Test Resource Management Center Presented by Mr. Derrick Hinton Principal Deputy Director, TRMC 22 March 2011 at the DoD National HBCU/MI Conference DoD.

Test Resource Management Center

Presented by Mr. Derrick Hinton

Principal Deputy Director, TRMC22 March 2011

at theDoD National HBCU/MI Conference

DoD Research & Educational Opportunities Panel

Test Resource Management Center

Overview

2

Deputy DirectorTest

Resources

Deputy DirectorJoint Investment

Programs & Policy

Deputy DirectorTest

Infrastructure

PolicyJMETC Program

T&E/S&T Program

CTEIP

Executive OfficeCFO, SMA, IT, etc.

Deputy DirectorStrategic Planning

Director, TRMCDr. John B. Foulkes

OUSD(AT&L)Honorable Ashton B. Carter

TRMC Organization DoD Field Activity

Direct Report to USD (AT&L)

SES Director and Principal Deputy

TRMC Organization DoD Field Activity

Direct Report to USD (AT&L)

SES Director and Principal Deputy

TRMC Mission Oversee Test & Evaluation (T&E) Budgets *Major Range Test Facility Bases (MRTFB) *Other T&E Budgets Within DoD

Produce Biennial 10-Year Strategic Plan

Certify Annual T&E Budgets *Military Departments *Defense Agencies

Administer T&E Investment Programs

*CTEIP *T&E/S&T Program *JMETC Program

Oversee MRTFB Policy

STEM Activities

Principal DeputyDerrick HintonPersonnel

Investment in Basic and Applied Research is a commitment to the future warfighter

Investment in Basic and Applied Research is a commitment to the future warfighter

“The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation. Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation. But because it’s not always profitable for companies to invest in basic research, throughout our history, our government has provided cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support they need.

Two years ago, I said that we needed to reach a level of research and development , we haven’t seen since the Space Race. And in a few weeks I’ll be sending a budget to Congress that helps us meet that goal. We’ll invest in biomedical

Connecting Researchers

to the Warfighter

3

President Obama, State of the Union, 25 Jan 2011President Obama, State of the Union, 25 Jan 2011

research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology -- an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people.

Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America’s success. But if we want to win the future - - if we want innovation to produce jobs in America and not overseas – then we also have to win the race to educate our kids.

Over the next 10 years, with so many baby boomers retiring from our classrooms, we want to prepare 100,000 new teachers in the fields of science and technology and engineering and math.”

FY12 DoD S&T

Budget Request

4

Total FY12 S&T Request = $12.25B

Total FY12 S&T Request = $12.25B

Total FY11 S&T Request = $11.82BArmy = 1,945 Navy = 1,961 AF = 2,191 DARPA = 3,026

ChemBio = 396 DTRA = 555 OSD = 1,356 Other DA = 389

Total FY11 S&T Request = $11.82BArmy = 1,945 Navy = 1,961 AF = 2,191 DARPA = 3,026

ChemBio = 396 DTRA = 555 OSD = 1,356 Other DA = 389

($ in

Mill

ion

s)

48 116

98

(2,283)

(2,009)

(2,286)

(2,907)

(502) (528)

(1,136)

(595)

27

RDT&E Budget Request Overview - FY11 and FY12 Comparison -

5

(TY

Do

llars

in M

illio

ns)

Overall S&T up 1.9% (In Real Terms) from FY11 PBRGrew at a faster rate than DoD top line (1.4%)All three categories (6.1, 6.2, 6.3) had real growthRDT&E is down, but S&T is up

Overall S&T up 1.9% (In Real Terms) from FY11 PBRGrew at a faster rate than DoD top line (1.4%)All three categories (6.1, 6.2, 6.3) had real growthRDT&E is down, but S&T is up

Test Resource Management Center

Overview

6

Deputy DirectorTest

Resources

Deputy DirectorJoint Investment

Programs & Policy

Deputy DirectorTest

Infrastructure

PolicyJMETC Program

T&E/S&T Program

CTEIP

Executive OfficeCFO, SMA, IT, etc.

