The Coffin Texts and the Democratization of Religion in the Middle Kingdom Megan Moulos 2 December 2014
The Coffin Texts and the Democratization of Religion in the Middle Kingdom
Megan Moulos
2 December 2014
Moulos 2
The Old Kingdom of Egypt disintegrated at the end of the Sixth Dynasty, when the power
of the nomarchs encroached on and eventually superseded that of the pharaohs. The pharaohs
themselves had been granting these local nome leaders more and more power, which ultimately
resulted in the nomarchs asserting themselves to compete with the central administration. When
Pepy II died leaving no apparent heir to the throne, Egypt entered a period of upheaval in the
Seventh and Eighth Dynasties, now known as the First Intermediate Period.1 During this time
Egypt was no longer unified under the rule of a single king, and power was decentralized. The
Old Kingdom rulers had produced some of the most stunning tombs in the world, and although
the importance of proper burial practice and an intense interest in the afterlife remained, there
was a marked decline in both the quality of tomb decoration and contents beginning in the late
Old Kingdom and continuing down through the First Intermediate Period. As the decoration of
the tomb proper declined, there was an increase in the painting of coffins and other funerary
objects such as the canopic chest.2 The distribution of the skill of reading and writing also
changed dramatically at this time. In the Old Kingdom, the written word was used exclusively by
the royal family and their entourage, but by the beginning of the Middle kingdom writing had
spread to the leading noble families of the nomes, officials, and eventually even the lower classes
of Egyptians.3 This shift is evident in burials, where text and image were increasingly found on
non-royal coffins during the Middle Kingdom, including abundant texts which are now known as
the Coffin Texts. This paper will explore how the Coffin Texts appeared in the Middle Kingdom,
with regards to the history of writing vis-à-vis burials, and the so called democratization of
religion. It will also explore the vicissitudes of the texts and the format in which they were
1 Much of the background history is indebted to the lectures of Dr. Daniel J. Pullen, in his course on Egyptian
Archaeology, Fall 2014. 2 Taylor 1989, 8.
3 Allen 1952, 177.
Moulos 3
depicted and used. It is evident that the Coffin Texts were the logical successor to the royal
Pyramid Texts and an important step towards the Book of the Dead, and their use by non-royal
patrons attests to the democratization of Egyptian religious practices.
As early as the Predynastic period, there is evidence that the Egyptians had a high regard
for the dead, and a firm belief in an existence after death.4 The careful burial of deceased persons
with grave goods points to a serious consideration of the individual after death. The Egyptian
obsession with the afterlife would help to explain the Great Pyramids at Giza. It would continue
over the generations and culminate in elaborate burial practices and texts in the New Kingdom.
Mud-brick mastabas were constructed for royalty and the upper classes beginning in the Naqada
II phase and continuing through the First and Second Dynasties. Mastabas had evolved from
simple, rectangular burial pits into multi-room 'houses for the dead'.5 Instead of allowing for
natural mummification as was customary in the Predynastic period, bodies in the Old Kingdom
were intentionally preserved. The careful preparation of the corpse was important for the ba
spirit which would need to return to the corpse at night, and the ka which required constant
nourishment after death. The Egyptians developed a dehydrating agent to achieve their goal.6
Pyramids followed the introduction of mastabas in the Third Dynasty with the step pyramid
complex of Djoser, although the mastaba would continue for high officials and was the burial
choice for various royalty throughout the Middle Kingdom.
The continued existence of the deceased was of utmost importance, and although this was
not a new concept, the importance of nourishing the body and soul of the dead took on new
forms in art and architecture, not to mention an expansion of religious rites. Provisions for the
deceased's afterlife included real food offerings and painted and carved "magical provisions" to
4 David 2002, 59.
5 Grajetzki 2003, 7; David 2002, 71.
6 David 2002, 73.
Moulos 4
supply the deceased with eternal nourishment.7 A religious role for the coffin and tomb appeared
very early, and it became extremely important to protect the corpse of the deceased in order to
ensure his or her continued existence in the afterlife, even more than mummification alone
allowed. Thus, increasingly elaborate rituals and decorations were invented to protect the body
and the soul of the interred person. Wealthy Egyptians made very expensive provisions to ensure
their survival in the afterlife, "by building, decorating, inscribing, and furnishing their tombs, in
some cases even drawing up complex legal contracts with the priests who would look after their
cults."8 The Opening of the Mouth ceremony, for example, would render painted, carved, and
model objects magically 'real' enough for the deceased to use. There was a so-called
"democratization of the afterlife" in the First Intermediate Period and Middle Kingdom, where
non-royal people could afford (and were allowed) to indulge in once-royal funerary practices.9
Even commoners could ensure their continued existence in the hereafter if they had the necessary
wealth. The idea of humans having a ba - a spirit able to move around between worlds after
death - was expanded to include all Egyptians, not just the king.10
The ba was the soul or spirit
which could leave the body after death and travel about the worlds of the living and the dead,
while the ka was a vital force which allowed an individual to continue to survive and receive
sustenance in the afterlife. The ka needed ongoing offerings, while the ba needed to be protected
from the dangers of the afterlife.11
The tomb was, as Shaw writes:
[The] location where the living and dead could continue to interact.
