Top Banner
Michael Brown (NOAO->Princeton) Buell Jannuzi (NOAO) Arjun Dey (NOAO) Glenn Tiede (Bowling Green) Tod Lauer (NOAO) Alyson Ford (NOAO->Swinburne) Lissa Miller (NOAO->Yale) NDWFS Survey Team The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs MGCT, Baltimore, September 2004
24

The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

chogan

Michael Brown (NOAO->Princeton) Buell Jannuzi (NOAO) Arjun Dey (NOAO) Glenn Tiede (Bowling Green) Tod Lauer (NOAO) Alyson Ford (NOAO->Swinburne) Lissa Miller (NOAO->Yale) NDWFS Survey Team. The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs. MGCT, Baltimore, September 2004. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Michael Brown (NOAO->Princeton)Buell Jannuzi (NOAO)

Arjun Dey (NOAO)Glenn Tiede (Bowling Green)

Tod Lauer (NOAO)Alyson Ford (NOAO->Swinburne)

Lissa Miller (NOAO->Yale)NDWFS Survey Team

The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

MGCT, Baltimore, September 2004

Page 2: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Imaging of 18 square degrees with KPNO & CTIO telescopes.

Limiting magnitudes of BW

~26.5, R~25.5, I~25.0, & K~19.0.

Comoving volume to z~5 is 0.3 Gpc3.

9 square degree BW

RIK imaging data release on October 22.

Imaging with Spitzer (IRAC+MIPS), Chandra, & GALEX.

4 to 10m spectroscopy including 10k Hectospec redshifts

Two preliminary clustering studies : Red Galaxies and EROs.

Page 3: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs
Page 4: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

orDoes evolveinto ?

z~2 z~0 z~0

Kinematics of z>1 galaxies can have large uncertainties.

Stellar masses of z>1 galaxies are uncertain.

SED evolution of z>1 galaxies is uncertain.

Page 5: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Clu

ster

ing

Str

engt

h

Luminosity (BJ)

L* Bright

Redshift

Spatial clustering : Data and Models

Stars ~3x1010 MSun

Page 6: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Flux limited samples mix redshifts, SEDs and luminosities.

Galaxy clustering is a function of SED and luminosity at z~0.

Angular scale

Clu

ster

ing

stre

ngthw(1')=0.024g=1.81

Page 7: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Tracing galaxy evolution via clustering

Select galaxies as a function of restframe properties & epoch.

Imaging surveys can cover large volumes to great depth.

Requires accurate photometric redshifts.

Use clustering to identify galaxies in massive DM halos.

Connect galaxies populations as an evolutionary sequence.

However, does clustering evolve as predicted by the models?

Page 8: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

How does clustering evolve?

Smail et al. (2003)

Page 9: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

How does galaxy clustering evolve?

Select the same galaxy population as a function of redshift.

Select galaxies with comparatively slow SED evolution.

Select galaxies with accurate photometric redshifts.

Brown et al. (2003), ApJ, 597, 225.

5325 0.3<z<0.9 red galaxies from ~1 sq degree.

Selected subsamples by luminosity, redshift and SED.

Compared measured clustering with the models, 2dF & SDSS.

Page 10: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Red galaxy apparent colours

PEGASE ModelsNDWFS

LBGs

FBGs

Page 11: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Spectroscopic Redshift

Pho

tom

etri

c R

edsh

ift

Red galaxy BW

RI photometric zs

Page 12: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Angular clustering

Angular scale

~L*

Restframe BW

-R>1.44

Clu

ster

ing

stre

ngth

Page 13: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Redshift

Obj

ects

per

uni

t red

shif

t

Redshift distributions

Page 14: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Evolution corrected luminosity

Spa

tial

Clu

ster

ing

Red galaxies at 0.3<z<0.9

2dF

NDWFS

Page 15: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Redshift

Spa

tial

Clu

ster

ing

~L* red galaxies at 0.3<z<0.9

NDWFS

SDSS

2dF

Page 16: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Red galaxy clustering at 0.3<z<0.9

Brown et al. (2003), ApJ, 597, 225.

Spatial clustering is correlated with luminosity (mass).

Spatial clustering is weakly correlated with redshift.

Spatial clustering is consistent with hierarchical models.

The full survey area is required for robust tests of models.

Next NDWFS data release is on October 22.

Page 17: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

R-K>5, z~1 Extremely Red Objects

Brown et al. (2004), ApJ, submitted.

EROs are presumed to be the progenitors of local ellipticals.

Dusty starbursts and galaxies with “old” stellar populations.

Extreme clustering? Possibly with r0>10 Mpc for <L*?

617 K<18.4 EROs selected from ~1 sq degree.

Largest ERO sample size by 2x. Largest ERO volume by 4x.

Extremely luminous galaxies, with L~3L*(z=0).

Page 18: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Angular Scale

Ang

ular

clu

ster

ing

Angular clustering

Page 19: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Spectroscopic Redshift

Pho

tom

etri

c R

edsh

ift

Extremely Red Objects

Page 20: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Redshift

Obj

ects

per

uni

t red

shif

t

Redshift distributions

Page 21: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Red galaxies and K<18.4 EROs

Redshift

Spa

tial

Clu

ster

ing

EROs3L* Red

2dF

SDSS

LCDM

Page 22: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

K-band magnitude limit

Ang

ular

clu

ster

ing

at 1

'

Are <L* EROs strongly clustered?

Page 23: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs

Completed preliminary z<1.4 studies with ~1 sq degree.

Galaxy clustering is a function of luminosity and mass.

Galaxy clustering does not evolve rapidly with redshift.

Observed clustering is consistent with hierarchical models.

ERO clustering is strong, but not unusually strong.

Larger area will robustly test hierarchical models.

We will use galaxy clustering to measure galaxy evolution.

Next imaging data release is 22 October 2004.

Page 24: The Clustering of Red Galaxies & EROs