Deputy DirectorStrategic Planning

Director, TRMCDr. John B. Foulkes

OUSD(AT&L)Honorable Ashton B. Carter

TRMC Organization DoD Field Activity

Direct Report to USD (AT&L)

SES Director and Principal Deputy

TRMC Organization DoD Field Activity

Direct Report to USD (AT&L)

SES Director and Principal Deputy

TRMC Mission Oversee Test & Evaluation (T&E) Budgets *Major Range Test Facility Bases (MRTFB) *Other T&E Budgets Within DoD

Produce Biennial 10-Year Strategic Plan

Certify Annual T&E Budgets *Military Departments *Defense Agencies

Administer T&E Investment Programs

*CTEIP *T&E/S&T Program *JMETC Program

Oversee MRTFB Policy

STEM Activities

Principal DeputyDerrick HintonPersonnel

Legend:Army, Navy, AF, Defense Agency

The STEWARD of the DoD Test Infrastructure Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB): The “Critical Core”

24 Sites: Army-9; Navy-6; Air Force-7; Defense Agency-2

Keyport

NAWC-WD China Lake

30th Space Wing

NAWC-WD Point Mugu

Air Force Flight Test Center

Yuma Test Center

Nevada Test and Training Range

Utah Test and Training Range

West Desert Test Center

White Sands Test Center

High Energy Laser Systems Test Facility

Electronic Proving Ground

PMRF

U.S Army Kwajalein AtollReagan Test Site

DISA,JITC 46th Test Wing (Includes 46th Test Group)

Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center

45th Space Wing

Arnold Engineering Development Center

NAWC-AD Patuxent River

Aberdeen Test Center

DISA,NCR

Cold Regions Test Center

Tropic Regions Test Center, HI & Puerto Rico

7

8

Risk mitigation needsTechnology shortfalls

Risk mitigation solutions Advanced development

Capabilities

Service Modernization and

Improvement Programs

Service Modernization and

Improvement Programs

Acquisition Programs and Advanced Concept

Technology Demonstrations

Acquisition Programs and Advanced Concept

Technology Demonstrations

T&E Multi-Service/Agency

Capabilities

T&E Multi-Service/Agency

Capabilities

DoD Corporate Distributed

Test Capability

DoD Corporate Distributed

Test Capability

TRMC Joint

Investment Programs

(FY09: $254M)

Transition

Requirements

DoD T&EStrategic Plan*DoD T&EStrategic Plan*

Service T&E Needs and

Solutions Process

Service T&E Needs and

Solutions Process

Annual T&E Budget

Certification*

Annual T&E Budget

Certification*

Quadrennial Defense ReviewStrategic Planning Guidance

(6.3 Funding)(6.3 Funding) (6.5 Funding)(6.5 Funding)(6.4 Funding)(6.4 Funding)

Department of Defense

Test Investment Strategy

8

Mission: Develop Technologies Required to Test Future Warfighting Capabilities

Established in FY02 Joint DDR&E / DOT&E Initiative Transitioned to TRMC in FY05

RDT&E Budget Activity 3 funds Purpose

High Risk / High Payoff R&D for Testing Foster technology transition to major DoD test ranges Risk reduction for test capabilities developments

92 ActiveProjects

Annual Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) Academia Industry Government Laboratories

Tri-Service working groups Validate requirements Evaluate proposals Facilitate technology transition

Central Oversight – Distributed Execution

Advanced Propulsion

18 Active Projects

Advanced Propulsion

18 Active Projects

Seven Test Technology Areas

Directed Energy

22 Active Projects

Directed Energy

22 Active Projects

Spectrum Efficiencies

13 Active Projects

Spectrum Efficiencies

13 Active Projects

Netcentric Systems

12 Active Projects

Netcentric Systems

12 Active Projects

Multi-Spectral Sensors

16 Active Projects

Multi-Spectral Sensors

16 Active Projects

Unmanned & Autonomous Systems

5 Active Projects

Unmanned & Autonomous Systems

5 Active Projects

AdvancedInstrumentation6 Active Projects

AdvancedInstrumentation6 Active Projects

Shaping Technology into Tomorrow’s T&E CapabilitiesShaping Technology into Tomorrow’s T&E Capabilities

Test & Evaluation / Science &Technology (T&E/S&T) Overview

FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016

$93.3M $97.6M $99.6M $102.2M $103.7M $105.4M $108.4M103.7

9

Technology Readiness Levels

TRL 9 Actual system 'flight proven' through successful mission operations

TRL 8 Actual system completed and 'flight qualified' through test and demonstration

TRL 7 System prototype demonstration in an operational environment

TRL 6 System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment

TRL 5 Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment

TRL 4 Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment

TRL 3 Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept

TRL 2 Technology concept and/or application formulated

TRL 1 Basic principles observed and reported

Co

st t

o A

chie

veC

ost

to

Ach

ieve

T&

E/S

&T

Pro

gra

mT

&E

/S&

T P

rog

ram

CT

EIP

CT

EIP

10

6.1

6.2

6.3

•Does not include WRC bands•At WRC-07, ITU allocated an additional ~1.4 GHz for ATM

