Page 1
1
Author: Merritt, Stephanie, G
Title: The Effect of Various Combinations of Whole Wheat Flour and
Modified Food Starch and Whole Wheat Flour and Wheat Flour on
Freeze-Thaw-Reheat Stability As Measured By Viscosity in Roux-
Gravy
Graduate Degree/ MS Food and Nutritional Sciences Major:
Research Advisor: Dr. Naveen Chikthammah, Ph.D.
Month/Year: Spring, 2012
Number of Pages: 48
Style Manual Used: American Psychological Association, 6th Edition
I understand that this research report must be officially approved by the Graduate School and that an electronic copy of the approved version will be made available through the University Library website
I attest that the research report is my original work (that any copyrightable materials have been used with the permission of the original authors), and as such, it is automatically protected by the laws, rules, and regulations of the U.S. Copyright Office.
My research adviser has approved the content and quality of this paper.
STUDENT:
NAME Stephanie Merritt DATE: May 16, 2012
ADVISER: (Committee Chair if MS Plan A or EdS Thesis or Field Project/Problem):
NAME Dr. Naveen Chikthammah, Ph.D. DATE: May 16, 2012
___________________________________________________________________________
This section to be completed by the Graduate School
This final research report has been approved by the Graduate School.
Director, Office of Graduate Studies: DATE:
Page 2
2
Merritt, Stephanie, G. The Effect of Various Combinations of Whole Wheat Flour and
Modified Food Starch and Whole Wheat Flour and Wheat Flour on Freeze-Thaw-Reheat
Stability As Measured By Viscosity in Roux-Gravy
Abstract
Developing a starch product with the combinations of a whole wheat native flour and
a modified food starch or a whole wheat native flour and a cross-linked wheat flour that can
withstand varying levels of freeze-thaw cycles followed by reheating and still maintain a
consistent viscosity as the fresh product could allow for many opportunities in the food
industry, in addition to other specialty industries. The objective of this study was to evaluate
the viscosities of various combinations (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75) of whole wheat flour
(X) and modified food starch (Y) and whole wheat flour (X) and wheat flour (Z) in roux-
gravies at 0, 1, and 3freeze-thaw cycles followed by reheat. The sample treatment viscosities
of the whole wheat flour and modified food starch (X + Y) combinations and whole wheat
flour and wheat flour (X + Z) combinations were analyzed using a Brookfield Synchro-
Lectric Viscometer. For X + Y and X + Z treatment combinations (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, and
25:75) viscosity significantly increased with increasing number of freeze-thaw cycles
(p<0.05). In general, increasing levels of Y or Z increased viscosity of the roux-gravy.
Page 3
3
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my genuine appreciate and gratitude to the many people who
helped and assisted in completing my research and thesis. I would first like to express my
deepest thanks to Dr. Naveen Chikthammah, who has appreciably contributed to assisting of
the completion of my research design, experiment accomplishment, scientific and thesis
writing, and overall support as well. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Renee Surdick,
who supported the initial idea of this thesis idea and experimental design. Furthermore, I
would like to express gratitude to Connie Galep for allowing me to perform experiments in
the laboratories and supporting the completion of my research and thesis. Finally, I would
like to give great thanks to my family and friends for giving me full support as I completed
my research and thesis.
I would like to dedicate this thesis to my wonderful parents, who have shown me the
true meaning of hard work, dedication, and perseverance.
Page 4
4
Table of Contents
……………………………………………………………………………………………...Page
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………...2
List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………….7
Chapter I: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………8
Statement of the Problem……………………………………………………………..12
Purpose of the Study………………………………………………………………….12
Research Objectives…………………………………………………………………..12
Assumptions of the Study…………………………………………………………….12
Definition of Terms…………………………………………………………………...13
Limitation of the Study………………...……………………………………………..14
Chapter II: Literature Review………………………………………………………………...16
Starch…………………………………………………………………………………16
Starch Granule………………………………………………………………………...17
Starch Composition…………………………………………………………………...17
Starch as a Thickening Agent………………………………………………………...20
Roux…………………………………………………………………………………..21
Industrial Uses………………………………………………………………………...23
Whole Wheat Flour…………………………………………………………………...23
Germ…………………………………………………………………………………..24
Endosperm……………………………………………………………………………24
Bran…………………………………………………………………………………...26
Wheat Flour Production………………………………………………………………27
Page 5
5
Modified Food Starch………………………………………………………………...28
Waxy Maize…………………………………………………………………………..29
Freeze-Thaw Stability………………………………………………………………...30
Retrogradation………………………………………………………………………...31
General Knowledge of Conventional Oven Cooking………………………………...32
Consistency/Viscosity………………………………………………………………...33
Chapter III: Methodology…………………………………………………………………….34
Materials & Description………………………………………………………………35
Table 1: Ingredient formulation used to prepare model roux – gravy (X +Y)………..36
Table 2: Ingredient formulation used to prepare model roux – gravy (X + Z)……….36
Viscosities of Roux-Gravy Data Collection…………………………………………..37
Data Analysis…………………………………………………………………………38
Limitations……………………………………………………………………………38
Chapter IV: Results……………...……………………………………………………………40
Chapter V: Conclusion………………………………………………………………………..42
Recommendations…………………………………………………………………….43
References………………………………………………………………………………….....45
Page 6
6
List of Figures
Figure 1: Structure of Amylose……………………………………………………………….20
Figure 2: Structure of Amylopectin…………………………………………………………..21
Figure 3: Structure of a Wheat Kernel………………………………………………………..28
Figure 4: A graph describing the mean viscosities of the sample treatments of X + Y at 0
freeze thaw cycles and 1 and 3 freeze-thaw cycles followed by reheating…………41
Figure 5: A graph describing the mean viscosities of the sample treatments of X + Z at 0
freeze thaw cycles and 1 and 3 freeze-thaw cycles followed by reheating………....42
Page 7
7
Chapter 1: Introduction
Starches have long been used for textural assistance. In the food industry, starch is the
most commonly used thickening and gelling agent due to the vast array of texture and
mouthful characteristics it provides. It is found as an ingredient in many foodstuffs such as
soups, sauces, gravies, and many processed foods (Arocas, Sanz, & Fiszman, 2009).
Starch granules have large, long-chain glucose polymers, which are insoluble in water
and do not form a true solution. These granules create a temporary suspension when stirred
into water, and if left undisturbed, they will settle out. In the uncooked stage, each starch
granule can swell slightly when absorbed in water, but as they are introduced to heat during
cooking, the granules swell or gelatinize irreversible causing the starch to leach out. This
feature of starch granules enables starch to be used as a thickener (Vaclavik & Christian,
2003).
Starch is made up of two molecules: amylose and amylopectin that are connected by
glycosidic bonds. Amylose is referred to as the straight-chain polymer, but the structure is
actually helical, allowing it to interact with other ingredients. Starches containing high levels
of amylose will show signs of gelling once gelatinized and cooled. Amylopectin is the chief
molecule in almost all starches. It is significantly larger than amylose and has a structure
made up of linked branches along the linear section of the polymer. Although amylose and
amylopectin are both comprised of the same units, they reveal very different properties and
functions, which add to functional performance and ingredient interactions in food structures
(Mitolo, 2006).
This natural condition of enclosing both amylose and amylopectin polymers is found
in the form of a starch granule (Mitolo, 2006). Amylose and amylopectin polymers are
Page 8
8
packaged into this granule. The granules are found in the form of a semi-crystalline
macromolecular structure that appear to be built up by deposits of successive layers
surrounding a central nucleus or hilum (deMan, 1999). The starch granule is held together by
semi-crystalline bundles which allow it to remain whole during heating without completely
disrupting it (Mitolo, 2006).
