A Living from Livestock Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative The Dairy Sector & Poverty Reduction: A FAO Perspective Joachim Otte & Simon Mack 7 th IFCN Dairy Conference Szczecin, Poland, 24 May 2006
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
The Dairy Sector & PovertyReduction: A FAO Perspective
Joachim Otte & Simon Mack
7th IFCN Dairy ConferenceSzczecin, Poland, 24 May 2006
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Outline
• Incidence of extreme poverty & the role of livestock
• Global dairy developments
• Characteristics of smallholder dairy production
• FAO’s smallholder dairy development work
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
The Extent of Extreme Poverty
• Globally 1.2 billion extreme poor (<1USD/day)
• 800 million extremepoor in agriculture
• 600 million extremely poor livestock keepers
Glo
bal P
over
ty
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Regional Incidence of Extreme Poverty
25 - 50
>7550 - 75
10 -25< 10
No data
Proportion of peopleliving in extremepoverty (<1$/day)
Source: World Bank 2003
Glo
bal P
over
ty
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Number of Poor (Millions) by Region
0
200
400
600
800
1,000Ea
st /
Sout
h A
frica
Cen
tral /
Wes
t Afri
ca
Nor
th A
frica
/ N
ear E
ast
Chi
na
East
Asi
a ex
cl. C
hina
Indi
a
Sout
h A
sia
excl
. Ind
ia
Cen
tral A
sia
Cen
tral A
mer
ica
Car
ibbe
an
Sout
h A
mer
ica
People below US$1 a day People below US$2 a day
Source: World Bank 2003
Glo
bal P
over
ty
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Average Incomes by Region
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
0 20 40 60 80 100
IndustLACNENAS.AsiaSE&E.AsiaSSATran
Annual per capita income in USD ppp
Proportion of population in agriculture (%)
ChinaIndia
26,000 Richest quintile (Q1)
7,000 Q2
4,000 Q32,000 Q4
Glo
bal P
over
ty
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
The Role of Livestock
• Agricultural populations are still growing
• Little scope for expansion of agricultural land
• The value of produce per area needs to increase
0
10
20
30
40
50
LAC
SSA
NENA
S.Asia
E&SEAsia
1970198019902000
Agricultural GDP from livestock
Sour
ce: F
AOST
AT
Percent
Glo
bal P
over
ty
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Value of Livestock Products 2000
Milk cow24%
Milk other7%
Cattle meat21%
SR meat4%
Pig meat17%
Poultry meat15%
Other meat2%
Eggs9% Other
1%
538 billion Int$Source: FAOSTAT
Glo
bal D
airy
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Dairy Production Trends
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Top 6 developing countriesDeveloping without top 6Developed Countries
Million MT
Glo
bal D
airy
50
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
210
230
250
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Developing CountriesDeveloped CountriesDeveloping without top 6Top 6 developing countries
Index 1980 = 100
Sour
ce: F
AOST
AT 2
005
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Dairy Farm Trends
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.619
91
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
IndiaPakistanNZUSAGermany
Farm numbers (1991 = 1)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
IndiaPakistanNZUSAGermany
Herd size (1991 = 1)
Sour
ce: I
FCN
200
3
Glo
bal D
airy
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
India: Dairy Stock by Herd Size (2001)
1 to 2 3 to 4 5 to 20 >20
73 %
23 %
Herd size class (nr of cows)
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
85 million dairy households
Sour
ce: I
FCN
200
3
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
India: Dairy ‘Farm’ Income Structure
Source: PPLPI Working Papers
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Net cash farm Non-cash farm Off-farm
Farm numberLandless =< 1 ha > 1ha
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
India: ‘Dairy’ Return to Labour
• Landless and marginal smallholders gain most income from off-farm sources
• Return to labour for landless and marginal rural smallholders is often below local wage rate
• Larger farms make a profit from dairying and often generate employment for non-family members
Sour
ce: P
PLPI
Wor
king
Pap
ers
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
USD
cen
ts /
hour
Landless =< 1 ha > 1ha
Farm number
Return to labour minus local wage rate
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Milk: Cost/Unit and Prices Received
Source: PPLPI Working Papers
Int. Milk Price
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
India: Dairy MarketS
mal
lhol
der D
airy
Sour
ce: S
taal
et a
l. (in
pre
p)
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
India: Milk Price by Market Channel
Source: Saha and Hemme, 2003
Producer price Consumer price
US-
$ / k
g ra
w m
ilk (4
% fa
t)
US-
$ / k
g m
ilkFormal Informal InformalFormal
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Dairy Development ‘Ladder’ for AP
• MN3: 3 local buffaloes in Mahboobnagar district
• Top MN3: Productivity increase through improved management
• 3-Grade: Productivity increase through genetic improvement
• 3-Murrah: Productivity increase (milk yield) by further genetic improvement
• 5-Murrah: Economies of scale (in labour use) through herd expansion
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
Return to labour (USD/hour)
Sour
ce: G
arci
a et
al.
(in p
rep)
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Production CostsS
mal
lhol
der D
airy
1 minus non-milk returns
USD/100 kg milk Probability of cost being:
Sour
ce: G
arci
a et
al.
(in p
rep)
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Conclusions
• Almost 1 in 3 farmers lives in extreme poverty
• Livestock offer the potential for farmers to increase returns to shrinking land
• Milk is a highly valued livestock commodity
• Growth in demand for and production of milk is high in most developingcountries
• Increasing demand from low-income households met largely by increasing production of small-holder farmers
• ‘Median’ smallholders are cost competitive(produce at or below international price)
• Ample scope for low-cost productivity increases and welfare improvement
Sm
allh
olde
r Dai
ry
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
FAO’s Roles
• Field projects (production / processing)• Short term (FAO TCP
funded)• Long(er) term (Extra-
budgetary)
• ‘Normative’ actions• Lessons learned• Information dissemination
(technical, production & processing)
• Lactoperoxidase network
FAO
& S
mal
lhol
der D
airy
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
Pre-requisites for Engagement
• Stable demand• Market access • Local feed resources• Support services• Institutional capacity
• Communal• Private sector
• Processing tradition
FAO
& S
mal
lhol
der D
airy Employment generation
along value chain
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative
References & Further Reading
For more information please visit the PPLPI website:www.fao.org/ag/pplpi.html www.fao.org/ag/againfo/projects/en/pplpi/publications.html
Links to PPLPI Working Papers
#2 A Review of Milk Production in India with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
#3 A Review of Milk Production in Pakistan with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
#7 A Review of Milk Production in Bangladesh with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
#16 The Economics of Milk Production in Orissa, India, with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
#20 The Economics of Milk Production in Chiang Mai, Thailand, with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
#33 The Economics of Milk Production in Hanoi, Vietnam, with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
#34 The Economics of Milk Production in Cajamarca, Peru, with Particular Emphasis on Small-scale Producers
A Living from LivestockPro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative