TEXT COMPLEXITY KEY TO STUDENT POSTSECONDARY SUCCESS Adapted from the work of Susan Pimentel November 3, 2010.

TEXT COMPLEXITYKEY TO STUDENT POSTSECONDARY SUCCESS

Adapted from the work of Susan Pimentel November 3, 2010

Substantial, Durable Deficits inLater Reading Performance

NAEP Results Confirmed by Other Measures

Early reading (4th grade) has improved somewhat. 1. ACT College Readiness• Reading stagnant at Grades 8 and 12 for 40 years!

• Fewer than 40% of high school seniors can read and respond to questions from “complicated literary and informational passages. . .and extend and restructure ideas in specialized and complex texts.”

The Crisis of Complexity

Complexity of texts students are expected to handle K-12 has eroded: High school textbooks have declined in all subject areas over several

decades. Average length of sentences in K-8 textbooks have declined from 20 to

14 words. Vocabulary demands have declined, e.g., 8th grade textbooks equivalent

to former 5th grade texts; 12th grade anthologies equal to former 7 th

grade. Complexity of college and careers texts have remained steady or increased:

Lexile scores of college textbooks have not decreased in any block of

time since 1962 and in fact have increased. Vocabulary difficulty of newspapers has remained stable. Word difficulty of scientific journals and magazines 1930–1990 has

increased since 1930.

Result

Huge gap between end of high school andcollege reading demands equal to 350L

(Lexile) or the Lexile difference between 4th

grade and 8th grade NAEP texts!

How much should we worry about this gap?

ACT Study

Purpose: Determine what distinguished the

reading performance of students likely to

succeed in college and not.• Process:

Set benchmark score on the reading test shown to

be predictive of success in college (“21”) . Looked at results from a half million students. Divided texts into three levels of complexity:

uncomplicated, more challenging, and complex.

Recap of ACT Findings

• Question type (main idea, word meanings, details) is NOT the chief differentiator between students scoring above and below the benchmark.

• Question level (higher order vs. lower order; literal vs. inferential) is NOT the chief differentiator between students either.

• What students could read, in terms of its complexity--rather than what they could do with what they read—is greatest predictor of success.

Too Few Students Reading atToo Low a Level

Only half of high school graduates are

meeting the benchmark.

Deficiencies are not equal opportunity. . .

The fortunate ones are kids. . .

Who have had lots of books available to them

at home and whose caretakers read to them in

their early years with great regularity.

Who have had teachers that augmented

textbooks with adequately complex reading.

Who themselves have become eager and

independent readers because they learned

how to read well in their first years of their

schooling.

The unfortunate ones are. . .

• Those who are isolated from texts before arriving at

the schoolhouse door.

• Struggling readers who are never given the

opportunity to grapple with adequately complex texts.

• Kids thought not to be able to “handle” the regular

curriculum so materials are pitched at a much lower

level.

• English learners who are provided adapted texts that

are often so greatly simplified they provide little

exposure to the content and the forms/structures of

the language they should be learning.

10

11

What’s wrong with the simplifiedtext approach?

Simplified usually means limited, restricted, and thin in meaning.

Academic vocabulary can only be learned from complex texts––by noticing how it works in texts, engaging with, thinking about, and discussing their more complex meanings with others.

Mature language skills needed for success in school and life can only be gained by working with demanding materials.

No evidence that struggling readers—especially at middle and high school--catch up by gradually increasing the complexity of simpler texts. . .

Measures of Text Complexity

Quantitative measures or readability formulas stand as proxies for semantic and syntactic complexity:

Word length; word frequency/familiarity Sentence length and text length

Qualitative measures complement and sometimes correct quantitative measures:

Purpose Language conventionality and clarity Text Structures Knowledge demands

Measures of Text Complexity,cont’d.

Quantitative and qualitative measures are at onceuseful and imperfect.

Quantitative measures are less valid for certainkinds of texts: Poetry k-1 texts Complex narrative fiction

Qualitative measures are on a continuum (notgrade/band specific) and most useful working inconjunction with quantitative measures.

Other Text ComplexityConsiderations

Percent of expository reading assigned

Degree of independence required when reading

Vocabulary!

Need to Foster Independent Reading

• Students are given considerable scaffolding to comprehend texts in k-12.

• General movement should be toward decreasing scaffolding and increasing independence because that is what will be demanded in college and the workplace (and on new tests).

Need to Systematically Focus on Vocabulary

Vocabulary is empirically connected to reading comprehension. Successful instruction incorporates and integrates morphology,

phonology, etymology, orthography, and syntax as well as meanings.

Instruction needs to be developed from text (frequency of rare words in even educated adult conversation is 17.3 per 1000 words)

Instruction needs to include heavy dose of informational text as it contains more rare words than narratives.

Instruction needs to teach how meanings of words vary with context (e.g., Texas was admitted to the union, he admitted his errors, admission was too expensive).

Special Focus on General Academic Vocabulary

Words that are likely to appear frequently in a wide variety of texts/disciplines (utility & importance)

Words that are necessary for understanding a text and allow for rich representations (instructional potential)

Words that relate to other words and offer students more precise ways of referring to ideas they already know about (conceptual understanding)

Sequenced Vocabulary Instruction First, contextualize the word for its use in the story that you are reading.

“She’s just too much of a distraction and I’ve been getting calls from the other parents. They’re afraid those stripes may be contagious.”

Next, ask the children to repeat the word so that they can create a phonological representation of the word.

“Say contagious with me.” (clap it out)

Next, explain the student friendly meaning of the word.

“Contagious means an illness that can spread to other people.”

Provide examples in contexts other than the one used in the story.

“The surgeon scrubbed his hands to prevent the spread of contagious germs.”

Have students interact with the word… “Could you be contagious if you went to work with strep throat?

Research Underway

To develop a tool that will gauge the complexity of texts in a number of dimensions including but not limited to readability measures.

To work with publishers on how to best use this tool in selecting texts as well as in developing materials and programs for states adopting the CCSS.

To develop a pool of annotated texts that exemplify and benchmark the process of evaluating complexity to help educators develop/select the best materials and methods for students.

To work with assessment developers so their assessments are based on these same principles.

What Schools Can Do Now

Take Complexity Inventory of what students are reading in each grade and make adjustments.

Adjust balances of texts so students are exposed to: More expository texts k-12 in and out of English classes More traditional narratives and poetry

As much as possible use on grade/band level text for instruction (with supports).

Ask students to stretch to read more complex texts— especially short texts--beyond their reading level (with supports).

What Schools Can Do Now,cont’d.

Teach students to read strategically. . .to slow down to understand key points and to re-read passages.

Attend systematically to building general academic vocabulary across-the-board.

Make word learning part of the school culture! Give frequent formative assessments that present students

with standards based tasks and provide absolutely no direct teacher support (writing to sources).

Teaching To Develop Deep Text Understanding

Process-Oriented Asking Questions

Testing Grading

EvaluatingGuided Practice with Feedback

Student Use with Feedback

Modeling

(Adapted by Dr. Lois Huffman from Richardson & Morgan, 2000)

Teaching versus Testing Comprehension

23

Determining Reading Comprehension

vs