THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS COURT PERFORMANCE COURT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT SYSTEM Guiding the Courts Into the Guiding the Courts Into the Future Future
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS COURT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT SYSTEM Guiding the Courts Into the Future.
Dec 17, 2015
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICEOF THE COURTS
COURT PERFORMANCECOURT PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT SYSTEMMEASUREMENT SYSTEM
Guiding the Courts Into the FutureGuiding the Courts Into the Future
HOW ARE WE DOING?
WHERE ARE WE GOING?
G.S. 7A-409.1.
Duties of State Judicial Council
(b) The State Judicial Council . . . shall recommend to the Chief Justice performance standards for all courts and all judicial officials and shall recommend procedures for periodic evaluation of the court system and individual judicial officials and employees. * * *
Performance Measures: Five Key Areas
1. Access to Justice
2. Expedition and Timeliness
3. Equality, Fairness, and Integrity
4. Independence and Accountability
5. Public Trust and Confidence
TCPS SURVEY RESULTS
Overall: A predominately
Positive
public perception of the court system
The most dissatisfaction was reported over:
Timeliness
TCPS SURVEY RESULTS
Performance Measures: Five Key Areas
1. Access to Justice
2. Expedition and Timeliness
3. Equality, Fairness, and Integrity
4. Independence and Accountability
5. Public Trust and Confidence
Expedition and Timeliness
The trial court establishes and complies with recognized guidelines for timely case processing while, at the same time, keeping current with its incoming caseload.
Public Trust and Confidence
The public has trust and confidence that basic trial court functions are conducted expeditiously and fairly and that trial court decisions have integrity.
AOC AOC
AOC
AOC
AOC
AOC
AOC
THREE MEASURES ADOPTEDBY THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL, AUGUST 2003
# of cases disposed as a % of total filed
(2) On Time Processing:% disposed within established timeframes
(3) Case Backlog:% of cases older than established timeframes
(1) Caseload Clearance:
NC JUDICIAL BRANCH, COURT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
DATA FOR STATE TOTALS Data are current as of: April 1, 2004
CASE CLEARANCE (past 12 months)Cases disposed as a% of cases filed (click for definitions)
0N-TIME PROCESSING (past 12 months)% of cases disposed within established guidelines (click for definitions)
BACKLOG (as of April 1, 2004)Cases older than established guidelines as a % of total pending (click for definitions)
Click here for:District or County Data ║ Query Functions ║ Print Page ║ Definitions/Explanations
Superior Court: Civil: X%
Criminal: X%
District Court: Civil: X%
Criminal: X%
Superior Court: Civil: X%
Criminal: X%
District Court: Civil: X%
Criminal: X%
District Court: Civil: X%
Criminal: X%
Superior Court: Civil: X%
Criminal: X%
7580
8590
95
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Trend Data – Superior Civil
NC JUDICIAL BRANCH, COURT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
DATA FOR STATE TOTALS – DISTRICT COURT CRIMINALData are current as of: April 1, 2004
CASE CLEARANCE
Cases disposed as % of cases filed (click for definitions)
Click a case type above, or click here for: District or County Data ║ Query Functions ║ Print Page ║ Definitions/Explanations
Superior Court – Civil (past 12 months)
Civil Cases X%
Estates X%
Special Proceedings X%
Past 6 Months Year to Date
Past Fiscal Years
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICEOF THE COURTS
COURT PERFORMANCECOURT PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT SYSTEMMEASUREMENT SYSTEM
Guiding the Courts Into the FutureGuiding the Courts Into the Future
Related Documents
