:
Reality is composed of holons, whole/parts, and not of things or processes (Wilber,
1996, p. 20);
Holons share four main drives, including agency, communion, Agape and Eros
(explained more fully below) (Wilber, 1996, pp. 21-22);
Holons emerge bringing new patterns, entities etc. (Wilber, 1996, pp. 24-25);
Holons emerge holarchically57 - “wholes that become parts of new wholes” (Wilber,
1996, p. 28);
Each emergent holon transcends and includes its predecessor (Wilber, 1996, p. 30);
The organisation of higher and lower order refers to levels of structural organisation
of increasing wholeness within holarchies, such as found in any developmental
sequence and is not referring to the socially constructed hierarchies (Wilber, 1996, p.
32);
If you destroy any particular type of holon, then all of the higher holons are also
destroyed, because they depend in part on the lower holons for their own
components (Wilber, 1996, p. 32);
The number of levels in any holarchy is referred to as its depth, and the number of
holons on any given level is referred to its span that is, evolution actually produces
greater depth and less span on succeeding levels (Wilber, 1996, pp. 33-24);
Spirit transcends all and includes all, ever-present at every level or dimension, as the
groundless Ground or Emptiness of all manifestation (Wilber, 1996, p. 38); and
Evolution has a direction, a drive toward greater depth (Wilber, 1996, p. 40).
Four main drives of a holon
As noted above, there are four main drives of a holon (Wilber, 1996, 2000) described below:
56
These are termed ‘tenets’ by Ken Wilber. 57
Holarchy is Arthur Koestler’s term for hierarchy.
61
Agency – “The horizontal drive for self-preservation, autonomy, and wholeness. The
drive to be a whole and not a part. Its complementary opposite is communion. Its
pathological expression is alienation, repression, rigid autonomy, and hyper-agency”
(Rentschler, 2006, p. 1).
Communion – “The horizontal drive for self-adaptation, part-ness, and joining with
others. The drive to be part of a larger whole. Its complementary opposite is agency.
Its pathological expression is fusion, herd mentality, and hyper-communion”
(Rentschler, 2006, p. 5).
Agape – “The vertical drive of the higher to embrace, enfold, or ‘love’ the lower; self-
immanence. Also refers to the involutionary force that pulls evolution from above.
Its complementary opposite is Eros. Its pathological expression is Thanatos58 [i.e.
regression]” (Rentschler, 2006, p. 1).
Eros – “The vertical drive of the lower to ‘reach up’ towards the higher; self-
transcendence. The urge to find higher, deeper, and wider wholeness. Its
complementary opposite is Agape. Its pathological expression is Phobos59 [i.e.
repression]” (Rentschler, 2006, p. 8).
The Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) is complex however in a nutshell the Integral model
“suggests that [the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’] are to be found in all four quadrants” (Walsh,
2012, p. 5). Thomas suggests that “the Integral approach continues to reshape the context
of the person-in-environment configuration by providing a full-spectrum master template”
(Thomas, 2004, p.13) and furthermore acknowledges that “Integralism per se has not been
expounded in the social work literature. However, its influence has indirectly been evident
through the application of transpersonal theory to social work practice and education”
(2004, p. 8). Transpersonal theory was introduced into social work from around the mid
1980’s (Canda, 1986, 1999; Canda & Furman, 1999; Cowley, 1993) and is found within
Thantos means “not the higher’s embrace of the lower, but the higher’s regression to the lower (Rentschler, 2006, p. 32). 59
Phobos means “not transcendence of the lower, but repression of the lower (Rentschler, 2006, p. 24).
62
To conclude the theoretical model section, the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) is being
utilised as a lens to discuss the analysis of the texts and as the basis for the ‘use of self’
Integral framework. By doing so I am drawing attention to what is known and what is not
known about the ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ in social work practice through textual analysis
inquiry. As Walsh points out, “without extensive communication with the mainstream,
integral ideas will not … permeate the mainstream culture nor produce the changes that are
so desperately needed” (2008, p. 7). Although I am not undertaking a multi-method inquiry
as it is out of scope for this thesis, in the next chapter I apply and discuss the results through
the lens of the four quadrants to build the universal worker’s ‘use of self’ Integral
framework. The rest of the chapter will focus on the methodology and method.
Methodology and method of inquiry
This research is essentially a philosophical work and the research methodology is
interpretive social science (ISS). Interpretive research “does not try to be value free …
because it sees values and meaning infused everywhere in everything” (Neuman, 2000, p.
75). It is understood that “an interpretative description of another person’s meaning system
is a secondary account, but the closer it is to the native’s primary account the better”
(Neuman, 2000, p. 74). To enable this, I have used extensive quotes in chapter’s 2 and 3 so
that the author’s voices are heard and their meanings provided.
A number of texts have been critiqued utilising the method of textual analysis (McKee,
2003). McKee’s description of textual analysis reads “when we perform textual analysis on a
text, we make an educated guess at some of the most likely interpretations that might be
made of that text” (p. 8). In order to critique, collate and compare selected texts and to
highlight potential gaps it is most appropriate to be utilising a qualitative method such as
textual analysis. Although the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) is a multi-method
approach (refer IMP above) the purpose of this thesis is to establish a current baseline of
knowledge on the workers’ ‘use of self’ through textual analysis inquiry and to introduce
some examples of other disciplines knowledge on the ‘self’ into social work.
63
The textual analysis method of collecting data fits in with ‘undertaking research into human
experience’ (Lincoln & Guba, 1985, cited in Canda, 1986, p. 36; McKee, 2003) such as the
workers’ ‘use of self’ and ‘self’. McKee (2003) explains,
Textual analysis is a way for researchers to gather information about how other
human beings make sense of the world. It is a methodology – a data-gathering
process – for those researchers who want to understand the ways in which members
of various cultures and subcultures make sense of who they are, and of how they fit
into the world in which they live. Textual analysis is useful for researchers working in
cultural studies, media studies, in mass communication, and perhaps even in
sociology and philosophy (p.7).
As the thesis is focusing on the examination of the workers’ ‘use of self’ within the social
work practice relationship, a solely positivist and quantitative focused research method
would miss the nuances of subjectivity and therefore not be appropriate.
The selection of texts is not thought to be exhaustive or the most important. However, a
cross-selection was chosen to highlight the various ways in which the ‘use of self and ‘self’ is
understood in practice from socials works’ inception to current time. The chosen texts (refer
Appendices A & B) also reflect the critical researcher’s position which suggests, “uncovering
the deeper level of reality is difficult, but it is essential because surface reality is full of
ideology, myth, distortion and false appearances” (Neuman, 2000, p. 79). The method of
textual analysis is assisted with directly reflecting what the authors are saying through the
use of quotes. McKee (2003) says it is the performing of textual analysis that the researcher
“attempts to gather information about sense-making practices … it allows us to see how
similar or different the sense-making practices that different people use can be” (pp. 14-15).