Surviving death to be reborn in the afterlife was thought to be a
complicated process requiring a group effort on the part of the gods, the
7 David 2002, 72.
8 Freed et al. 2009, 39.
9 Shaw 2000, 180.
10 Shaw 2000, 181.
11 Kanawati 2001, 20.
Moulos 5
king (who served as an intermediary between the gods and humans),
mortuary priests, the deceased, and their survivors.12
With the continued existence of the ba and ka, there was a particular Egyptian obsession
with ensuring that the deceased had multiple modes of attaining the same goal of everlasting life
after death. Willems writes:
In order to understand the Egyptian attitude to death, it is necessary to
comprehend that the living and the dead were regarded as members of one
community, and thus the dead continued to play an important part in
influencing the daily events of the living. Provisioning a tomb was an
essential duty.13
There were many types of offerings, often all occurring in a single burial: actual offerings left by
family and priests, texts describing offerings that would magically provide sustenance, and the
pictorial representations of the offerings which would also 'become' offerings themselves through
ritual and magic. There were also depictions of the production of food and drink as well as
workers who would perpetually create nourishment for the deceased in the afterlife. There was
sometimes even a serdab sculpture, which could receive offerings as a proxy for the deceased if
the corpse were destroyed. In the First Intermediate Period, wooden models of servants, boats,
animals, houses, granaries, workshops and other production facilities were placed in tombs as
substitutes which would presumably work for the deceased in the afterlife just as they did in life.
Willems observed: "To us, such models may look almost like toys, but they were really magical
instruments, substitutes for actual people who might fail to bring offerings, and for actual
workshops which would supply the deceased with victuals."14
In the Middle Kingdom, these
wooden models, as well as the ubiquitous offering stele and elaborate false door from the Old
Kingdom, would all become parts of the painted decoration of an individual's coffin.
12
Freed et al. 2009, 39. 13
Willems 1988, 114. 14
Willems 1988, 46.
Moulos 6
The earliest true coffins appeared in the Pre-Dynastic period, when rectangular chests
would be fashioned of roughly hewn pieces of wood doweled together. The burial chest was
known as a hn n 'nh ('Chest of Life') or a neb ankh ('Lord of Life').15
The coffin was essentially a
container to protect the body from destruction by tomb robbers, animals, or the elements. The
integrity of the body was crucial to the Egyptians, even during prehistoric times.16
The corpse
would be placed in the coffin in a contracted position with the knees drawn up to the chest,
which made these early coffins considerably smaller than their Middle Kingdom successors.17
Many of these coffins were plain, rectangular boxes, although some had a curved or vaulted lid
which would become popular on later wooden chests and boxes.18
By the late Second or early
Third Dynasty, some of the coffins were decorated on the exterior with a painted paneled façade
which imitated the niches and projections of the walls of royal palaces and mastabas. Embalming
techniques had advanced by the beginning of the Fourth dynasty, when the evisceration of the
corpse was introduced. This allowing for better preservation of the body. Coffins were made
longer to incorporate the new practice of placing the corpse on its back with the legs extended.19
At this time, coffins also became more expensive and finely made, using woods such as cypress.
fir, juniper, pine, and even cedar imported from Lebanon (Ficus sycomorus).20
During the Old Kingdom, high-ranking officials began to have themselves buried in one
or two wooden coffins, the smaller nestled inside of a slightly larger one. Sometimes both of the
wooden coffins were covered with an enormous stone sarcophagus. Wooden coffins found at
Giza and Saqqara fell into two distinct types. The first style of coffins had vaulted lids and sides
15
Willems 1988, 47; Freed et al. 2009, 105. 16
Grallert 2007, 35. 17
See Taylor 1989, Fig. 3. 18
Taylor 1989, 13. 19
Taylor 1989, 14. 20
Taylor 1989, 15.
Moulos 7
painted to represent the paneled façades of palaces or the mythic "white walls of Memphis." An
example is the coffin of Seshahotep from the Fifth Dynasty. The second style coffin had a flat lid
with a painted inscription running down the center and an ornamental, horizontal band of
hieroglyphic text running around the sides containing an 'offering formula.' The coffin of Idu II
from Giza is a fine example of this type.21
There was a shift in the Middle Kingdom, and
funerary texts were moved from the carved stone walls of tombs directly onto the painted coffin.
For the first time in Egyptian history, there is a combination of texts and images painted directly
onto a single funerary object - the coffin.22
The offering formulae commonly found on the coffin
sides would ask the gods to provide the deceased with food, drink, and other necessities in the
afterlife. This was functional decoration to aid and nourish the body interred within. A frequent
type of phrase found is called the pri.t.hrw formula which reads, "an invocation offering for the
revered one [Name of Deceased]."23
Even in the early dynasties, the orientation of the corpse
was crucial. Just as the entrance to a mastaba would always be found at the southeastern end, the
head of the mummy would always be placed pointing north, and the head or body would be
turned to face the east. This pattern would remain throughout the Old and Middle Kingdoms
until the advent of anthropomorphic coffins in the late Middle Kingdom which would have the
face of the deceased facing upwards, out through the 'eyes' of the sarcophagus. The painted or
carved eyes wedjat, the eyes of the falcon god Horus, were always on the east side of the coffin
where the mummy's face would lie so that the deceased could look out towards the east where
the land of the living was located. At some point in the Old Kingdom the wedjat became one of
the most important features of the coffin decoration, and perhaps of the entire burial. The eye
21
Taylor 1989, 15. 22
Grallert 2007, 37. 23
Willems 1988, 124.
