Top Banner
The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006
30
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

The Case for aName Change

John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PENovember 2006

Page 2: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Goal of University

UMR will be one of thetop five technological

research universities in the

United States by 2010.

Page 3: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Objective:

Enhance the national reputation of the

University to increase the value

of degree.

Page 4: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Are we seeking an enhanced national reputation with a branch campus, regional name?

Page 5: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

MissouriPublic HS Graduates

1987-88 to 2001-02 (actual), 2002-03 to 2017-18 (projected)

WICHE: Knocking at the College Door, 2003

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

60,00019

87-8

8

1989

-90

1991

-92

1993

-94

1995

-96

1997

-98

1999

-00

2001

-02

2003

-04

2005

-06

2007

-08

2009

-10

2011

-12

2013

-14

2015

-16

2017

-18

Page 6: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Missouri’s 2005 Student Funnelfor All Engineering Fields

Public High School Seniors Cohort: 67,074

Public High School Graduates: 57,495

All ACT Testers/College Bound: 42,705

Any Engineering Interest, all scores: 1,519

Engineering Interest, +21 comp. score: 1,028(21 = MO average score / 50%)

Engineering Interest, +24 comp. score: 769(24 = UM minimum for auto admission)

UMR’s Freshmen Engineering Majors 560from Missouri

Page 7: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

+9

> 20 %

+11% to +20%

0% to +10%

Decreases

-11+7

+12 +4

-22+11

+53+7

-10

+9

+20

-20

-6

-8

+7

+2

-11

+5

-4

+16

+13

+5-7

-6

-8

-4

-1

-12

+3

-2

-3

+8+3

+2-1

-3

+4

-7+6

-3

+9

Projected Change in High School Graduates2002-2012

+3

+10

-10

0-1-2-10 -10

-17

NCES, 2003

Page 8: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Trends in Engineering

Potential United States Undergraduate Engineering MajorsAll College Bound, ACT Tested Students Interested in Any

Engineering Field

40000

45000

50000

55000

60000

65000

70000

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

(<5%)

Page 9: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Name Recognition AmongCollege-Bound Students

Outside of Missouri Even with the increased recruiting efforts

since 2000, of the more than 1.1 million ACT testers in 2006, only 551 non-Missouri high school seniors sent ACT scores to UMR.

238 of the 551 out-of-state ACT scores were from students interested in engineering.

UMR is 9th in Missouri for number of ACT scores received from out-of-state students.

Page 10: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.
Page 11: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Conclusion:

Our University needs to attract students

from all parts of the United States.

Page 12: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

What does the nameUniversity of Missouri-Rollatell you about the intrinsic nature of our University?

Answer: Nothing

Page 13: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

How does the nameUniversity of Missouri-Rolla

differentiate us from the

other UM campuses?

Answer: It does not

Page 14: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

What is a technological

research university?

Page 15: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Technological Research Universities

Engineering enrollment ≥ 25%

Engineering, Business, Physical Sciences, and Mathematics enrollment ≥ 50%

Cutting-edge graduate research programmaster’s and Ph.D. degrees awardedsignificant external research funding

Page 16: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Illinois Institute of Technology

New J ersey Institute of Technology

University of Missouri-St. Louis

Texas A&M University

California Institute of Technology

Carnegie Mellon

Colorado School of Mines

Drexel University

Georgia Institute of Technology

Michigan Technological University

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Stevens Institute of Technology

University of Missouri-Rolla

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of California-Berkeley

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

University of Missouri-Kansas City

The University of Texas at Austin

Purdue University

Texas Tech University

University of Missouri-Columbia

Stanford University

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% Engineering, Business, Science & Math Enrollment

% E

ng

ine

eri

ng

En

rollm

en

t

Average enrollment is 6,457

Average enrollment is 29,391

Page 17: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

California Institute of Technology

Colorado School of M ines

Georgia Institute of Technology

Illinois Institute of Technology

Michigan Technological

Univers ity

New Jersey Institute of Technology

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

South Dakota School of M ines and Technology

Stevens Institute of Technology

Univers ity of M issouri-Rolla

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%

% Engineering, Business, Science & Math Enrollment

% E

ng

inee

rin

g E

nro

llm

ent

Average enrollment is 6,457

Page 18: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

University of Missouri-St. Louis

Texas A&M University

Carnegie Mellon

Drexel University

University of Southern California

University of California-Berkeley

University of Illinois at Urbana-

Champaign

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

University of Missouri-Kansas City

The University of Texas at Austin

Purdue University

Texas Tech University

University of Missouri-Columbia

Stanford University

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

% Engineering, Business, Science & Math Enrollment

% E

ng

inee

rin

g E

nro

llmen

t

Average enrollment is 29,391

Page 19: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.
Page 20: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Should UMR change its

name?

Page 21: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

We will engage the entire University community facultystudentsalumnistafffriends of the University

in considering this important question.

Page 22: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Some possible names which

would accurately describe our University...

Page 23: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Possible Names

Missouri University of Science and Technology

Missouri University of Science and Engineering

Missouri Technological University

Missouri Science and Technology University

Missouri Science and Engineering University

Other names?

Page 24: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Would a name change affect our

relationship with the University of Missouri

System?

Answer: No

Page 25: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Who would have to approve a

name change forUMR?

Answer: The Board of Curators

Page 26: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Would state appropriations and/or student fees be used to pay for the one-time cost associated with a possible

name change for the University?

Answer: No

Page 27: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

The Arts and Sciences departments are

critically important to the future of our

University.

Page 28: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Arts and Sciences UMR hired a total of 18 new tenure track

faculty members in FY06 and FY07. 8 tenure track hires were in Arts and Sciences,

including English, Philosophy, and PsychologyCurrently searching for tenure track faculty in

Computer Science, History, Spanish, and Technical Communication

This years’ A&S budget has been supplemented by over $890,000

Potential graduate programs

Page 29: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Interesting Fact:

Outstanding programs in Business, Economics, English, Finance, History, Management Information Systems, Psychology, etc. exist at technological research universities.

Examples:Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyRensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Page 30: The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.

Summary

Increasing our national reputation and prestige will enhance the long-term value of your degree.

Our University’s goal is to be one of the top 5 technological research universities in the United States.

We need attract more students from other parts of the United States and the world.

It is difficult to promote our national reputation with a branch campus, regional name that does not describe the mission of our University.