The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network 5-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Evaluating Ranibizumab Plus Prompt versus Deferred Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
5-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Evaluating Ranibizumab Plus Prompt versus Deferred Laser for
Diabetic Macular Edema
Background: Protocol IBackground: Protocol IPreviously reported intravitreous ranibizumab
with prompt or deferred laser more effective through at least 2 years compared with laser
3-year comparison of ranibizumab groups concluded prompt laser was no better and possibly worse than deferred laser
Study extended to 5 years to assess longer-term course of DME treated with ranibizumab
To report the comparison of ranibizumab groups through 5 years
2
3
Completion of 5 Year VisitCompletion of 5 Year Visit
Ranibizumab+ Prompt Laser
Ranibizumab + Deferred Laser
Eyes originally randomized N = 180 N = 181Completed 5 Year (excl deaths) 69% (76%) 61% (74%)
Death prior to 5 Year 9% 17%Discontinued/Dropped prior to 5 YearIncludes pts who did not consent to extension
21% 22%
Eyes in the extension study N = 132 N = 136Completed 5 Year (excl deaths) 94% (97%) 82% (92%)
Death prior to 5 Year 3% 11%
Dropped prior to 5 Year 3% 7%
Ranibizumab
+ prompt laserRanibizumab
+ deferred laser
CompletersNon-
completers CompletersNon-
completers
N = 124 N = 56 N = 111 N = 70
Median Age 63 65 63 65
Prior PRP 33% 11% 21% 20%
Lens Status Phakic 73% 61% 75% 63%
Median VA (letter score) 65 65 67 62
Median CST (µm) 375 372 394 378
Mild/Moderate/HR PDR 34% 27% 24% 37% 4
Baseline Characteristics of Completers vs Non-Completers
Baseline Characteristics of Completers vs Non-Completers
5
Visits Prior to 5 Year*Visits Prior to 5 Year*
Ranibizumab+ Prompt
LaserN=124
Ranibizumab + Deferred
LaserN=111
Median # of visits in year 1 13 13
Median # of visits in year 2 8 10
Median # of visits in year 3 7 8
Median # of visits in year 4 5 6
Median # of visits in year 5 4 5
Median # of visits prior to 5 year visit 38 40
* Only eyes that completed 5 year visit
TreatmentsTreatments
6
7
Injections Prior to 5 Year*Injections Prior to 5 Year*
*Only eyes that completed 5 year visit
Ranibizumab+ Prompt
LaserN=124
Ranibizumab + Deferred
LaserN=111
Median # of injections in year 1 8 9
Median # of injections in year 2 2 3
Median # of injections in year 3 1 2
Median # of injections in year 4 0 1
Median # of injections in year 5 0 0
Median # of injections prior to 5 year visit 13 17
% of eyes that received >1 injection in year 4 46% 55%% of eyes that received >1 injection in year 5 38% 48%
8
Focal/Grid Laser Prior to 5 Years*Focal/Grid Laser Prior to 5 Years*
Ranibizumab+ Prompt
LaserN = 124
Ranibizumab + Deferred
LaserN = 111
% of eyes that did NOT receive laser treatments prior to the 5 year visit
0 56%
Median # laser treatments prior to the 5 year visit 3 0
* Only eyes that completed 5 year visit
Visual AcuityVisual Acuity
9
Mean Change in Visual Acuity* at Follow-up Visits
Mean Change in Visual Acuity* at Follow-up Visits
10
+7.2
+9.8
11
Change in Visual Acuity at 5 YearsChange in Visual Acuity at 5 Years
Change in Visual Acuity (letters)
Ranibizumab+ PromptLaser N = 124
Ranibizumab + Deferred
Laser N = 111
Estimated Means* +7.2 +9.8Estimated Diff*(95% CI)*[P-Value]*[adjusted P-Value]†
-2.6 (-5.5 to +0.4)
[P = 0.09] [P = 0.15]
*truncated to ± 30 letters, based on longitudinal analyses adjusting for baseline VA†Additional adjustment for potential confounders (baseline lens status, CSF, DR severity, prior PRP, age)
Distribution of VA Change at 5 YearsDistribution of VA Change at 5 Years
12
Change in Visual Acuity (letters)
Ranibizumab+ PromptN = 124
Ranibizumab + Deferred
N = 111>15 letter gain 27% 38%
RR (95%CI)P value
1.47 (1.04, 2.09)0.03
>10 letter gain 46% 58%
RR (95%CI)P value
1.27 (1.01, 1.60)0.04
>15 letter loss 6% 5%
RR (95%CI)P value
0.96 (0.34, 2.72)0.94
>10 letter loss 9% 8%
RR (95%CI)P value
0.91 (0.40, 2.10)0.83
Change in VA Over 5 Years Stratified by Baseline VA
Change in VA Over 5 Years Stratified by Baseline VA
13
• Test for interaction at 5 Year time point: P = 0.001• Test for interaction from longitudinal model: P = 0.004
14
Percent of Eyes with VA 20/40 (Letter Score 69) or Better
Percent of Eyes with VA 20/40 (Letter Score 69) or Better
15
Percent of Eyes with VA 20/200 (Letter score 38) or Worse
Percent of Eyes with VA 20/200 (Letter score 38) or Worse
Retinal ThickeningRetinal Thickening
16
Mean Change in CSF Thickeningat Follow-up Visits
Mean Change in CSF Thickeningat Follow-up Visits
17
18
Change in Retinal Thickness at 5 Years*Change in Retinal Thickness at 5 Years*
*Based on a longitudinal model adjusting for baseline CSF and VA†Additional adjustment for potential confounders (baseline lens status, DR severity, prior PRP, age)
Ranibizumab+
PromptLaser N = 124
Ranibizumab +
DeferredLaser N = 111
Estimated Mean change* -167 -165
Estimated Difference* (95% CI)[P-Value][adjusted P-Value]†
-8 (-30 to +15)[P = 0.48][P = 0.53]
19
Reduced VA and Thickened at 5 Years
Reduced VA and Thickened at 5 Years
Ranibizumab+ PromptLaser N = 124
Ranibizumab + Deferred
Laser N = 111
VA 20/32 or worse and
CSF >250 µm 23% 24%
EndophthalmitisEndophthalmitis
Ranibizumab + Prompt Laser
treatment
Ranibizumab + Deferred Laser
treatment
N = 187 eyes N = 188 eyesNumber (%) cases 1 (1%) 2 (1%)
N=2557 injections N=3176 injectionsRate per injection 0.04% 0.06%
20N’s include ALL randomized eyes
SummarySummary
VA gain at 1 year was maintained to 5 years concomitant with diminishing need for treatment over time
Adding laser at initiation of ranibizumab was no better than deferring laser at least 24 weeks
Deferring laser may be associated with more VA gain through 5 years, especially in eyes with worse VA at baseline
21
SummarySummary
Over half assigned to deferral never received laser through 5 years
Eyes assigned to prompt laser needed fewer injections over 5 years
Few eyes in either group had substantial VA loss About 1/3 still thickened more work to be done
22
ConclusionsConclusions Differences in VA may be real, in particular for
eyes with worse baseline VA, but deferral may require more injections over 5 years to achieve results seen in this report, and thus may entail greater costs (cost effectiveness analysis is beyond scope of study)
Results apply to patients similar to those enrolled in this trial and following same retreatment criteria.
Eyes initiating ranibizumab (with prompt or deferred laser) can maintain vision gains obtained by first year through 5 years with minimal treatment after 3 years 25
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Thank You