The CFMU Network Operations 2011 Meetings Seminars and Workshops/Global... · The CFMU Network Operations 2011 . ... 2007 Effective Capacity 26.7 27.3 27.5 27.9 28.3 26.7 27.0 29.0

The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

The CFMU Network Operations

2011

Directorate Network Management

Network Management Functions

• Integrated route network design

• Central function for frequencies

• SSR code allocation coordination

• Operations – incl. ATFM

Deployment coordination

Training Network Technical

Systems

Airspace

AIS Data Mgt Safety Airports

Operations

Planning

Network Operations

Management

Performance Monitoring

Network

Operations

ATM Structure in Europe

One single

ATFCM

System over

Europe

41 States

59 En-route centres = 1750 Sectors

1348 Aircraft Operators

450 Airports

59 FMPs

4000+ connected end-users

Peaks 34 400+ flights a day

10 000 000+ flights a year

Airspace data management

• To achieve this common view, all 40 countries which form part of the

CFMU area of operations provide us their airspace data information.

• Static data such as air traffic control (ATC) sector boundaries and air

routes (such as the maximum capacity for each airport and air traffic

control sector)

• Dynamic data showing the availability of airspace, default ATC

Capacities (for instance, number of runways available, availability of air

traffic controllers…) and air-route availability based on foreseen military

airspace usage.

CACD

Network view on planned & current status of airspace

Access to archived data for post ops

Access to draft data for simulation/DDR

Digital NOTAM + Real Time data

AUP/UUP

NoN AIP +ATM data

AIP data

EAD

ADR

seamless access

from various sources

Airspace Data Repository

Flight Planning

• “Network Operations" : Single entry point which collects all

flight plans in Europe.

• 2 central units – Brussels and Bretigny (France)

• Distribution to all ACCs in CFMU area

• Establishment of accurate demand picture for ATC and ATFCM

Flight Planning

Aircraft

Operators

(AOs)

/

Air Traffic

Services

Reporting

Offices

(AROs)

Air

Traffic

Control

(ATC)

IFPU1 IFPU2

Brussels Brétigny

IFPS

ENV

ORM

FPL FPL

ATC FPL

Changes

Fli

gh

t P

lan

s

RPL

© EUROCONTROL1997 - Central Flow Management Unit

URB\SEZ\085\1771\20.03.06

ATFCM System

ETFMS

EAD

23% RPL

+- 62 000 MESSAGES/DAY

+-30 000 flights

IFPU1 IFPU2

Brussels (B) Brétigny (F)

45% 55%

ATFCM

• A pan-European network view shared with the local units responsible for air traffic control and devising solutions that optimise the handling of traffic flows according to the available capacity.

• This is done both on the day of the flight and by anticipating operations months in advance, by establishing a single network operations plan collectively agreed.

• Events that impact air traffic every day, whether they are planned - such as sporting events - or unpredictable, such as adverse weather conditions, aviation crises.

Feedback Feedback

Strategic Flow & Capacity Planning

Optimised Capacity Management

Tactical Flow &

Capacity Management

Harmonised

Planning

considering :

- Traffic Demand

- Airspace Structure

- ATC Capabilities

- Airport Capabilities

Optimised Daily

Plan

and

anticipation of

events in order to

maintain the

network stability.

Reaction to real-

time events to

minimise

disruptions impact

and/or to take

benefit of

opportunities.

1

year

1 week real-time

Real-Time

Operations

- ATC

- ASM

- Airport

- AOs

Resources

- Airspace

- ATC

- Airport

Feedback

Traffic

Forecast

Feedback

© EUROCONTROL2004 - Central Flow Management Unit

URB\SEZ\14.03.06

ATFCM

• Strategic phase - From several months until one week before the flight.

• Assist the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) to predict what capacity they will need to provide in each of their air traffic control centres. In addition, a routing scheme is prepared – a structure of air routes across Europe designed to balance the air traffic flows and maximise capacity.

• Pre-tactical phase - In the six days before the flight

• Coordinate and define the daily plan and inform Aircraft Operators and ATC units about the ATFCM measures that will be in force in European airspace on the following day. Optimise available capacity to meet forecast demand, manage demand to minimise delay and cost, and to publish the agreed plan for the day of operations after a collaborative decision making process.

• Tactical phase - On the day of the flight

• Optimisation of the capacity according to the demand across Europe, and delay management where aircraft are affected by a regulation in order to offer alternatives and minimise delay. Flights taking place on that day receive the benefit of ATFCM, which includes the allocation of individual aircraft departure times, re-routings to avoid bottlenecks and alternative flight profiles to maximise efficiency.

