Photo by MGP Committee The 2010 Macao Grand Prix What visitors and residents think Ubaldino (Dino) Couto Lecturer Institute for Tourism Studies, Macao
Photo by MGP Committee
The 2010 Macao Grand Prix What visitors and residents think
Ubaldino (Dino) Couto Lecturer
Institute for Tourism Studies, Macao
Photo by MGP Committee
• This presentation is an adapted version of the Macao Grand Prix Survey 2010 Preliminary research results which will soon be available on www.ift.edu.mo
Photo by MGP Committee
Agenda
• Macao Grand Prix
• Research aims and objectives
• Research method
• Key findings – Involvement in MGP
– Visitor‘s’ trip to Macao
– Perceived impacts of residents
– Overall evaluation of the event
– Key demographics
• Discussions and Implications
Photo by MGP Committee
Macao Grand Prix
• First MGP in 1954 (58th MGP in 2011)
• 3rd weekend of November
• 4-day event (Thu-Sun)
• Street circuit racing
• Type and number of races
– Motorcycle (1)
– Formula 3 (2)
– Touring car (5)
Photo by MGP Committee
Macao Guia Circuit 3.8 miles (6.2km)
Photo from http://www.macau.grandprix.gov.mo/mgpc/public_html/mapvideo/map.html
Photo by MGP Committee
Research aims and objectives
• To understand perceptions and opinions of residents and visitors
• 3rd instalment of a longitudinal study
• Provide up-to-date information to the government and MGP committee
• Provide the general public with information on results of survey
Photo by MGP Committee
Research method
• 18-21 November 2010
• Street surveyors at 7 locations
• Questionnaire surveys
• Instrument based on Fredline & Faulkner (2002)
• n=801
– Resident 49.2%
– Non-resident 50.8%
Photo by MGP Committee
Involvement of MGP
0
5
10
15
20
25
Will watch Have watched Not going to watch
Participating Non-participating
%
Participation of residents and visitors at MGP 2010 n=800
Residents Visitors
Photo by MGP Committee
Involvement of MGP
0
50
100
150
Participating Non-participating Participating Non-participating
Residents Visitors
Nu
mb
er o
f R
esp
on
den
ts
Number of times of watching MGP at Grandstands n=797
Never 1-3 4-6 7-10 11-20 20+
Photo by MGP Committee
Involvement of MGP
0
50
100
150
Participating Non-participating Participating Non-participating
Residents Visitors
Nu
mb
er o
f R
esp
on
den
ts
Number of times of watching MGP on TV n=797
Never 1-3 4-6 7-10 11-20 20+
Photo by MGP Committee
Involvement of MGP
0
20
40
60
80
Workcommitment
Cannot afford Environmentallyunsustainable
event
No interest Others
Nu
mb
er o
f R
esp
on
den
ts
Reasons of not watching (Grandstands or TV) the MGP 2010 n=246
Residents Visitors
Photo by MGP Committee
Visitors’ trip to Macao
0 10 20 30 40
Viewing the MGP
Shopping
VFR
Visiting WHS, art and history
Dining (cuisine)
Gaming
Attending special events
Business
Others
%
Primary purpose of visit to Macao n=398
Photo by MGP Committee
Visitors’ trip to Macao
First time 17.7%
Not first time 82.3%
Visitors’ maiden trip to Macao n=401
Photo by MGP Committee
Visitors’ trip to Macao
Very influential 45.8%
No influence on the decision
39.8%
Never heard of MGP
14.4%
Role of MGP in deciding to visit Macao n=397
Photo by MGP Committee
Visitors’ trip to Macao
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Food and drink
Accommodation
Gaming
Other costs
MOP (nearest $5)
Approximate spending in MOP
Photo by MGP Committee
Residents’ perceptions of impacts
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
%
Noise and litter pollution n=390 and n=391
More noise
More litter
Photo by MGP Committee
Residents’ perceptions of impacts
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
%
Traffic jams and crowding n=391 and n=391
More traffic jams
More crowding
Photo by MGP Committee
Residents’ perceptions of impacts
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
%
Crime, dangerous driving and uncivilised behaviour n=389, n=391 and n=391
More crime
More dangerousdriving
More uncivilisedbehaviour
Photo by MGP Committee
Residents’ perceptions of impacts
0.0
25.0
50.0
75.0
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
%
Enhances Macao’s image and visitor arrivals to Macao n=390 and n=391
Enhances Macao'simage
Discourages visitorsfrom visiting Macao
Photo by MGP Committee
Overall evaluation of MGP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Participating Non-participating Participating Non-participating
Residents Visitors
(%)
Uniqueness of MGP n=798
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Photo by MGP Committee
Overall evaluation of MGP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Participating Non-participating Participating Non-participating
Residents Visitors
(%)
Continuation of MGP n=798
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Photo by MGP Committee
Overall evaluation of MGP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Participating Non-participating Participating Non-participating
Residents Visitors
(%)
Benefit to Macao n=795
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Photo by MGP Committee
Key demographics
Macao 49%
Mainland China 19%
Hong Kong 20%
Taiwan 5%
Others 7%
Places of residence of the participating respondents n=529
Macao 49%
Mainland China 24%
Hong Kong 14%
Taiwan 8%
Others 5%
Places of residence of the non-participating respondents n=271
Photo by MGP Committee
Key demographics
15-24 19%
25-34 33%
35-44 31%
45-54 13%
55-64 4%
65+ 0%
Age of participating respondents n=526
15-24 16%
25-34 34% 35-44
25%
45-54 19%
55-64 5%
65+ 1%
Age of non-participating respondents n=269
Photo by MGP Committee
Key demographics
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100N
um
ber
of
resp
on
den
ts
Occupation of the respondents (n=799)
Residents Visitors
Photo by MGP Committee
Discussions - Involvement
• High level of participation
• Spectators at the grandstands
• Participation on TV
• Reasons for not coming
Photo by MGP Committee
Discussions – Visitors’ trip
• MGP as the main reason for visit
• Approximate spending
Photo by MGP Committee
Discussions – Residents’ perceptions
• Minimise impacts
– Education
– Temporary measures
– Incentives
– Fines
• Recognise the role of local residents
Photo by MGP Committee
Discussions – Overall evaluation
• Uniqueness and continuity
• Survival of the event
Photo by MGP Committee
Special thanks to…
• Institute for Tourism Studies for funding this project
• The International Tourism Research Centre of Macao team: – Professor Leonardo (Don) Dioko for great comments
– Mr Patrick Lo, Ms Wendy Tang & Ms Louisa Ian in choreographing collection and processing of data
• Student surveyors for collecting data