When starch cools, retrogradation occurs where the starch reverts to a more crystalline
structure. During this, amylose and amylopectin can participate in textural changes causing a
gritty mouth feel. This is caused by the realignment of the natural state of the starch
molecule. Freezing accelerates this process when the gel is exposed to a freeze-thaw cycle
where the water in the gel is frozen and thawed every time this cycle occurs. The ice crystals
that are melted during the thawing process are not able to reassociate with the starch, thus
shrinking the gel network from the loss water or syneresis (Vaclavik & Christian, 2003).
The quality of a finished starch product is based on several factors, such as the source
of starch, concentration of starch used in the formulation, the temperature of heating, and
other components like acid and sugar that interact with starch (Vaclavik & Christian, 2003).
There has been an increased interest in frozen products, which presents new challenges for
developers working with starch-based products. In the article, “Starch in frozen sauces”,
Denise Fallaw, technical manager for meat and convenience at Cargill Texturizing Solutions
in Wayzata, MN stated, “In frozen applications, it is important the starches have good
freeze/thaw stability to maintain these characteristics through multiple cycles of temperature
fluctuations” and Rachel Wicklund, food scientist at Tate and Lyle in Decatur, IL, explained
that temperature swings and freeze/thaw cycles are far more numerous than one person might
think, beginning in the manufacturing facility to the grocery display case. Combining the
Page 9
9
repeated freezing and thawing from the freezer door opening at the grocery store, with the
fluctuating temperatures before the product reaches the grocery store to the time that the
product sits in the grocery cart, it is understandable why freeze/thaw stability is so important
in the quality of the food product (Cited in Foster, 2009).
There are many different sources of starch on the market today. These products
originate from different types of cereal grains such as rye, oats, barley, rice, corn, and wheat
(Godon & Willm, 1994). Each grain contains different nutritional compositions that offer
various functional properties in a variety of food products (deMan, 1999). Examples of these
starches would be modified waxy maize, which is used primarily to convey viscosity (Light,
1989); wheat flour, used heavily in bread making, consists of 28% amylose and 72%
amylopectin and contains 0.3 grams per 100 grams of protein and 0.8 grams per 100 grams of
lipids. Waxy maize, which contains a mere 1.4-2.7% amylose and as much as 98.6%
amylopectin and also, has only 0.02-0.14 grams per 100 grams of lipids and does not
comprise of any protein (Eliasson & Gudmundsson, 2006).
Whole wheat flour is unlike that of wheat flour because it contains the germ,
endosperm, and bran that are found in the kernel. The way whole wheat flour performs in
food products is simultaneously related to its composition. Starch is a major component of
the wheat kernel. It is made up of over half of the dry weight. The amount of amylose,
approximately 23%, and amylopectin, roughly 77%, are found in wheat (Hegenbart, 1996).
This is significantly different than the mutant grain variety, waxy maize, which is almost
100% amylopectin. Waxy maize is the major source of starch produced in the United States
and is commonly deviated into a modified food starch. For the reason that modified food
starches impart functional properties that native starches are not able to provide, they have
Page 10
10
become a popular element in the food industry (Light, 1989).
Whole wheat flour is considered a native starch and because of this there are
limitations such as instability and the tendency to retrograde during freezing (Arocas, Sanz, &
Fiszman, 2009). Overall, modified food starches are able to assist with the granular integrity
and resist over processing, allowing the texture and appearance of the starch-based product to
be smooth and improve the consistency dramatically (Mitolo, 2006).
Roux is a mixture of flour and fat cooked together and used as a thickening agent for
soups and sauces. This term dates back more than 300 years in French cuisine where cooking
a flour and oil paste until the raw flavor of the flour cooks out and the roux has achieved the
desired color. A correctly cooked roux has a silky-smooth body and a nutty flavor while
thickening sauces and soups. A variety of fats can be used such as vegetable oil, olive oil,
butter, and in some instances, bacon grease and other rendered fats. A roux is distinctively
different from other thickeners because the starch source is cooked before use, removing the
raw flavor while preserving starch’s functional properties Thus, gravy is made from the roux
with the addition of a liquid, such as chicken stock or beef broth, that will assist in thickening
and flavoring (Allrecipes.com , n.d.).
There has been little research done on the consistency of a roux-gravy from the effect
of a freeze-thaw-conventional reheat cycle. Both heating and freezing can impact starch in
regards to the final texture, mouth feel, and consistency of a roux. A Brookfield Synchro-
Lectric Viscometer (Model RVT, Brookfield Engineering Labs. Inc., Stoughton, MA) was
used to measure the viscosity of the roux-gravy at both the initial processing and after freeze-
thawing followed by conventional reheating steps.
Page 11
11
Statement of the Problem
Starch is the staple ingredient in gravy-based products. Problems arise when a product
of such is put through a freeze-thaw-reheat cycle causing texture and mouth feel
inconsistencies from the initial processing to reheating steps. This research project is aimed at
creating a roux–gravy that enhances the textural and mouth feel features that maintains a
consistent viscosity through each processing step.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of freeze-thaw-reheat
cycles on the viscosity of various combinations of whole wheat flour (X) and modified food
starch based roux-gravies (Y) and whole wheat flour (X) and wheat flour (Z) based roux-
gravies. The viscosities of the roux-gravies will be measured using a Brookfield Synchro-
Lectric Viscometer at the University of Wisconsin-Stout in Heritage Hall in the spring of
2012.
Research Objectives
This research project is aimed at determining the effect of freeze-thaw-reheat cycles
on the viscosities of various combinations of whole wheat flour (X) and modified food starch
(Y) based roux-gravies and whole wheat flour (X) and wheat flour (Z) based roux-gravies.
The following is a list of objectives for this study.
1. To determine the combination of whole wheat flour (X) and modified food starch
(Y) in a roux-gravy that will allow for a consistent viscosity from the cooking, cooling,
freezing, and thawing steps to conventionally reheating the roux gravy. This research was
done for the University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Page 12
12
2. To determine the combination of whole wheat flour (X) and wheat flour (Z) in a
roux-gravy that will allow for a consistent viscosity from the cooking, cooling, freezing, and
thawing steps to conventionally reheating the roux gravy. This research was done for an
organic farm in southwestern Wisconsin.
Assumptions of the Study
In this study, it is assumed that the whole wheat flour and the modified food starch
being used are similarly produced at the anonymous company of purchase as compared to
other milling companies. In addition, it is thought that the oven used in this research is
comparable to the ovens used by research and development departments that work with
starch-based products.
Definition of Terms
The following terms have been defined for the purpose of this research paper to help the
reader fully understand the information.
AACC International: a non-profit organization of members who are specialists in the
use of cereal grains in foods (Widjaja, 2006).
Aesthetics: the logic of exquisiteness learned through mind and sentiment studies.
Amyloplast: accountable for the production and well-being of starch granules.
β-glucans: D-glucose monomers polysaccharides connected by β-glycosidic bonds.
Crystal Structure: distinctive collection of molecules in a crystalline liquid.
Hydrogen Bonding: a form of bonded intermolecular strength that subsists between
two partial electric charges of differing polarity.
Hydroxyl Groups: an oxygen atom joined by a lone bond to a hydrogen atom in
functional assemblies.
Page 13
13
Gelatinization: to form into a jelly structure or texture.
Glucose: a sugar with the structure of: C6H12O6.
Gluten: the nitrogenous material that remains after a grain has been washed to remove
the starch.
Glycosidic Bond: joining of a carbohydrate molecule to another group through a
covalent bond.
Gristing: grinding a certain amount of grain.
Hemicellulose: a group of polysaccharides with more intricacy than sugar, but less
intricate than cellulose.
Molecule: the tiniest particle made up of two or more atoms that are adhered by
chemical forces while maintaining its physical and chemical properties of the material.
Mouth Feel: a perceptible feeling that a food offers to the mouth.
Nucleation: the start of chemical or physical alterations at distinct areas in a matrix.
Pentosan: a class of polysaccharides.
Plastid: the location of construction and maintenance of significant chemical
compounds used by the cell.
Polymer: a small and plain molecule made up of repeated connected units that can be
either of natural or synthetic compounds and typically, a high molecular weight exists.
Polymerization: the development of forming a polymer or copolymer.
Reducing Group: any sugar that has an aldehyde or a ketone group in solution.
Syneresis: the reduction of a gel assisted by the expulsion of liquid.
Tempering: an application done by heating or cooling to bring a material to an
appreciable texture, hardness, or consistency.
Page 14
14
Whole Grains Council (WGC): The Whole Grains Council helps consumers find
whole grain foods and understand their health benefits, helps manufacturers produce
appetizing whole grain products, and helps the media write precise, gripping stories about
whole grains (Widjaja, 2006).
Limitation of the Study
There is one limitation to this study. The quality and age of the Brookfield Synchro-
Lectric Viscometer may impact the precision and accuracy of the measurements for viscosity.
Page 15
15
Chapter II: Literature Review
Introduction
Five different sections are included within this chapter. The first section includes
information about starch. This knowledge will define the basic familiarity of starch, the
starch granule, the composition of starch, how it is used as a thickening agent, and its
purposes and uses in the food industry. The next section discusses whole wheat flour and the
background information that includes composition and the flour milling process. The third
section discusses modified food starch and information regarding composition, purposes in
the food industry, and as a derivative of waxy maize. The fourth section discusses freeze-
thaw stability as an effect on starch-based products, the impact of retrogradation, and the
general knowledge of conventional oven heating. The final section includes a discussion
about the consistency and viscosity of a roux–gravy.
Starch
Carbohydrates are the second most plentiful and widely allocated food components in
the world (Hizukuri, Abe, & Hanashiro). The main use of starch is to supply the chief source
of carbohydrates in the diet. Starch can be defined as a highly functional, reactive
carbohydrate, which can be modified chemically, physically, or enzymatically for specific
needs. In the food industry, starches have been traditionally used as an ingredient at
reasonably low levels for nutritional purposes and its functional properties in food systems.
Additionally, starches play a vital role when it comes to manipulating texture, moisture,
consistency, aesthetics, and shelf stability in processed foods (Pomeranz, 1991).
Starch exists mainly in most green-leafed plants, such as the root and tuber in tapioca
and potato plants, in the stem-pith in sago, and in the seed of cereal plants, which includes
Page 16
16
wheat and waxy maize. The purpose of starch in cereal grains is to store it as energy during
dormancy or germination, until sugar is photosynthesized in the green leaves (Lineback &
Inglett, 1982).
Starch Granule
Starch is found in the form of granules. In cereal plants, such as wheat and waxy
maize, the granules are made by amyloplasts, which are found in the plastids. Because wheat
and waxy maize are considered simple starch granules, plastids only consist of one granule.
Wheat has two types of starch granules: the large lenticular and small spherical. The large
lenticular granule is initially formed by the plastid and soon after the plastids produce
evaginations, where the small spherical granules are formed. Constriction causes the
amyloplasts to be separated from the original plastid (Hoseney, 1994).
A highly organized nature of an unharmed granule can be observed under a polarized
light microscope. This exhibits a well-defined birefringence or maltese cross pattern that
resembles a dark cross. It has been determined that amylopectin is accountable for
crystallinity and amylose being responsible for birefringence (Lineback & Inglett, 1982).
During heating, the granule’s structure is changed significantly by granular disruption
(Friedman, 1995). When enough water is present, gelatinization occurs, causing the medium
to become more viscous. (Lineback & Inglett, 1982).
Starch Composition
Starch is created mostly of glucose and other minor The intramolecular hydrogen
bonds become disturbed, thus causing the amorphous regions to hydrate first. As the
viscosity of the medium increases, the granule continues to swell. However, once the granule
has swelled to a point that the internal bonding has lost its integrity, the granule bursts and
Page 17
17
viscosity decreases constituents at very low levels (Eliasson & Gudmundsson, 2006). Within
cereal starches, low levels of polar lipids, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the form of
phospholipids exist. Starch is essentially polymers of D-glucose and two distinguishable
types of polymers: amylose and amylopectin (Hoseney, 1994).
Amylose (Figure 1) is considered the linear polymer of D-glucose linked
glycosidic bondsormally, amylose is presumed as linear, but this is only for part of
the molecule, where the remnants appear to be lightly branched. The molecular weight is
typically less than 500,000, but varies significantly among species of plants, within species,
and the stage of plant maturity (Mitolo, 2006). When starch is heated above the gelatinization
temperature, amylose leaches from the starch and is essentially linear, but as the temperature
is raised, amylose becomes of greater molecular weight and more branched. These extra
branches are known as long–chain branching, with side chains of hundreds of glucose that
remain at bonds. Due to the linear nature of Amylose, it is able to provide unique
properties, such as being able to be precipitated from a solution of starch, its tendency to
associate with itself, and its ability to readily retrograde (Hoseney, 1994).
Page 18
18
Figure 1. Structure of Amylose. Mitolo, J.J. (2006). Starch Selection and Interaction in
Foods. In A.G. Gaonkar & A. McPherson, Ingredient Interactions: Effects on Food Quality
(pp.141). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Amylopectin (Figure 2) is also composed of D-glucose that is mainly linked by
glycosidic bondsbut branched to a greater degree with 4–5% being bonds
(Mitolo, 2006). Due to this level of branching, the unit chain is only 20–25 glucose units long
on average. It is considered a giant molecule, being one of the most enormous found in nature
due to its molecular weight of 10,000,000 Daltons, having 595,238 glucose residues, and
29,762 chains with an average degree of polymerization of 20. The molecule is made up of
three types of chains: A-chains, comprised of glucose linked B-chains consisting of
glucose linked andand C-chains that have glucose with
andlinkages in addition to a reducing group. Therefore, A-chains don’t have
branches, whereas B-chains do and C-chains are branched and have the only reducing group
within amylopectin (Hoseney, 1994).
Page 19
19
Figure 2: Structure of Amylopectin. From Mitolo, J.J. (2006). Starch Selection and
Interaction in Foods. In A.G. Gaonkar & A. McPherson, Ingredient Interactions: Effects on
Food Quality (pp.142). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Starch as a Thickening Agent
Starch is used in food production as a thickener sequentially to improve textural
functionalities, water retention, and to supply to the lesser energy intake in dietary products
(Korus, Juszczak, Witczak, & Achremowicz, 2004). The thickening of food products is
accomplished by the swelling of the starch granule. The starch granule is insoluble in cold
water. If exposed to cold water, it will begin to swell slightly, but eventually it will shrink
back to its original size (Pomeranz, 1991). Once a starch granule is introduced to progressive
heat in a water suspension, it begins to swell and at the same time loss of birefringence
occurs. This is called gelatinization and depending on the species of starch, swelling can
begin occurring between 56-78°C. The loss of birefringence happens when To is reached and
causes the birefringence to vanish. This loss signifies that the order in the starch granules is
lost. However, this does not mean that the order at the crystalline level is gone. The loss of
Page 20
20
birefringence occurs over a more vast temperature range when less water is used. The most
frequent way to conclude the gelatinization temperature range is to follow the loss of
birefringence in surplus water (Eliasson & Gudmundsson, 2006).
The mechanism that allows this phenomenon to occur is by the weakening of the
hydrogen bonds breaking in the amorphous area. After the initial gelatinization, the starch
granule will continue to swell with hydration. Ultimately, these swollen granules grow so
large that they take in all of the free water that still remains and begin to swarm each other,
causing a thick body consistency and short texture of a cooked starch paste. Overall, the
starch granules are hydrated and swelled to a greater extent than their original size, the loss of
the dark maltese cross or birefringence occurs, there is an increase in lucidity, a rapid increase
in viscosity and the linear molecules are diffused from the burst granules. However, this
starch paste is not a solution. The gelatinized granules do not completely dissolve, thus acting
as elastic gel particles (Pomeranz, 1991).