Moulos 8
panel always maintained its importance on coffin decor (see Figure 1 for continual depiction of
wedjat).24
In the First Intermediate Period and Middle Kingdom, there were some common or
standard features in addition to the wedjat eyes on coffins discovered. Inscriptions were found
down the center of the lid and in a band around all four sides, normally painted in blue or green
hieroglyphs on a white or yellow background.25
This color scheme may represent hieroglyphs
written on light colored papyrus. Sometimes the painting of these hieroglyphs was exquisite,
each glyph a work of art onto itself. The text on the lid was normally an offering formula to
Anubis, while the sides had invocations and prayers to Osiris, Anubis, Isis, and Nephthys. Osiris
was the god of the underworld and an important symbol for rebirth, so his appearance on a coffin
is sensible. Anubis was an important god for the mummification and burial, and thus is also
referenced very early on in coffin decoration. Isis and Nephthys were Osiris's sisters who put his
body back together and invented mummification in the process - again it is entirely reasonable to
find these goddesses referenced in the ornamental texts of coffins. The utterances to or of Osiris
were placed on the East, and those of Anubis on the West, where one would request a good
burial in the Western Desert of which he was the patron.26
A traditional formula would read: "An
offering which the king and Anubis, Foremost of the God's Booth, who is on his mountain, who
is in w.t., Lord of the Holy Land, give: a good burial in his tomb in the necropolis in the Western
Desert for [Name of Deceased]."27
Within a few generations the sides became even more intricate, adding vertical
inscriptions in bands along the sides with added spells to Geb, Nut, Shu, Tefnut, and the Four
24
In fact, Horus eyes were present on the east side of all coffins in Willem's sample; See Willems 1988. 25
Taylor 1989, 17; Willems 1988, 119. 26
Willems 1988, 124. 27
Willems 1988, 124.
Moulos 9
Sons of Horus (Figure 2).28
These ornamental bands of text normally concerned the material
welfare of the deceased. They served to ensure a good burial and requested the perpetual
offerings necessary to survive in the Netherworld.29
External decoration of coffins became more
complex over time, evolving from single bands of ornamental hieroglyphic texts to multiple lines
of vertical and horizontal inscriptions, detailed paintings of deities, and the appearance of
features painted to imitate architecture (Figure 1). Sometimes there would even be a painted
cavetto cornice which was reminiscent of Egyptian architecture of small temples and shrines.30
The horizontal and vertical edges of most coffins were lined with an ornamental frame that was
gilded, had monochrome bands, or bands of colored rectangles.31
Willems attempted, quite
successfully, to create a typology of Middle Kingdom Coffins in 1988, noting this increase in
decoration over the course of the Middle Kingdom.32
The Coffin Texts would normally appear
on the interior of the inner coffin, presented in vertical bands of text written in hieratic or cursive
hieroglyphs. The interior of the coffin would be painted with the following elements, although
many coffins did not contain the entire repertoire: a false door with the Horus eyes above it,
object friezes, Coffin Texts, offering friezes, 'menus' of offerings, offering tables, and depictions
of the deceased and people bringing offerings. The layout of these various elements could occur
in varying combinations, and not every element appeared on every coffin (see Figures 3, 4 and 5
for typical layouts, and Figure 8 for an example coffin interior). When new elements were
introduced to the coffin's schema, they were added to the old repertoire, that is, no older elements
were thrown out entirely, and, as Willems explains, "[a]s time went by, this 'additive principle'
28
Taylor 1989, 17. 29
Willems 1988, 122. 30
Taylor 1989, 23. 31
Willems 1988, 120. 32
See Willems 1988.
Moulos 10
tended to produce increasingly intricate patterns" (Figure 1; see Figure 6 for a late Middle
Kingdom coffin that is extremely intricate and includes many of these elements).33
There were regional styles apparent in the painting of the coffins, with a northern type
found in Beni Hasan, El Bersha, and Meir, and a southern type popular at Asyut, Akhmim,
Thebes, Gebelein and El Moalla.34
In the north, coffin interiors are far more elaborately
decorated with brighter colors than those of the south. Object friezes and offering lists are quite
popular and fill most of the decorated space that is not taken up by the Coffin Texts. Conversely,
southern type coffins from Upper Egyptian artists confined the decoration mostly to the exterior,
and depict far more human figures. It is in the south that we see the earliest depiction of deities
on coffins, with the Four Sons of Horus shown as squatting figures on the short ends of coffins.35
Coffin Texts are found in both Lower and Upper Egypt, and are presented in orderly, vertical,
narrow columns in cursive hieroglyphs.36
In Asyut, Thebes, Gebelein and Aswan some coffins
have been found with astronomical texts and depictions of stars and constellations on the
underside of the lid. Often the figures of Nut, Sopdet, Orion, and Ursa Major would be carefully
arranged with accompanying text.37
It is not surprising to see Nut, the sky goddess, on the inner lid of some Middle Kingdom
coffins. Star-filled skies were already a popular decoration for the ceilings of tombs, and a fine
example can be found in the burial chamber of Unas in his pyramid at Saqqara. The coffin lid
would lie above the mummy much like Nut would lie above the earth. In the Pyramid Texts and
Coffin texts, there was a prayer that begged Nut for divine protection over the deceased: "O my
mother Nut, spread yourself over me, so that I may be placed among the imperishable stars and
33
Willems 1988, 120. 34
Taylor 1989, 21. 35
Taylor 1989, 21. 36
Taylor 1989, 21. 37
Taylor 1989, 23.
Moulos 11
may never die."38
Nut was the mother of Osiris, whom the deceased was identified with in death.
In fact, the Old Kingdom word for a chest or sarcophagus is mwt or 'mother', perhaps also
likening the coffin to a mother's womb, from which the deceased would be reborn in the
afterlife.39
Around the time of the reign of Sesostris I, the entire coffin became identified with
Nut, as she protects and covers the earth (Geb) much like the coffin protects the body.40
In fact,
the Sons of Horus could be found on the sides of the coffin, which would hold up and support
Nut in the painting and mythology, and sometimes Geb was even painted on the inner floor of
the coffin.