ATFCM Co-ordination - FMPs

CFMU States (ATFM Area)

Cooperating States

(ATFM Adjacent Areas)

FI

IS

GE

AM AZ

EE

UA

MD

TR

CY

FR

LV

LT

BE

NL DE

GB IE BY

RO

AL

MK BG

GR

CH

IT

AT HU

ES PT

DK

NO SE

PL

CZ

MT

BA

MA

DZ TN

SY

IQ IR

KZ

RU

SK

LB

IL

SI

HR

HE

RS ME

Before After

Such solutions require

Network Wide implementation required by both ANSPs and AOs

Network ASM ATFCM Solution

Capacity

ATFCM Network

Operations

Capacity

Emissions Flight

Efficiency

ATFM

Delay

Network Operations

Airport/TMA ATFM Delay Repartition in 2011

AIRPORT

WEATHER

49%

AIRPORT

INFRASTRUCTURE

31%

AIRPORT ATC

CAPACITY

20%

En-Route ATFM Delay Repartition in 2011

EN ROUTE

WEATHER &

EXTERNAL

DISRUPTIONS,

0.13

EN ROUTE

EVENTS, 0.03

EN ROUTE ATC

DISRUPTIONS,

0.05

EN ROUTE ATC

CAPACITY, 0.55

EN ROUTE ATC

STAFFING, 0.25

Breakdow n of All Delay Causes per Flight

8.512.2

0.7

1.5

0.9

1.0

3.0

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0

2010 2011

Avera

ge D

ela

y p

er

Flight (m

in)

ATFM Ot her

ATFM En- Rout e Primary

Ot her

Ot her - 3 0 %

10.1 minA TF M - 53 %

14.7 min

ECAC "Effective Capacity" Evolution Per Month 2005-2011

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

"E

ffe

cti

ve

Ca

pa

cit

y"

flig

hts

pe

r d

ay

(th

ou

sa

nd

s)

2005 Effective Capacity 25.2 25.5 25.2 27.3 25.8 26.0 25.5 26.6 27.3 25.6 25.9 25.0







Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Additional Pan European and Crisis

management Functions

• SAFA – Safety Alert of Foreign Aircraft

• AMON – Arrival Monitoring Tool

• CSST - Call Sign Similarity Management Cell.

• CCAMS

• …………

• CRISIS MANAGEMENT

21

Call Sign Similarity (CSS) Tool

CSS Tool

[file] Flight

Schedule

Conflict List

Constraints,

Preferences

Report

Reference

data &

system

parameters

ENV

Data

Profile

Catalogue

Local

Rules

Ref. Similarity

Rules

Ref.

Parameters

Flight Schedule ,Conflict List

User param. & actions, etc…

Live

Data

3. Quality Check

1. Load Schedule

2. Initialise ATC C/S

[file] Flight

Schedule

With proposed ATC C/S

With Status:

Resolved/Unresolved +

reason

4a. Detect

4b. De-conflict

5. Accept

AO AO

CFMU/CSMC

Enter here your presentation title 22

Established through SES IR of the Network Manager

• Focal point for crises

• Alert on the crisis

• To call the right experts

• To propose measures / options to unlock / manage the crisis

• Communicate updated information to aviation community

• To ensure proper communication with media

• Build on lessons learnt to improve response to the next crisis

• Organise and participate in exercises to maintain the level of

readiness

EACCC role

N M C ris is M anagem ent P rocedure (V18 )N

OM

Mgr

on

Dut

yD

NM

&

EAC

CC

Chi

ef

Ope

ratin

g

Offi

cer

AN

SP

s/ S

tate

s /

Airp

orts

/ FA

A /

Mili

tary

/ N

ATO

DR/

COM

Cris

is S

uppo

rt

(logi

stic

s)N

OM

Mgt

CO

M (o

r OP

S

SU

P a

t nig

ht)

Any

aut

horis

ed

Sou

rce

In fo r m D N M-C O M o n th e

p r o ba b le

in cid e n t (e g . S ta r t o f Vo lc

activity )

In fo r m D N M-C O M o n th e

in cid en t (e g .

S ta r t o f e r u p tio n o r

a le r t p h ase

in E U R D EP )

G ath er

in fo ;

issu e A IM 1

G ath er

in fo ;

a sse ss w ith N O M

M g r/C O O ;

In fo r m

C O M

C a ll N O M

M g r /C O O ;

a sse ss in cide n t

jo in tly

O r g an ise & ru n

te leco n f

G ath er in fo ; sen d A IM ;

u pd a te N O P

he ad line n ew s, in fo r m

A O L C

U p da te E V IT A w ith

fo re cast in fo & N O T A M co o rd ina te s, up d a te

N O P ( + he a d lin e n ew s)

C o nta ct

re leva n t F M Ps +

r e ce ive

m e a su r es

A pp ly m ea sur

es

B ack to no r m a l

O P S

Issu e

A IM ; u p da te

N O P

R e co ver fr om

cr is is

Assess

in cid e n t w ith

C O M a nd b r ie f C O O ( if no t

ye t d on e)

C a ll in N O M

M gt+ do m a in

e xp e r ts; jo in

th is g r o up

G ath er in fo ;

assess th e

in cid e n t

M e et on

site

C r is is fo ca l

p o in t: In fo r m

D R /C O M

Assess incide n t

w ith N O M M gt a nd

C O M ; g a th e r in fo;

