Top Banner
TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva
28

TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Ethel Carson
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva

Page 2: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

PREDICTIONS

• Micro-Black hole production at CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

• Micro-Wormhole/time machine production at LHC

I.A. and I.V.Volovich, Time Machine at the LHC,arXiv: 07102696, Int.J.Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys. (2008)

Page 3: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

• TeV gravity• TIME MACHINES

• Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations

Outlook:

Page 4: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Time Machine

• In GR a TM is a region of space-time that has a Closed Timelike Curve (CTC)

• CTC suggests the possibility of time-travel with its well known paradoxes

CTC Time Machine

Page 5: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Time Machine. Definition

• Spacetime: (M,g), M – manifold, g – metric.• Einstein equations for g.

• Time machine is a region of space-time (M,g) that has a closed timelike curve (CTC).

• Example. Time is circle:

31 RSM

Page 6: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Causality

Time machines violate the standard causality condition.

“It seems that there is a Chronology Protection Agency which prevents the appearance of CTCand so makes the universe safe for historians”

Hawking, Phys.Rev. (1992)

Page 7: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

• Cauchy problem. Global hyperbolic:• Causality in QFT Bogoliubov, Shirkov

• Local commutativity: Bogoliubov, Tavkhelidze, Vladimirov, Whightman,…

• Locality in string theory: Gross, Veneziano, Susskind, ‘t Hooft

• Nonlocality at the Planck scale: Bronstein, Wheeler, Blokhintzev, Markov, ‘t Hooft, p-adic space-time

Causality

0)(,0)](),([ 2 yxyx

3R* 0,

( ) ( )

SS x y

g x g y

Page 8: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Time Machine in Special Relativity

• TM is impossible in special relativity. • Indeed, to make a loop, a curve must somewhere

leave the null cone as shown in this picture. • A particle with such a world line would exceed the

speed of light that is impossible in SR.

Page 9: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Time Machine in GR• In general relativity the situation is much less trivial.• According to GR, our spacetime must be a smooth

Lorentzian manifold small regions `approximately Minkowskian', large scale any geometry and topology. There may be holes, handles, almost whatever one wants.

• A direction of null cones may change.

t

x

A simple example is the Minkowski space rolled into a cylinder. Locally everything is fine in this spacetime, but due to its non-trivial global structure, an observer can meet his younger self

Page 10: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Solutions of Einstein eqs. with Closed Timelike Curves (CTC) / Time Machine.

• Godel's solution [1949]• van Stockum-Tipler cylinder [1937, 1974];• Kerr solutions; 2 axially symmetric, stationary

Kerrs • Gott's time machine;• Wheeler wormholes;• Morris-Thorne-Yurtsever's TM• Ori's dust asymptotically-flat space-time

Violation of normal chronology is such an objectionable occurrence that any of such solutions could be rejected as nonphysical.

Page 11: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

General Relativity and Chronology

• In GR one cannot simply assert that chronology is preserved, and causality respected, without doing considerable additional work.

• The essence of the problem lies in the fact that the Einstein eqs of GR are local equations, relating some aspects of the spacetime curvature at a point to the presence of stress-energy at that point.

• “In the small” GR respects all of the causality constraints of special relativity, but GR does not provide any natural way of imposing global constraints on the spacetime

• Without imposing additional principles along GR is completely infested with time machines

Page 12: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Paradoxes generated by thepossibility of time travel

• Grandfather paradoxes: Caused by attempts to “change the past”,

and so modify the conditions that lead to the very existence of the

entity that is trying to “modify the timestream”.

• Information paradoxes: bring information to past.

There are two broad classes of paradox generated by the possibility of time travel

Page 13: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Proposals• Make radical alterations to our worldview to

incorporate at least some versions of chronology violation and “time travel”.

• Permit constrained versions of closed timelike curves

• Incorporate quantum physics to intervene and provide a universal mechanism for preventing the occurrence of closed timelike curves.

“Chronology Protection Conjecture” Hawking

Page 14: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

• There are long debate concerning such principles. • Several people participated in these discussions. Wheeler, Tipler, Gott, Visser, …

Hawking, Deser, Jackiw, ‘t Hooft, …

Page 15: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

“Chronology Protection Conjecture“ (Hawking)

• But there are not enough convincing arguments for this conjecture

• QG effects might smear out the divergences.• Moreover, if QG exists, then chronology protection

should be settled within the framework of this theory • CTC does appear in a semi-classical approximation

Page 16: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

“Chronology Protection Conjecture“

• It was suggested that large values of expectation value of the energy-momentum tensor occur when one has CTCs. If one fed this energy-momentum tensor into the Einstein eqs. it could prevent one from creating a TM.