At this point it is prudent to trace the creation of the Coffin Texts, which borrow heavily
from the earlier Old Kingdom Pyramid Texts. The Pyramid Texts are the "world's oldest extent
substantial body of religious literature" and first appeared in the Fifth Dynasty in the pyramid of
Unas at Saqqara.41
Pyramid Texts were also found in the pyramids of Teti, Pepy I, Merenre,
Pepy II and three of his queens, and the Seventh Dynasty pharaoh Ibi. The Pyramid Texts were
only used in royal burials, and "provided an alternative method of attempting to secure the royal
burials and ensure the king's ascent to heaven at a time when, because of economic, political and
religious pressures, the pyramids of Dynasties 5 and 6 were reduced in size and quality."42
As
mentioned earlier, the Egyptians found it very important to offer aid, protection, and nourishment
in multiple ways to the deceased through the use of imagery, text, utterances or oral prayers, and
statuary. The Pyramid Texts were utterances or spells carved or painted as hieroglyphs arranged
in vertical columns on the walls of the underground portions of the tomb. Some of the utterances
would be found in multiple burials while others were unique to a specific pyramid. There was no
38
Taylor 1989, 11. 39
Taylor 1989, 12. 40
Willems 1988, 141. 41
David 2002, 91. 42
David 2002, 91-2.
Moulos 12
attempt at standardization, and contradictory statements appear often but this did not seem to be
problematic.43
It is thought that priests would read the utterances during the burial rites, and
perhaps the deceased's spirit could also read and recite the spells as necessary to ensure his own
safety.44
There was a great emphasis on solar and celestial elements as the king would achieve
immortality by ascending to the sky with Horus.45
There, the deceased king would join Re-
Harakhty on his divine barque which followed the sun, pushed across the sky by Khepri.46
An
example of this mythology can be found in Utterance 467, where the king reaches the sky by
flying like a bird or leaping like a grasshopper:
He that flies flies! He flies away from you, oh men.
He is no longer on earth, he is in the sky...
He rushes at the sky as a heron, he has kissed the sky as a hawk,
He has leapt skyward as a grasshopper.47
Utterance 267 has the same goal of ascension, but using imagery of ramps, the smoke of incense
which drifts upwards, and again, birds:
A ramp to the sky is built for him, that he can go up to the sky on it.
He goes up upon the incense.
He flies as a bird, and he settles as a beetle on an empty seat that is in the
ship of Re...48
A third mention of for the king becoming one of the 'imperishable stars' - or immortal - is found
in Utterance 245, which reads: "Make your seat in heaven, Among the stars of heaven, For you
are the Lone Star, the comrade of Hu!"49
Thus, the king was provided with a multiplicity of
images regarding flight, the air, the sky, ramps, and wings. Thus the pharaoh would have
multiple methods for achieving his goal even if a few of the methods failed. There would be
43
David 2002, 93. 44
Willems 1988, 175. 45
David 2002, 93. 46
Taylor 1989, 8. 47
David 2002, 93. 48
David 2002, 94. 49
David 2002, 91.
Moulos 13
multiple ways for the king to reach the sky, just as there would be multiple ways for the king to
receive nourishment. In fact, the ancient Egyptians used the word for mer for pyramids, which
means the 'Place of Ascension,' perhaps implying that even the pyramid was built in such a
manner to help the pharaoh achieve his ascension to the stars.50
Some of the Pyramid Texts would be repeated in the Coffin Texts, although there are
many Coffin Texts that were entirely novel. The Coffin Texts, just like the earlier (and
continuing) depictions of food and drink and the wooden models, are tools for survival beyond
death. It is important to point out that only a select few could afford the expense of such highly
decorated coffins, in spite of the "democratization" of religion. It is estimated that only 2.8% of
the population of Upper Egypt possessed decorated coffins during the Middle Kingdom, and
Coffin Texts would have only belonged to .68% of Upper Egyptians.51
The study of the Coffin
Texts began in earnest in 1910 when Pierre Lacau published 84 spells in Receuil de Travaux
relatifs à la Philologie et à l'Archaéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes. Between 1935 and 1961,
Professor Adriaan de Buck published the enormous volumes of The Egyptian Coffin Texts, which
opened the Coffin Texts up for study by a wider public.52
It is interesting to note that de Buck
discovered that not every coffin would have every coffin text, indeed, none of the coffins found
have the full oeuvre of spells. The Coffin Texts were not strictly standardized, and it appears that
spells were chosen on an individual basis, either by the deceased or his or her family, or
according to local tradition, or even perhaps it was the preference of the priests involved in the
burial. Both the Pyramid Texts and the Coffin Texts can be labeled "soteriology," or the study
into how to overcome mortality.53
From the positions of the texts, one can see that it was
50
David 2002, 97. 51
Freed et al. 2009, 105. 52
Faulkner 2004, preface. 53
Hays 2012, 10.
Moulos 14
important that the hieroglyphs and even the depictions of deities should face the head of the
deceased so that he or she may read and recognize them. The offering formulae would always
begin at the northeast corner, nearest to the face, and the lid inscription, too, would run from
head to foot (Figure 7).54
This followed the Old Kingdom tradition where hieroglyphs on false
doors and stelae would face either the deceased or an important deity, out of respect or perhaps
legibility from the perspective of the person or god represented.
There were overlapping religious traditions at play in the Coffin Texts. The first
borrowed the emphasis on the celestial afterlife from the Pyramid texts and Re's daily journey
across the sky. In the later Middle Kingdom, some non-royals were appropriating utterances
from the Pyramid Texts for inclusion in their repertoire of Coffin Texts. Coffins from the 'Tomb
of Two Brothers' - Khnum-Nakht and Nekht-Ankh - at Asyut borrows the idea of ascendance to
the divine barque in heaven, even though this was formerly a royal tradition. The lids of the
tombs record the following utterances:
Utterance, may you sit upon the pesekh seat55
of turquoise at the prow of
the barque of Re. May you purify yourself in the Cool Lake. May Anubis
fumigate the incense for you, revered one, son of a local prince, Nekht-
Ankh, offspring of Khnum-Aa.56
A-boon-which-the-King-gives57
and boon which Anubis, Lord of Sep,
gives in front of the divine booth, that he may ferry across, that he may be
interred, that he may ascend to the great god, lord in heaven, in peace.
upon the beautiful ways of the West.
Utterance. Your mother Nut has shared with you in her name of Shetpet.
She has caused you to be a god without enemies, in your name of Great
God. She protects you against all evil things, in her name of Khnumet.58
54
Taylor 1989, 16. 55
The prime seat on the god's barque for the celestial journey. 56
The mother of Khnum-Nakht and Nekht-Ankh. 57
A formula in funerary texts to confirm that all offerings presented on behalf of the deceased are granted through beneficence of the king on earth. 58
David 2002, 346.
Moulos 15
In both of these inscriptions, there is still an emphasis on the sky, although now in a non-royal
context. This was seen juxtaposed with a second important mythology, that of the resurrection of
Osiris, which identifies the deceased with Osiris and his cycle of death and resurrection. The
inclusion of Osiris with the pre-existing prominence of Re and Horus was not problematic and
the two religious trends occurred simultaneously, even on a single coffin. There was a
multiplicity of religious themes, just as there were a plethora of ways to nourish and protect the
dead. Coffin Texts were just one of the many levels of Egyptian protection of the deceased and
insurance for a good afterlife. The Coffin texts provided for an individual eternity for the
deceased.
The appearance and prominence of Osiris on private coffins is not surprising. The cult of
Osiris grew rapidly in popularity in the Middle Kingdom as Twelfth Dynasty pharaohs set up
elaborate offerings to the deity at Abydos.59
Stelae at Abydos during the Middle Kingdom show
that it was increasingly common for private, non-royal people to make offerings, construct
votives, and take part in the rites of Osiris.60
Osiris was very appealing to non-royals as his
worship offered individual resurrection and eternal life to all Egyptians. David writes:
The murder of Osiris showed that gods could be mortal, but he also
personified victory over evil and the conquest of death, and through his
own experiences, he could promise eternal life to his followers who had
lived blameless lives.61
Indeed, in the Middle Kingdom, any person could guarantee a good afterlife by being a moral
person and worshipping Osiris, as David notes:
The afterlife was no longer limited to royalty: an exemplary life, and
knowledge of the correct responses and actions to be taken when facing
59
Shaw 2000, 179. 60
Shaw 2000, 180. 61
David 2002, 158.
Moulos 16
the gods and demigods in the underworld - these qualifications made
immortality accessible even to the humblest worshipper.62
Perhaps because of the promise of personal salvation for all Egyptians, Osiris became the most
significant deity of the Middle Kingdom. The god's story of rebirth was a mirror of the constant
ebb and flow of the Nile River - one of the most crucial Egyptian themes. Osiris was not only a
symbol for resurrection and everlasting life, he was also a divine judge and ruler of the
Underworld. The belief in a Day of Judgment after death became widespread in the Middle
Kingdom, and it was believed that every person would be judged after death by a tribunal of 42
divine judges led by Osiris.63
There are multiple depictions on coffins and papyri of the tribunal
proceedings which would prepare the deceased for what would come after death.64
During the
trial the deceased would recite a 'Negative Confession' declaring that he or she had committed no
serious crimes, and the deceased could attempt to use magic and spells to try to deceive the
gods.65
The goddess Ma'at and Anubis would place the deceased's heart (which was
representative of their intellect and emotions) on a scale to see if it balanced with the feather of
Truth. The goddesses Meshkenet and Renenutet would provide testimonies about the deceased's
character, and finally Thoth would declare the individual 'true of voice' or 'vindicated.'66
There
are Coffin Texts which legitimize the deceased's claims to being divine or worthy of a good
afterlife. From the Eleventh Dynasty onwards, it was customary to add 'true of voice' after the
deceased's name in funerary inscriptions, which would allow the deceased to reunite with his or
her ba in the kingdom of Osiris.67
After a successful trial, the deceased would also be granted an
62
David 2002, 159. 63
David 2002, 158. 64
Some authors place this development in the Second Intermediate Period, while others believe it began firmly in the Middle Kingdom. 65
David 2002, 158. 66
David 2002, 158. 67
David 2002, 158.
Moulos 17
'Osiris title' in front of their name, which would appear painted on the coffin and was sometimes
also found on papyri.68
There were more ways for wealthy Egyptians to enjoy the afterlife, and there were Coffin
Texts which provided for ka-servants and shabtis (or ushabtis) to serve the deceased in the
hereafter. Around the Twelfth Dynasty a new tradition emerged that Osiris's underworld was
much like the most fertile parts of the Nile Valley - only these fields were eternally abundant
with flood-rich soil. These were known as 'Fields of Reeds', where there was eternal springtime,
abundant and unfailing harvests, and no suffering.69
The shabtis or figures of servants would take
the place of the deceased an perform all of the labor required by Osiris to live in his lands. The
summons to these servants took a specific shape, as this example from the coffin of Gua, the
chief physician of the governor Djehutyhotep, found at Bersha:
If this (the deceased) is called up for substitute-work of replacement-land,
for removal of a sector, for traversing riverbank lands, for turning over
new fields for the reigning king (Osiris), Here I am! you should say to and
commissioner who may come for this (the deceased) as his replacement.70
The shabti figure would then take the deceased's place in the case of this manual labor in the
afterlife. This tradition was an obvious successor to the depictions of persons making offerings
or working for the deceased which stretched back to Old Kingdom tombs.
Religion became extremely nuanced and multi-faceted during the Middle Kingdom, but
Coffin Texts would create lasting formulas for the presentation of religious ideas. One example
can be found on the coffin of Sobekaa from Thebes. Here, the Coffin Texts mix the concrete
reality of a funeral right with a mythological theme. The eight coffin bearers which would
transport the coffin to the tomb take the guise of the eight gods of the Unending, and the
68
David 2002, 159. 69
David 2002, 160. 70
Forman and Quirke 1996, 98.
Moulos 18
deceased becomes Shu, the god of air. This was in addition to the deceased being identified with
Osiris and Horus, and again one can see the multiplicity of meaning and identification.71
The
Unending was considered the antithesis to existence, and Shu, son of Atum, represents living and
being - a counter to a permanent death and nothingness of the Unending. The Coffin Text
formula is presented as the 'Formula for Going Forth by Day in the Underworld by the honored
Sobekka' known today as Coffin Text 335:
The spoken came into being.
Mine is All (Atum) in my existence, alone.
I am Ra in his first appearances.
I am the great god who came into being of himself,
who created his names, lord of the Nine Gods,
without opponent among the Gods.
Mine is yesterday; I know tomorrow.
It means Osiris.
At my word they acted at the battle-place of the gods.
The battle-place of the gods means the West.
I know the name of that great god who is (in) it.
'I am in adoration of Ra' is his name.
I am that great benu-heron which is in Iunu,
the keeper of controls of what exists.
It means Osiris. What exists means Eternity and Everlastingness.
I am Min in his processions.
I am given the double plume upon my head.
What is the Double Plume?
It means Horus who champions his father.
It means the Double Plume Crown.72
Coffin decoration and the texts themselves became increasingly standardized after the
reign of Senwosret III in the Twelfth Dynasty.73
Some of the Coffin Texts would grant the
deceased power over malignant spirits in the afterworld, or would provide important 'passwords'
to travel through Osiris's realm.74
There was an increased focus on the dangers of ascending to
71
Forman and Quirke 1996, 82. 72
Forman and Quirke 1996, 83. 73
Freed et al. 2009, 56. 74
Willems 1988, 48.
Moulos 19
the afterlife through the underworld in the Coffin Texts, which culminated in the "Guides to the
Hereafter," including the popular Book of the Two Ways. Painted 'maps' also appeared on the
coffin's lid which would guide the deceased through the perils of the underworld.75
The Book of
the Two Ways was a set of instructions for safely navigating the dangerous journey to the
afterlife. These texts were completely novel and first appeared in Middle Kingdom non-royal
burials.76
These maps would also aid the spirit in returning to its mummy each night.77
The coffin
of Gua, also referenced above, contains the only surviving Middle Kingdom guide through the
underworld (Figure 9). This is how it appears as part of the Coffin Texts, as Spell 336:
The first portal, of which it is said: vigil of fire.
It is its flame which repels from it.
Fifty cubits along its side is its fire,
and the front of its flame traverses the earth from this sky.
The gods said of it - it is charwood.
It came from the arms of Sekhmet.
It stood bound with the dispensers.
It created its body, and made the gods
a light task of plunder afterwards.
It stretches its foot to the tomb called
'That of which the horn guides him who is in the secret place'.
Open to me. Make way for me. See, I am come.
O Atum who is in the great sanctuary, O seizer of the gods.
Rescue me from that god who lives on meat-sacrifice,
dog-faced, human-skinned, keeper of the bend of the waterway of fire,
who swallows shadows, who snatches hearts,
who throws the lasso and yet is not seen.78
Perhaps one of the most interesting additions to the Coffin Texts are the appearance of "mitre
inscriptions" (known elsewhere as 'edge inscriptions', 'Dübelinschriften', and 'Fugeninschriften')
which were incised or painted on hidden seems, joins, dowels and miters of a coffin. The
75
Freed et al. 2009, 39. 76
Freed et al. 2009, 63. 77
Kanawati 2001, 24. 78
Forman and Quirke 1996, 88.
Moulos 20
verbiage of these hidden inscriptions has no forerunner in either the Pyramid Texts or the Coffin
Texts proper (i.e. those found on the inner or outer walls of the coffin).79
Clearly the Coffin Texts were a rational step from the royal Pyramid Texts, as both
religion and government became democratized in the First Intermediate Period. The Coffin
Texts, like the Pyramid texts before them, highlight the Egyptian obsession with immortality and
the protection of the eternal soul. As nomarchs rose to power and prominence, they borrowed
royal funerary practices, and, in time, lesser people would become more wealthy and borrow
from both. The Coffin Texts were not standardized in any sense until after the reign of Sesostris
III, perhaps owning to the regional nature of the coffin styles and religious practices. The Coffin
Texts chosen for a coffin were individualized and varied from coffin to coffin, which perhaps
mirrors the individualistic nature of religion during the Middle Kingdom - when one's personal
deeds and knowledge would decide their fate and guide them through the afterlife. The successor
to the Coffin Texts, the Book of the Dead, borrowed heavily from the Coffin Texts and the Old
Kingdom Pyramid Text. It was not truly a book, but rather a collection of selected spells that
would differ from papyrus to papyrus. Each copy would have passages and images chosen on an
individual basis for the deceased.80
In the Old Kingdom and Middle Kingdom, similar spells or
utterances would be written on the tomb walls or the coffin itself, but the later Book of the Dead
texts were commonly found on papyri. Much like the progression from the Pyramid Texts to the
Coffin Texts, the Book of the Dead was a logical answer to the increasingly nuanced and
complex evolution of the practice of Egyptian religion.