In fo r m D N M

C on su lt E AC C C

C o -C h a ir s

M on ito r

in cid e n t ;

ga the r in fo

E AC C C to b e co n ve n ed

In str u ct C O M to u pd a te N O P +

se n d A IM to

d ecla r e C r isis

typ e X

In str u ct C r is is Su p po r t to

co nve ne

EA C C C &

S ta te C on f

In fo r m

D G on

p r og r ess

Jo in

E AC C C te leco n f

C on tact S ta te fo ca l po in ts o r

in str u ct C r is is

Su p to se n d in vita tion

C o nta ct in fo

so u rce s

like VA AC s

B ack to no r m a l

O P S

In fo rm

C O M

In fo rm

E A C C C ( if

co nve ne d )

R un te le co n f;

stud y in fo

on cr is is

D e cid e o n E AC C C p o sit ion

E nsu r e tha t la test cr is is

s itu a tio n is

co m m u n ica te d

to p o lit ica l bo d ie s

M on ito r cr is is ,

ga the r in fo

Ba ck to n o rm a l

O PS

In fo r m

po litica l bo d ie s

D ism antle

E AC C

C

C o lle ct in fo v ia

foca l p t; jo in O PS

& E AC C C te le co n f

In fo r m m ed ia

M on ito r s itu a tio n ;

r e co r d d ecis io n s + tim es +

r ea son s/co n te xt

Y

N

Y

Y

N

Y

N

S en d N O T A M s

S en d

m e a su r es to b e

a p p lie d

C o m p ile in fo + In str u ct C O M

to u pd a te

N O P + sen d A IM

In fo r m D G

o n

p r o gr e ss

M on ito r

in cide n t ;

g a th er in fo

C o nta ct

S ta te

fo ca l

p o in ts

C on tact in fo

sou r ce s

like

V AA C s

Jo in N O M

M gt g rp

N

C a ll in m o r e sta ff if

ne e de d ; ca ll

C S O (se e ch ecklist ) ;

a le r t A O L C

S e nd

n ece ssa ry

d a ta (e g . vo lca n ic a sh

d a ta)

C o n ta ct

r e leva n t

F M P s + r e ce ive

m e asu re s

S e nd

m ea su r es to be

ap p lie d

In fo r m a ffe cted

F M P s, r e le van t

ext. avia tio n a g en cie s (w he n

ne cessar y )

issu e A IM 2

U pd ate

N O P + h e ad line

ne w s

A pp ly

m e asu re s

A ssig n :- C r is is S up p or t

r o le

- C r is is fo ca l po in t fo r D R/C O M

- C r is is S p oke sp e rso n(s ) fo r D R/C O M

M a ke sur e th a t

the EA C C C co n f

r oo m & lo g istics is ava ilab le &

r e ad y

In vite (v ia

SM S ) S ta te s fo r

te le con f

C o lla te a ll

r eco rd s fo r

p ost-cr isis

r e vie w

1 2 35

67 8

94

10

1 1 1 31 4

1 5 16 17

12

34 5 6 7 8 9 11 11

1

2

4

5

56

783

91 0

2 3 4 4

45

5

41

2 3

R un S ta te te le con f

11

In vite (v ia

SM S ) EA C C C fo r

te le con f

2

R u n

S ta te

te le con f

1 0

M e et w ith C o m m s C r is is T ea m :u pd a te on the situ a tio n ; d ecide on

n ext ste p s & r o les a llo ca tion ;

p e r fo rm log istics ch eck ; sta ff ava ila b ility ch e ck ; d e cid e o n n e xt

m ee ting

B r ie fin g w ith

E C & EA SA com m u n ica tio ns r e sp o nsib le s

Po st- cr is is

a na lysis a n d

le sso ns lea r n t

B r ie f

N O M M g t

1 2

B r ie fin g C r is is

Sp o ke spe r so n (s)

fo r p re ss in te r v iew p r ep a ra tion s

C h e ck w ith N O M

m gt/C O O w he the r to co n ta ct E C a nd /

o r EA S A

Pr e pa r e p re ss

r e lea ses an d che ck w ith C O O /

E AC C C C h a ir m an

A sse ss incide n t ;

g a th er in fo

1

F M P s ( +

o th er

a g en cie s ) a r e

in fo r m e d

F M Ps sta r t

loca l co n tin g en cy

p la n s

R E C O V E R Y &

A N A L Y S IS P h a s eP R E- A L E R T P h a s e C R IS IS P h a s eO P E R A T IO N A L P h a s e

NOP

Unique tool for Planning,

Collaborating, Information,

Transacting

Real time situation display

Dynamic solutions

The CFMU Network Operations 2011 Meetings Seminars and Workshops/Global... · The CFMU Network Operations 2011 . ... 2007 Effective Capacity 26.7 27.3 27.5 27.9 28.3 26.7 27.0 29.0

Documents