There were several main phases to the research process. Phase one, preparation, included
the preliminary work of proposal development and clarification of a rationale for the
research, professional context of the research problem, and guidelines for conceptualising
(Neuman, 2000). This phase involved the stage of a preliminary literature review and
problem conceptualisation with the results contained in chapter one. Phase two, as
described in this chapter, focuses on theoretical model, methodology and method of inquiry
(Wilber, 1996, 2000; Newman, 2000; McKee, 2003). This involved comprehending and
64
setting out the chosen theoretical Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000, Esbjorn-Hargens,
2009) and understanding its essential guiding principles (Rentschler, 2006) to enable the
building of a workers’ ‘use of self’ Integral framework. It also included undertaking an
extensive and detailed analytical review of the selected social work (Appendix A) and other
disciplines (Appendix B) literature to identify what is known and what is not known about
the ‘use of self’ and the ‘self’. Other texts were also critiqued to support the analysis and
situate it in a broader philosophical context (refer to bibliography). The outcome of this
phase is reported in chapter five.
Social work authors, defined as those who have published texts and journal papers, were
chosen because of their demonstrated ability to reflect, conceptualise and discuss the ‘use
of self’ and where applicable the ‘self’. Similarly, the other disciplines authors are defined as
those who have published texts and journals in relation to the notion of ‘self’ and were also
chosen because of their demonstrated ability to reflect, conceptualise and discuss the
notion of the ‘self’. Finally, phase three draws upon the data to apply it to the chosen
methodological model to develop an Integral ‘use of self’ framework and to highlight the
implications and make recommendations for the social work profession.
A selection of twenty-nine case work related social work writings (Appendix A) between the
dates of 1917 and 2011 were analysed. Foundational texts were included in the review
process due to the ‘use of self’ being an important feature linked to social works inception.
Authors include the foundational casework pioneer Mary Richmond, a select number of the
second wave pioneers’, influential academic case work authors, and some more recent
commentary two of which specifically draw on Integral theory (Wilber, 1996, 2000). The
cross-section of chosen texts includes chapters within texts, journal articles, an e-learning
module and a Masters dissertation.
To expand further, the inclusion of social work pioneers in the examination of texts is due to
the following:
1) the ‘use of self’ is recognised alongside the professionalization of social work;
2) social work pioneers advocate for a worker to have self-awareness and self-knowledge;
65
3) the texts are still utilised in academic institutions as the basis for core social work
teaching in undergraduate degrees; and
4) to establish what progress has been made in relation to an understanding of the ‘use of
self’ and ‘self’.
With regard to chapter and journal subject headings, titles included, ‘The Essence of
Casework’, ‘The Client-Worker Relationship’ and the ‘Essential Elements in Social Work
Practice’. In relation to the journals, titles included ‘Conscious Use of Self’, ‘Social Worker’s
Use of Self’ and ‘Use of Self in Relational Clinical Social Work’. The initial literature search
highlighted that the workers’ ‘use of self’ within the client-worker relationship is
predominantly discussed in relation to casework, although its importance is noted as
applicable to all spheres of social work activity.
A selection of twenty-three texts and journals were selected and analysed from other
disciplines (Appendix B) between the dates of 1958 and 2012. The authors discuss the ‘self’
using various terms (e.g. consciousness, wisdom) and discuss the importance of an engaging
in an ongoing inner inquiry and practice. For example, Walsh (2008) recommends that those
who engage in any form of consciousness research must go beyond intellectual
understanding as “without direct experience, transpersonal insights and ideas remain what
Immanuel Kant called ‘empty concepts’. … Without such direct experience, the deeper
meaning of concepts – or what philosophers call ‘higher grades of significance’ – will escape
us. But what is most problematic is this: we will not recognise that their real meaning and
significance are escaping us” (p. 7).
This chapter has outlined the theoretical model, methodology and method of inquiry. The
outline has taken the reader through the overarching theoretical method - Integral theory -
which is a drawing together of all the major accepted theories, perspectives and practices
by taking the ‘orientating generalisations’ from each to construct the four quadrant model
(Wilber, 2000, p. 5). I have orientated the reader to the basics of the Integral model (Wilber
1996, 2000) so as to provide the basis on which to construct my universal workers’ ‘use of
self’ Integral framework. I also clarified that whilst the Integral model is based on integral
methodological pluralism (IMP) (Wilber, 1996, 2000), I am not conducting IMP in this
66
research. The goal of this research is to explain the current notion of the worker’s ‘use of
self’ in social work practice and to elaborate, enrich and extend this notion (Neuman, 2000,
p. 22). With the idea of interpretative social science (ISS) in mind, I am conducting a textual
analysis inquiry to establish what is known and not known about the workers’ ‘use of self’
and ‘self’ in social work and furthermore to discuss some philosophical and consciousness
disciplines/contemplative inquiry approaches to the ‘self’ through the examination of other
disciplines texts. It is anticipated that this will broaden social works knowledge on the
workers’ ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ in practice and propose a new horizon for the ‘use of self’
into the future.
67
CHAPTER 5
The ‘use of self’ Integral framework
This chapter will do two things. It will interpret the results of the social work and other
disciplines textual analysis inquiry and it as this is undertaken the discussion will construct
the workers’ ‘use of self’ framework. Both of these will be undertaken through the lens of
the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000). It was discussed in the previous chapter that the
Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) represents an approach which powerfully draws
together the known and accepted philosophical orientations and theories, perspectives and
practice orientations and provides a solid foundation for understanding and expanding upon
a worker’s ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ in social work practice.
First, it is important to reorientate the reader to the four quadrants (Wilber, 1996, 2000):
Figure 3: Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants (2000, p. 198).
Upper Left
Interior-Individual
(Intentional)
I
Upper Right
Exterior-Individual
(Behavioural)
IT
ITS
Lower Right
Exterior-Collective
(Social)
WE
Lower Left
Interior-Collective
(Cultural)
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
LEFT-HAND SIDE – INDIVIDUAL – RIGHT-HAND SIDE
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R LEFT-HAND SIDE – COLLECTIVE – RIGHT-HAND SIDE
68
In the centre of Figure 2 (above), is a circle segmented into four quadrants which is
representative of the four ‘generalising orientations’ (Wilber, 2000). The two circular arrows
at the centre represents the dynamic and embedded interplay between each quadrant (left,
right, up, down and diagonal). Wilber & Walsh (2000) explain that, “apparently each
quadrant causes, and is caused by, the others in a circular and non-reducible fashion, which
is precisely why all four types of truth … are necessary to access the various dimensions
(2000, p. 313). Equally important is that “each of the perspectives associated with the four
quadrants can be studied through two major methodological families, namely from either
the inside or the outside. This results in eight distinct zones of human inquiry and research.
These eight zones comprise what integral theory calls IMP” (Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009, p. 16).
Interior Exterior
singular
structuralism empiricism
inter-subjective inter-objective
plural
cultural anthropology/spiral dynamics sociology/systems theory
*60
Figure 4: Ken Wilber’s ‘Major Methodologies’ applied to the four quadrants (1996, 2000).
