Top Banner
THE ECONOMY OF NATURE: STRUCTURE IN BIOLOGY The History of Science and Contemporary Scientific Realism Indianapolis, IN 2/19/2016 Charles H. Pence and Daniel G. Swaim Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
27

The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Feb 22, 2017

Download

Education

Charles Pence
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

THE ECONOMY OF NATURE:STRUCTURE IN BIOLOGY

The History of Science and Contemporary ScientificRealism ⋅ Indianapolis, IN ⋅ 2/19/2016

Charles H. Pence and Daniel G. Swaim

Department of Philosophyand Religious Studies

Page 2: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

BIOLOGICALSTRUCTURALISM

Page 3: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

• McMullin (1984): gene as structuralconcept

• French (2011, 2012, 2014): biologicalmodels as structural, grounded innatural selection

Page 4: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Claim: Economy of natureas an underappreciatedstructural element in the

history of biology

Page 5: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis
Page 6: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Economic and theologicalcontexts

Page 7: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

The animal is formed by circumstances: this explainsthe inner perfection and its expediency with regard

to external conditions. (Goethe)

Page 8: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

There is a law universal in Nature, tending to renderevery reproduction being the best possibly suited toits condition that its kind, or that organized matter issusceptible of, which appears intended to model thephysical and mental or instinctive powers, to their

highest perfection, and to continue them so. (PatrickMatthew)

Page 9: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Thus we see Nature resemble a well regulated statein which every individual has his proper employmentand subsistence, and a proper gradation of officesand officers is appointed to correct and restrainevery detrimental excess. (Linnaeus, Police of

Nature)

Page 10: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis
Page 11: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

By the Oeconomy of Nature, we understand theall-wise disposition of the Creator in relation to

natural things…. Whoever duly turns his attention tothe things on this our terraqueous globe, must

necessarily confess, that they are so connected, sochained together, that they all aim at the same end,and to this end a vast number of intermediate ends

are subservient. (Oeconomy of Nature)

Page 12: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

A structure of places againstwhich we should understandthe distribution of life on earth

Page 13: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

color by Mads Madsden

Page 14: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

If proof were wanted let any singular change ofclimate [occur] here … the pressure is always

ready … a thousand wedges are being forced into theœconomy of nature. (Sketch, 7–8)

Page 15: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

I need hardly observe that the slow and gradualappearance of new forms follows from our theory, forto form a new species, an old one must not only beplastic in its organization, becoming so probably

from changes in the conditions of its existence, but aplace in the natural economy of the district must [bemade,] come to exist, for the selection of some newmodification of its structure, better fitted to the

surrounding conditions than are the other individualsof the same or other species. (Sketch, 145)

Page 16: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

An empty place in the economyof nature as prerequisite for

evolutionary change

Page 17: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

The face of Nature may be compared to a yieldingsurface, with ten thousand sharp wedges packedclose together and driven inwards by incessant

blows, sometimes one wedge being struck, and thenanother with greater force. (Origin, 67)

Page 18: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Where’d themetaphor go?

Page 19: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

The truth of the principle, that the greatest amountof life can be supported by great diversification of

structure, is seen under many natural circumstances.In an extremely small area, especially if freely opento immigration, and where the contest between

individual and individual must be severe, we alwaysfind great diversity in its inhabitants. (Origin, 114)

Page 20: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Principle of divergence stilldivulges information about theunderlying structure present

in nature

Page 21: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

AFTERDARWIN

Page 22: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

In Nature, taken from evoText, http://www.evotext.org/

Page 23: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Hypothesis: Structural roleformerly occupied by the

economy of nature taken up bygenetics

Page 24: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

The true role of the environment in evolution couldnot be understood until the nature of small mutations

and of selection were fully comprehended (Mayr1966, 3)

• Wright’s Shifting Balance Theory

• Morrison on Fisher vs. Pearson onpopulations

Page 25: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

Take-home: Economy of natureis a significant structuralelement throughout the

history of evolutionary theory

Page 26: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

With OSR:

• Preserved across theory change

• Modal

• Analytically prior to entities (organisms)

Contra OSR:

• Not mathematical

• Directly intelligible

• Not evidently ontologically prior toentities

Page 27: The Economy of Nature: Structure in Biology from Linnaeus, to Darwin, to the Modern Synthesis

[email protected]

[email protected]://charlespence.net

@pencechp