Top Banner
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket
50

The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Dustin West
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket

Page 2: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

PART I: VEHICLE

Page 3: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

MAJOR MILESTONE SCHEDULE

• March 21 Second test flight of full-scale vehicle

• April 12 Rocket ready for launch• April 16 Rocket Fair/Hardware & Safety check• April 19 SLI Launch Day

Page 4: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

1. First stage burn 2. Stage separation.3. Booster coasts to its apogee

and deploys main parachute.4. Booster lands safely5. Second stage motor burn6. Sustainer reaches apogee,

deploys drogue parachute7. Sustainer descends under

drogue parachute to 700ft 8. Main parachute deploys,

slowing rocket to safe landing speed of 15-20 fps.

9. Sustainer lands safely.

FLIGHT SEQUENCE

Page 5: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

SUCCESS CRITERIA• Stable launch of the vehicle • Target altitude of one mile reached• Smooth stage separation. • Proper deployment of all parachutes• Safe recovery of the booster and the

sustainer

Page 6: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Length 156.5”Diameter 6”Liftoff weight 37.4 lb.Motor K1275 Redline (54mm)

CP 118.8” (from nosetip)CG 101.8” (from nosetip)Static Margin 4.23 calibers

ENTIRE ROCKET

Page 7: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Length 94”Diameter 4”Liftoff weight 12.7 lb.Motor J380 Smokey Sam (54mm)

CP 83.8” (from nosetip)CG 63.6” (from nosetip)Static Margin 5.04 calibers

SUSTAINER

Page 8: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Letter Part Letter PartA Nosecone H Payload Bay

B Main Parachute I Payload Electronics

C Sustainer E-Bay J Drogue Parachute

D Fins K Motor Mount

E Transition L Main Parachute

F Booster E-Bay M Payload Electronics

G Fins N Motor Mount

ROCKET SCHEMATICS

Page 9: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

• Fins: 1/32” G10 fiberglass + 1/8” balsa sandwich• Body: fiberglass tubing, fiberglass couplers• Bulkheads: 1/2” plywood • Motor Mount: 54mm phenolic tubing, 1/2” plywood

centering rings • Nosecone: commercially made plastic nosecone• Rail Buttons: large size nylon buttons• Motor Retention system: Aeropack screw-on motor retainer• Anchors: 1/4” stainless steel U-Bolts• Epoxy: West System with appropriate fillers

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

Page 10: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

THRUST CURVE

Page 11: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

ACCELERATION PROFILE

Page 12: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

VELOCITY PROFILE

Page 13: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

ALTITUDE PROFILE

Page 14: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Booster SustainerFlight Stability Static Margin

4.23 5.04

Thrust to Weight Ratio 6.15 5.29

Velocity at Launch Guide Departure:

54 mph(launch rail length 144”)

FLIGHT SAFETY PARAMETERS

Page 15: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Wp - ejection charge weight in pounds. dP - ejection charge pressure, 15psiV - free volume in cubic inches. R - combustion gas constant, 22.16 ft- lbf/lbm R for

FFFF black powder.T - combustion gas temperature, 3307 degrees R

EJECTION CHARGE CALCULATIONS

Page 16: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Ejection charges have been verified using static testing.

CALCULATED EJECTION CHARGES

Section Ejection ChargeBooster 2.15 g (of FFFF black

powder)Sustainer (Drogue) 2.0 g

Sustainer (Main) 3.15 g

Stage Separation Charge 1.0 g

Page 17: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Component Weight Parachute Diameter

Descent Rate

Booster(predicted)

399 oz 92 in.(main)

17.6fps

Sustainer (measured)

211 oz 24 in.(drogue)

54.7 fps

Sustainer(measured)

211 oz 60 in.(main)

17.5 fps

PARACHUTES

Page 18: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Tested Components

• C1: Body (including construction techniques)• C2: Altimeter• C3: Data Acquisition System (custom computer board and sensors)• C4: Parachutes• C5: Fins• C6: Payload• C7: Ejection charges• C8: Launch system• C9: Motor mount• C10: Beacons• C11: Shock cords and anchors• C12: Rocket stability• C13: Second stage separation and ignition electronics/charges

