The project is supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA): T043145 TWEPP 2007 conference, Prague, 3-7 September 2007 Results and Consequences of Magnet Test and Cosmic Challenge of the CMS Barrel Muon Alignment System Bencze, Gy. L. 3,4 , Béni, N .1 , Imrek, J. 2 , Molnár, J. 2 , Novák, D. 2 , Raics, P. 1 , Sass, V 2 , Szabó, Zs. 1 , Székely, G. 2 , Szillási, Z. 1 More than 500 measurement cycles have been completed, the results can be summarized as follows: - The system worked correctly and provided results that could be interpreted. - The dynamic running scheme has proved to be very efficient leading to fully parallel operation of the board PCs. - A full cycle lasted about 100 minutes. This is already acceptable for future CMS operation, however, speed-up is foreseen. - Control of the operating muon chambers through the chamber DCS system went smoothly even at the maximum load of the channel. - A separate test has been made during the MTCC to check the operation of commercial Ethernet switch units in magnetic field. This test was also successful. - The resolution of the system in the most important phi-direction is ~20 micrometer, well below the specification. This enabled us to detect even thermal deformations due to the daily temperature oscillation. - The irreversible deformation (shrinkage) of the full barrel yoke during the first magnet operation as well as the elastic deformation under field during the changes of the magnetic field have been observed. The result is in good agreement with the preliminary finite-element calculations. 1 Institute of Experimental Physics, Debrecen University, Debrecen, Hungary H-4001 2 Institute of Nuclear Research (ATOMKI), Debrecen, PO BOX 51. Hungary H-4001 3 Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Budapest, Hungary H-1525 4 CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland. Fig.1 Optical network of the Barrel Muon Alignment System Wheel -2 Wheel -1 Wheel 0 Wheel +1 Wheel +2 Sector 10 Sector 11 Board PC (BPC) PIConNET (PoN) DT MiniCrate (MC) DT XDAQ system 5 MC 4 PoN + 1 PBC 2 BPC 8 PoN + 2 BPC 8 PoN + 1 BPC 8 PoN + 2 BPC Main Workstation Ethernet switch DB 9 MC Fig. 2 Part of the setup during the MTCC Fig.3 Logical scheme of the MTCC setup Fig.4 Flow diagram of the measurement cycle Fig.5 Data flow scheme Fig.6 Daily thermal effectsFig. 7 Non-elastic shrinking of the barrel yoke Device Device Device Custom protocol TCP/IP PVSS DIM Configuration and calibration data measured data JDBC Detector Control System FSM Devices: ● MAB through BPC - Cameras - LEDs - Temperature/Rel. Humidity ● Chamber LED sources (Forks) through PoN or XDAQ Device Device Local DB Measurement control (Java) -Rigid structures (MABs, z-bars) -Videocamera boxes (on the MABs) -LED-holders (called forks) on the chambes -Diagonal and z-LED holders (on the MABs and z-bars) -Board computers (one for each MAB) Barrel muon chamber MAB MAB -1/9, DT 0/10/1R/Fork3/FLED1 Is it a barrel chamber LED measurement? Take next connection from the list Y N Y Y Y Y N N N Y Reserve MAB of the given z-LED Measure the connection (separate thread) Are there any non-measured connections? Y N Set every connection as non-measured N N STOP START Get optical connection list from DB Y End of single measurement thread Optical line is a diagonal measurement Repeat measurement cycle? Connection is already measured? Is the cam. MAB used by other measurement? Is the chamber used by other measurement? Is it a z-LED measurement? N Is the MAB used by other measurement? N Reserve chamber of the given LED Reserve MAB of the given camera Set connection to “under measurement” Unblock MAB of the given z-LED Unblock MAB of the given camera Y N N Optical line is a diagonal measurement Is it a barrel chamber LED measurement? Is it a z-LED measurement? Unblock chamber of the given LED Y N Set connection to “bad measurement” (+ errcode) Was the measurement successfull? Set connection to “good measurement” Y N ~15 μm ~2.7 mm MAB +3/11, ZLED3, MTCC phase 1 ~ 2.9 mm MAB +3/11, ZLED3, MTCC phase 2 Fig. 8 Elastic shrinking of the barrel yoke