Roux
Roux is used in soups, sauces, and stews as a thickener and as a flavor additive.
Typically, it is a combination of wheat flour and a clarified fat, such as butter. Due to its
ability to be used as both a thickener and a flavoring agent for many dishes, it is very
important to understand how cooking roux affects the physical characteristics of the final
product (Krasnow, Hirson, & Shoemaker, 2011).
When producing a roux, the flour and fat are combined together and heated for a short
time over a low to medium heat depending on the final product’s use. The roux is heated to
the point where the raw flavor is cooked off, but not to the stage where the flour is toasted
(Krasnow, Hirson, & Shoemaker, 2011). This is due to the peroxidase enzymes in the flour
Page 21
21
to be inactivated and allowing the starch constituents to become modified (Hardacre,
Campanella, Budiman, & Hemar, 2004). As the temperature of the roux rises during cooking,
the thickening ability of the roux weakens. The thickening power of the roux depends on the
starch granule’s size and shape, the polysaccharide matrix, and the collaboration of these
characteristics (Krasnow, Hirson, & Shoemaker, 2011).
The behavior of the starch gel is significantly influenced by the addition of a lipid.
With the addition of lipids, the gelatinization and swelling power are reduced and averts the
leaching of lower molecular weight portions, such as amylose when starch is heated.
Typically, when the fragments, such as the amylose are leached, it is correlated with the
swelling power of the starch granule. The type of lipid constituent that interrelates with the
starch is also important. Triglycerides, monoglycerides, free fatty acids, or steroids will each
impart different properties as it reacts with the starch granule during swelling (Friedman,
1995).
The blend of flour and a lipid in a roux is essential when presenting a smooth, rich
texture in roux-based foods. The viscosity of roux produced from flour and butter is
influenced by ingredient features. Because it is a suspension of starch granules in a lipid,
60% of the volume fraction is occupied. It has been determined that the viscosity of a roux is
proportional to the volume fraction of the starch granules in the suspension. To impart a
consistent viscosity in a roux, the ratio of starch to water must be constant and the oil
absorption by the flour must be optimized with the cooking time and temperature the roux is
being cooked at (Hardacre, Campanella, Budiman, & Hemar, 2004)
The main function of the fat in the roux is to impart distinctive flavors and aromas. As
the temperature during cooking is raised in the roux, many changes occur with the ketones,
Page 22
22
furancs, pyrazines, and carboxylic acids. The distinct flavor and aroma compounds produced
during cooking are due to the fat source (Krasnow, Hirson, & Shoemaker, 2011).
Industrial Uses
Starch has been used in the food industry for the following six functions:
1. Colloidal stabilizers in foods such as salad dressings
2. Moisture withholding in food such as cake mixes
3. Gelation agent in foods such as confections
4. Binding agent in foods such as ice cream cones and wafers
5. Coating and glazing management in foods such as candies and nut meats
6. Thickening agent in foods such as sauces, pie fillings, and gravies
In most instances, starch is used as a thickening agent and typically consumed in a
cooked paste form. In the United States, starch is used for its aesthetic appeal, how it crafts
foods to be presentable to the eye, assists in desirable texture and mouth feel, to avoid
separation of ingredients, and to offer a transporter for delicate flavors, rather than using it
solely as a nutritional purpose. As a thickening agent, it represents a major portion of total
starch sales in the food industry (Pomeranz, 1991).
Whole Wheat Flour
Wheat is a member of the grass family (Gramineae), which is made up of cereal grains
that produce dry, one-seeded fruits. These fruits are caryopsis or commonly named a kernel
or grain. On average, wheat kernels are about eight millimeters in length and weigh
approximately 35 milligrams. The kernel contains a pericarp or fruit coat that tightly encases
the seed and clings to a seed coat. An embryo or germ, an endosperm surrounded by a
nucellar epidermis, and a seed coat are found in the seed (Hoseney, 1994). Wheat is
Page 23
23
recognized as red or white by the color that exists on the kernel surface, as soft or hard, and as
spring or winter. It is considered as the most versatile grain because it can be used in many
applications. It can be used as flour to structure the source of many food products, such as
pastas, noodles, cereals, flours for baking, and starch production (Medved, 1986).
Whole wheat flour is categorized as a whole grain. According to the Whole Grains
Council (WGC, 2004) and AACC International (2000), foods can be considered a whole grain
if the foods consist of almost the same relative proportions of bran, germ, and endosperm as
the original grain kernel (Cited in Widjaja, 2006).
Germ
The wheat germ (Figure 3) encompasses 2.5–3.5% of the kernel and is comprised of
two major parts: the embryonic axis or rudimentary root and shoot and the scutellum or a
small shield-like structure. The two parts function as a storage organ. The embryonic axis is
made up of 16% oil and the scutellum is 32% oil. The germ also consists of relatively high
amounts of protein (25%), sugar (mainly sucrose and raffinose, 18%), and ash (5%). The
germ does not contain starch, has many enzymes, and is high in B vitamins and vitamin E,
with values as high as 500 ppm of total tocopherol (Hoseney, 1994).
Endosperm
The endosperm (Figure 3) is made up of three types of cells: peripheral, prismatic, and
central. These cells differ in size, shape, and their location within the kernel. The cell walls
of the endosperm are comprised of pentosans, β-glucans, and hemicelluloses. Depending on
the location of the cell wall in the kernel, thickness varies due to the location of the cultivars
and the types of hard and soft wheat. Wheat flour is made up of the contents and cell walls of
the endosperm. The peripheral, prismatic, and central cells are packed with starch granules
Page 24
24
that are inserted in a protein matrix, which is mostly all gluten, the storage proteins of wheat.
The starch granules are large in size and shaped as a lens that can occur up to 40 µm, but can
be spherical in shape and as small as 2- 8 µm in diameter (Hoseney, 1994). They constitute
54–72% of the dry weight in the wheat kernel, while the two molecules comprised in the
starch granule, amylose and amylopectin, ranged from 17–29% and 71–83% (Pomeranz,
1991).
As part of the wheat grain the endosperm texture plays an important role because it
establishes both the hard and soft wheat’s final use in food products (Turnbull, Marion,
Gaborit, Appels, & Rahman, 2002). There are distinct differences between soft and hard
wheat endospems. A trait of hard wheat is that the protein and starch create a tight adherence
as the protein coats the starch surface allowing for high water retention. The hemicellulose in
the wheat absorbs great amounts of water causing the cell wall to thicken. In contrast, soft
wheat flour is not able to absorb high amounts of water and as a result, the cell walls are much
thinner. Additionally, the bond between starch and protein is much stronger when hard wheat
breaks through the cell wall and starch granules. The bond becomes significantly weaker
when the hard wheat ruptures through the cell contents and at the starch–protein interface.
The durability of the starch–protein bond is reason to explain the hardness of the wheat kernel
(Pomeranz, 1991).
The appearance of the endosperm is also an important feature. Depending on the
wheat variety, the endosperm can appear hornlike, translucent, opaque, or floury. Typically,
hard wheat and high protein content have been associated with translucency, while soft wheat
and low protein content have been found to be opaque. This is explained by the amount of air
spaces in the wheat kernel that diffract and diffuse light to create a translucent or opaque
Page 25
25
appearance (Hoseney, 1994).
Bran
The third major component of a grain is the bran or outer hull (Figure 3), which is
approximately 16% of the wheat kernel. This component is layered and has an outer coat of
the wheat kernel. It contains an outside pericarp layer, which provides protection to the seed
and an inside layer that consists of the seed coat. The bran is roughly comprised of 19% of
the protein, 3–5% lipid, minerals such as iron, and is approximately 14.5% of the seed. A
distinct feature of bran is that it offers cellulose and hemicellulose, which adds a rich source
of fiber to the diet (Vaclavik & Christian, 2003).
