The Effect of The Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (CKD) on the CardioVascular on the CardioVascular System System Lesley C. Lesley C. Dinwiddie Dinwiddie MSN, RN, FNP,CNN MSN, RN, FNP,CNN February 24th, 2011 February 24th, 2011
103
Embed
The Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on the CardioVascular System Lesley C. Dinwiddie MSN, RN, FNP,CNN February 24th, 2011.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Effect of The Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on the CardioVascular Systemon the CardioVascular System
Lesley C. DinwiddieLesley C. DinwiddieMSN, RN, FNP,CNNMSN, RN, FNP,CNN
February 24th, 2011February 24th, 2011
Thanks to the Cardinal Chapter
for giving me the opportunity to increase awareness about the under-diagnosed and under-treated public health threat that is Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) plus CardioVascular Disease!
Disclosures
ICEER – Institute for Clinical Excellence, ICEER – Institute for Clinical Excellence, Education, and Research – nurse organized, Education, and Research – nurse organized, non-profit group promoting education about non-profit group promoting education about CKD CKD
Acknowledgement of Patricia McCarley, RN, Acknowledgement of Patricia McCarley, RN, MSN, NP, co-creator of this presentation. MSN, NP, co-creator of this presentation.
Consultant for Teleflex Medical, Hemosphere, Consultant for Teleflex Medical, Hemosphere, SurgPro, and Genentech – no conflicts of SurgPro, and Genentech – no conflicts of interest to disclose for this presentation.interest to disclose for this presentation.
Overall ObjectiveOverall Objective
Explain the scenario of chronic Explain the scenario of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the effect kidney disease (CKD) and the effect of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the patient with chronic kidney the patient with chronic kidney disease. disease.
What is What is the the leading leading cause of cause of MortalityMortalityin our in our CKD CKD patient patient populatiopopulation? n?
Focused ObjectivesFocused Objectives
• Describe the link/the synergy between Describe the link/the synergy between patients with CKD and CVD.patients with CKD and CVD.
• Teach how to recognize patients at risk for Teach how to recognize patients at risk for CKD, review screening for CKD and CKD, review screening for CKD and assessment of eGFR.assessment of eGFR.
• Discuss factors related to progression and Discuss factors related to progression and slowing of progression of CKD and CVD.slowing of progression of CKD and CVD.
• Identify complications of CKD and strategies Identify complications of CKD and strategies to improve outcomes.to improve outcomes.
How you How you see this see this all all depends depends on your on your perspectperspective!ive!
NKF-KDOQI Staging Classification of CKDNKF-KDOQI Staging Classification of CKD
Stage Description GFR
1Chronic kidney damage with
normal GFR>90–120 mL/min/1.73
m2
2 Mild GFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2
3 Moderate GFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2
4 Severe GFR15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2
5 Kidney failure<15 mL/min/1.73 m2
orDialysis
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(suppl 1):S1-S266.
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) * May be normal for age
• Mary is a 70 year old female with history of Mary is a 70 year old female with history of CKD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, twenty year CKD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, twenty year history of hypertension, CHF, hyperlipidemia, history of hypertension, CHF, hyperlipidemia, and CAD with recent history of MI and and CAD with recent history of MI and angioplasty.angioplasty.
• Patient presents to the officePatient presents to the office
• Chief complaint: “shortness of breath”Chief complaint: “shortness of breath”
CASE 1CASE 1
Assessment in the office:Assessment in the office: – BP 118/50 P-112 R-24 T-97.4 BP 118/50 P-112 R-24 T-97.4 – Alert & oriented x 3Alert & oriented x 3– No neck vein distention or apparent edemaNo neck vein distention or apparent edema– Lungs – crackles in basesLungs – crackles in bases– RRR, SEM III/VIRRR, SEM III/VI– No focal neurological deficitsNo focal neurological deficits– Meds: lisinopril, furosemide, clopidogrel, aspirin, Meds: lisinopril, furosemide, clopidogrel, aspirin,
isosorbide, carvedilol, glipizide, and rosiglitazone, isosorbide, carvedilol, glipizide, and rosiglitazone, atorvastatinatorvastatin
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
What are your differential diagnoses?What are your differential diagnoses?