79
Grallert 2007, 66. 80
Allen 1952, 177.
Moulos 21
Illustrations
Figure 1. Types of exterior decoration of Middle Kingdom Coffins. From Willems 1996, 2.
Moulos 22
Figure 2. Typical placement of the gods in vertical text columns
on Middle Kingdom coffins. From Willems 1988, 138.
Figure 3. The most important and typical layout patterns of the
short ends of Middle Kingdom coffins. From Willems 1988, 182.
Figure 4. Typical layout patterns for the interior back wall of
Middle Kingdom coffins. From Willems 1988, 183.
Moulos 23
Figure 5. Typical layout patterns for the interior front wall of
Middle Kingdom coffins. From Willems 1988, 184-5.
Figure 6. Front long-side panel of outer coffin of Djehutynakht,
late Eleventh Dynasty-early Twelfth Dynasty, cedar, Museum of
Fine Arts, Boston. Photograph © Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
Moulos 24
Figure 7. Orientation of Hieroglpyhic Texts on Middle Kingdom
coffins. From Willems 1988, 119.
Figure 8. Eastern wall (interior) of the inner coffin of Gua
showing object frieze, false door, funerary meal and extracts from
the Coffin Texts. El Bersha, Eleventh or Twelfth Dynasty. From
Taylor 1989, 18.
Figure 9. A portion of the Book of the Two Ways. After Adriaan de
Buck, The Egyptian Coffin Texts, Vol. 7. Texts of Spells 787-1185,
Oriental Institute Publication 87 (Chicago, 1961), Plan I: Drawing
of Coffin BIC[AuQI].
Moulos 25
Bibliography
Aldred, C. 1950. Middle Kingdom Art in Ancient Egypt. London: A. Tiranti.
Allen, J.P. 1976. "The Funerary Texts of King Wahkare Akhtoy on a Middle Kingdom Coffin."
In Studies in Honor of George R. Hughes. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 39.
Chicago: University of Chicago.
_____. 2006. The Egyptian Coffin Texts. Volume 8: Middle Kingdom Copies of Pyramid Texts.
Oriental Institute Publications 132. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Allen, T.G. 1952. "Additions to the Egyptian Book of the Dead." JNES 11: 177-186.
Andrews, C., and R.O. Faulkner. 1985. The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. London:
Trustees of the British Museum by British Museum Publications.
Barguet, P. 1982. Les Textes des sarcophages égyptiens du Moyen Empire. Paris: Cerf.
Bianchi, A. 1987. "Remarks on the Beings Called mrwty or mrwryt in the Coffin Texts." The
Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 73: 206-207.
Borghouts, J.F. 1978. Ancient Egyptian Magical Texts. Leiden: Brill.
Bourriau, J. 1991. "Patterns of Change in Burial Customs during the Middle Kingdom." In
Middle Kingdom Studies, edited by S. Quirke, 3-20. New Malden, Surrey: SIA
Publishing.
Buck, A. de, and A.H. Gardiner. 1935. The Egyptian Coffin Texts. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Budge, E.A.W. Sir, and the British Museum. 1920. The Book of the Dead, with Twenty-Five
Illustrations. London: The Trustees of the British Museum.
Bull, L.S. 1922. The Religious Texts from an Egyptian Coffin of the Middle Kingdom. Ph.D.
diss., University of Chicago.
Carrier, C. 2004. Textes des sarcophages du Moyen Empire égyptien Coffret. Monaco: Editions
du Rocher.
Cooney, J.D. 1951. "Equipment for Eternity: Objects from Egyptian Tombs." Bulletin of the
Brooklyn Museum 12: 1-12.
David, R. 2002. Religion and Magic in Ancient Egypt. New York: Penguin.
Dunham, D. and W.S. Smith. 1949. "A Middle Kingdom Painted Coffin from Deir el Bersheh."
In Scritti in onore di Ippolito Rosellini pubblicati cure dell'Università di Pisa. Vol 1,
263-268. Pisa: Industrie Grafiche V. Lischi e Figli.
Faulkner, R.O. 1981. "Abnormal or Cryptic Writings in the Coffin Texts." JEA 67: 173-174.
_____. 2004. The Ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts. Oxford: Aris & Phillips.
Forman, W. and S. Quirke. 1996. Hieroglyphs and the Afterlife in Ancient Egypt. Norman:
University of Oklahoma Press.
Freed, R.E., L.M. Berman, D.M. Doxey, and N.S. Picardo, eds. 2009. The Secrets of Tomb 10A:
Egypt 2000 BC. Boston: Museum of Fine Arts Publications.
Garstang, J. 2002. Burial Customs of Ancient Egypt as Illustrated by the Tombs of the Middle
Kingdom: A Report of Excavations Made in the Necropolis of Beni Hassan during 1902-
3-4. London: Kegan Paul.
Grajetzki, W. 2003. Burial Customs in Ancient Egypt: Life in Death for Rich and Poor. London:
Duckworth.
Moulos 26
Grallert, S. 2007. "The Mitre Inscriptions on Coffins of the Middle Kingdom: A New Set of
Texts for Rectangular Coffins?" In Life and Afterlife in Ancient Egypt During the Middle
Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period, edited by S. Grallert and W. Grajetzki, 35-80.
London: Golden House Publication Egyptology.
Grallert, S., and W. Grajetzki. 2007. Life and Afterlife in Ancient Egypt During the Middle
Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period. London: Golden House Publication
Egyptology.