Page 26
26
Figure 3: Structure of a Wheat Kernel. Saunders, R.M. (1980). Wheat bran as a dietary fiber.
In G.E. Inglett & G. Munck, Cereals for food and beverages: Recent progress in cereal
chemistry (pp. 139). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Wheat Flour Production
The production of whole wheat flour is done in a mill. There are different milling
methods that can be done, depending on the type of grain and/or flour being produced
(Wingfield, 1980). The basic process of producing flour is done by separating the endosperm
from the bran and germ. Due to the differences in the endosperm, bran, and germ’s physical
properties, these tightly bound structures can be mechanically separated. Several hours prior
to milling, the bran and endosperm are stressed by conditioning or tempering. This is done by
adding water to the wheat to harden the bran and weaken the endosperm for easier separation
due to the differences in friability. Next, gristing occurs, where different batches of wheat are
gristed together to make a mix able to produce the required flour quality. During the milling
Page 27
27
process a steady pulverization occurs followed by maturing. Maturing involves oxidative
changes that occur in storage, thus improving rheological properties (Pomeranz, 1991).
Modified Food Starch
Modified food starches have become an essential component in the food industry since
their invention in the 1940s. Almost all areas in the industry employ starch’s functional
properties to aid in the appeal of the final product. Modified food starch, also called starch
derivatives, is prepared by physically, enzymatically, or chemically treating native starch, thus
altering the properties of the starch (Light, 1989).
There are three major reasons why starches are modified, the first being that modified
food starches offer functional properties that native starches cannot give in food functions.
For example, in a roux–gravy, the starch imparts a thickening ability, a smooth short
consistency, and the handiness in an instant gravy. In addition, modified food starches can
assist with absorbing or hindering moisture, binding, disintegrating, producing different
textures, developing various coatings, and steadying an emulsion. Secondly, starch is
plentiful and readily accessible, and thirdly, it can supply a financial advantage in many food
applications due to the inexpensive processing and abundant supply as compared to gums,
which are much higher priced ingredients (Light, 1989).
As mentioned previously, starch contains linear and branched polymers of glucose:
amylose and amylopectin. These glucose units can have up to three reactive hydroxyl groups
that are the foundation of all of starch’s unique derivatizations. This includes: granular
swelling, loss of birefringence, native crystallite melting, solubilization, and retrogradation.
The modification of starch typically affects these occurrences by hybridization, chemical, and
physical modification of the native starch. Examples of chemical modification include
Page 28
28
derivatization and conversion, where physical modification incorporates pregelatinization,
particle size alteration, and moisture regulation (Light, 1989).
A principal type of modified food starches is cross-linking. Cross-linking is a
treatment that involves small amounts of compounds to be added to starch polymers to react
with hydroxyl groups. The purpose of cross-linking is to enhance the resistance to
overcooking, acidic environments, high shear, or extreme temperatures. This will create a
short texture or less swelling and thickening to cooked dispersions of starch and allows for the
starch to become more durable against breakdown (Vaclavik & Christian, 2003).
Waxy Maize
Modified food starches are commonly derived from waxy maize. This is because
waxy maize contains almost 100% amylopectin, which imparts advantageous viscosity
characteristics. In the United States, waxy maize is by far the most important starch source in
the food industry (Lineback & Inglett, 1982). It was developed in 1909 by plant breeders and
became a very popular food ingredient during World War II. The starch granule size of waxy
maize can range in size from 5–25 µm and its granules are multisided or polygonal (Hood,
1980).
Waxy starches have much more diverse compositions compared to normal starches.
Typically, standard starches contain roughly 20–30% amylose and 70–80% amylopectin,
whereas waxy starches consist of about 99% amylopectin and only minute portions of
amylose. Therefore, waxy starches have very different rheological properties as contrasted by
dispersions of normal starches. As stated in the article, “Shear-thickening properties of waxy
maize starch dispersions”,
Page 29
29
It is well known that for the pastes of a normal starch, a gel structure will
develop on cooling at room temperature. Generally, the short-term
development of the gel structure and the crystallinity in starch gels was found
to be dominated by irreversible gelation and crystallisation within the amylose
matrix, while the long-term retrogradation of the starch gels which was
reversible could be attributed to amylopectin. The pastes of waxy starches
could not develop a gel structure, due to the fact that unlike amylose, which is
linear or slightly branched, amylopectin in the pastes is highly branched and
could not form gels under normal conditions. (Wang, Wang, Li, Zhou, &
Ozkan, 2011, pp.1).
Due to this fact, it is very appropriate to modify waxy maize to impart the functional
properties to create a desirable food product.
Freeze–Thaw Stability
Storage stability of starch-based foods is one of the main concerns in food
applications, especially if the product has to be frozen. In extreme instances of a thickened
starch product, poor storage conditions can result in syneresis from the food product. This
potentially makes the consumer believe that the food has been spoiled through
microbiological activity when actually it was just a means of poor stability. Therefore,
controlling retrogradation during freezing is a challenge (Pomeranz, 1991).
This effect is accompanied by the freeze–thaw cycle, which basically is when starch
thickened products are frozen and thawed and/or exposed to thermal temperature fluctuations
that can ultimately occur at any stage of processing, storage, or distribution. These courses
then can change quality attributes such as syneresis, organoleptic and/or textural differences
Page 30
30
associated with these types of foods (Eliasson & Kim, 1992).
Starch’s ability to endure the objectionable physical changes that occur during
freezing and thawing have been coined the term, freeze–thaw stability. These transformations
have been credited to the phase separation due to retrogradation and starch crystallization.
Freeze – thaw stability varies noticeably with the source of starch, but it is known that starch
modification improves this effect considerably. In addition, factors such as starch
concentration, pH, cooking conditions, freezing rate, and other components present can affect
overall freeze–thaw stability (Eliasson & Kim, 1992).
Retrogradation
Retrogradation is a slow, progressive characteristic of starch molecules that associate
during cooking. Once a food product is thawed for consumption, the moisture is separated
from the matrix, thus causing texture softening, drip loss, and worsening of quality (Gill,
Kaur, Sogi, & Chandi, 2009). Retrogradation is basically described as recrystallization during
freezing after gelatinization has occurred. This causes the crystalline structure to change to an
ordered double helical structure from amorphous glucans. This is brought on by low
temperatures, starches that contain high amylose content, and the presence of polar
substances, such as salts (Sobolewska-Zielinska, & Fortuna, 2010).
Consequently, intermolecular distances between starch molecules weaken, causing
water to be removed from the gel and dehydration of the product. During cold temperature
freezing, insoluble starch, mainly amylose, leaches from the starch granules. During each
freeze–thaw cycle, the amylose molecules and the non–branched portions of amylopectin link
together by hydrogen bonding. This occurs in the first stage of retrogradation and
simultaneously, starch gel rigidity is induced by amylopectin crystallization. Once a product
Page 31
31
has been introduced to freezing, retrogradation of the starch molecule speeds up and during
each freeze – thaw cycle it is accelerated drastically (Sobolewska-Zielinska, & Fortuna,
2010).
Comparatively, it has been found that cereal starches, such as whole wheat flour are
more susceptible to retrogradation. However, this phenomena can be controlled by a starch’s
molecular weight, concentration, temperature during heating, and the presence of non–starch
constituents, which can include lipids, acids, hydrocolloids, surfactants, saccharides, and salts.
Retrogradation can also be hindered by starch modification (Sobolewska-Zielinska, &
Fortuna, 2010).
