The Effect on Differential Mailing Methodologies on Response Rates Testing Advanced Notices, Package Design, Postage, and Other Treatments American Association for Public Opinion Research Orlando, Florida May 18, 2012 Presented by: Yelena Pens, Robin Gentry
21
Embed
The Effect on Differential Mailing Methodologies on ...Postcards 13.6 1, 2, 3 Official Package 10.4 3 Overall 14.3 Household Response Rates by Treatment 1 Statistically significant
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Effect on Differential Mailing Methodologies on Response RatesTesting Advanced Notices, Package Design, Postage, and Other
Treatments
American Association for Public Opinion ResearchOrlando, Florida
»Sample: • ~11,000 households• ABS matched and unmatched telephone numbers• Five markets
»Methodology:• Fielded in Summer 2011• Tested several different mailing approaches, design, and personalization.• New online diary application (registration and radio listening portions)• Household flooding approach• Mobile option (iPhone and Android)• Emails (registration confirmation, reminders, thank you/incentive)• Promised Incentive choices (Amazon or Visa Gift Cards)
Address Mail Label (Personalization Test)*Name Arbitron Radio Household
*See session The Effect on Personalized Address Labels on Response Rates and Postal Deliverability Rates by Vrinda Nair and Yelena Pens, Friday, May18, 2012 at 10:00 AM-11:30 AM
» Registered Households• Households who successfully registered for the online diary• Not including completion of the online diary• This is a household level not person level statistic
» Estimated Usable Households• Starting sample • Removing the following:
– Non-deliverable Unusable Households (Vacant, No Such Number, Insufficient Address, or No Such Street)
– Media affiliated households– Group Quarters households (10+ persons living in a household such as
dormitories, military barracks, etc.)
= Registered Households
Estimated Usable Households÷(Also called registration rate)
» Results of Pre-alert Postcard • Design (oversized postcard)
– A large majority of respondents identified it as junk mail and would throw it away.– Many said it appeared to look like something they would receive from a healthcare,
insurance or pharmaceutical company.– Considered to have too much text and unappealing pictures.
• Headlines– “Represent your community” – Some respondents thought “community” was having
to go somewhere and work or donate their time with others.– “You listen to the radio, now the radio listens to you!” – Most recognized that it was
too vague – they weren’t clear on what it was asking of them.– “Be part of the Arbitron radio ratings” – clearly states what they are being asked do.
» Focus Groups (Winter 2012)• Hispanic demos in three markets• Pre-alert postcard, box mailer, and
» If multiple mailings are being mailed to the same address, non-deliverable mail may differ by packages/waves.
» Reasons for inconsistencies:• When a mail piece is returned to the sender for any reason, the piece
is endorsed by the carrier.• There many be different carriers on a route on any given day, so
endorsements may vary.
Promotional Mailerpre-alert box 6x9 #10
Usable 84.0 76.7 82.4 82.8
Unusable 16.0 23.3 17.6 17.2
Non-Deliverables by Mailer
The box which is a bulky mailer has the highest unusable rate.
Note: Usable: Attempted Not Known , Illegible, Unable to Forward/Forwarding Order Expired, Deceased, Temporarily Away/hold mail, Refused, No Mail Receptacle, In Dispute, or Unclaimed; Unusable: Vacant, No Such Number, Insufficient Address, or No Such Street.
» Planning a third Pilot Test in Fall 2012• Focus on collecting email addresses from all household members• Solving usability issues from previous tests• Testing pre-recorded telephone messages alone as a pre-alert• Testing different pre-alert designs and messaging• Testing a pre-alert incentive