Snapshot of Aeronautical Telemetry Usage Trends & Spectrum Availability Prior to 2007 World Radio Conference

11

• Blue Line (Left Scale): Amount of spectrum available for aeronautical telemetry since 1960• Black Dots (Right Scale): Data rates for test vehicles at flight test ranges• Red Line (Right Scale): Projected trend of test vehicle data rates

• Blue Line (Left Scale): Amount of spectrum available for aeronautical telemetry since 1960• Black Dots (Right Scale): Data rates for test vehicles at flight test ranges• Red Line (Right Scale): Projected trend of test vehicle data rates

• Candidate bands for the Broadband Initiative are:Frequency / Bands

Amount (MHz) Current Allocation T&E Usage

(Broadcast TV) VHF /UHF Frequencies 120 Non-Federal

406.1-420 13.9 Federal Yes

758-763 788-793 10 Non-Federal

1300-1390 90 Federal Yes

1525-1559 1626.5-1660.5 40 Non-Federal

1610-1626.5 2483.5-2500 10 Non-Federal

1675-1710 35 Shared Yes

1755-1780 25 Federal Yes

1780-1850 70 Federal Yes

1915-1920 1995-2000 10 Non-Federal

2000-2020 2180-2200 40 Non-Federal

2020-2025 5 Non-Federal

2155-2180 25 Non-Federal

2200-2900 90 Federal Yes

2305-2320 2345-2360 30 Non-Federal

2700-2900 200 Federal Yes

2900-3100 200 Shared

3100-3500 400 Shared Yes

3500-3650 150 Federal

3700-4200 500 Non-Federal

4200-4400 4200-4220 4380-4400 200 Shared Yes

TOTAL 2263.9

Band critical for all unmanned vehicle testing, including missile and

missile defense T&E. All DoD satellite C2.

Band critical for all unmanned vehicle testing, including missile and

missile defense T&E. All DoD satellite C2.

National Broadband Plan

• Extensive impact and sharing studies underway by Ranges

– Very costly– Lead times for research &

development is years if bands are lost

• Wireless industry wants these specific bands because of cost and performance:

– 1755-1850 MHz band matches the spectrum they got from us in 1990s (1710-1755)

– 2200-2290 MHz band pairs well with 1710-1850 because industry can use same antennas & radios

Band critical for missile and missile defense T&E

Band critical for missile and missile defense T&E

Bands in yellow are used for various T&E purposes12

Spectrum Efficient TechnologyS&T Challenges

• Develop more efficient modulation and signal coding techniques for greater efficiency (higher data rates in the same bandwidths)

• Develop software for the CTEIP Integrated Network Enhanced Telemetry (iNET) radio frequency (RF) management telemetry application

• Develop multi-band transmitters and broadband antennas

• Develop QoS management software and simulation tools

Major Developments• Mitigation of interference between two transmitter antennas

• Simulations to address iNET networking requirements

• RF channel model development to perform ground station system design

• Increased efficiency of linear RF power amplifiers (improved efficiency from 20% to 30%)

T&E Gaps• Ability to transmit higher data rates in reduced

bandwidth environments• Ability to dynamically allocate frequency bands

– Ability to detect and use available portions of the spectrum

• Ability to operate in super-high frequency• Ability to use newly acquired spectrum• Need Quality of Service (QoS) management

software

Budget ($M)

13 active projects13 active projects

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

4.8 6.2 10.8 10.9 11.1 11.2 11.4

13

14

Improving Testing of IRCM Systems

Both Units Delivered Directly to TestEglin AFB (DoN LAIRCM Testing on Navy CH-46)China Lake (LAIRCM Testing on AFSOC CV-22)

Included in Navy TEMPsDoN LAIRCM, JATAS, Assault & Strike DIRCM (for MH-60, MV-22, JSF, F/A-18E/F, CH-53)

Included in Air Force TEMPLAIRCM NexGen(For C-17, C-130J, C-5, CV-22)

JMITS “paints” UV & IR signatures on IRCM systems and characterizes laser and flare countermeasures

MWS Declare Laser Jam and/or FlaresTracker Slew & Handoff

MISSDistance

Laser Jam Beam Flares

UV/IR Plume Radiation

MWS Declare Laser Jam and/or FlaresTracker Slew & Handoff

MISSDistance

Laser Jam Beam Flares

Flares

UV/IR Plume Radiation

Required T&E/S&T Development for Higher Power Continuous Wave Infrared Sources• To simulate long range shots within MANPAD operational envelopes • To simulate longer range RF SAMs during multi-spectral testing (RF & IR)• Two Colors (IR-Red & IR-Blue)