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
Does the fact that this patient has CKDDoes the fact that this patient has CKDaffect your choice of diagnoses?affect your choice of diagnoses?
• CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASECARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
– MI MI
– ArrhythmiaArrhythmia
• CHFCHF
• AnemiaAnemia
• OTHEROTHER
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
IHD admissions are 2-2.5 times higher in the IHD admissions are 2-2.5 times higher in the CKD population CKD population USRDS, 2004 Annual Report
MI remains in our diagnosesMI remains in our diagnoses
CVD and CKD – MorbidityCVD and CKD – Morbidity
• Cardiac arrhythmia admission rates are 2 Cardiac arrhythmia admission rates are 2 times as common in CKD populationtimes as common in CKD population
• 269 patients with stable CHF 269 patients with stable CHF - longer PQ and QRS intervals were - longer PQ and QRS intervals were inversely related to eGFR (cardiac-event inversely related to eGFR (cardiac-event free survival rate 51% in pts with CKD vs free survival rate 51% in pts with CKD vs 81% in those without CKD) 81% in those without CKD)
USRDS, 2004 Annual Report
Bruch, C et al. Int J of Cardiol. 2007. 118(3):375-380.
Cardiovascular Disease ??Cardiovascular Disease ?? MI or arrhythmiaMI or arrhythmia
• Shortness of breath – YESShortness of breath – YES
Exam reveals - RRRExam reveals - RRR• MI – possible – must continue to consider MI – possible – must continue to consider
in the differential and evaluate furtherin the differential and evaluate further
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
Cardio-Renal Syndrome* – “ A syndrome in which Cardio-Renal Syndrome* – “ A syndrome in which the heart the heart OROR kidney fails to compensate for the kidney fails to compensate for the functional impairment of the respective organ, functional impairment of the respective organ, resulting in a vicious cycle that will ultimately result resulting in a vicious cycle that will ultimately result in decomposition of the entire circulatory system.” in decomposition of the entire circulatory system.”
Boerrigter,G. Current Heart Failure Rep. 2004: 1(3); 113-120.
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
CRS “occurs through multiple mechanisms that demonstrate the CRS “occurs through multiple mechanisms that demonstrate the
complex interaction between the two organs”complex interaction between the two organs”
Elhassan and Schrier 2010 ASN Kidney NewsElhassan and Schrier 2010 ASN Kidney News
““A pathologic condition where combined cardiac and A pathologic condition where combined cardiac and renal dysfunction amplifies progression of the renal dysfunction amplifies progression of the individual organ to astounding morbidity and individual organ to astounding morbidity and mortality.”mortality.”
Bongartzr, Eur Heart J,
2995
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
““A Fatal Dance of Two Noble Organs”A Fatal Dance of Two Noble Organs” Burl, D, UCDavis,
2008.
The Cardiorenal Syndrome: The Cardiorenal Syndrome: Which Came First—Which Came First—the Chicken or the Egg?the Chicken or the Egg?
Classification and Pathophysiology of CRS• Acute cardiorenal syndrome (type 1) - Acute worsening of heart function leading to kidney injury and/or dysfunction
• Chronic cardiorenal syndrome (type 2) -Chronic abnormalities in heart function leading to kidney injury and/or dysfunction
• Acute renocardiac syndrome (type 3) -Acute worsening of kidney function leading to heart injury and/or dysfunction
Heywood, JT et al. J Card Fail. 2007. Aug 13(6); 422-230.
ADHEREADHERE Acute Decompensation Heart Failure National Registry
Cardiorenal Cardiorenal SyndromeSyndrome
Prevalence of LVH in the General Prevalence of LVH in the General Population and CKDPopulation and CKD
CVDisease
General Population
CKD
LVH(ECHO)
8 - 13% 25 – 50% (stage 2 – 4) 75- 85% (stage 5)
Sarnak, M et al. Circulation. 2003: 108(17) 2154-2169
Patient has long history of hypertension – LVH often Patient has long history of hypertension – LVH often the intermediate step resulting in impaired LV filling, the intermediate step resulting in impaired LV filling, increased ventricular stiffness, and CHFincreased ventricular stiffness, and CHF
• Patients with CKD have volume 10 - 30% Patients with CKD have volume 10 - 30%
increase in volume in absence of edema increase in volume in absence of edema Palmer, BF, N Eng J of Med, 2002: 347; 1256-1261
•Common LIFE THREATENING DX!!!Common LIFE THREATENING DX!!!
