The 20 DEVELOPMENT OF GREEN BUILDING RANGKING …senvar.event.upi.edu/file/ppt/Senvar20_Presentation_AuliaFikriarini.pdf · CONCLUSIONS 9 Organized By: Supported By: Interpreting

DEVELOPMENT OF GREEN BUILDING RANGKING

BASED ON STAKEHOLDER VALUES USING THE AHP

Aulia Fikriarini Muchlis, Dewi Larasati, Sugeng Triyadi S, Yulita Hanifah,

Anedya Wardhani, Novya Ekawati

Institut Teknologi Bandung

[email protected]

Urban Retrofitting: Building, Cities and Communities

in The Disruptive Era

The 20th

International Conference on

Sustainable

Environment

& Architecture

Supported By:Organized By:Presenter Affiliation:

INTRODUCTION & LITERATURE REVIEW

2

Supported By:Organized By:

environmentally friendly building design that aligns with the

philosophy of sustainable growth.

building life cycle using environmentally friendly, resource-efficient

methods, from site to design, construction, operation,

maintenance, reconstruction, and deconstruction [1]

sustainable buildings and high-performance buildings with health

and quality of life improvement mechanism [2][3][4]

improving building productivity while simultaneously mitigating the

adverse environmental and human health effects [5]

enhance the atmosphere's quality and the diversity of life and

excellent life quality

greenbuilding

Figure 1. Sustainable Development Goals [7]

Figure 2. Green Building Timeline [6]

senvar20

INTRODUCTION & LITERATURE REVIEW

3

Supported By:Organized By:

senvar20

RESEARCH STAGE

Figure 3. Research Stage

4

Supported By:Organized By:

1

2

senvar20

METHODS

Figure 4. AHP Method Flow

5

Supported By:Organized By:

[14] [15] [16] [17]senvar20

6

Supported By:Organized By:

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 5. Stakeholder Perspective on Sustainable Site Criteria

Figure 6.(b) Stakeholder Perspective on Landscape Indicator;

Figure 6. (a) Stakeholder Perspective on Vegetation Indicator;

Figure 6. (c) Stakeholder Perspective on Microclimate Indicator;

Figure 7. (a) Stakeholder Perspective on Water Indicator;

Figure 7. (b) Stakeholder Perspective on Road Indicator

senvar20

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

7

Supported By:Organized By:Figure 8. Stakeholder Perspective on Landscape Criteria

senvar20

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

8

Supported By:Organized By:

senvar20

Figure 9. Comparison Ranking between Greenship and Stakeholder Figure 10. Comparison Indicator between Greenship and Stakeholder

CONCLUSIONS

9

Supported By:Organized By:

▪ Interpreting religious values, the achievement of a sustainable concept will be in line

with spiritual attainment, because values derived from religion are expected to

increase environmental awareness, especially for improving the application of green

buildings and realizing much better environmental change.

▪ Stakeholders' concern to minimize the environmental footprint. All of the existing criteria are

closely related to realizing a sustainable site and emphasize that site planning and

architecture plays a vital role in creating a sustainable site

▪ The ranking tool for green buildings should be given good weight for categories,

criteria, and indicators so that the degree of achievement is much more measurable.

▪ Rearranging the weighting system to reflect each category's characteristics, criteria, and

indicators into a complete assessment, need to be reviewed.

senvar20

REFERENCES

10

Supported By:Organized By:

[1] “Environmental Protection Agency.” https://www.epa.gov.

[2] J. Yudelson, Green Building A to Z Understanding the Language of Green Building. Canada: New Society Publishers, 2007.

[3] C. J. Kibert, Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery, vol. 1. 2016.

[4] RSMeans, Green Building: Project Planning & Cost Estimating. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey., 2011.

[5] L. A. Sam Kubba Ph.D., Handbook Green Building Design and Construction, 2nd ed. Elsevier Inc. All, 2017.

[6] J. Yudelson, Reinventing Green Building : Why Certification Systems Aren’t Working and What We Can Do About It. 2016.

[7] https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/green-building-improving-lives-billions-helping-achieve-un-sustainable-development-goals

[8] M. Wimala, E. Akmalah, and M. R. Sururi, “Breaking Through the Barriers to Green Building Movement in Indonesia: Insights from Building Occupants,” in Energy Procedia, 2016,

vol. 100, no. September, pp. 469–474, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.204.

[9] H. Y. Wadu Mesthrige, J., & Kwong, “Criteria and Barriers for the Application of Green Building Features in Hong Kong,” Smart Sustain. Built Environ., 2018, doi: 10.1108/sasbe-02-

2018-0004.

[10] J. L. Wilson and E. Tagaza, “Green Buildings in Australia : Drivers and Barriers,” Aust. J. Struct. Eng., vol. 7 No 1, no. April, 2006, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2006.11464964.

[11] G. Y. Qi, L. Y. Shen, S. X. Zeng, and O. J. Jorge, “The Drivers for Contractors’ Green Innovation : An Industry Perspective,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 18, pp. 1358–1365, 2010, doi:

10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017.

[12] M. Ucci, “Sustainable Buildings, Pro-Environmental Behaviour and Building Occupants: A challenge or an Opportunity,” J. Retail Leis. Prop., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 175–178, 2010, doi:

10.1057/rlp.2010.11.

[13] X. Xie and Y. Lu, “Green Building Pro-Environment Behaviors : Are Green Users Also Green Buyers ?,” Sustainability, pp. 1–13, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9101703.

[14] T. L. Saaty, “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures,” J. Math. Psychol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977, doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.

[15] T. L. Saaty, “How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” vol. 48, 1990.

[16] T. L. Saaty, “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Sci. Iran., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 2002, doi: 10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590.

[17] A. I. Abdelazim, A. M. Ibrahim, and E. M. Aboul-zahab, “Development of an Energy Efficiency Rating System for Existing Buildings Using Analytic Hierarchy Process – The Case of

Egypt,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., no. December, pp. 0–1, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.071

senvar20

Thank You

The 20th International Conference on

Sustainable Environment & Architecture

Supported By:Organized By:Presenter Affiliation: