2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition The 2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Republic of Adaria V. The Republic of Bobbia, the Kingdom of Cazalia, the Commonwealth of Dingoth, the State of Ephraim, and the Kingdom of Finbar The Case Concerning The Rotian Union Competition Results International Law Students Association
15
Embed
The 2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court ...2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition ... 28 762 Mexico 3 2926 25 29 153 Ireland 3 2918 24.5 30 105
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
The 2007 Philip C. JessupInternational Law Moot Court Competition
Republic of Adaria
V.
The Republic of Bobbia, the Kingdom of Cazalia, the Commonwealth of Dingoth, theState of Ephraim, and the Kingdom of Finbar
The Case Concerning The Rotian Union
Competition Results
International Law Students Association
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
The 2007 Philip C. JessupInternational Law Moot Court Competition
World Cup Championship Round
31 March 2007Grand Ballroom
The Fairmont HotelWashington, D.C., USA
2007 Jessup Cup World Champion:University of Sydney. Australia
Team MembersLucas Bastin
Odette MurrayFiona Roughley
Natasha SimonsenZelie Wood
Coach:Justin Hogan-Doran
2007 Runner-Up:Kin2s Colle2e London, United Kin2dom
Team MembersMichael CottrellJack MacaulayTaalay RasheedKartikeya Tanna
Lilly Wong
Coaches:Soroush Kafiabadi
Man Er Kong
Best Oralist in Final Round (by judges' vote)
Lucas BastinUniversity of Sydney
Final Bench of the 2007 Jessup World Cup Championship Round
H.E. HISASHI OWADAInternational Court of Justice
PIETER JAN KUIJPERPrincipal Legal Advisor and Director for External Relations in the Legal Service of the European
Commission
LARRY D. JOHNSONAssistant Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, United Nations
International Law Students Association
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
Advanced Round Pairings
Run-Off Rounds*Florida Coastal School of Law (USA) defeated University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong, China)Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Ukraine) defeated National Law University (India)University of Sydney (Australia) defeated Case Western Reserve University (USA)University of Ottawa, Common Law (Canada) defeated Universidad Cat6lica Andres Bello (Venezuela)University of California Hastings (USA) defeated Ateneo de Manila University (Philippines)National Law School of India University (India) defeated Universit6 Paris I (France)International Islamic University (Malaysia) defeated Universidad de los Andes (Colombia)University of Queensland (Australia) defeated Utrecht University (Netherlands)
Octafinal Rounds*King's College London (United Kingdom) defeated Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Ukraine)University of California Hastings (USA) defeated Florida Coastal School of Law (USA)National University of Singapore (Singapore) defeated National Law School of India University (India)University of Ottawa, Common Law Section (Canada) defeated University of Pennsylvania (USA)University of Sydney (Australia) defeated Washington University St. Louis (USA)University College London (United Kingdom) defeated International Islamic University (Malaysia)University of Queensland (Australia) defeated National Academy for Legal Studies and Research (India)Lewis and Clark Law School (USA) defeated University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Ouarterfinal Rounds*King's College London (United Kingdom) defeated University of California Hastings (USA)National University of Singapore (Singapore) defeated University of Ottawa, Common Law (Canada)University of Queensland (Australia) defeated University College London (United Kingdom)University of Sydney (Australia) defeated Lewis and Clark Law School (USA)
Semifinal RoundsUniversity of Sydney (Australia) defeated University of Queensland (Australia)Kings College London (United Kingdom) defeated National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Shearman & Sterling Jessup Cup Championship RoundUniversity of Sydney (Australia) defeated Kings College London (United Kingdom)
* According to the Official Rules (9.3.5.3), if more than one team from a single country advance to the Run-Off,Octafinal or Quarterfinal Rounds, such teams are required to compete against one another. No more than six teams from anygiven country may advance to the Run-Off Rounds and Octafinal Rounds.
International Law Students Association
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
Team RankingsShearman & Sterling International Rounds
Top 30 Teams After Preliminary Rounds
Rank Team Region Wins Raw Pts. Round Pts.1 376 USA (Penn) 4 3224 342 895 Singapore 4 3187 363 354 USA (Wash. U.) 4 3162 304 196 UK (U College London) 4 3139 33.55 276 India (NALSAR) 4 3109 346 197 UK (Kings College London) 4 3105 307 335 USA (Lewis & Clark) 4 3094 348 193 UK (Oxford) 4 3075.5 31.59 694 Ukraine 4 3038 3310 449 USA (Florida Coastal) 4 2983 26.511 772 Venezuela 4 2972 3312 118 France 4 2951 2913 353 USA (Case Western) 3 3124 3014 737 Colombia 3 3112 2115 473 USA (Cal-Hastings) 3 3110 2816* 380 USA (Boston College)* 3 3103 20.517 804 Australia (Queensland) 3 3079.5 2818 163 Netherlands 3 3070 2719 893 Philippines 3 3069 24.520* 355 USA (Columbia)* 3 3055 2621 881 Malaysia 3 3052 2022 808 Australia (Sydney) 3 3031 2223 278 India (NLSIU) 3 3021 25.524 305 Canada (Ottawa Common) 3 2999 22.525 241 Hong Kong, China 3 2992 2326 279 India (NLU) 3 2978 2527 584 South Africa 3 2964 24.528 762 Mexico 3 2926 2529 153 Ireland 3 2918 24.530 105 Belgium 3 2910 26.5
* Rule 9.3.4: No more than six (6) Teams from one nation may advance to the Advanced Rounds of the InternationalTournament. If more than six (6) Teams from one nation place among the twenty-four (24) highest-ranked Teams fromthe Preliminary Rounds, only the six highest-ranked Teams from such nation may advance to the Advanced Rounds. Ifafter the application of this rule, there are fewer than twenty-four (24) Teams eligible for the Advanced Rounds, thehighest-ranked Team(s) that did not otherwise qualify for the Advanced Rounds shall be added until the number ofTeams equals twenty-four.
International Law Students Association
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
2007 Shearman & Sterling International RoundsBest Individual Oral Performances
(top 100)
Rank Oralist1 H. Azkya2 J. Connah3 K. Whittaker4 J. Eggleton
L. WongM. Angeles
7 N. Hassan8 A. Henderson
0. Pringle10 W. Patterson11 0. Murray12 J. Harper
R. McLelland14 N. Morris15 T. Appleton16 L. Bastin17 J. Macaulay18 M. Lindl19 K. Tanna20 S. Davis21 Q. Rasheed22 T. Parker23 M. Day24 S. Machado25 X. Shum26 M. Weibell27 N. Idris
T. Payne29 C.D. Pangilinan
R. SchmidtS. Petkov
32 C. O'CulainE. Chua
34 E. PonceJ. JonesT. Kastelic
37 B. TasciD. Trimino
39 B. McRae40 E. Kelsey41 N. Gamio
Y. Zhang43 A. Kanli44 T. Herrera45 K. Odynski46 C. McLaughlin47 L. Sinisterra48 M. Doris
School (Nation)Indonesia (U. Indonesia)NetherlandsUSA (Penn)USA (Boston College)USA (Wash. U.)MexicoMalaysiaUSA (Penn)USA (Penn)USA (Lewis & Clark)Australia (Sydney)USA (Boston College)USA (Ohio Northern)SingaporeUSA (Columbia)Australia (Sydney)UK (Kings Coll. London)USA (Cal-Hastings)UK (Kings Coll. London)USA (Columbia)UK (Kings Coll. London)Hong Kong, ChinaUSA (Case Western)ColombiaUK (U Coll. London)USA (Case Western)UK (U Coll. London)USA (Lewis & Clark)PhilippinesGermany (Heidelberg)AustriaIrelandSingaporeColombiaUSA (Ohio Northern)SloveniaTurkeySwedenAustralia (Queensland)UK (Oxford)ArgentinaNetherlandsGreeceUSA (South Texas)Canada (Ottawa Common)USA (Case Western)ColombiaCanada (Victoria)PhilippinesLithuania
Total Score279276.5276275.5275.5275.5273271.5271.5271270269.5269.5269.25269268.5267.5267265.5265264.75264.667264.5264263.75263.5263263262.5262.5262.5261.5261.5261261261260.5260.5259.667259.5259259258.5258.25257.667257.5257256.5256.5256.5
Average Score9392.1679291.83391.83391.8339190.590.590.3339089.83389.83389.7589.66789.589.1678988.588.33388.2588.22288.1678887.91787.83387.66787.66787.587.587.587.16787.16787878786.83386.83386.55686.586.33386.33386.16786.08385.88985.83385.66785.585.585.5
International Law Students Association
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
51 0. Burlyuk52 R. Fuad
S. KimT. Lyne
55 L. Grant56 A. Kegye
L. HaufM. Morales
59 M. GurgelR. Borrmann
61 B. WilesE. HwangM-L. OverbeckZ. Lampell
65 Z. Wu66 C. Tolliver
P.Intsiful68 M. Zayd69 E. Lefever
L. McLaurinL. Schicho
72 A. SinghH. AbdulkareemJ. HowleyJ. SwanepoelV. Kesari
77 D. SchweitzerG. LuccheseS. Kui
80 P. Horal81 E. Bueuss
H. KwakT. Geron
84 S. Rao85 Tseng86 E. Eastaugh
M. RoyN. Blake-KnoxZ. Karsai
90 A. ArkoM. DedeicM. NaniwadekarN. LeeR. GibsonY. Liu
University of Sydney, AustraliaNALSAR School of Law, IndiaCase Western Reserve University, United StatesUniversidad Cat6lica Andres Bello, VenezuelaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
International Law Students Association
Total Score552548547541535532531530525524524522521520520519518518517516515515514512511
2007 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
RICHARD R. BAXTER AWARDSBEST MEMORIALS OVERALL
Top Memorial Overall - Applicant *
Universidad de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Top Memorials Overall - Respondent *
Washington University Saint Louis - United States
• Since one team placed in the top five in both the Dillard and Evans Competitions, nine teams were