(CHF admissions 5x higher in CKD)(CHF admissions 5x higher in CKD) USRDS, 2004 Annual Report
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
Congestive Heart Failure?Congestive Heart Failure?• Rosiglitazone may aggravate edema and CHFRosiglitazone may aggravate edema and CHF
O’Connor AS, Schelling JR. Am J Kid Dis. 2005. 46(4):766-773
• Volume overload not clearly evident on exam Volume overload not clearly evident on exam • Lungs with evidence of possible fluid so CHF Lungs with evidence of possible fluid so CHF still in differentialstill in differential
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
Anemia secondary to GI bleed or CKD?Anemia secondary to GI bleed or CKD?
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
Central Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System• FatigueFatigue• DepressionDepression• Impaired cognitive functionImpaired cognitive function
Myocardial InfarctionAdapted from Metivier et al Nephrol, Dial, Transpl. 2000; 15 Suppl 3: 14-18.
Correction of Anemia in PatientsCorrection of Anemia in Patientswith CKD and CHFwith CKD and CHF
N = 84 Before After P Value
Hgb (g/dl) 10.4 13.1 < 0.05
NYHA 3.89 2.53 < 0.05
VAS fatigue/ SOB index 8.6 2.8 < 0.05
No. of days Hospitalizations 3.38 0.16 < 0.05
.Silverberg, DS. Perit Dial Int . 200l.; 21Suppl3 ; S236-240.
Anemia secondary to GI Bleed or CKD?Anemia secondary to GI Bleed or CKD?
• Clopidogrel and aspirin – as high as 30 % incidence of bleeding - increased risk in elderly, women, and patients with reduced kidney function uptodate.com
Stool for occult blood negativeStool for occult blood negative
CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”CASE 1 – cc: “shortness of breath”
ANEMIAANEMIA
Adapted from: Harrison, FIn Principles of Internal Medicine. 1998:334.
Red blood cellsRed blood cells OO22 delivery delivery
Ix, JH et al, JASN, 2003Anavekar, NS et al, NEJM, 2004
Shilpak, et al, JASN, 2004
Per
cent
of
Pat
ient
s w
ith
CK
DP
erce
nt o
f P
atie
nts
wit
h C
KD
CHFGFR < 60
DIG. In HF
ACSGFR < 60
VALLIANT
CADCRCL < 60
Heart and Soul
N=
68000 N=
14527 N=
431
• 37,173 individuals screened 2000-2003 in Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP)
• Ave age 52.9, h/o DM, HTN, or CKD on survey
• Followed (max 47.7 months)
“Anemia, (decreased) eGFR, and microalbuminuria were independently associated with CVD, and when all 3 were present, CVD was common and survival was reduced.”
CKD and CVDCKD and CVD
McCullough, PA et al. Arch. Of Int Med. 2007. .
• 13,826 individuals screened between 1987 – 1990
(Atherosclerosis Risk in Community Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study)
• Ave age 57.6• Followed at 3 year intervals (average of 9.3 years)
• BP and Cr. were measured to track decline in kidney function
CVD and CKDCVD and CKD
Elsayed, E et al. 2007. Arch. Of Int Med. 2007. .
“Cardiovascular disease is independently associated with kidney function decline and with the development of kidney disease.”
