Top Banner
The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies [email protected] UNTELE, Compiègne March 19, 2004
25

The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies [email protected] UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Dwayne Barber
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom

Research

Leo van LierMonterey Institute of International Studies

[email protected]

The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom

Research

Leo van LierMonterey Institute of International Studies

[email protected] UNTELE, Compiègne

March 19, 2004

Page 2: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

e

Perception/Action: Affordance

Emergence: Grammaring

Social Interaction

Quality

Page 3: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

OverviewOverview

• Perception and action in semiotic contexts

• The emergence of language abilities in

meaningful activity

• The dynamics of social interaction

• The quality of educational experience

Page 4: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

PerceptionPerception

• Picture or landscape?• Static observer or dynamic agent?• Representation or pickup?• Direct or indirect?• Immediate or mediated?

Page 5: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

What are affordances?What are affordances?

Affordances are relations of possibility between animals and their environments (Neisser, 1987, p. 21).

Page 6: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

What are affordances?What are affordances?

Affordances consist in the opportunities for interaction that things in the environment possess relative to the sensorimotor capacities of the animal (Varela, Thompson & Rosch, 1991, p. 203).

Page 7: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

What are affordances?What are affordances?

[The linguistic world]… is full of demands and requirements, opportunities and limitations, rejections and invitations, enablements and constraints - in short, affordances (Shotter and Newson 1982:34)

Page 8: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

What are affordances?What are affordances?

We could benefit from considering participants' orientations to the production and recognition of structural patterns in talk as social affordances: immediately recognizable projections, predictions and perceived consequences of making this (and not that) utterance at any given time (Forrester, 1999, p. 88).

Page 9: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Gibson’s affordanceGibson’s affordance

• An affordance refers to the fit between an animal’s capabilities and the environmental supports and opportunities (both good and bad) that make possible a given activity (Gibson & Pick, 2000, p. 15).

• According to Gibson, to perceive the world is to co-

perceive oneself. This means that when we perceive something, we perceive it as it relates to us.

Page 10: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Agent,Self (abilities, interests)

affordance

Action

PerceptionInterpretation

Environment (meaning potential)

Page 11: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

OverviewOverview

• Perception and action in semiotic contexts

• The emergence of language abilities in

meaningful activity

• The dynamics of social interaction

• The quality of educational experience

Page 12: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

EmergenceEmergence

Emergence happens when relatively simple organisms or elements reorganize themselves into more complex, more intelligent systems. In addition, these systems appear to be able to adapt to changing conditions whereas the simpler forms that compose them have no such adaptive abilities (van Lier, in press; Johnson, 2001).

Page 13: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

EmergenceEmergence

In the emergentist perspective, grammar is not a prerequisite of communication, rather it is a byproduct of communication (Hopper, 1998). Regularity and systematicity are “produced by the partial settling or sedimentation of frequently used forms into temporary subsystems” (Hopper, ibid, p. 158).

Page 14: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

OverviewOverview

• Perception and action in semiotic contexts

• The emergence of language abilities in

meaningful activity

• The dynamics of social interaction

• The quality of educational experience

Page 15: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Social InteractionSocial Interaction

• Primary intersubjectivity: face-to-face ‘proto-conversations,’ felt immediacy.

• Secondary intersubjectivity: joint attention, ‘aboutness,’ indicational.

• Tertiary intersubjectivity: grammaticalization, predicational.

Page 16: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

ScaffoldingScaffolding

The game consists of an initial contact, the establishment of joint attention, disappearance, reappearance, and acknowledgement of renewed contact. These obligatory features or the “syntax” of the game occur together with optional features, such as vocalizations to sustain the infant’s interest, responses to the infant’s attempts to uncover the mother’s face, etc. These “non-rule bound” parts of the game are an instance of the mother providing a “scaffold” for the child (Bruner & Sherwood, 1975, p. 280).

Page 17: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

ProlepsisProlepsis

The mind projects its mature psychological capacities onto the earlier stages of its development: We see the higher mental functions in the infant’s behaviour even when they are not yet present….. treating children as if they had abilities they do not yet possess is a necessary condition of the development of those abilities (Bakhurst, 1991, p.67).

Page 18: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

ScaffoldingScaffolding

• Continuity: task sequences, ritual with variation• Contextual Support: supportive environment, guidance

and structure, facilitated access• Intersubjectivity: engagement, encouragement• Contingency: contributions oriented towards one

another• Handover/Takeover: increasing role for learner• Flow: balance between skills and challenges

(van Lier, in press)

Page 19: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Scaffolding on Three Time Scales

Scaffolding on Three Time Scales

• Macro: Planning (a syllabus, a chain of tasks, a project, etc.) over a long-term period

• Meso: Planning the steps of a particular activity or task

• Micro: Moment-to moment interactional work

Page 20: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Leo van Lier, 1996Based on L.S. Vygotsky

zone of proximal development

selfregulation

inter-personal

process

Intra-personal

process

scaf

fold

Page 21: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Assistance from more capable peers or adults

Inner Resources: knowledge, experience, memory investment

Interaction with equal peers

Interaction with less capable peers

An Expanded ZPDAn Expanded ZPD

REGULATIONSELF

Scaffolding: Modeling…Resourcefulness, Self-access

“Docendo discimus” (We learn by teaching)

“If one member of a dyad undergoes developmental change, the other is also likely to do so”

(Bronfenbrenner 1979:65)

Van Lier, 2003

Page 22: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

PROLEPSIS SCAFFOL-DING

ZPD PROXIMAL CONTEXT

EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING

Page 23: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

OverviewOverview

• Perception and action in semiotic contexts

• The emergence of language abilities in

meaningful activity

• The dynamics of social interaction

• The quality of educational experience

Page 24: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

QualityQuality

• Standards do not equal quality

• Quality cannot be measured by test scores

• Indicators of educational quality cannot be quantified

• Interventionist and contextualized types of research are important

• Education must promote creativity, variety and diversity

Page 25: The Ecology of Language Learning & Classroom Research Leo van Lier Monterey Institute of International Studies lvanlier@miis.edu UNTELE, Compiègne March.

Effective FunctioningEffective Functioning

• differentiated perception and response• directing and controlling one’s own behavior• coping successfully under stress• acquiring new knowledge and skill• establishing and maintaining mutually rewarding

relationships• modifying and constructing one’s own physical,

social, and symbolic environment(Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, 1994, p. 569).