VERIFICATION MATRIX

Page 19: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Verification Tests• V1 Integrity Test: applying force to verify durability.• V2 Parachute Drop Test: testing parachute functionality.• V3 Tension Test: applying force to the parachute shock cords to test • durability• V4 Prototype Flight: testing the feasibility of the vehicle with a scale model.• V5 Functionality Test: test of basic functionality of a device on the ground• V6 Altimeter Ground Test: place the altimeter in a closed container and decrease air pressure

to simulate altitude changes. Verify that both the apogee and preset altitude events fire. (Estes igniters or low resistance bulbs can be used for verification).

• V7 Electronic Deployment Test: test to determine if the electronics can ignite the deployment charges.

• V8 Ejection Test: test that the deployment charges have the right amount of force to cause parachute deployment and/or planned component separation.

• V9 Computer Simulation: use RockSim to predict the behavior of the launch vehicle.• V10 Integration Test: ensure that the payload fits smoothly and snuggly into the vehicle, and

is robust enough to withstand flight stresses.

VERIFICATION MATRIX

Page 20: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

VERIFICATION MATRIXV 1 V 2 V 3 V 4 V 5 V 6 V 7 V 8 V 9 V

10

C 1

C 2

C 3

C 4

C 5

C 6 P P

C 7

C 8

C 9

C

10

C

11

C

12

C13

Page 21: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Full Scale Vehicle Launch

Page 22: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

• Liftoff Weight: 34 lbs

• Motor:Booster K1100 T

Sustainer I599N

• Length: 157 inches

• Diameter: 6in

• Stability Margin: Booster 4.53

Sustainer 5.88

Vehicle Parameters

Page 23: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

• Test dual deployment avionics

• Test full deployment scheme

• Test validity of simulation results

• Test rocket stability

• Test staging scheme

Flight Objectives

Page 24: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

• Apogee: 2519 ft– RockSim Prediction: 2479 ft

• Time to apogee: 12 seconds

• Apogee events: drogue

• Sustainer main parachute: 700 ft

Sustainer Flight Results

Page 25: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Apogee Events

Sustainer Main Parachute Deployment

Sustainer True Apogee

Sustainer Flight Data

Temporary Altimeter #2Power Failure

BoosterApogee

Page 26: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Description Initial Pointtime, altitude

End Pointtime, altitude

Descent Rate

Sustainer Descent with Drogue

13.5s, 2466ft 54.5s, 700ft43.0 fps

Sustainer Descent with Main

58.0s, 588 ft 97.5s, 0ft 14.9 fps

Booster Descent with Main (unopened)

10.6, 845ft 18.7, 0ft 104 fps

Measured Decent Rates

Page 27: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Recorded data

Simulation results(updated CD)

Apogee = 2519ft

Apogee = 2479ft

Flight Simulations vs. Data

Page 28: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

PART II: THE PAYLOAD

Page 29: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

EXPERIMENT CONCEPT• We will use an array of pressure sensors to

observe the airflow characteristics around several obstacles during a two stage flight.

• After flight, we will test the rocket in a wind tunnel and compare the results.

Page 30: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

EXPERIMENT CONCEPT

Artificial protrusions (obstacles) will be placed on the sustainer body to create disturbances in airflow.

Airflow

Pressure sensors will measure the local pressure before and after the protrusions

Page 31: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

PAYLOAD SEQUENCE

The sequence of our payload as it goes from flight to the final report.

Page 32: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

PAYLOAD OBJECTIVES

• Determine the effect of obstacles on the surface of rocket on airflow around the rocket

• Determine the accuracy of wind tunnel testing

Page 33: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

PAYLOAD SUCCESS CRITERIA

• Obstacles remain attached to the rocket during flight.

• Sensors will successfully collect and store measureable data during flight.

• Data collected is reliable and accurate.

Page 34: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

The payload will measure the airflow around the rocket using an array of

pressure sensors.