Required T&E/S&T Development for Higher Power Continuous Wave Infrared Sources• To simulate long range shots within MANPAD operational envelopes • To simulate longer range RF SAMs during multi-spectral testing (RF & IR)• Two Colors (IR-Red & IR-Blue) 14

Multi-Spectral TestingS&T Challenges

• Develop large-scale hyperspectral signatures and scenes

• Develop real-time, high frame rate battlespace representations with high spectral and spatial resolution

• Develop spatially and temporally correlated dynamic infrared and radio frequency scenes and targets

• Develop realistic spectral radiance and high dynamic range across environmental conditions

• Develop technologies to present high temperature (≥3,000°C) emitters

Major Developments• Emitters and projectors encompassing more than one spectral band (i.e., Near Infrared, Short-Wave Infrared, and Mid-Wave Infrared)

• High temperature, real-time scene generation using 3-D atmospheric models (more accurate than any existing model)

• High power carrying optical fibers for infrared countermeasure testing

Budget ($M)

T&E Gaps• Ability to present accurate, high resolution battle

scenes for sensor testing (e.g. missile warning system)

• Ability to present temperature ranges for missile plumes and afterburners for sensor stimulation

• Ability to stimulate sensors by projecting simulated scenes in real-time (trick sensor into responding to simulated data)

• Ability to project and inject spatially and temporally correlated high frame rate scenes for hyperspectral and multi-spectral seeker testing

16 active projects16 active projects

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

11.4 18.8 16.3 12.8 12.8 13.0 13.2

15

University: 8%

Gov Org/Labs: 17%

Industry:75%

University:12 Projects

Gov Org/Labs: 25 Projects

Industry:55 Projects

FY 2010 T&E/S&T Distribution

Funding

Project Leads

16

• Morgan State University *

• Naval Post Graduate School

• New Mexico State University

• North Carolina State University

• Ohio State University

• Oklahoma State University

• Purdue University

• University of Alabama, Huntsville

• University of Arizona

• University of California Irvine

• University of California Los Angeles

• University of California San Diego

• University of Central Florida

• University of Delaware

Universities Supporting Test Technology Development

Since FY03, University Efforts Totaled > $60M Since FY03, University Efforts Totaled > $60M

• Brigham Young University

• Carnegie Mellon University

• Case Western Reserve University

• Columbia University

• Cornell University

• Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

• Fayetteville State University *

• George Washington University

• Georgia Tech Research Institute

• Harvey Mudd College

• Johns Hopkins University

• Lincoln University *

• Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• Middle Tennessee State University

• University of Florida (Gainesville)

• University of Hawaii at Manoa

• University of Illinois (Urbana-

Champagne)

• University of Iowa

• University of Kansas

• University of Maryland (College Park)

• University of Missouri

• University of Pittsburgh

• University of Virginia

• University of Washington

• Utah State University

• Vanderbilt University

• Virginia Tech* Denotes MSI

Since FY03, Universities have led 37 projects (~15% of total portfolio),

receiving ~8% of total program funding

Since FY03, Universities have led 37 projects (~15% of total portfolio),

receiving ~8% of total program funding17

Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) & TRMC MOA

(Signed on 15 Oct 2010)

Program for Undergraduate/Graduate Students to Inspire, Develop and Attract Diverse STEM Talent to Careers in

Test and Evaluation within the DOD

Program for Undergraduate/Graduate Students to Inspire, Develop and Attract Diverse STEM Talent to Careers in

Test and Evaluation within the DOD

KEY ELEMENTS

TRMC will provide funding for undergraduate/graduate internships through on-going research efforts within the T&E/S&T Program

ATEC will leverage the Student Career Experience Program (SCEP) to identify STEM student candidates to work at ATEC

ATEC will work in coordination with TRMC to develop individual program development plans for the students

ATEC will set aside billets within T&E for students to be hired upon graduation

18

TRMC / Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI)

Partnership to Identify MSI Research Capabilities

Identify Minority Serving Institutions (MSI) with Research Competencies that Address TRMC’s Test Technology Areas

Mentor Minority Institutions on TRMC 6.3 Funding Opportunities

Determine Synergistic Areas and Natural Partnerships Between TRMC and Minority Serving Institutions

19

T&E/S&T ProgramSummary

• Develops test technology roadmaps and conduct studies to reduce risk for needed DoD test capabilities:– DoD Strategic Plan for Test Resources Guidance– CTEIP and Service Improvement and Modernization Risk Mitigation Needs

