Testing Results NHEIAP Grades 3 and 6 Iowa Test of Basic Skills Grades 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 2003-2004.

Testing Results

NHEIAP

Grades 3 and 6

Iowa Test of Basic Skills

Grades 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8

2003-2004

Graduating Class of 2011

Math2003-2004

Grade 1200-200Grade

200-200Grade

200-200Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

Iowa 67NHEIAP

English Language Arts2003-2004

Grade 1200-200Grade

200-200Grade

200-200Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

Iowa 94NHEIAP

Science2003-2004

Grade 1200-200Grade

200-200Grade

200-200Grade 8

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

Iowa 95NHEIAP

Social Studies2003-2004Grade 51

200-200Grade

200-200Grade

200-200Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

20__-20__Grade

Iowa 80NHEIAP

Composite 94%

Annual Yearly ProgressClass of 2011

67

94 95

80

0

1020

3040

5060

7080

90100

Math ELA Sci SS

Gr. 1

Grade 1 2003-2004(graduating 2011)

0 -3 0 % 3 1- 40% 4 1- 50%

Mat h C o mp utat ion

5 1- 60% 61- 70 %

S oc ia lS t udie s

Tota lM ath

M athcon cept s

Ma ps a ndD ia gra ms

71- 80 %

A dvan cedW r iting

R efer enc eMa ter ia ls

V ocab ular y

81 -90 %

W or d A n alys is

C om posit e9 4%

C or eTot al

P rob /D at a

In terp re tation

Tot alLan gu age /Int egr ated

W riting

Liste ning

S cienc e

Tot alR ea ding

Tot alS our ces o fInfo rm ation

C om pre hen s ion

9 1% -1 00

I TB SA na lys isG rad e 1

20 03 -20 04

Annual Yearly ProgressClass of 2010

53%

72%

91%82%

97%

83%

98%96%

0%10%

20%30%40%

50%60%70%

80%90%

100%

Math ELA Sci SS

Gr 1

0 -3 0 % 3 1 -4 0 % 4 1 -5 0 %

M athC om p u ta tion

5 1 -6 0 % 6 1 -7 0 %

S oc ia lS tu d ies

To ta lM ath

M athcon cep ts

7 1 -8 0 %

W ord A n a lys is

A d van cedW rit in g

V ocab u la ry

8 1 -9 0 %

C ore To ta l9 4 %

C O M P O S ITE9 4 %

Tota lS ou rces o fIn fo rm ation

S c ien ce

P rob /D ata

In te rp re ta tion

To ta lL an g u ag e /In teg ra ted

W rit in g

L is ten in g

Tota lR ead in g

C om p reh en s ion

9 1 % -1 0 0

ITB SA n a lys isG rad e 2

2 0 0 3 -2 0 0 4

Grade 2 2003-2004(graduating 2010)

Grade 3 NHEIAP results

3

12

28

31 3130

38

27

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

CCS

State

6

15

28

35

47

34

1916

05

101520253035404550

Adv % Prof % Bas % Nov

CCSState

6062 64

81

0102030405060708090

%E

LA

%M

ath

StateCCS

ELA

Math

AYP

Annual Yearly ProgressClass of 2008

47 46

88

50

7365

76 79

68

44

74

54

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Math ELA Sci SS

Gr 1Gr 2Gr 4

0 -3 0 % 3 1 -4 0 %

S oc ia lS tu d ies

4 1 -5 0 %

R eferen ceM ateria ls

M ap s an dD iag ram s

Tota lS ou rces o fIn fo rm ation

5 1 -6 0 %

Tota lL an g u ag e/In teg ra ted

W rit in g

Tota l R ead in g

C om p reh en s ion

A d van cedW rit in g

W ord A n a lys is

C O M P O S ITE6 2 %

S c ien ce

V ocab u la ry

6 1 -7 0 %

M athcon cep ts

C oreTota l

L is ten in g

7 1 -8 0 %

Tota lM ath

P rob /D ata

In te rp re ta tion

8 1 -9 0 %

M athcom p u ta tion

9 1 % -1 0 0

ITB SA n a lys isG rad e 4

2 0 0 3 -2 0 0 4

Grade 4 2003-2004(graduating 2008)