60
Autopoiesis (from Greek auto-, meaning ‘self’, and poiesis, meaning ‘creation, production’) refers to a system capable of reproducing and maintaining itself. The term was introduced in 1972 by Chilean biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to define the self-maintaining chemistry of living cells. Since then the concept has been also applied to the fields of systems theory and sociology. For the original definition see Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living, (2nd Edition).
phenomenology
autopoiesis*
hermeneutics
social
autopoiesis*
69
Right-hand Side (RHS)
The right hand side (RHS) of the model takes into account the exterior validity,
encompassing both the objective individual exterior located in the upper right (UR)
quadrant and the objective collective exterior located in the lower right (LR) quadrant
(Wilber, 1996, 2000). As noted, this is the exterior doing side of the model where everything
is empirically observed either in an individual’s behaviour (UR) or in a social system’s
behaviour (LR). In accordance with the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000), both the UR and
LR quadrants are “IT/ITS” values, the perspective of the external view of the 3rd person
(Wilber, 1996, 2000). Whereby the UR is referring to the observation of an external singular
entity “IT”, the LR is referring to the external collective entity “ITS” such as social systems.
Adding the inner and outer zones of inquiry to each of these quadrants, we can see that
there are four methodologies to the RHS (refer Figure 4, p. 68).
Left-hand Side (LHS)
The left-hand side (LHS) of the model focuses on the contextual, subjective aspects and the
relationship to interior truthfulness either within culture (LL) or an individual (UL). With the
interior everything must be interpreted as opposed to being observed (Wilber, 1996, 2000).
The LHS of the model takes into account both the subjective collective interior located in the
lower left (LL) quadrant and the subjective individual interior located in the upper left (UL)
quadrant. In accordance with the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000), the LL has a “WE”
value relating to the 2nd person, and the UL has an “I” value relating to the 1st person. Lastly,
the subjective individual interior UL quadrant is about individual consciousness, and the
collective individual interior LL quadrant is about collective consciousness (Wilber, 1996,
2000; Durkheim cited in Sheldrake & Fox, 1997). Adding the inner and outer perspectives to
each of these quadrants, we can see that there are four methodologies to the LHS (refer
Figure 4, p. 68).
With these four ‘orientating generalisations’ and eight perspectives (Wilber, 1996, 2000) in
mind the social work analysis on the ‘use of self’ will now be applied to the workers’ ‘use of
self’ framework to gain a sense of where social work is at in relation to an Integral
understanding of the ‘use of self’.
70
Social work textual analysis applied to the Integral model
The figure below demonstrates social work’s thinking from the analysis in relation to the
RHS of the Integral model.
Figure 5 – Social works understanding of the ‘use of self’ as viewed through the right-hand side of Wilber’s
Integral model (2000).
As noted above, the RHS of the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) is the exterior doing
side of the model where everything is observed in third person and can be empirically
tested. The discussion will begin with the social work analysis relevant to the UR quadrant.
Within this quadrant, the ‘use of self’ aspects related to this quadrant are the demonstrated
engagement of social work skill, method and knowledge as seen through behaviour. For
example, this includes things like a worker’s attitude, body language, communication style
and style of dress and openness to a client. One perspective then, and this is the outer
perspective of the UR quadrant (e.g. empiricism – behavioural observation), essentially
relates to how a worker’s ‘use of self’ can be empirically validated through behavioural ways
of being which the social work literature addresses.
Observation of social work skills,
methods, and knowledge via body lanuage,
communication style and
approach etc.
Observation of optimising
functional-fit with social systems.
INDIVIDUAL – RIGHT-HAND SIDE
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
COLLECTIVE – RIGHT-HAND SIDE
71
With regard to the UR inner perspective of the objective individual exterior (i.e. inner body),
nothing was found in the social work texts. Even though the outer perspective of the
objective individual exterior, that is behavioural observation, is addressed within social
work, the inner perspective of the objective individual exterior (i.e. inner body) is not. It
could be argued that this is not relevant to social work, however, if social work is to address
the ‘use of self’ in an integrated way then all perspectives must be addressed such as the
To summarise, the UR quadrant and the outer inquiry of the objective individual exterior of
the ‘use of self’ is recognised by all the examined social work authors (Appendix A) as an
important aspect of the ‘use of self’ within practice. Due to behavioural observation it
appears that this is one of the easier ones to address for social work.
Moving on to the LR quadrant, the ‘use of self’ is about a workers demonstrated capability
of influencing collective social systems, or how the ‘self system’ of the social work
profession influences collective social systems. For example, worker networks with key
personnel within another social system to establish a robust referral pathway process
between the two social systems. The enactment of the established process is the observable
evidence of the worker’s ‘use of self’. To take this further and embed in a social system
practice per se, instead of just between two workers in the two social systems, the two
workers would collect evidence of the outcomes for clients when the referral process was
used and when it wasn’t.
As can be seen by the above analysis, the RHS whether looking at the individual behaviour
of a worker’s ‘use of self’ or the way in which the social worker uses/engages with the social
system of social work, it is a 3rd person approach because behaviour can be observed and
externally validated regarding the ‘use of self’.
61
Silow (2011) in her article titled ‘An Interior and Exterior View of Body’ states that “Western culture is geared toward the exterior. … Through numbed senses and a veering away from direct experience we have become alienated from our interior experience” (p. 58).
72
The figure below demonstrates social work’s thinking in relation to the LHS of the Integral
model.
Figure 6 – Social work’s understanding of the ‘use of self’ as viewed through the left-hand side of Wilber’s
Integral model (2000).
As noted above, the left hand side (LHS) is where everything must be interpreted within a
context as opposed to being observed (Wilber, 1996, 2000). The LHS incorporates both the
lower left (LL) collective “WE” and the upper left (UL) individual “I”. In relation to the social
work analysis through the lens of the LHS, the subjective collective interior of the LL will be
discussed first. All of the social work authors (Appendix A) highlighted in one way or another
that the ‘use of self’ incorporates a high level of skill in relationships and relationship
dynamics inclusive of understanding social interactions and associated dynamics that occur
within them, cultural norms and cultural values (Richmond, 1917; Hamilton, 1951; Biestek,
collaborative inquiry functionalism and systems theory
Figure 7: The ‘Use of Self’ Integral Framework (Gretta O’Hagan, 2014).
In chapter four, it was identified that an Integral approach takes into account: the AQAL
metatheory (inclusive of all quadrants, levels, lines, states and types), the IMP and valid
social practices (based on principles of non-exclusion, enactment and enfoldment), and the
concept of whole/part. One of the basic tenants of the model is that each quadrant, in this
case each facet of the ‘use of self’, is both a whole and a part simultaneously. That is, whilst
each quadrant tells its own ‘whole’ story, it is at the same time part of the larger four
quadrant story. Similarly, the ‘whole’ of the four quadrant story at this moment is ‘part’ of a
future more developed ‘whole’. This whole/part notion is particularly useful when
discussing the ‘use of self’ as the notion emphasises the innate drive for the continual
evolution of the ‘self’ (Wilber, 1996, 2000).
Skilful development. Consciousness approaches to the subjective interior individual 'self' "I".
Empirical observation.
Objective individual
exterior approaches to
'use of self' "IT"
Empirical observation.