General Knowledge of Conventional Oven Cooking
Conventional ovens are the most common type of household ovens. According to
custom, most households in the United States are equipped with one and every day they are
used by people to cook foods from casseroles to breads to desserts and the list goes on. These
ovens are able to use gas or electricity depending on the homeowner’s preference and/or the
available connection in the home.
Conventional ovens are not to be confused with convection ovens, which use a fan to
force heated air inside the oven to circulate around the food. It allows the food item to cook
much faster compared to a standard conventional oven. On the contrary, conventional ovens
use heat as well to cook the food, but do not force heated air throughout the oven during cook
time; consequently cook time takes longer than convection type ovens. This heat is produced
by two resistance elements. The top unit is used in broiling, whereas the bottom unit is used
for the baking period. Overall, the temperature that a food product is cooked and the time that
it is spent in the oven can affect the final product (Dragon, 2011).
Page 32
32
Viscosity
The desired texture of food has significant economic deliberations, thus making is a
critical feature of roux-gravy texture (Bourne, 2002). The consistency of a roux–gravy
product is essential from the fresh to freezing to thawing stages. It is important that it remains
consistent throughout the entire process to allow for a desirable product. Consistency is
defined as a degree of viscosity that has unfaltering observance to the same principles, course,
and/or form. Consistency is measured by viscosity, which is the property of a fluid that
resists the ability for fluid to flow and the degree of measurement to which a fluid acquires
this property (Bourne, 2002). As mentioned before, viscosity in starch-based products is
influenced by the swelling of the starch granule during heating in the presence of water.
Viscosity is increased concurrently with the weakening of the hydrogen bonds, causing an
increase in granular size. This is done by the intramolecular hydrogen bonds becoming
disturbed, thus causing the amorphous regions to hydrate first. As the viscosity of the
medium increases, the granule continues to swell. However, once the granule has swelled to a
point that the internal bonding has lost its integrity, the granule bursts and viscosity decreases
(Lineback & Inglett, 1982).
Therefore, the viscosity in a roux–gravy is a significant issue that affects the final
product’s quality. A major influence on the product’s viscosity is heat transfer, effectiveness
of processing, type, and content of the starch. Furthermore, the chemical structure of the
starch being used can impact the overall flow of the roux–gravy due to amylose:amylopectin
ratio. If the starch contains more branching or amylopectin, the higher the viscosity will be,
whereas if more amylose is present, the greater the gel strength will be (Zeng, Zhang, & Lee,
1996).
Page 33
33
Viscosity plays an important role in this study. As previously mentioned the
features described that impart viscosity characteristics will be studied to determine the ideal
amount of whole wheat flour (X) and modified food starch (Y) in combination that will allow
for a consistent roux–gravy from the cooking, cooling, freezing, and thawing steps to
reheating the product and/or the amount of whole wheat flour (X) and wheat flour (Z) in
combination that will allow for a consistent roux–gravy from the cooking, cooling, freezing,
and thawing steps to conventional reheating the product. This will be done in two successive
studies.
Page 34
34
Chapter III: Methodology
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of starch combinations on the
freeze-thaw-reheat stability of a roux-gravy model system assessed by viscosity
measurements (stability was indicated by a lack or a minimal change in viscosity).
Combinations of two starches types indicated below (X + Y or X + Z) at varying levels were
tested for viscosity following freeze-thaw-reheat in the roux-gravy model system.
The starches used in the study were:
Whole wheat flour (Whole Grain Milling Company, Welcome, MN) (indicated as X)
Modified food starch (Penford Food Ingredients, Centennial, OH) (indicated as Y)
Wheat flour (a cross-linked proprietary blend obtained from a provider requesting
anonymity) (indicated as Z)
This chapter includes a description of the materials, sample preparation and
methodology, statistical/data analysis, and the limitations of the study.
Materials and Description
Starches X, Y, and Z were obtained from suppliers indicated above. The starches
were stored at room temperature. Other roux-gravy ingredients used included unsalted butter
(Organic Valley Cooperative, LaFarge, WI) and chicken stock (Emeril’s Organic All-Natural
Chicken Flavored Stock), purchased at a local grocery store in Menomonie, WI (Lammer’s
Food Fest and Marketplace Foods). The unsalted butter and chicken stock were stored at
40°F.
Table 1 shows the ingredients formulations (in grams; percentages in parentheses)
used to prepare the batches of the model roux–gravy.
Page 35
35
Table 1
Ingredient formulation used to prepare model roux – gravy (X + Y).
Ingredient
Treatment 1 X=100% Y=0%
Treatment 2 X=75% Y=25%
Treatment 3 X=50% Y=50%
Treatment 4 X=25% Y=75%
Butter 22.5 (4.50%) 22.5 (4.50%) 22.5 (4.50%) 22.5 (4.50%)
X 37.0 (6.92%) 27.8 (5.19%) 18.5 (3.46%) 9.3 (1.73%)
Y 0.00 (0.00%) 9.3 (1.73%) 18.5 (3.46%) 27.8 (5.19%)
Chicken Stock 440.5 (88.10%) 440.5 (88.10%) 440.5 (88.10%) 440.5 (88.10%)
Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Table 2
Ingredient formulation used to prepare model roux – gravy (X + Z).
Ingredient
Treatment 1 X=100%
Y=0%
Treatment 2 X=75% Y=25%
Treatment 3 X=50% Y=50%
Treatment 4 X=25% Y=75%
Butter 22.5 (4.50%) 22.5 (4.50%) 22.5 (4.50%) 22.5 (4.50%)
X 37.0 (6.92%) 27.8 (5.19%) 18.5 (3.46%) 9.3 (1.73%)
Z 0.00 (0.00%) 9.3 (1.73%) 18.5 (3.46%) 27.8 (5.19%)
Chicken Stock 440.5 (88.10%) 440.5 (88.10%) 440.5 (88.10%) 440.5 (88.10%)
Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% A Tappan stove top coil burner was preheated to a heating level 4 (on a 7 scale).
Unsalted butter was placed into a medium sized stainless steel sauce pan and melted for two
minutes. Starch combinations X + Y or X + Z (formulation levels and treatments indicated in
Tables 1 or 2) were added to the melted butter and mixed constantly for one minute to bring
the mixture to the consistency of a standard roux. The roux was heated for two minutes to
reach a temperature of 150° F followed by simmering. During the simmering step, the
chicken stock was added and continuously stirred for two minutes until visible thickening of
the roux-gravy occurred (thickening may indicate gelatinization of the starch particles in the
roux-gravy). The mixture was simmered for approximately 30 minutes with constant stirring
Page 36
36
(10 seconds every two minutes to avoid scorching of the bottom) during which time the
temperature of the roux–gravy reached 175°F. The mixture was then removed from heat and
allowed to cool to room temperature for approximately one hour. Upon cooling, the sample
treatments (roux-gravy) were dispensed into a 500 gram disposable baking dish (Sonoco,
Hartsville, SC) and covered with aluminum foil. The viscosity of the cooled sample
treatments were measured using a Brookfield Synchro-Lectric Viscometer.
Prepared roux-gravy treatments made using starch combination X and Y or X and Z
were allowed to undergo freeze-thaw cycling (1 or 3 cycles). Each cycle of freeze-thaw was
performed by placing the sample treatments in a freezer at a temperature of 5°F (Maytag,
Benton Harbor, MI) for 12 hours followed by thawing at room temperature for 12 hours.
Samples that underwent freeze-thaw (1 or 3 cycles) were then reheated in a Tappan
Conventional Double Oven for 30 minutes at 400°F. The treatments were cooled to room
temperature after the reheating step. The viscosity of the reheated/cooled samples were
measured and calculated for viscosity using the Brookfield Synchro-Lectric Viscometer to
determine the effect of freeze-thaw- reheat on treatment(s) viscosity.