The location of the pressure sensors are shown in red and obstacles are shown in

blue.

DATA ACQUISITION

Page 35: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Sampling rate: 100 times per second

Sampling resolution: 16 bits(2 LSB noise expected)

100kPa full scale range(15kPa ~ 115kPa)

Sampling locations: 12 on sustainer and 12 on booster

DATA ACQUISITION

Page 36: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

DATA CONNECTIONSEach data acquisition board (DAB) reads and stores data from 6 pressure sensors

Analog signals from the sensors are carried to the digitizer (ADC) using a shielded cable

All DABs in the same stage are activated by the same G-switch

shielded cable

Common G-switch

sensor

Dataacquisition

Page 37: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Electronics

Data Acquisition Board: controls signal digitization, receives and storesdigitized data from pressure sensors

Sensor Board: hosts a single pressure sensor and signal conditioning (noise suppression) circuitry

Electrical schematics for DAB: shows the components and connections between them

Page 38: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

INTEGRATION PLAN

1. Fin2. Parachute3. Data Processing and Storage4. Motor

Fin Tab

Sensor package

Page 39: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

SUSTAINER

Diagram of the sustainer showing the payload integration.

DPSUnit

TimerAlt

Sensor package Parachute Compartment

Page 40: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

BOOSTER

Diagram of the Booster showing the payload integration.

Fin Tab

Fin

Motor

Alt

Alt

Parachute

DPS&S

Parachute Compartment

Page 41: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

VARIABLES• Independent Variables

– Type and location of obstacles………….…. L– Air density outside of rocket……..……..…. D– Speed of air flow…………………………………. S– Air pressure………………………………………… P– Acceleration profile…………………………….. X,Y,Z

• Dependent Variables– Pressure at each sensor………….………….. Yi

Page 42: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

CONTROLS• Identical rocket in wind tunnel and actual flight

• Identical obstacles on rocket in wind tunnel and actual flight

• Similar wind speeds in wind tunnel and actual flight of first stage

• Identical sensors and method of data storage

Page 43: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

CORRELATIONS• Primary correlations

– Yx = f(L) (local pressure vs. location) – Yx = f(S) (local pressure vs. airspeed) – Data from wind tunnel test and actual flight will be

compared

• Further correlations from actual flight– pressure vs. selected independent variables

Page 44: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

TEST AND MEASUREMENT

Test Measurement

Pressure Pressure will be collected at least 100 times per second by the sensor array

Page 45: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

VERIFICATION MATRIXComponents

1.Pressure Sensors2.Battery Pack3.Altimeter4.3D Accelerometer5.Obstacles

Verification Tests

1. Drop Test2. Connection and Basic

Functionality Test3. Pressure Sensor Test4. Scale Model Flight5. Durability Test6. Acceleration Test7. Battery Capacity Test

Page 46: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

VERIFICATION MATRIXP=PLANNEDF=FINISHED

T E S T S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

COMPONENTS

1 F F P

2 F F F

3 F F F F F

4 F F F P

5 F F F

Page 47: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

RELEVANCE OF DATA, ACCURACY AND ERROR ANALYSIS

Simulated pressure profile at 100mphPredicted pressure changes: -400Pa .. +300Pa

Page 48: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

RELEVANCE OF DATA, ACCURACY AND ERROR ANALYSIS

Simulated pressure profile at 250mphSimulated pressure profile at 250mph

Predicted pressure changes: -2,000Pa .. +1,500Pa

Page 49: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

RELEVANCE OF DATA, ACCURACY AND ERROR ANALYSIS

Resolution: true 14 bit(16 bit digitization with 2 LSB noise)

14 bits = 16,384 signal levelsSensor range: 100,000Pa (15,000 – 115,000Pa)

100,000Pa / 16,384 levels = 6.10Pa / level

Expected pressure differences:

@ 100mph: -400Pa ~ +300Pa 114 levels @ 250mph: -2,000Pa ~ +1,500Pa 573 levels

Page 50: The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Questions?