Traditional Risk FactorsTraditional Risk Factorsfor Cardiac Diseasefor Cardiac Disease
Microalbuminuria: Independent Predictor of Microalbuminuria: Independent Predictor of Combined End PointsCombined End Points
CV Death, MI, and Stroke: The HOPE TrialCV Death, MI, and Stroke: The HOPE Trial
Variable Hazard Ratio
Microalbuminuria 1.59
Cr >1.4 mg/dl 1.40CAD 1.51
PVD 1.49
Diabetes Mellitus 1.42
Male 1.20
Age 1.03
Waist-hip Ratio 1.13
Mann et al, Ann of Intern Med, 2003
Proteinuria is Associated withProteinuria is Associated withAdverse CV Outcomes – LIFE studyAdverse CV Outcomes – LIFE study
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Composite EndPoint
CV Mortality All-causeMortality
Stroke MI
Adj
u ste
d H
azar
d R
atio
Adj
ust e
d H
azar
d R
atio
N= 7143
Watchtell et al, Ann of Intern Med, 2003
<2.2 mg/g>83.3 mg/g
AlbuminuriaAlbuminuria
• In a population-based study (subset n = 9000) the In a population-based study (subset n = 9000) the presence of albuminuria enhanced the presence of albuminuria enhanced the predictivepredictivevalue of ST-T segment changes in a restingvalue of ST-T segment changes in a restingECG for all-cause and CVD mortality. ECG for all-cause and CVD mortality.
• The impact of the presence of microalbuminuriaThe impact of the presence of microalbuminuriaon all-cause mortality was greater than other more on all-cause mortality was greater than other more traditional cardiac risk factors including traditional cardiac risk factors including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking, obesity, and diabetessmoking, obesity, and diabetes..
• Despite the fact that the Framingham study Despite the fact that the Framingham study established in 1984 that proteinuria is an important established in 1984 that proteinuria is an important risk marker of CV mortality in the general risk marker of CV mortality in the general population, albuminuria has never been added to population, albuminuria has never been added to the list of important CV risk factors.the list of important CV risk factors.
• Confirmed by Arnlov et al, persons with normal Confirmed by Arnlov et al, persons with normal BP, without DM and normal GFR – BP, without DM and normal GFR – microalbuminuria is a strong predictor of CV microalbuminuria is a strong predictor of CV outcome.outcome.
Kannel, A Heart J,108,1984
Arnlov et al, Circulation, 2005
Albuminuria — So WHAT?Albuminuria — So WHAT?
LIFE STUDY LIFE STUDY
Reducing Proteinuria independent of BPReducing Proteinuria independent of BPdecreased CVD risk (endpoints CV mortality, stroke, MI)decreased CVD risk (endpoints CV mortality, stroke, MI) Ibsen, et al, Hypertension 45, 2005
PREVEND-IIPREVEND-II
Patients with albuminuria treated with fosinopril decreased Patients with albuminuria treated with fosinopril decreased CV events compared to patients on pravastatin CV events compared to patients on pravastatin
Asselbergs et al Circulation 110, 2004
RENAAL RENAAL
Patients treated with ARB showed significant decreased risk Patients treated with ARB showed significant decreased risk of CV endpoints with any decrease in albuminuria. of CV endpoints with any decrease in albuminuria.
deZeeuw, et al , KI, 2004.
Chronic Kidney Disease is a Risk FactorChronic Kidney Disease is a Risk Factorfor Cardiovascular Diseasefor Cardiovascular Disease
Sarnak et al. Circulation. 2003;108:2154-2169.
CASE 2CASE 2
Case:Case:– Diane, 63-year-old , 66-kg body weightDiane, 63-year-old , 66-kg body weight
– Hospitalized March & April,Hospitalized March & April,Hct 16%, GI work-up negative,Hct 16%, GI work-up negative,TransfusedTransfused
– May, Adm. with weaknessMay, Adm. with weaknessHct 27.5%, K+ 6.9 mg/dl,Hct 27.5%, K+ 6.9 mg/dl,Creatinine 1.3 mg/dlCreatinine 1.3 mg/dl
– Nephrology consultNephrology consult
CASE 2CASE 2
Case:Case:
– What if any level of kidney disease?What if any level of kidney disease?
• May be superimposed on CKDMay be superimposed on CKD• Evaluate and correct potentially reversible Evaluate and correct potentially reversible causescauses
of a kidney injury:of a kidney injury:- Decreased renal perfusion – - Decreased renal perfusion –
hypovolemia, hypovolemia, hypotension, or drug hypotension, or drug induced (ACEi, ARB)induced (ACEi, ARB)
CKD IS A PROGRESSIVE DISEASECKD IS A PROGRESSIVE DISEASE
KidneyKidneyDamageDamage
22 33 44
120120 9090 6060 3030 1515
11StageStage 55
eGFReGFR
KidneyDamage
KidneyFailure
Mild KidneyFunction
Moderate KidneyFunction
Severe KidneyFunction
Timely evaluation and treatment may improve outcomesTimely evaluation and treatment may improve outcomes.
The Chronic Kidney Disease EpidemicThe Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemic
5.6 5.7
7.4
0.3 0.45*
0123456789
10
1 2 3 4 5
Mill
ions
of
People
eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate.*2003. Coresh et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:180-188; United States Renal Data System (USRDS) 2005 Annual Data Report. Available at: www.usrds.org; USRDS 2005 Annual Data Report. The data reported here have been supplied by the USRDS. The interpretation andreporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation ofthe U.S. government. Available at: www.usrds.org. Accessed December 6, 2005.
≥90 60-89 30-59 15-29 <15
CKD Stage
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
CKD Affects 12% of the US PopulationCKD Affects 12% of the US Population
CKD Patients Are More Likely CKD Patients Are More Likely to Die Than Progress to ESRDto Die Than Progress to ESRD
Percentage Who Remained Event-Free vs. Death vs.Percentage Who Remained Event-Free vs. Death vs.Developed ESRD During 5-Year Follow-UpDeveloped ESRD During 5-Year Follow-Up
10%20% 24%
46%
75%63%
64%
28%
15% 16% 10% 7%
20%
1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV
% o
f P
atie
nts
DisenrolledEvent-freeRRTDied
Totals Stage 2-4Totals Stage 2-4
3.1% RRT3.1% RRT
24.9 % Die24.9 % Die
Keith D, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:620A.
N= 27,000
Screening and Detection of CKDScreening and Detection of CKD
• WHO to screen? – identify risk factors • HOW to screen? - History
- Measure BP and glucose - Urinalysis – hematuria, proteinuria- Measure urinary albumin or protein excretion- eGFR - use prediction equation
• WHEN to screen?
Screening is the beginning of a complex Screening is the beginning of a complex management process for CKDmanagement process for CKD..
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis.2002; 39(suppl 1): S1-S266.
Identify Risk Factors: Individual Predictors of Identify Risk Factors: Individual Predictors of New-Onset Kidney DiseaseNew-Onset Kidney Disease
0
1
2
3
4
5
BMI Smoking HTN Age Diabetes
Community Based Population N = 2585 Community Based Population N = 2585 Baseline Exam 1978-82; FU- 18 yrs.Baseline Exam 1978-82; FU- 18 yrs.
Fox et al JAMA, 2004; 291(7): 844-50.
Odd
s R
atio
Ris
k of
Dev
elop
ing
CK
D
WHO to screen?
• DiabetesDiabetes
• HypertensionHypertension
• Aging (>60 years old)*Aging (>60 years old)*• Racial-ethnic backgroundRacial-ethnic background
(African American, Native American, Asian American,(African American, Native American, Asian American,Pacific Islander, Latin American, Hispanic)Pacific Islander, Latin American, Hispanic)
• Family history of kidney diseaseFamily history of kidney disease
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis.2002; 39(suppl 1): S1-S266.*Coresh, J et al, Am J Kidney Dis, 2003; 41(1):1-12..
WHO to screen?
Risk Factors for CKD - Early DetectionRisk Factors for CKD - Early Detection
Risk Factors for CKD - Early DetectionRisk Factors for CKD - Early Detection
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis.2002; 39(suppl 1): S1-S266.Fox et al JAMA, 2004; 291(7): 844-50.
Mohanram, A et al. Kidney Int. 2004; 66: 1131-1138.Kurella, M et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 2134-2140.
• Tobacco UseTobacco Use
• Low Income/Education/ Low Income/Education/ Poor access to healthcarePoor access to healthcare
• GFR – Best overall index of kidney GFR – Best overall index of kidney function in health and diseasefunction in health and disease
• Normal GFR varies according to Normal GFR varies according to age, sex, and body sizeage, sex, and body size
• Normal – 120 to 130 mL/min/1.73mNormal – 120 to 130 mL/min/1.73m22 in young adults, declines with agein young adults, declines with age
• Estimate GFR from prediction Estimate GFR from prediction equationsequations
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis.2002; 39(suppl 1): S1-S266..