Annual Yearly ProgressClass of 2007

3038

9697

6066 66

62

83 84

6875

59 606665

0

1020

3040

506070

8090

100

Math ELA Sci SS

Gr 1Gr 2Gr 4Gr 5

Grade 52003-2004

(graduating class 2007)

0 -30 % 3 1-4 0% 4 1-5 0 %

Referen ceM ateri als

S oc i alS tud ies

T otalR ead in g

C om p rehe ns i on

V o cabu la ry

51 -60 %

A dvan cedW ri t ing

To ta lLan gu ag e/Inte grated

W ri t ing

6 1-7 0%

C O M P O S ITE71 %

S c ien c e

M athcon cepts

T otalS o urce s o f

Info

M a psan d

D iag ram s

C oreT otal74 %

71 -80 %

P rob /Da ta

In terp re tat ion

8 1-9 0%

T otalM ath

M athC om p utat io n

9 1% -10 0

IT B SA nal ys isG rade 520 0 3-0 4

Grade 6 NHEIAP results

3

9

16

31

41

34

41

26

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

CCS

State

0

7

2226

46

40

3227

05

101520253035404550

Adv % Prof % Bas % Nov %

CCSState

6060

64

68

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

%E

LA

%M

ath

State

CCS

ELA

Math

AYP

Class make-up

40 40

5

15

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Honor Roll SpEd

Class 2005Class 2006

Class of 2005-current Gr. 8

Class of 2006-current Gr. 7

Annual Yearly ProgressClass of 2005

79

92 91

4956

62

41

7468

47 50

66

01020

3040

5060

7080

90100

Math ELA Sci SS

Gr. 4Gr. 5Gr. 7

0 -3 0 % 3 1 -4 0 % 4 1 -5 0 %

A d van cedW rit in g

V ocab u la ry

5 1 -6 0 %

R eferen ceM ateria ls

M ap s an dD iag ram s

S oc ia lS tu d ies

To ta lR ead in g

C om p reh en s ion

Tota lS ou rces o fIn fo rm ation

S c ien ce

Tota lL an g u ag e /In teg ra ted

W rit in g

6 1 -7 0 %

C O M P O S ITE7 3 %

C oreTota l

M athcon cep ts

7 1 -8 0 %

Tota lM ath

P rob /D ata

In te rp re ta tion

8 1 -9 0 %

M athcom p u ta tion

9 1 % -1 0 0

ITB SA n a lys isG rad e 7

2 0 0 3 -2 0 0 4

Grade 7 2003-2004(Graduating 2005)

Annual Yearly ProgressClass of 2004

9597 9899

7377

8879

61

909698

44

737875

0

1020

3040

506070

8090

100

Math ELA Sci SS

Gr 4Gr 5Gr 7Gr 8

0 -3 0 % 3 1 -4 0 % 4 1 -5 0 % 5 1 -6 0 %

R eferen ceM ateria ls

S oc ia lS tu d ies

6 1 -7 0 %

A d van cedW rit in g

Tota lR ead in g

V ocab u la ry

7 1 -8 0 %

C oreTota l8 9 %

C om p reh en s ion

Tota lS ou rces o fIn fo rm ation

Tota lL an g u ag e/In teg ra ted

W rit in g

8 1 -9 0 %

P rob /D ata

In te rp re ta tion

C O M P O S ITE9 1 %

M ap s an dD iag ram s

S c ien ce

Tota lM ath

M athcon cep ts

M athcom p u ta tion

9 1 % -1 0 0

ITB SA n a lys isG rad e 8

2 0 0 3 -2 0 0 4

Grade 8 2003-2004(graduating class 2004)

Value AddedResults of 2004 Iowa Test of Basic Skills

Gr.

1 2

003

toG

r. 2

200

4

Val

ue A

dded

Gr.

2 (

2002

) to

Gr.

4 (

2004

)

Val

ue A

dded

Gr.

4 (

2003

) to

Gr.