Objective collective
exterior systems approach to 'use
of self' "ITS"
Applied action. Dialogical and practical approaches to the subjecive interior collective 'use of self' "WE".
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
Left-hand Side - INDIVIDUAL – Right-hand Side
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
Left-hand Side – COLLECTIVE – Right-hand Side
76
Within chapter three a number of other disciplines texts (Appendix B) were critiqued. The
following interpretation of the other disciplines analysis will be applied through the lens of
the Integral model (Wilber, 1996, 2000) to continue to develop the workers’ ‘use of self’
Integral framework (figure 7, p.75), specifically the UL quadrant. As Wilber and Walsh (2001)
suggest,
the methodology of an integral study of consciousness would apparently require at
least three broad wings: the first is a commitment to interdisciplinary study and
thinking; … second [is] the simultaneous tracking of the various levels and lines in
each of the quadrants, then noting their correlations, each to all the others, and in
no way trying to reduce any to the others; [and] the third is our own interior
transformation and development. This is one crucial reason why the left-hand
dimensions of immediate consciousness have been so intensely ignored and
aggressively devalued by most ‘scientific’ researchers (pp. 100-101).
AQAL - all quadrants, levels, lines, states and types
The universal workers’ ‘use of self’ Integral framework situates the ‘use of self’ squarely
within the all quadrant model by including: empirical observation of the worker’s use of
demonstrative skills such as body language and communication (UR); empirical observation
of the workers’ demonstrative ability to engage and utilise social systems (LR); shared
understanding bought about by the workers’ applied action within the client-worker
relationship (LL); and the workers’ ongoing skilful development and articulation of their
inherent consciousness capacities (UL). This ‘use of self’ framework is in line with the
Integral model’s four quadrants, that is, each domain has its own area of research,
methodology, practice and theory. The above description also includes the individual and
collective perspectives, and the objective and subjective components of the ‘use of self’.
Taking the four ‘use of self’ quadrants and overlaying the ‘self’ as an organising principle of
body, mind and soul (the working definition) the framework immediately increases in
complexity. For example:
UR (empirical observations of worker’s use of demonstrative skills such as body
language and communication):
77
o body - uses the body through which to convey understanding, engagement etc.;
o mind – thinks about the current use of body language and communication; and
o soul – practices and read further to incrementally advance this skillset, and
engages in conversations with others about their use of body language and
communication.
LR (empirical observation of the workers’ demonstrative ability to engage and utilise
social systems):
o body - uses the body to engage the necessary social systems and elicit required
outcomes;
o mind – displays understanding of particular social systems through referral and
functional-fit outcomes; and
o soul – develops key strategies to enhance social systems capacity to increase its
reach to a client cohort, and/or develop new systems.
LL (shared understanding bought about by the workers’ applied action within the client-
worker relationship):
o body – communicate a sense of communion and private space with the client;
o mind – communicate in a way that simultaneously distinguishes the worker “I”,
the client “I” and the shared “THOU/I” within the client-worker space; and
o soul – communicate in a way that builds a ‘truthful’ shared worldview in the
“THOU/I” space to provide opportunity for enhanced communication of
perspectives and perceptions of an issue. For example, in the client-worker
relationship, a shared worldview will need to be found with clients who are not
at the same level of consciousness. The more a worker has developed their
consciousness, the easier it is to forge this shared worldview on the universal
understanding that ‘we are all one’. In these cases, the worker is freed up to
facilitate a new understanding of intersubjective awareness for the client, as
opposed to being caught up in the dynamic of attempting to ‘change the client’s
value base from the point of challenging their personal/cultural ideology.
UL (workers’ ongoing skilful development and articulation of their inherent
consciousness capacities):
78
o body – engage in consciousness development of the body through e.g. body-
mind centering62, yoga, tai chi, jogging or walking etc.;
o mind – engage in consciousness development of the mind through e.g. applying
phenomenology techniques, meditation or other contemplative practice. Eastern
practices have long discussed and taught about the ‘optical illusion of the mind’
(Bennett-Goleman:2001). For most of the time this illusion is useful, however,
when the ‘mental partitions’ become habit “we are under the impression that we
are aware of all that we take in and all that we do … [but] … we are consciously
aware of only a tiny portion of our perceptions and actions. To us, that small
compartment appears to fill our whole mental cabinet” (Bennett-Goleman:2001:
p.55); and
o soul – engage in truthful self-communion and examination e.g. reading spiritual
texts, journaling and dream analysis, spend time in nature or other spiritual
dwelling such as a temple, dialogue with a spiritual mentor (in any of the above
chosen body and mind consciousness development approaches) to gradually
quieten into the truthful stillness of ones’ higher consciousness. This enhances
ones’ capacity to respond to personal challenges in a deliberate and pragmatic
way, and therefore convey this in the client-worker relationship/communion.
Levels and stages
The levels or stages are where milestones of growth and development are explored.
Applying spiritual anatomy (Myss, 1997, 2001), one of the examined contemplative
practice’s, to the ‘use of self’ provides a seven stage model of personal growth through
learning ‘seven sacred truths’63. The current level / stage of social works understanding of
the ‘use of self’ as viewed through this model indicates that social work predominantly
focuses on the first three chakras, that is, lessons related to the material world (first chakra);
lessons related to the power of relationships (second chakra); and lessons related to
personal power such as the ego, personality, and self-esteem (the third chakra). This is
evident from the examination into social work texts. More self-aware social workers may
62
Linda Hartley (1995), Wisdom of the Body Moving: An Introduction to Body-Mind Centering. 63
These seven stages can be explained through the chakras of the kundalini system and include: the first chakra - tribal power – lessons related to the material world; the second chakra - the power of relationships – lessons related to sexuality, work and physical desire; the third chakra - personal power – lessons related to the ego, personality, and self-esteem; the fourth chakra - emotional power – lessons related to love, forgiveness, and compassion; the fifth chakra - the power of will – lessons related to will and self-expression; the sixth chakra - the power of the mind – lessons related to mind, intuition, insight, and wisdom; and the seventh chakra - our spiritual connector – lessons related to spirituality (pp. 69-70).
79
incorporate the below lessons of emotional power, will and mind into their ‘use of self’,
however, the current level of social work education regarding the ‘use of self’ rests with the
first three chakra’s. It does suggest then, that the other sacred truths require inclusion64.
Looking at the applicability of this model, it suggests that it is able to further expand upon
the current ‘level / stage’ of the ‘use of self’ across all four quadrants.
All lines
With regards to ‘all lines’, this is referring to the numerous developmental lines, such as
spiritual and values etc., discovered by the discipline of psychology. For example, Jane
Loevinger (1976, 1987, 1996) developed a theory of personality and Susan Cook-Greuter
(2013) has further advanced this area by developing a model of the higher reaches of ego
development which moves from ‘knowledge’ towards ‘wisdom’, in which wisdom
incorporates “self-other constructed, increasing integration and post-conventional
understanding” (p.4). This aspect adds many dimensions of knowledge to an understanding
of ‘self’ and ultimately to an enhanced ability for a worker to apply this understanding to a
client.