HOW to screen?HOW to screen?
Screening and Detection of CKD
• Measure annually for microalbuminuria in patients at risk for CKD (including pts with CVD)
• Measure for microalbuminuria in patients with DM - at diagnosis for type 2 diabetes
- after 5 years for type 1 diabetes• Measure serum creatinine annually in patients at risk for CKD and calculate eGFR (automatic on many labs and required by law in some states)
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis.2002; 39(suppl 1): S1-S266.www.cdc.gov/MMWR?PDF?wk/mm5610.pdf.
WHEN to screen?
KidneyKidneyDamageDamage
22 33 44
120120 9090 6060 3030 1515
11StageStage 55
eGFReGFR
KidneyKidneyDamageDamage
KidneyKidneyFailureFailure
MildMild KidneyKidneyFunctionFunction
ModerateModerate KidneyKidneyFunctionFunction
SevereSevere KidneyKidneyFunctionFunction
What Would Your Strategy Be What Would Your Strategy Be to Slow Progression of CKD?to Slow Progression of CKD?
Early Detectionof CKD
Delay progression
BP ControlTreat
Proteinuria
DM/BS control
Avoid Nephrotoxins
Prevent complications
Anemia
Malnutrition
Bone Disease
Acidosis
Treat co- morbidities
Cardiovascular disease
Hypertension
Diabetes
Prepare for RRTEducate patient
Select RRT modality
Determine access and initiate
dialysis in a timely fashion
Adapted from Pereira, B.. Kid Int. 2000;57:351-365.
Lifestyle
Treat Dyslipidemia
Targets for Treatment - CKDTargets for Treatment - CKD
• Hypertension is an independent Hypertension is an independent variable that predicts long-term variable that predicts long-term decline in kidney functiondecline in kidney function
• Proteinuria is also an independent Proteinuria is also an independent variable that predicts long-term variable that predicts long-term decline in kidney functiondecline in kidney function
• Both are targets to reduce CKD Both are targets to reduce CKD progressionprogression
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43(suppl 1): S1-S290..
Delay Progression: Delay Progression: Targets: Hypertension and ProteinuriaTargets: Hypertension and Proteinuria
Lower Mean BP Results in Slower Rates of Lower Mean BP Results in Slower Rates of Decline in GFRDecline in GFR (Diabetics and Non-Diabetics)(Diabetics and Non-Diabetics)
-14-14 Parving HH, et al. Br Med J. 1989. Moschio G, et al. N Engl J Med. 1996.Viberti GC, et al. JAMA. 1993. Bakris GL, et al. Kidney Int. 1996.Klahr S, et al. N Eng J. Med 1994. Bakris GL. Hypertension. 1997.Hebert L, et al. Kidney Int. 1994. The GISEN Group. Lancet. 1997.Lebovitz H, et al. Kidney Int. 1994.
Bakris GL, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36(3):646-661.
Slide source: hypertensiononline.org
,
130/80 mm Hg DM/CKD130/80 mm Hg DM/CKD(JNC VII, NKF)(JNC VII, NKF)))
130/80 mm Hg 130/80 mm Hg or lower or lower (NKF)(NKF)))
Without Proteinuria
GOAL:GOAL: With Proteinuria
DelayDelay Progression: Progression: Targets: Hypertension and ProteinuriaTargets: Hypertension and Proteinuria
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43(suppl 1): S1-S290.Chobanian et al, JAMA, 2003; 289: 2560-2572.
2 drinks/day men 2 drinks/day men 1 1 drink/day/womendrink/day/women
2 – 4 mmHg2 – 4 mmHg
Lifestyle modificationsLifestyle modifications
Chobanian et al, JAMA. 2003; 289: 2560-2572.
