Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.

Texas State Performance Plan

Data, Performance, ResultsTCASE Leadership Academy

Fall 2008

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy|

Fall 2008

In the beginning…or at least since 2000


Fall 2008

State Performance Plan

Integrated Monitoring Activities

Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation

Data on Processes and

Results

Improvement, Correction, Incentives,

& Sanctions

Effective Dispute Resolution

Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development

Fiscal Management

Effective General Supervision


Fall 2008

State Performance Plan (SPP)


Stakeholders are actively involved

SPP leads to improved results

SPP is the blueprint for systems change


Fall 2008

What is the State Performance Plan?

IDEA 2004 requires each State to develop a six-year performance plan (2005-2010).

The State Performance Plan (SPP) evaluates the State’s efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of IDEA and illustrates how the State will continuously improve upon this implementation.


Fall 2008


States will submit on an annual basis to the USDE Office of Special Education Programs an annual performance report (APR) and report publicly the performance of LEAs against the targets in the APR.


Fall 2008

Monitoring Priority

a prioritized area in which State and Local Education Agencies’ performance is

measured (set by USDE)



Fall 2008

FAPE in the LRE (includes Parent) Disproportionality Effective General Supervision Effective Transition

Monitoring Priorities in SPP



Fall 2008

Indicator

a statement used to help quantify and/or qualify a monitoring priority (set by USDE)

What’s in the State Performance Plan?


Fall 2008


Indicators in the SPPFAPE in the LRE

1. Graduation

2. Dropout

3. Adequate Yearly Progress

4. Suspension and Expulsion

5. Educational Environment, 6-21

6. Educational Environment, 3-5

7. Early Childhood Outcomes

8. Parent Participation

Disproportionality

9. Disproportionality inSpecial Ed

10.Disproportionality bySpecific Disability


11.Child Find

Effective Transition

12.Early Childhood Transition

13.Secondary Transition

14.Post-School Outcomes


Fall 2008


Indicators in the SPPEffective General Supervision / General Supervision

15. Effective General Supervision

16. Complaint Investigation Timeline

17. Due Process Hearing Timeline

18. Resolution Sessions

19. Mediation Agreements

20. State Data Reporting


Fall 2008


Indicators in the SPP Student performance

1. Graduation3. Adequate Yearly Progress

Student outcomes7. Early Childhood Outcomes14. Post-school Outcomes

Student placement5. Educational Environment2. Dropout

6.Preschool LRE Student identification

9. and 10. Disproportionality

Indicators 1 - 14 reflect:


Fall 2008


Indicators in the SPPIndicators 1 - 14 reflect:

Student disciplinary action 4. Suspension/Expulsion

LEA compliance11. Child find12. Early Childhood Transition13. Secondary Transition

Parent participation8. Parent Involvement


Fall 2008


Indicators in the SPPIndicators 15 - 20 reflect:

State performance in its “state supervisory” responsibilities including:

Identifying noncompliance and ensuring correction within one year (Monitoring)

Completing complaint investigations,due process hearings within timelines

Offering resolution sessions and mediation Reporting federally required data timely

and accurately


Fall 2008


Measurement

Specific measures, determined by USDE or State, used to quantify or qualify given indicators

Data

Information reported by LEAs, used in measurements to determine performance for indicators


Fall 2008

Where does the data come from?

Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS)

Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Dataset

State Supervision Data New Data Systems


Fall 2008


Explanation of Progress or Slippage

Analysis of data for each indicator

Improvement Activities /Timelines / Resources

Plans to address slippage through adjustmentsor improvements made in State programs,

policies, or practices


Fall 2008


Target

Desired level of performance to be reached foreach year of the State Performance Plan

• Set by State, with stakeholder input or aligned to existing legislative performance measure

• Set by OSEP in the case of compliance indicators, either 0% or 100%


Fall 2008

Public Public Input Input

MeetingsMeetings

Improvement Improvement Planning Planning

Two-wayFlow of Data

Self-Assessment Self-Assessment Process / Texas Process / Texas

Steering CommitteeSteering Committee

1. Self-Assessment Process / Texas

Steering Committee

2. Public Input Meetings

3. Improvement Planning

4.

Texas Continuous Improvement ProcessFederal

Region

District

Campus

State


Fall 2008

Improved Results for Students

General Supervision

Secondary Transition

FAPE / LRE

Parent Involvement

Early Childhood Transition

State SupervisionCommittee

Early Childhood Committee

Post-School Results

Committee

Parent Training

Committee

Access to General

CurriculumCommittee

DisciplineCommittee

CSPD Leadership

Council

TCIP | Improvement Groups


Fall 2008

General Supervision

Secondary Transition

FAPE / LRE

Parent Involvement

Early Childhood

CSPD Leadership Council

State Supervision

Parent Training

Early Childhood

Post-School Results

Access to General Curriculum

Behavior and Discipline Management

Child-Centered Framework (ESC 18)CSPD Leadership Council (ESC 6)

Services for the Deaf (ESC 4, 10, 11, 20)

Parent Coordination (ESC 9)

Texas Effectiveness Study (ESC 11)Transition (ESC 11)

Access to General Curriculum (ESC 20) Evaluation (ESC 12)

Assistive Technology (ESC 4)Technical Assistance and Training—VI (ESC 11)

Behavior/Discipline Management (ESC 4)Three Low Incidence Disabilities (ESC 2)

Texas Autism Conference (ESC 2)Multicultural and Diverse Learners (ESC 1)

Autism (ESC 13)Disproportionate Representation (ESC 1)

Alignment of TCIP Improvement Groups and ESC Statewide Leadership Functions & Projects with cluster areas/indicators of the State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report

CSPD Leadership Council

3

= SPP Indicator

ImprovedResults forStudents

More information on the TEA website at: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/decfunc/

45

109

8

6 712

1

2

13

14

11

15

1617

1918

20


Fall 2008

What does this mean to me?


Fall 2008

Making the Connection


Fall 2008


Integrated Monitoring Activities

Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation

Data on Processes and

Results

Improvement, Correction, Incentives,

& Sanctions

Effective Dispute Resolution

Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development

Fiscal Management



Fall 2008

Cluster 1

Indicator 1 Graduation Indicator 2 Dropout Indicator 13 Secondary Transition Indicator 14 Post School

Outcomes


Fall 2008

Cluster 2

Indicator 4 Suspension & Expulsion

Indicator 9/10 Disproportionality Indicator 20 State Report Data


Fall 2008

Cluster 3

Indicator 16 Complaint Timelines Indicator 17 DPH Timelines Indicator 18 Resolution Sessions Indicator 19 Mediation Agreements


Fall 2008

Cluster 4

Indicator 8 Parent Involvement Indicator 11 Child Find


Fall 2008

Cluster 5/6

Indicator 12 Preschool Transition Indicator 6 Preschool LRE Indicator 7 Preschool Outcomes


Fall 2008

Cluster 7

Indicator 3 Assessment (AYP) Indicator 5 LRE 6-21


Fall 2008

Public Reporting

Disproportionate Representation

Significant Disproportionality

Determinations

Related Requirements


Fall 2008

Texas Continuous Improvement ProcessAPR Submission

Feb 2007 2005-06 Data1, 2, 3A-C, 4A, 5A-C, 6, 9, 10,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Feb 2008 2006-07 Data1, 2, 3A-C, 4, 5A-C, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Feb 2009 2007-08 Data1, 2, 3A-C, 4, 5A-C, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,16, 17, 18, 19, 20


Fall 2008

States are required to make “Determinations” annually under 616(d) on the performance of LEA programs. Pursuant to 616(a)(1)(C)(i) and 300.600(a):

Meets requirements

Needs assistance

Needs intervention

Needs substantial intervention


Fall 2008

Texas Continuous Improvement Process

State Performance PlanAnnual Performance Report

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/


Fall 2008

Texas State Performance Plan

Data, Performance, Results

Leadership

Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.

Documents

year performance plan

sppstudent performance

performance of leas

annual performance report

educational environment

early childhood transition13

early childhood outcomes8

adequate yearly progress4