• Or divergences in the energy-momentum tensor occur. These divergences may create space-time singularities which prevent one from traveling through to the region of CTC

Page 17: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Hawking's "chronology protection conjecture“

18

2R g R G T

0lim ( , , ) ( , )Rx y

T D x y G x y

0

1/2

2

( , ) 1( , ) {

4 ( , )

( , ) ln | ( , ) | ( , )}

R

x yG x y

x y

x y x y w x y

Hadamard form

Page 18: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Hawking's "chronology protection conjecture“

0

1/2

2

( , )( ) ...

( , )R

x xT t x

x x

Theorem (Kay,Radzikowski,Wald). There are points on the chronology horizon where the two-point functions is not of Hadamard form

Page 19: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Renormalization Group in Curved Spacetime

• Problems with definition of Renormalization Group flow:

• Scaling of global coordinates or momenta (as in Minkowski space) is not well defined;

• No preferred vacuum state for Green functions

2

( )

g g

x x in flat spacetime

DeWitt

Proposal:

,

[ ( ), ( )] ( , )adv ret

x y i x y

Page 20: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Mathematical solution of Grandfather paradox

Recent overcoming of the grandfather paradox:

There are spacetimes having CTC for which smooth, unique solutions to the scalar wave eq. exist for all data on generalized Cauchy surface

I.A., I. Volovich, T. Ishiwatari

Page 21: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Time MachineSurgery in the Minkowski spacetime

Make two cuts and glue the left edge of left cut to the right edge of the right cut and vice verse,

This space contains timelike loops

x

t

Page 22: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

The Cauchy problem on spacetimes that are not globally hyperbolic

x

t

2 2

0 0 0 1

( ) ( , ) 0, 0 ,

( , ) | ( ), ( , ) | ( )

t x

t t t

u t x t x

u t x u x u t x u x

1 2 1 2

1 2 1 2

2 1 2 1 1 1

2 1 2 1

( , ) | ( , ) | , ( , ) | ( , ) | , ,

( , ) | ( , ) | , ( , ) | ( , ) | ,

x a x a x x a x x a

x a x a x x a x x a

u t x u t b b x u t x u t b b x b t b l

u t x u t b b x u t x u t b b x

Cauchy problem:

1 1( , )a b

2 2( , )a b

Page 23: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

x

t

( , ) ( ) ( )R Lu t x u x t u x t

1 2 1 2

1 2 1 2

2 1 2 1 1 1

2 1 2 1

( , ) | ( , ) | , ( , ) | ( , ) | , ,

( , ) | ( , ) | , ( , ) | ( , ) | ,

R x a R x a L x a L x a

R x a R x a L x a L x a

u t x u t b b x u t x u t b b x b t b l

u t x u t b b x u t x u t b b x

Page 24: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2

3 3 2 1 2 1 4 4 1 2 1 2

( , ) ( ) ( ), ( , )

, 0; , 0;

0, ; 0, ;

0, 0, 5,6,7.

f gi i i

f g f g

f g f g

f gi i

t x f x t g t x t x D

a a b b a a b b

a a b b a a b b

i

0 0

0 1 0 1

1 1( ) ( ) ( ) , ( ) ( ) ( )

2 2

x x

x x

f x u x u s ds g x u x u s ds

Page 25: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Example: 2 dim scalar wave equation

Theorem: Under assumption of minimal singularity the Cauchy problem has a unique solution

The Cauchy problem for t>b is not well posed

Page 26: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Quantization

1 2 1 1 2 1

( , ) ( ) ( ), ( , )

, 0; ...

f gi i i

f g

t x f x t g t x t x D

a a b b

1( ) ( ) ( ) ;

4 | |

1( ) ( ) ( )

4 | |

ikxk k

ikxk k

dkf x e a k a k

k

dkg x e a k a k

k

IR regularization

Page 27: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Energy density2 2

1 2 1 1 2

1

( , ) ( ) ( ), ( , )

,

0; ...

f gi i i

f

g

H t x f x t g t x t x D

a a b b

( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )renH x t H x t H x t H x t

No new divergences as compare with Minkowski case

Counter example to Hawking's "chronology protection conjecture“

Page 28: TeV Gravity at LHC, Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture and Renormalizations Group I. Aref’eva.

Conclusion

• TeV Gravity opens new channels – BH, WH, TM Wheeler foam at TeV scale.

• No enough arguments for Hawking's "chronology protection conjecture“

• WH/TM production at LHC is of the same order of magnitude as BH production.

• The important question on possible experimental signatures of spacetime nontrivial objects deserves further explorations.