All states
‘All states’ addresses the temporary states of consciousness such as waking, dreaming and
deep sleep, as well as meditative and altered states and peak experiences (Wilber, 2000).
The importance of a consistent pattern for the temporary states upon wellbeing is well
known, yet less is known within social work about the benefits of other states for the ‘use of
self’. Schools of meditation (Vipassansa, www.dhamma.org) and yoga (Iyengar, 1991) attest
to the fundamental benefits of engaging in a body and mind practice that develops
meditative states for consciousness development (also referred to as spiritual
development), and for health and well-being.
64 The other chakra lessons are emotional power (lessons related to love, forgiveness, and compassion-fourth
chakra; the power of will (lessons related to will and self-expression-fifth chakra); the power of the mind (lessons related to mind, intuition, insight, and wisdom-sixth chakra); and our spiritual connector (lessons related to spirituality-seventh chakra).
80
Jack Kornfield (1993) suggests that “spiritual practice [is] simply the cultivation of certain
mental qualities (p. 58). He cautions that this be underpinned by both “investigation65 and
energetic observation66 of how things really are” … [because if not] … “such practice will not
lead to a deeper understanding of self and the freedom of enlightenment” (Kornfield, 1993,
p. 58). It is suggested that as consciousness practices become part of a daily routine, over
time deeper experiential structures are created and eventually become permanent as
opposed to peak and/or temporary.
As a result of Jung’s (1958) transpersonal theory development and studies of mentally
healthy people, the humanist psychology movement has paved the way for the emergence
of transpersonal psychology. It studies transpersonal experiences “defined as experiences in
which the sense of identity or self extends beyond (described as ‘trans’) the individual or
personal to encompass wider aspects of humankind, life, psyche, and cosmos” (Walsh &
Vaughen:1993; p.3). The added element to an understanding of the ‘use of self’ adds further
fertile knowledge and experiential domains for social work to explore.
All types
The ‘all types’ of experience refers to such aspects such as feeling, thinking, sensing and
intuiting, and masculine and feminine. Phenomenology (Moran, 2000; Coghlan, 2008) as a
discipline of first-person practice provides valuable methods to assist workers’ in exploring
within their ‘self’ subjective experiences and exposing them to validity testing. Additionally,
feminist critique (de Beauvoir, 1988; Merchant, 1989; Eisler, 1990; Eisenstein, 1990) has
advanced thinking regarding understanding masculine and feminine experience
immeasurably.
To conclude, the above describes the various elements which is encompassed in the
proposed ‘use of self’ Integral framework. It also provides examples of how phenomenology
and consciousness disciplines/contemplative inquiry significantly expands upon an
understanding of and practice base for a workers’ ‘self’ within the ‘use of self’. It is not
65
This relates to Eastern methods of for example “concentration meditation … in which the emphasis is to train the mind by focusing it fixedly on a particular object (e.g. breath) (Kornfield, 1993, p. 56). 66
This relates to the Western psychology movement where “there is much emphasis on the active factors, which include investigation and energy devoted to understanding of one’s self” (Kornfield, 1993, p. 58).
81
within the confines of this Masters research to explore this further through actual method
application however additional exploration will be undertaken in future study.
The proposed workers’ ‘use of self’ Integral framework is based on the idea that the
workers’ ‘use of self’ is the essence of the social work relationship, and that the essence of
the ‘use of self’ is the ‘self’. Approaching the ‘use of self’ from this understanding and
viewing the ‘use of self’ through an Integral lens (Wilber, 1996, 2000), I am taking the
perspective that first and foremost the ‘use of self’ is an embodied practice (Esbjorn-
Hargens, 2009, 2010, 2014). Embodied practice means to me the matching of interior depth
of ‘self’ to being an effective change agent through the engagement the ‘use of self’
(Esbjorn-Hargens, 2009). Whereas current social work understanding is the other way
round, that is, learning theory and models and then applying them within the client-worker
relationship through the instrument/tool of the ‘use of self’.
It is important to note that phenomenology, consciousness approaches and contemplative
inquiry don’t directly state what the ‘self’ is, suggesting instead that the ‘self’ is ineffable.
What the other disciplines authors do suggest is that consciousness development is a life
long journey. Although I am bringing the ‘self’ to light for discussion and I have taken care
not to engage in reductionism, it must be acknowledged as a potential risk.
By developing a ‘use of self’ Integral framework, the emphasis is on the worker to engage in
their own consciousness development as a core element of the ‘use of self’ in practice. As
social work is an occupation which directly works with human beings at their most
vulnerable, consciousness development of the ‘self’ is indispensable. This developed ‘use of
self’ Integral framework is a concerted effort toward addressing social works expectation
that the ‘use of self’ must be applied for the benefit of the client.
82
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSIONS – NEW HORIZON FOR THE WORKERS’ ‘USE OF SELF’
In summary, the developed ‘use of self’ Integral framework has highlighted the gaps within
social works current understanding of the ‘use of self’. However, it has also identified key
concepts from the social work pioneers and influential authors in particular to ground the
model in. The ‘use of self’ Integral framework provides an opportunity for the social work
profession to strengthen the notion of a workers’ ‘use of self’ as it draws together the
orientating generalisations (Wilber, 1996) of the pioneers and influential authors and
introduces other disciplines knowledge on the ‘self’ into social work. It is recognised by the
author that ‘use of self’ is an extremely challenging area to tackle and that other social
workers have raised as a central issue to resolve (e.g. Beistek, 1957; Camilleri, 1999; Egan,
It is anticipated that the ‘use of self’ Integral model which embeds a robust application of
the ‘self’ will have numerous benefits for the social work profession. These benefits include
but are not limited to:
identification of the core features, principles and methodologies underpinning the ‘use
of self’ Integral framework;
situating the development of ‘self’, i.e. consciousness, as pivotal to being an effective,
accountable and ethical social worker; and that by
embedding ‘self’ within the ‘use of self’ greatly enhances the workers’ capacity to enter
more deeply into a client’s worldview with ones’ own as a method of practice.
As identified by a psychotherapist, “few, if any, [courses] explicitly address the topic of the
therapist’s use of self by guiding students through a systematic and rigorous educational
process designed to help them identify, research, evaluate, enhance and integrate
attributes of self in order to begin to meld these into their own unique and individual styles”
(Wosket:2003; p. 12).
A suggested new horizon for the workers’ ‘use of self’ and ‘self’ in social work practice, that
is the universal ‘use of self’ Integral framework, has been presented in this thesis. This
includes identifying the ‘self’ as the core essence underpinning the ‘use of self’ in social
work practice (with the ‘use of self’ being identified as the essence of social work practice),
clarifying the differences between the ‘use of self’ (i.e. span/breadth of social work
knowledge and practice models) and ‘self’ (i.e. depth of inner inquiry and development of
consciousness), and finally to suggest that the ‘use of self’ Integral framework will bring
about an even more ‘ethical’ practice by continuously being developed, supported and
charted.