Hays, H.M. 2012. The Organization of the Pyramid Texts. Vols. 1 and 2. Leiden: Brill.
Heerma Van Voss, M.S.H.G. 1963. De Oudste versie van Dodenboek 17a. Coffin Texts spreuk
335a. Leiden.
Hoffmeier, J.K. 1996. "Are There Regionally-Based Theological Differences in the Coffin
Texts?" In The World of the Coffin Texts: Proceedings of the Symposium Held on the
Occasion of the 100th Birthday of Adriaan de Buck : Leiden, December 17-19, 1992.
edited by H. Willems, 45-54. Leiden: Nederlands Institute Voor Het Nabije Oosten.
Hornung, E., and D. Lorton. 1999. The Ancient Egyptian Books of the Afterlife. Ithaca, N.Y.:
Cornell University Press.
Ikram, S. 2003. Death and Burial in Ancient Egypt. Harlow: Longman.
Kanawati, N. 2001. The Tomb and Beyond: Burial Customs of Egyptian Officials. Warminster:
Aris & Phillips.
Kemp, B. 2007. How to Read the Egyptian Book of the Dead. London.
Lacau, P. 1910. Textes Religieux Égyptiens. Vol 1. Paris.
Lapp, G. 1985. Särge Des Mittleren Reiches aus der ehemaligen Sammlung Khashaba.
Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 43. Wiesbaden.
_____. 1993. Typologie der Särge und Sargkammern von der 6. bis 13. Dynastie. SAGA 7.
Heidelberg.
Lesko, L.H. 1969. The Composition of the Book of Two Ways. Ph.D. diss., University of
Chicago.
_____. 1971. "Some Observations on the Composition of the Book of Two Ways." JAOS 91: 30-
43.
_____. 1971. "The Field of Hetep in Egyptian Coffin Texts." JARCE 9: 89-101.
_____. 1972. The Ancient Egyptian Book of Two Ways. Berkeley: University of California Press.
_____. 1979. Index of the Spells on Egyptian Middle Kingdom Coffins and Related Documents.
Berkeley: B.C. Scribe Publications.
Lichtheim, M. 1975. Ancient Egyptian Literature. Vol. 1., The Old and Middle Kingdoms.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Müller, D. 1975. A Concise Introduction to Middle Egyptian. Lethbridge: Privately distributed.
Nyord, R. 2009. Breathing Flesh: Conceptions of the Body in the Ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts.
Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Parkinson, R.B. 1991. Voices from Ancient Egypt: An Anthology of Middle Kingdom Writings.
London: British Museum Press.
Peck, W.H. 1968. "A Painted Coffin Wall from Ancient Egypt." Bulletin of the Detroit Institute
of Arts 47: 28-30.
Piankoff, A. 1974. Wanderings of the Soul. Bolligen Series 40/6. New York.
Pinch, G. 1994. Magic in Ancient Egypt. London: British Museum Press.
Quirke, S., ed. 1991. Middle Kingdom Studies. New Malden: SIA Publishing.
_____. 1992. Ancient Egyptian Religion. London: British Museum Press.
Moulos 27
Richards, J. 2005. Society and Death in Ancient Egypt: Mortuary Landscapes from the Middle
Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schack-Schackenburg, H. 1903. Das Buch von den zwei Wegen des seligen Toten. Leipzig.
Shaw, I. 2000. The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sørensen, J.P. 1989. "Divine Access: The So-Called Democratization of Egyptian Funerary
Literature as a Socio-Cultural Process." In The Religion of the Ancient Egyptians:
Cognitive Structures and Popular Expressions; Proceedings of Symposia in Uppsala and
Bergen, 1987 and 1988, edited by G. Englund, 109-25. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
Spencer, A.J. 1982. Death in Ancient Egypt. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Steindorff, G. 1901. Grabfunde des Mittleren Reiches in den Königlichen Museen zu Berlin, Vol.
2. Berlin.
Szpakowska, K. 2003. Behind Closed Eyes: Dreams and Nightmares in Ancient Egypt. Swansea:
The Classical Press of Wales.
Taylor, J.H. 1989. Egyptian Coffins. London: Shire Egyptology.
_____. 2010. Journey through the Afterlife: Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. Cambridge,
Mass: Harvard University Press.
_____. 2010. Spells for Eternity: The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. London: British
Museum Press.
Terrace, E. L. B. 1968. Egyptian Paintings of the Middle Kingdom: The Tomb of Djehuty-nekht.
New York.
Thompson, S. E. 1990. "The Origin of the Pyramid Texts Found on Middle Kingdom Saqqâra
Coffins." JEA 76: 17-25.
Van Der Molen, Rami. 2000. A Hieroglyphic Dictionary of Egyptian Coffin Texts. Probleme der
Ägyptologie Bd. 15. Leiden: Brill.
Vandier, J. 1968. "Deux textes religieux du Moyen Empire." In W. Helck, ed., Festschrift f ür
Siegfried Schott zu seinem 70. Geburtstag. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz, 121-124.
Willems, H. 1988. Chests of Life: A Study of the Typology and Conceptual Development of
Middle Kingdom Standard Class Coffins. MVVEG 25. Leiden: Ex Oriente Lux.
_____., ed. 1996. The World of the Coffin Texts: Proceedings of the Symposium Held on the
Occasion of the 100th Birthday of Adriaan de Buck : Leiden, December 17-19, 1992.
Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor Het Nabije Oosten.
_____. 2008. Les Textes des Sarcophages et la démocratie: Éléments d'une histoire culturelle du
Moyen Empire égyptien; Quatre conférences présentées á l'École pratique des hautes
études, section des sciences religieuses, Mai 2006. Paris: Cybèle.