Top Banner
Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding http://www.tektonics.or Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted
17

Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Penelope Willis
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Texts and TransmissionTwo Objections Claiming the Bible Was

Distorted

James Patrick Holding

http://www.tektonics.org

Objections Answered,

Rogues Refuted

Page 2: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

BACAW!

The World According to

Bart

Page 3: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Two Major ObjectionsTo the Reliability of the Copying of

the New Testament

1.“We haven’t got the originals, so we don’t know what they said.”

2.“There are over 400,000 mistakes in copies of the NT.”

Page 4: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Tacitus (all works)

New Testament

Date of Earliest Copies (Years After Written)

Number of Earliest

Copies

Page 5: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Mistakes??

Page 6: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Knocking Down

Spelling mistakes, slips

of the pen = 70%

Page 7: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Types of Manuscript Errors

Spelling errors.

“That hat is too bug for my head.”

Page 8: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Knocking Down

Spelling mistakes, slips

of the pen = 70%

Use of synonyms or

other word use switches

= 20%

Page 9: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Types of Manuscript Errors

Spelling errors.

“That hat is too bug for my head.”

Word Use Errors.

“Fred loves Wilma.”

“Wilma loves Fred.”

Page 10: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Knocking Down

Important, but not likely = 9%

Page 11: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Types of Manuscript Errors

Important but not likely.

“The Gospel of ____”

Significant Errors or Changes.

1 Thess. 2:7

Mark 16:9-20

Page 12: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Knocking Down

Important, but not likely = 9%

Significant = 1%Total significant copying errors:

Page 13: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Types of Manuscript Errors

Important but not likely.

“The Gospel of ____”

Significant Errors or Changes.

1 Thess. 2:7

Mark 16:9-20

Page 14: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

BACAW!

The World According to

Bart

Page 15: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

BACAW!

Lastnightatdinnerisawabundanceonthetable

therewerebreadsandmeatsandcheeseseverywhere

unclehenrytriedtostabotwithhisforkwhileitdidthewatusi

IS THIS REALLY SO DIFFICULT?

Page 16: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Bart in the Batter’s Box

Mark 1:41: The angry Jesus

1 John 5:7 The Trinity Text

Matt. 24:36 The Ignorant Jesus

Page 17: Texts and Transmission Two Objections Claiming the Bible Was Distorted James Patrick Holding  Objections Answered, Rogues Refuted.

Conclusion: A Reliable Witness

For further reading:

http://www.tektonics.org/ntdocdef/gospdefhub.html

http://www.tektonics.org/ntdocdef/orality01.html

http://www.tektonics.org/lp/nttextcrit.html