84
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arnd-Caddigan, M., & Pozzuto, R. (2007). Use of Self in Relational Clinical Social Work. Clinical Social Work Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 235-243 Australian Association of Social Workers Ltd. (1990). Code of Ethics & By-Laws on Ethics. Adopted Directors Meeting July 1989 Bali, D. R. (1989). Introduction to Philosophy. Sterling Publishers Private Limited, New Delhi Barnard, A. M. (2011). The self in social work. Work Based Learning E-Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-192 Bartlett, H. M. (1958). Working definition of social work practice. Social Work, Vol.3 (2), pp. 5-8 (reprinted with permission Research on Social Work Practice, Vol.13, No.3, pp.267-270, Sage Publications Bartlett, H. M. (1970). The Common Base of Social Work Practice. National Association of Social Workers Inc. Bartlett, H. M. (2004). Social Work Pioneers. NASW Social Work Pioneer Program, National Association of Social Workers, USA, www.naswfoundation.org/pioneer.asp Bennett-Goleman, T. (2001). Emotional Alchemy: How the Mind Can Heal the Heart, Random House, Australia Biestek, F. P. (1957). The Casework Relationship. George Allen & Unwin, London Biestek, P. (no date). Biestek’s Biographical Sketch, Loyola University Chicago, University Archives, p.1 Bodhi, B. Ven. (2005). In The Buddha’s Words: An Anthology of Discourses From The Pali Canon. Wisdom Publications, United States of America Bohm, D. & Peat, F. D. (1987). Science, Order and Creativity. Bantam Books, USA Brown, E.L. (1943). Comparative Developments in Social Work, Medicine and Law. The Family. Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 254-255. Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Ashgate Publishing, UK Camilleri, P. (1999). Social Work and its search for meaning: Theories, narratives and practices. Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern critical perspectives. Allen & Unwin, Australia
85
Canda, E.R. (1986). A Conceptualisation of Spirituality for Social Work: Its issues and implications. Doctorate Dissertation, UMI Dissertation Services, A Bell and Howell Company’ Michigan Canda, E. R. (1999). Spiritually sensitive social work: Key concepts and ideals. Journal of Social Work Theory and Practice, 1(1), pp. 1-15. Canda, E.R. Ph.D. & Furman, L.D. Ph.D. (1999). Spiritual Diversity in Social Work Practice: The Heart of Helping. The Free Press, New York Chenoweth, L., & McAuliffe, D. (2005). The road to social work and human service practice: An introductory text, Thomson Learning, Melbourne Coghlan, D. (2008). Authenticity as first-person practice: An exploration based on Bernard Lonergan. Action Research, Volume 6(3), pp. 351-366, Sage Publications, Las Angeles Cook-Greuter, C. (2013). 9 Levels of Increasing Embrace in Ego Development: A Full-Spectrum Theory of Vertical Growth and Meaning Making. Adapted and expanded from A detailed description of the successive stages of ego-development (1985, 2005), Wayland, MA Cowley, A. S. (1993). Transpersonal Social Work: A Theory for the 1990s. Social Work, Volume 3, No. 5, pp. 527-533 Cowley, A. S. & Derezotes. D. S. (1994). Transpersonal Psychology and Social Work Education. Journal on Social Work Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 32-41 Crowley, V. (1998). Jungian Spirituality. Thorsons Publishers, London Damasio, A. (2000). The Feeling of What Happens: body, emotion and the making of consciousness. Vintage, London Danzig, E. (1965). Review of Casework: A Psychosocial Therapy. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 504-505 de Beauviour, S. (1988). The Second Sex. Pan Books, London Dewane, C.J. (2006). Use of Self: A Primer Revisited. Clinical Social Work Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4, Winter Diespecker, D. PhD. (1991). One Mind: An Introduction to Transpersonal Psychology. The Earthrise Press, Australia Doxtdator, M.L. (2012). Mindfulness: Helping Social Workers ‘Bring Themselves Home’. McMaster University, School of Social Work, Hamilton, Ontario Durkheim, E. (1915). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. George Allen & Unwin, London
86
Egan, G. (1990). The Skilled Helper: A Systematic Approach to Effective Helping. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, USA Eisenstein, H. (1990). Contemporary Feminist Thought. Unwin Paperbacks, London Eisler, R. (1990). The Chalice and The Blade. Pandora, London England, H. (1986). Social Work As Art: Making Sense for Good Practice. Allen & Unwin Publishers, London Engler. J.H. (1993). Becoming Somebody and Nobody: Psychoanalysis and Buddhism. Paths Beyond Ego: The Transpersonal Vision, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York Epstein, M. (2002). Going On Being. Broadway Books, New York Esbjorn-Hargens, S. (2009). An Overview of Integral Theory: An All-Inclusive Framework for the 21st Century. Integral Institute Resource Paper, No. 1, pp. 1-24 Esbjorn-Hargens, S. (2010). Integral Theory in Action: applied, theoretical, and constructive perspectives on the aqal model. State University of New York Press, Albany, USA Esbjorn-Hargens, S. (2014). Tetra Dynamics: Quadrants in Action. 2nd Ed, MetaIntegral Publishers, USA Finlay, L. PhD. (2008). Reflecting on ‘Reflective practice’. Discussion paper prepared for Practice-Based Professional Learning Centre, Paper 52, www.open.ac.uk/pbpl Fook, J. (1993). Radical Casework: A Theory of Practice. Allen & Unwin, Australia Fook, J. (1999). Critical reflectivity in education and practice. Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern critical perspectives. Allen & Unwin, Australia Ganzer, C. (2007). The Use of Self from a Relational Perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 117-123 Garner, M.D. (2011). Thinking Practice: The Social Work Integral Model. Social Work Publications, Paper 1, http://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/socialwork_pub/1 Goleman, D. (1999). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bloomsbury Publishing, London Govinda, A. Lama. (1960). Foundations of Tibetan Mysticism. B.I. Publications, India Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault. In D. Coghlan, Blackwell, Oxford
87
Hollis, F. (2004). Social Work Pioneers. NASW Social Work Pioneer Program, National Association of Social Workers, USA, www.naswfoundation.org/pioneer.asp Hamilton, G. (1951). Theory and Practice of Social Case Work. Columbia University Press, New York & London Hartley, L. (1995). Wisdom of the Body Moving: An Introduction to Body-Mind Centering. North Atlantic Books, California Helminiak, D.A. (2013). More Than Awareness: Bernard Lonergan’s Multi-Faceted Account of Consciousness. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, Advance online publication Heydt, M.J. & Sherman, N.E. (2005). Conscious Use of Self: Tuning the Instrument of Social Work Practice with Cultural Competence. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 25-40 His Holiness Dalai Lama (1999). Ethics for a New Millennium. Riverhead Books, New York His Holiness the Dalai Lama (2001). The Transformed Mind – Reflections on Truth, Love and Happiness. Hodder and Stoughton, London Hollis, F., & Woods, M. (1964). Casework: A Psychosocial Therapy. Random House, New York Howe, D. (1993). An Introduction to Social Work Theory: Making Sense in Practice. Wildwood, Aldershot Howe, D. (1993). On Being A Client: Understanding the Process of Counselling and Psychotherapy. SAGE Publications, London Howe, D. (1995). Attachment Theory for Social Work Practice. Macmillan Press Ltd, London Howe, D. (2008). The Emotionally Intelligent Social Worker. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers, London Hughes, L. (2008). Social Care Work in the Recent Past: Revisiting the professional/amateur dichotomy. Australian Social Work, 61(3), 226–238. Ife, J. (1999). Rethinking Social Work: Towards critical practice. Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Ltd, Australia Infed. (est. 1995). YMCA George Williams College, London, www.infed.org Iyengar, B. K. S. (1976). Light on Yoga. Woolnough Bookbinding Ltd, Great Britain Jordan, B. (1979). Helping in Social Work. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
88
Jung, C. G. (1958), The Undiscovered Self, Mentor Book, USA Jung, C. G. (1964), Man and His Symbols, A Laurel Book, New York Kim, C. Y. (2010). William James and Bernard Lonergan on Religious Conversion. The Heythrop Journal, No. 51, pp. 982-999 Kornfield, J. (1993). The Seven Factors of Enlightenment. Paths Beyond Ego: The Transpersonal Vision, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Lindsay, R. (2002). Recognizing Spirituality: The interface between faith and social work. University of Western Australia Press, Western Australia Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego Development. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Loevinger, J. (1987). Paradigms of Personality. Freeman, New York Loevinger, J. & Hy, L. X. (1996). Measuring Ego Development. Erlbaum & Associates, NJ McGarrigle, T., MSW & Walsh, C. A. PhD, (2011). Mindfulness, Self-Care, and Wellness in Social Work: Effects of Contemplative Training. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 30:3, pp. 212-233 McKee, A. (2003). Textual Analysis: A Beginners Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd, London McMahon, A. (2002). Redefining the Beginnings of Social Work in Australia. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Social Work and Welfare Education Conference, Perth, Western Australia Merchant, C. (1989). The Death of Nature. Harper Collins Publishers, United States Minahan, A. (2004). Social Work Pioneers. NASW Social Work Pioneer Program, National Association of Social Workers, USA, www.naswfoundation.org/pioneer.asp Moore, T. (1994). Care of the Soul: A Guide for Cultivating Depth and Sacredness in Everyday Life. Harper Perennial of Harper Collins Publishers, USA Moran, D. (1999). Introduction to Phenomenology. Routledge, USA Moran, D. & Cohen, J. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. Continuum International Publishing Group, London and New York Moran, D. (2013). Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology. Wiley, Hoboken NJ
89
Myss, C. PhD. (1997). Anatomy of the Spirit: The Seven Stages of Power and Healing. Bantam, Australia Myss, C. (2001). Sacred Contracts: Awakening Your Divine Potential. Bantam, Australia Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social Research Methods – Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn & Bacon, USA Nyanatiloka, (1968). Fundamentals of Buddhism: Four Lectures. Buddhist Literature Society, Colombo Okun, B. (1987). Effective Helping: Interviewing and Counselling Techniques. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, USA O’Connor, I., Wilson, J., & Setterland, D. (2003). Social Work & Welfare Practice, Pearson Education, Australia Pease, B. & Fook, J. (1999). Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern Critical Perspectives, Allen & Unwin, Australia Peat, F.D. (1996). Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Matter and Mind. The Holographic Universe, Harper Collins Publishers, London Pembroke, N. (2004). Working Relationships: Spirituality in Human Service and Organisational Life. Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd, England Pennington, J. (2011). Beneath the Surface: A Country of Two Nations. www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians Perlman, H. H. (1947). Content in Basic Social Case Work. Social Service Review, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 76-84. Pincus, A. & Minahan, A. (1973). Social Work Practice: Model and Method. F. E. Peacock Publishers Inc, Illinois Powell, S. K. (2010). Effective Use of Self in Direct Social Work Practice. Master of Social Work, California State University, Sacramento, USA Reid, J. P. (not dated). Social Welfare History. University of North Carolina Pembroke America, http://www2.uncp.edu Rentschler, M. (2006). AQAL Glossary. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, MetaIntegral Foundation, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1-40 Reupert, A. (2006), Social Worker’s Use of Self. Clinical Social Work Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 107-116
90
Richmond, M. E. (1917). Social Diagnosis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York Richmond, M. (2009). History of Social Work- Mary Richmond. www.historyofsocialwork.org Rogers, C. (1961). Transpersonal Pioneers: Carl Rogers. Sofia University, p. 2, www.sofia.edu/about/history/transpersonal-pioneers-carl-rogers/ Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Thinking Professionals Think In Action. Arena: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Great Britain Scott, D. Emeritus Professor. (2011). Reflections on Social Work: Past, Present and Future. Paper, 70th Anniversary Colloquium, Social Work, University of Melbourne Sheldrake, R. & Fox, M. (1997). Natural Grace: Dialogues on Science and Spirituality. Bloomsbury Publishing, London Silow, T. (2011). An Interior and Exterior View of Body. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 6(3), pp. 58-74 S. N. Goenka. (not dated), Vipassana Meditation: in the tradition of Sayagyi U Ba Khin. www.dhamma.org Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. (2008). Phenomenology. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Centre for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University, pp. 1-23, plato.stanford.edu Taylor, D. (1988). What was the position of women in 1850? Mastering Economic and Social History, Palgrave Macmillan Limited, United Kingdom Taylor, G. (1905). Chairman’s Report of The Committee On Training For Social Workers. Proceedings Of The National Conference Of Charities And Corrections, Thirty-Second Annual Session, City Of Portland, Oregon, p.436 Taylor, K. (1995). The Ethics of Caring: Honouring the Web of Life in Our Professional Healing Relationships. Hanford Mead Publishers, USA Thera, N. (1975). Buddhism in a Nutshell. Buddhist Publication Society, Sri Lanka Thera, N. (1991). The Buddha-Dhamma or The Life and Teachings of the Buddha. Asian Educational Services, New Delhi, India The Social Welfare History Project. (2013). People – Richmond, Mary, Online Resource, http://www.socialwelfarehistory.com, United States of America The Social Welfare History Project. (2013). Charity Organization Societies (1877 – 1893), http://www.socialwelfarehistory.com, United States of America
91