Viscosity Measurement of the Roux-Gravy
The Brookfield Synchro-Lectric Viscometer was used to measure viscosity of the
roux–gravy treatments (0 freeze-thaw cycles and 1 or 3 cycles of freeze-thaw cycles followed
by reheat). Five hundred grams of each treatment sample were dispensed into a 12 ounce cup
(Solo Cup, Lake Forest, IL) and allowed to sit for one minute before measurements were
taken. Viscosity measurements were conducted by fixing and leveling the viscometer head.
Spindle sizes were selected based on treatments. For treatments with 100% whole wheat flour
(X), spindle size five was used. For all other treatments, spindle size six was used. The
Page 37
37
spindle was inserted into the sample until it reached the immersion groove cut into the
spindle. A rotation speed of 10 RPM was selected and the spindle was allowed to rotate for
30 seconds after which the dial reading was recorded and viscosity calculated using the below
formula:
viscosity (cps) = dial reading x Brookfield Synchro-Lectric Viscometer
conversion factor
Data Analysis
Measurements were carried out in triplicate. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was
conducted on the viscosity measurements of the treatments. One way ANOVA to determine
treatment effects (effects of starch combinations on roux-gravy viscosity) was conducted
using the Microsoft Excel program available on MS Office (Microsoft Office, Redmond,
WA) and the post-hoc Tukey’s test was conducted to determine differences among viscosities
dependent upon treatments and freeze-thaw cycles followed by reheat using the SPSS
software (IBM, Armonk, NY).
Limitations
The limitations of this research conducted as part of this study are the following:
1. The study used blends of flours/starches. While whole wheat flour was obtained
from retail; one of the starch blends was provided by a manufacturer who
requested anonymity. The inability to divulge the source of the wheat flour
interferes with the free dissemination of research information.
2. Viscosity is a measure of the resistance of flow in materials. The objective of this
study was to determine the textural changes in a roux-gravy that was frozen and
reheated. While viscosity is one measure of texture, viscosity profiles do not
Page 38
38
wholly provide information about texture. Including other texture measurements
(sensory, spectroscopy, texture analysis, consistometer) may have enhanced the
strength of thus research work.
3. A viscometer is used to determine viscosity by measuring the torque required to
rotate a spindle in a fluid. The viscosity or resistance to flow is proportional to the
speed of the viscometer and the spindle size and shape. While there are many
models of viscometers used today and some being more advantageous than others,
the Brookfield Synchro-Lectric Viscometer Model RVT (Brookfield Engineering
Labs. Inc., Stoughton, MA) was the only viscometer available for use. Other
viscometer models that would allow for digital readings of torque, shear, and
viscosity may have enhanced the accuracy of this research work’s results.
Page 39
39
Chapter IV: Results
Mean viscosities (cps) of the model roux-gravy samples that underwent 0 freeze-thaw
cycles or 1 and 3 freeze-thaw cycling followed by reheat are presented in Figure 4 and Figure
5 (X + Y combinations and X + Z combinations, respectively). For all X + Y (whole wheat
flour + modified food starch) treatment combinations (100:0; 75:25; 50:50; and 25:75) the
viscosity values significantly increased with increasing number of freeze-thaw cycles
(p<0.05). Increasing levels of Y (whole wheat flour) increased viscosity of the roux-gravy
(Figure 4).
Figure 4: graph describing the mean viscosities of the sample treatments of X + Y (whole
wheat flour + modified food starch) at 0 freeze thaw cycles and 1 and 3 freeze-thaw cycles
followed by reheating. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Bars indicated with
different alphabets indicate significant difference (p<0.05) in mean viscosity values among
the treatments.
A
C
E F
B
D
E
H
B
G G
H
-5000.00
5000.00
15000.00
25000.00
35000.00
45000.00
55000.00
65000.00
75000.00
85000.00
100-0 75-25 50-50 25-75
Vis
cosi
ty (
cps)
Treatment Samples of X (whole wheat flour) and Y (modified food starch)
0 Freeze-Thaw Cycles
1 Freeze-Thaw Cycle
3 Freeze-Thaw Cycles
Page 40
40
For X + Z (whole wheat flour + wheat flour) treatment combinations (100:0; 75:25;
50:50; and 25:75) viscosity significantly increased with increasing number of freeze-thaw
cycles (p<0.05). In general, increasing levels of Z increased viscosity of the roux-gravy
(Figure 5).
Figure 5: graph describing the mean viscosities of the sample treatments of X + Z (whole
wheat flour + wheat flour) at 0 freeze thaw cycles and 1 and 3 freeze-thaw cycles followed by
reheating. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Bars indicated with different
alphabets indicate significant difference (p<0.05) in mean viscosity values among the
treatments.
A
D
G
H
B E
G
I
C
F
G
J
0.00
10000.00
20000.00
30000.00
40000.00
50000.00
60000.00
100-0 75-25 50-50 25-75
Vis
cosi
ty (
cps)
Treatment Samples of X (whole wheat flour) and Z (wheat flour)
0 Freeze-ThawCycles1 Freeze-Thaw Cycle
3 Freeze-ThawCycles
Page 41
41
Chapter V: Conclusion
A major observation in this study was the increase in the viscosity of the roux-gravy
with increasing numbers of freeze-thaw cycles. This observation has been previously
observed by Eliasson & Kim (1991) and Gill et al. (2009).
The observation can be attributed to the phenomenon of starch granule swelling,
which occurs during the weakening of the hydrogen bonds that are breaking in the amorphous
area (matrix) of the starch granule (Pomeranz, 1991). Once a starch granule is introduced to
progressive heat in a water suspension, it begins to swell and at the same time loss of
birefringence occurs (Eliasson & Gudmundsson, 2006). The starch granules are hydrated and
swelled to a greater extent than their original size and a rapid increase in viscosity occurs
(Pomeranz, 1991). The starch granules are being consecutively damaged as the number of
freeze-thaw cycles are increased (Szymonska et al., 2002). With freezing and succeeding
thaw cycles, the starch granules become more disarrayed, allowing the water in the matrix to
become more available (White, Abbas, & Johnson, 1989). This allows the water from the
exterior and amorphous areas of the starch granules to form new pathways, allowing the water
to break through into the opened interior areas of the starch granule (Oates, 1991).
Additionally, the subsequent freeze- thaw cycles may cause ice crystals to develop,
thus providing a location for nucleation of the water to occur (Gill et al., 2009). This allows
ice crystals to form into larger ice crystals, causing the starch granule structure to be
destroyed (Eliasson & Kim, 1991). Overall, the density of the starch granules is more
resistant due to the freezing of external water in the matrix (Fannon et al., 2004).
Furthermore, the reheating after the final thawing stage may have allowed for
continued thickening caused by the leaching of the soluble polysaccharides (Friedman, 1995).
Page 42
42
With an increase in the number of freeze-thaw cycles, starch granules will become more
disorganized, thus leaching amylose (Gill et al., 2009).
The second significant observation was that as proportions of Y or Z increased, the
viscosity of the roux-gravy increased. This observation can be attributed to the replacement
of native starches with modified starches that may deteriorate the starch granule structure due
to the steric methods causing the hydroxyl groups to become obstructed, thus reducing
hydrogen bonding activity in the starch granule matrix (Wootton & Bamunuarachchi, 1979).
It may also be attributed to the modification process of the native starch, during which
gelatinization may occur, damaging the native starch (even supposing the design is managed
under controlled conditions) (Wootton & Bamunuarachchi, 1979). Modification methods
disturb the structure of starch granules, allowing the granules to be more vulnerable to
hydration and total breakdown at freezing conditions (White, Abbas, & Johnson, 1989).
Native starches do not impart the functional properties that modified starches offer.
Little research has been conducted on the effect of starch blends exposed to different levels of
freeze-thaw cycles followed by reheating. A roux-gravy containing the optimal combination
of a native starch and a modified starch that could withstand freeze-thaw cycling followed by
reheating and mitigate viscosity would be an ideal starch product addition to the food industry
in the United States.
Recommendations
The following recommendations were made for the future research in order to
maintain a similar viscosity from initial processing through freeze-thaw cycles and reheating.
1. In this study, waxy maize corn starch was used as the modified food starch native
source. For future product development at the University of Wisconsin-Stout it is
Page 43
43
recommended that a modified food starch with a lower content of amylopectin be used
to minimize viscosity values.
2. Whole wheat flour was used as the native starch source. It is recommended that a
native starch source with more similar properties to the modified food starch, such as
waxy maize be used for the purpose of a symbiotic relationship between the two starch
sources to mitigate the viscosity of the starch blend after freeze-thaw cycles followed
by reheat.
3. There were three different freeze-thaw cycles (0, 1, and 3) that the sample treatments
(roux-gravy) were exposed to for a length of 12 hours of freezing and 12 hours of
thawing. It is recommended that less harsh parameters of the freeze-thaw cycles be
analyzed.
4. It is recommended that the X and Z starch blend of 50% whole wheat flour and 50%
wheat flour be presented to the organic farm in southwestern Wisconsin. Due to the
results, the starch blend can maintain a consistent viscosity through the harsh freeze-
thaw cycles and reheating conditions based on the viscosity values. However, it is
recommended that a different method to better predict texture characteristics, such as
sensory analysis is used.
Page 44
44
References
All about roux. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2011, from
http://allrecipes.com/HowTo/all-about-roux/detail.aspx
Arocas, A., Sanz, T., Fiszman, S.M. (2009, April). Clean label starches as thickeners in
white sauces. Shearing, heating and freeze/thaw stability. Food Hydrocolloids, 23,
2031–2037.
Bourne, M. (2002). Food texture and viscosity: Concept and measurement. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press, 1-18.
Consistency. (n.d.) Retrieved October 1, 2011 from,
www.dictionary.reference.com/browse/consistency
deMan, J.M. (1999). Principles of food chemistry. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers,
Inc., 163-208.
Dragon, D. (n.d.) Convection vs. conventional ovens…what’s the difference? Retrieved
from www.streetdirectory.com/restaurants/articles/278/cooking_tips/
convection_vs_conventional_ovens_whats_the_difference.html
Eliasson, A.C., & Kim, H.R. (1992). Changes in rheological properties of hydroxypropyl
potato starch pastes during freeze-thaw treatments. Journal of Texture Studies, 23,
279-295.
Eliasson, A.C., & Gudmundsson, M. (2006). Starch: Physiochemical and functional aspects.
In Eliasson, A.C., Carbohydrates in Foods (pp. 391-470). Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press.
Page 45
45
Fannon, J.E., Gray, J.A., Gunuwam, N., Kerry, C., & Bemiller, J.N. (2004). Heterogeneity of
starch granules and the effect of granule channelization on starch modification.
Cellulose, 11, 247-254.
Foster, R.J. (2009, July). Starch in frozen sauces. Food Product Design. Retrieved from
http://www.foodproductdesign.com/articles/2009/07/frozen-assets.aspx
Friedman, R.B. (1995). Interactions of starches in foods. In A.G. Gaonkar, Ingredient
interactions: effects of food quality (pp 171-198). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker,
Inc.
Gill, B.S., Kaur, S., Sogi, D.S., & Chandi, G.K. (2009). Effects of freeze thaw cycles on
properties of sweet potato starch. Advances in Food Sciences, 31(2), 89-95.
Godon, B., & Willm, C. (1994). Primary cereal processing. New York, NY: VCH, 68-69,
73, 322-325,440-442.
Hardacre, A.K., Campanella, O.H., Budiman, M., & Hemar, Y. (2004, January/February).
Roux composition on the viscosity of roux sauces. Food New Zealand, 29-34.
Hegenbart, S. (1996, January). Understanding starch functionality. Food Product Design.
Retrieved from www.foodproductdesign.com/articles/1996/01/understanding-
starch-functionality.aspx
Hizukuri, S., Abe, J., & Hanashiro, I. (2006). Starch: Analytical aspects. In Eliasson, A.C.,
Carbohydrates in Foods (pp. 305-390). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hood, L.F. (1980). Advances in maize carbohydrates. In G.E. Inglett & G. Munck, Cereals
for food and beverages: Recent progress in cereal chemistry (pp. 41-59). New York,
NY: Academic Press.
Page 46
46
Hoseney, R.C. (1986). Principles of cereal science and technology. St. Paul, MN:
American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., 1-13, 29-62.
Korus, J., Juszczak, L., Witczak, M., & Achremowicz, B. (2004, January). Influence of
selected hydrocolloids on triticale starch rheological properties. International Journal
of Food Science & Technology, 39, 641-652.
Krasnow, Hirson, & Shoemaker. (2011). Effects of cooking temperatures and starch source
on the gelatinization and thickening power of roux. Journal of Culinary Science &
Technology, 9, 247-260.
Light, J.M. (1989). Modified food starches: Why, what, where and how. Food Innovation.
Retrieved from http://eu.foodinnovation.com/pdfs/modified.pdf
Lineback D.R., & Inglett, G.E. (1982). Food carbohydrates. Westport, CT: The AVI
Publishing Company, Inc., 217-269, 383-385
Medved, E. (1986). Food preparation and theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
Inc., 67.
Mitolo, J.J. (2006). Starch selection and interaction in foods. In A.G. Gaonkar & A.
McPherson (Eds.), Ingredient interactions: effects on food quality (pp. 139-165).
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Oates, C.G. (1991). Studies on mung bean starch: granule stability. Food Hydrocolloids,
4(5), 365-377.
Pomeranz, Y. (1991). Functional properties of food components. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press, 25-61, 130-133, 412-415.
Page 47
47
Saunders, R.M. (1980). Wheat bran as a dietary fiber. In G.E. Inglett & G. Munck, Cereals
for food and beverages: Recent progress in cereal chemistry (pp. 137-153). New
York, NY: Academic Press.
Sobolewska-Zielinska, J., & Fortuna, T. (2010). Retrogradation of starches and
maltodextrins of origin various. ACTA. Scientiarum Polonorum, 9(1), 71-81.
Szymonska, J., Krok, F., Komorowska-Czepirska, E., & Rebilas, K. (2002). Modification of
granular potato starch by multiple deep freezing and thawing. Carbohydrate
Polymers, 52, 1-10.
Turnbell, K.M., Marion, D., Gaborit, T., Appels, R. & Rahman, S. (2003). Early expression
of grain hardness in the developing wheat endosperm. Original Article, 216, 699-706.
Vaclavik, V., & Christian, E.W. (2003). Essentials of food science. New York, NY:
Kluwer Academic/plenum Publishers, 47-61, 319-320.
Wang, B., Wang, L., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Ozkan, N. (2011). Shear-thickening properties of
waxy maize starch dispersions. Journal of Food Engineering, 107(3-4), 415-423.
Wingfield, J. (1980). Bread and soft wheat: Recent milling processes. In G.E. Inglett & L.
Munck, Cereals for food and beverages: Recent progress in cereal chemistry (pp.
233-253). New York, NY: Academic Press.
White, P.J., Abbas, I.R., & Johnson, L.A. (1989). Freeze-thaw stability and refrigerated-
storage retrogradation of starches. Starch, 41 (5), 176-180.
Widjaja, K. (2006). The stability of alpha-tocopherol in whole-wheat flour and corn meal
during heating. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout,
Menomonie, WI.
Page 48
48
Wootten, M. & Bamunuarachchi, A. (1979). Application of differential scanning calorimetry
to starch gelinization. I. Commercials native and modified starches. Starch/Staerke,
31, 201.
Zeng, W., Zhang, H.Z., & Lee, T.C. (1996). Direct determination of starch content in gravy
by near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 44, 1460-
1463.