Brenner. N et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
% R
educt
ion in
Ris
k
Primary EndPoint
Doubling ofSCr
Progression toESRD
*
†**
* P = 0.02 † P =0.006**P =0.002
Renoprotection with ARBRenoprotection with ARB
16%
28%
25%
Type 2 Diabetes: RENAALType 2 Diabetes: RENAAL
CALM: Reductions from Baseline in Urinary CALM: Reductions from Baseline in Urinary Albumin: Creatinine Ratio (Week 24)Albumin: Creatinine Ratio (Week 24)
SulfonylureasSulfonylureas accumulate in kidney failure accumulate in kidney failure (glipizide preferred agent) (glipizide preferred agent) GlitazoneGlitazones may aggravate edema and CHFs may aggravate edema and CHF
O’Connor, AS & Schelling, JR. Am J Kid Dis. 2005; 46(4): 766-773.American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2008;31(suppl 1): S1-S41
Braun J, Oldendorf M, Moshage W, Heidler R, Zeitler E, Luft FC. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27:394-401.
Framingham Heart Study: Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Increase as GFR Declines
*Median CAC (solid lines) and interquartile GFR ranges (boxes) are presented.•319 subjects (162men/157 women) from the Framingham Heart Study who were free of symptomatic cardiovascular disease•Coronary artery calcification (CAC) was evaluated by electron-beam computed tomography( EBCT)•Correlation was significant when adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension and total cholesterol
Treat Disorders of Bone andTreat Disorders of Bone andMineral MetabolismMineral Metabolism
• Check iPTH and (25)OH DCheck iPTH and (25)OH D22 levels annually starting levels annually starting
in stage 2 CKD in stage 2 CKD
• Treat low (25)OH DTreat low (25)OH D22 levels with ergocalciferol levels with ergocalciferol
50,000 IU q mon x 6, cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day50,000 IU q mon x 6, cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day• Treat iPTH with activated Vitamin DTreat iPTH with activated Vitamin D
• Monitor Ca and POMonitor Ca and PO44 levels and keep in normal levels and keep in normal
ranges for labranges for lab
National Kidney Foundation.. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42(suppl 3): S1-S201.
Cardiovascular Disease Mortality General Cardiovascular Disease Mortality General Population vs. ESRD PatientsPopulation vs. ESRD Patients
Age (years)Age (years)
Ann
ual C
VD
Mor
talit
y (%
)A
nnua
l CV
D M
orta
lity
(%)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 66-74 75-84 >85
Dialysis Female
Dialysis Black
Dialysis White
GP Male
GP Female
GP Black
GP White
Dialysis Male
Foley RN, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32:S112-S119.
GP: General Population.GP: General Population.
Target: CardioprotectionTarget: Cardioprotection
Initiate cardioprotective Initiate cardioprotective measures at measures at
diagnosis of CKDdiagnosis of CKD. • Traditional risk-factor reductionTraditional risk-factor reduction
Control BP and blood sugars, treat dyslipidemias, stop Control BP and blood sugars, treat dyslipidemias, stop smoking, increase physical activity, and manage weight.smoking, increase physical activity, and manage weight.
• Nontraditional CKD-related risk factor reductionNontraditional CKD-related risk factor reductionDecrease proteinuria, treat anemia and mineral and bone Decrease proteinuria, treat anemia and mineral and bone disorders, control volume overload, and correct electrolyte disorders, control volume overload, and correct electrolyte imbalances.imbalances.
National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(suppl 1):S1-S266.
KidneyKidneyDamageDamage
22 33 44
120120 9090 6060 3030 1515
11StageStage 55
eGFReGFR
KidneyKidneyDamageDamage
KidneyKidneyFailureFailure
MildMild KidneyKidneyFunctionFunction
ModerateModerate KidneyKidneyFunctionFunction
SevereSevere KidneyKidneyFunctionFunction
Primary Care, Endocrinologist, CardiologistPrimary Care, Endocrinologist, Cardiologist
NephrologistNephrologist
Early Recognition of CKD and Collaboration Early Recognition of CKD and Collaboration between Cardiology and Nephrologybetween Cardiology and Nephrology
Adapted from K/DOQI Guidelines For Bone Metabolism and Disease 2003, Bone Care market research .
CKD and CVDCKD and CVDHave One, Screen for the Other!!!Have One, Screen for the Other!!!
•Pts with CVD have increased risk for CKD and should be screened annually.
•Aggressively manage CVD and CKD risk factors and slow progression of two diseases.
Thank You! You are not just Nephrology Nurses – you are RNs who interact with our patients’ families, the public and other RNs who care for our CKD patients long before either they, or we, know they have CKD!You cancan make a difference!