The Social Welfare History Project. (2013). Era 1901-1950, http://www.socialwelfarehistory.com, United States of America p.3 and p.133 Thomas, P.E. (2004). Toward the Development of an Integral Approach to Social Work: Implications for Human Behaviour Theory and Research. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, Vol. 9(3), pp. 1-19 Towle, C. (1969). Helping: Charlotte Towle on Social Work & Social Casework. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Towle, C. (2004). Social Work Pioneers. NASW Social Work Pioneer Program, National Association of Social Workers, USA, www.naswfoundation.org/pioneer.asp United Neighbourhood Houses. (2011). United Settlement House History, www.unhny.org/about/history University of Chicago website – School of Social Service Administration Centennial. Urdang, E. (2010). Awareness of Self – A Critical Tool. Social Work Education, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 523-538 Walsh, R. PhD. (1983). The Consciousness Disciplines. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23, pp. 28-30 Walsh, R. M. PhD. (2000). Essential Spirituality: The 7 Central Practices to Awaken Heart and Mind. John Wiley & Sons Inc Walsh, R. MD. PhD. (2000). Conventional and authentic lives: Existential and transpersonal perspectives. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 4(3), pp. 4-12 Walsh, R. MD. PhD. (2008). The State of the Integral Enterprise Part 1: Current Status and Potential Traps. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 4(3), pp. 1-12 Walsh, R. MD. PhD. (2008). The State of the Integral Enterprise Part 2: Key Ideas for a World at Risk. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 4(3), pp. 13-22 Walsh, R. MD. PhD. (2012). Wisdom: An Integral View. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 7(1), pp. 1-21 Walsh, R. MD. PhD. & Vaughen, F. PhD. (1993). Paths Beyond Ego: The Transpersonal Vision. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York Whittington, C. (2013). Contrasting philosophies and theories of society in social work: paradigms revisited. Greenwich Working Paper, www.whittingtonconsultants.co.uk/publications.html
92
Wilber, K. & Walsh, R. (2000). An Integral Approach to Consciousness Research: A Proposal for Integrating First, Second and Third-person Accounts of Consciousness. Advances in Consciousness Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 82-101 Wilber, K. (1996). A Brief History of Everything. Hill of Content Publishing, Melbourne Wilber, K. (2000). Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution. Shambhala, Boston Wilber, K. (2006). The Many Ways We Touch – Three Principles Helpful for Any Integrative Approach. www.kenwilber.com Wilber, K. (2012). The Ways We Are In This Together. Integral Life Magazine, http://integrallife.com Wilber, K., Pattern, T., Leonard, A., & Morelli, M. (2008). Integral Life Practice: A 21st Century Blueprint for Physical Health, Emotional Balance, Mental Clarity, and Spiritual Awakening. Integral Books, Boston Woods, M. E. (1996). Iowa Women’s Archives. University of Iowa Libraries, Iowa City, Iowa Wosket, V. (1999). The Therapeutic Use of Self. Routledge, London
Younghusband, E. (1981). The Newest Profession: A short history of social work. IPC Business Press Ltd, London Younghusband, E. (2008). Social Work and Society International Online Journal, Vol.6, No.1, United Kingdom
93
APPENDIX A
Social Work Texts
DATE AUTHOR TITLE
SOCIAL WORK PIONEERS
1917 Mary Ellen Richmond Social Diagnosis
1951 (Amy) Gordon Hamilton Theory and Practice of Social Case Work
1957 Felix Biestek The Casework Relationship
1957 Helen Harris Perlman Social Casework: A Problem-solving Process
1958 Harriet Bartlett Working Definition of Social Work (Journal)
1964 Florence Hollis &
Mary Woods
Casework: A Psychosocial Therapy
1969 Charlotte Towle Helping: Charlotte Towle on Social Work and Social
Casework
1970 Harriet Bartlett The Common Base of Social Work Practice
INFLUENTIAL AUTHORS
1979 Bill Jordan Helping in Social Work
1986 Hugh England Social Work As Art – Making Sense for Good Practice
1987 Barbara Okun Effective Helping: Interviewing and Counselling Techniques
1987
David Howe An Introduction to Social Work Theory: Making Sense in
Practice
1990 Gerard Egan The Skilled Helper: A Systematic Approach to Effective
Helping
1993 Janis Fook Radical Casework – A Theory for Practice
1993 David Howe On Being A Client: Understanding the Process of
Counselling and Psychotherapy
1993 Au-Deane S. Cowley Transpersonal Social Work: A Theory for the 1990s’
1995 David Howe Attachment Theory for Social Work Practice
1999 Jim Ife Rethinking Social Work
MORE RECENT COMMENTARY
2003 O’Connor, Wilson &
Setterland
Social Work and Welfare Practice (4th Edition)
2005 Margo J Heydt &
Nancy E. Sherman
Conscious Use of Self: Tuning the Instrument of Social Work
Practice with Cultural Competence (Journal)
94
2007 Andrea Reupert Social Worker’s Use of Self (Journal)
2007 Carol Ganzer The Use of Self from a Relational Perspective (Journal)
2008
Margaret Arnd-Caddigan
& Richard Pozzuto
Use of Self in Relational Clinical Social Work (Journal)
2008 David Howe The Emotionally Intelligent Social Worker
2008 Linda Finlay Reflecting on ‘Reflective practice (Paper)
2010 Esther Urdang Awareness of Self – A Critical Tool (Journal)
2010 Skye Katherine Powell Effective Use of Self in Direct Social Work Practice
(Master of Social Work Project)
2011 Adam Barnard The Self in Social Work (e-Journal work based learning)
2011 Michelle D. Garner
Thinking Practice: The Social Work Integral Model (Journal)
95
APPENDIX B
Other Disciplines Texts
Date Author Text Title
PHENOMENOLOGY
1957 Bernard Lonergan Insight: A Study of Human Understanding
2000 Dermot Moran Introduction to Phenomenology
2006 M Reitschler AQAL Glossery
2008 D Coghlan Authenticity as first-person practice: An exploration based
on Bernard Lonergan (Journal)
CONSCIOUSNESS DISCIPLINES/CONTEMPLATIVE INQUIRY
1958 Carl G. Jung The Undiscovered Self
1960 Lama Anagarika Govinda Foundations of Tibet Mysticism
1968 Nyanatiloka Fundamentals of Buddhism: Four Lectures
1975 N. Thera Buddhism in a Nutshell
1983 Roger Walsh The Consciousness Disciplines (Journal)
1991 N. Thera The Buddha-Dhamma or The Life and Teachings of the
Buddha
1991 Iyengar Light on Yoga: The Classic Guide to Yoga by the World’s
Foremost Authority
1997
Caroline Myss Anatomy of the Spirit: The Seven Stages of Power and
Healing
1998 V Crowley Jungian Spirituality
1999 His Holiness the Dalai
Lama
Ethics for a New Millennium
2000 Roger Walsh Essential Spirituality: The 7 Central Practices to Awaken
Heart and Mind (Journal)
2001 Roger Walsh &
Ken Wilber
An Integral Approach to Consciousness Research: A
Proposal for Integrating First, Second and Third-person
Accounts of Consciousness
2001 His Holiness the Dalai
Lama
The Transformed Mind – Reflections on Truth, Love and
Happiness
2001 Caroline Myss Sacred Contracts: Awakening Your Divine Potential
2004 Neil Pembroke Working Relationships: Spirituality in Human Service and
96
Organisational Life
2005 Ven. B. Bodhi In The Buddha’s Words: An Anthology of Discourses From
The Pali Canon
2012 Roger Walsh Wisdom: An Integral View
2013 S. N. Goenka Vipassana Meditation: in the tradition of Sayagyi U Ba Khin
97
APPENDIX C
Other research not included within the thesis
The ‘self’ – evolutionary perspectives on ways of being in the world (Jean Gebser:1985).