5 (

2004

)

Val

ue A

dded

Gra

de 5

((2

002)

toG

rade

7 (

2004

)

Val

ue A

dded

Gra

de 7

(20

03)

toG

rade

8 (

2004

)

Val

ue A

dded

Vocab 87/75 -12 69/68 -1 60/52 -12 45/57 +12 79/78 -1

Compreh 91/90 -1 86/70 -10 66/52 -14 65/64 -1 92/84 -8TotalReading

91/86 -5 81/69 -12 64/53 -11 56/61 +5 89/80 -9

Listening 91/92 +1Usage andExpression

90/76 -14 67/65 -2 70/68 -2 53/58 +5 88/75 -13

Total UsageandExpress.

91/85 -6 72/60 -12 64/64 0 58/68 +10 88/81 -7

Math conc 57/86 +29 76/78 +2 88/78 -10 69/80 +11 92/97 +5

Probability 93/76 -17 76/85 +9 89/90 +1 85/82 +3 90/93 +3

Total Math 68/77 +9 65/83 +18 92/95 +3 86/87 +1 97/98 +1Core 87/85 -2 77/71 -6 75/74 -1 69/75 +6 91/89 -2SocialStudies

98/96 -2 74/44 -30 55/58 +3 50/65 +15 70/70 0

Science 97/83 -14 79/68 -11 68/75 +7 74/68 -6 96/98 +2Sources ofInfo

97/83 -14 89/59 -30 76/80 +4 66/67 +1 83/81 -2

Composite

96/89 -7 79/62 -17 68/57 -11 67/73 +6 91/91 0

WordAnalysis

93/66 -27

Math Comp 38/67 +29 27/93 +66 72/72 0 98/94 -4 99/99 0Maps andDiagrams

69/71 +2 81/70 -11 91/92 +1

Ref Mat 99/99 0 41/63 +22 73/64 -9

Chronicle of Strengths/WeaknessesFor two years of testing

2003 to 2004

Grade 2 Areas of Weakness vocabulary science sources of info

Grade 2 Areas of Strength math concepts math computation

Grade 3 Areas of Weakness Factual/Practical Math problem solving and making

connections

Grade 3 Areas of Strength Math numbers and numeration

Grade 4 Areas of Weakness science

Grade 4 Areas of Strength math computation

Grade 5 Areas of Weakness comprehension math concepts

Grade 5 Areas of Strength no consistent areas

Grade 6 Areas of Weakness Data analysis, statistics,

probability, discrete math

Grade 6 Areas of Strength Math problem solving and making

connections Algebra, math of change

Grade 7 Areas of Weakness usage and expression

Grade 7 Areas of Strength math concepts

Analysis Response to Tests A consultant is being hired to assist

teachers in establishing a system of accountability in assuring that the GLE’s are instituted in all classrooms. The consultant will be paid for through the federal REAP grant.

All classroom teachers must be knowledgeable of the GLE’s in writing, reading, and math.

Teachers must demonstrate the use of various strategies to address the needs of all students (new professional development plan).

Analysis on data to enhance learning. Established a guided study time for

students who are having difficulty with organization and work management.

A new assessment will be used to measure student progress. MAP will be used 3 times a year and provide immediate feedback to teachers on student strengths and weaknesses. Funds will come from the federal REAP grant.

Curriculum guides will be reviewed and revised this year, to include HOT and technology integration.

6 Traits of Writing Professional reading groups to

continue Use of Title I to strengthen basis

skills (grades 2-5) LEIP plan revised with newly

identified goals.

ImprovedStudent

Performance

Best Practices

•GLE

•Measure where all children are

Use ofTechnology

•Know competencies

•Use COGS

•Use spelling program

•Use assessment “play” tools

Use of Team Meeting

time

•Delayed opening instead of early release

•2x month: team AND curriculum issues

•Create writing prompts from released and original

Curriculummaterials needed

•Practice test materials

•Integration

•Look at assessment for Gr. 1/2 (new)

Test Performance

Success•Use released items frequently

•Use released items in math journals (fix and finish)

•Prompts on computer to improve keyboardingPrograms of

Remediation/Enrichment

•# of reading teachers with pull-out revolving

•Continually evaluate for who needs help

•IRI’s through Gr. 6

DifferentiatedInstruction

•Use of individual plans

•Lots of writing-everywhere

•Critical thinking