• Maintains close collaboration with DDR&E

• Advances STEM for the T&E community– Universities involved thru projects initiated by BAA response– Intern activities at DoD Test Ranges and Facilities

• Responds to transformation & warfighting changes– Investigating technologies to support T&E in a GPS-Denied environment– Evaluating new technology requirements to meet future Air Launched

Weapons T&E needs

Forward-Looking, Relevant, Agile, Efficient Forward-Looking, Relevant, Agile, Efficient 20

21

Mr. Derrick HintonPrincipal Deputy Director,

Test Resource Management Center703-601-5200

[email protected]

22

• ARDS: Fielded for 25 years on every major open air range for range control and tracking

– Over 300 air and ground packages sold– 10 MRTFB ranges, training venues, Israel– Variants: P5 Combat Training System,

others• JAMI: In production• CRIIS: Risk reduction work completed. Expect contract award by end of FY10 to provide systems to replace the ARDS inventory starting in 2014.

• Next Generation TSPI Study completed.

Challenge

Drivers Programs

Goals/Successes

• Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) - First real-time, high-precision (sub-meter) TSPI range system

• Joint Advanced Missile Instrumentation (JAMI) First hybrid GPS engine able to track in 100G environment.

• Subminiature Flight Safety -- for small missile tracking and termination.

Greater TSPI accuracy to evaluate future high accuracy platforms. CRIIS: sub-meter TSPI.

CRIISGPS ARDS

Real-Time Time Space Position Information (TSPI) for Systems Under Test (SUT)

22

23

Improving Testing of Undersea Systemsin a Realistic Operational Environment

Needs: Provide submarine undersea tracking during test events - without sub needing to ping!

Needs: Provide submarine undersea tracking during test events - without sub needing to ping!

5 Ft.

DARPA-developed chip scale atomic clock

Key issues: Maintain clock accuracy, operate week+ without update Key issues: Maintain clock accuracy, operate week+ without update

Highly accurate track is displayed in real-time on board

the tracked submarine

Highly accurate track is displayed in real-time on board

the tracked submarine

Insertion into undersea pingers

Insertion into undersea pingers

T&E/S&T – CTEIP transfer: Providing critical test needs, validate crucial

warfighting systems

T&E/S&T – CTEIP transfer: Providing critical test needs, validate crucial

warfighting systems

OT for Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System (CBASS)

Torpedo

OT for Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System (CBASS)

Torpedo 23

24

Improving MeasuringEnergy on Target

Cell count (inches)

Ce

ll c

ou

nt

(in

ch

es

)

Image of ADS System 1 Beam

20 40 60 80 100 120

20

40

60

80

100

120 -25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10Scanning Target Board Image of ADS Beam

Kirtland AFB

24

Developed new test technology to characterize beam of Active Denial System in real-timeDeveloped new test technology to characterize beam of Active Denial System in real-time

25

Air Storage Mixer

Stilling Chamber Variable Mach Nozzle

Valve

Valve

Test Cabin

DiffuserEjector

OrVacuum Sphere

Alumina Storage Heater

(3500 R)

Zirconia Storage Heater (4700 R)

Schematic Diagram of Variable Mach Number Propulsion Test Facility with Clean Air Supply

Advanced Survivable, Variable Mach Number Nozzles

Advanced Clean Air Heat Addition

Advanced High Pressure/High Temperature Air Supply

Improving Testing HypersonicPropulsion Systems

Demonstrate Advanced Technologies Developed by T&E/S&T Program

Demonstrate Advanced Technologies Developed by T&E/S&T Program

25

26

BA1 basic research, which is systematic study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts but without specific applications to processes or products in mind.

BA2 applied research—systematic study to understand the means to meet a recognized and specific need.

BA3 advanced technology development, which includes development of subsystems and components and efforts to integrate subsystems and components into system prototypes for field experiments or tests in a simulated environment.

BA4 advanced component development and prototypes, including efforts that evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes, or prototype systems in a high-fidelity and realistic operating environment.

BA5 system development and demonstration programs. Such programs conduct engineering and manufacturing development tasks aimed at meeting validated requirements prior to full-scale production.

BA6 RDT&E management support.

BA7 development of operational systems, which covers development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full-scale production.

DoD divides its RDT&E funding into seven different types of budget authority. The first three are collectively termed science and technology (S&T) budget authority.

DoD S&T Budget Authority

FY2007 DoD Obligations for Science & Engineering

Bumper StickerBumper Sticker

Type of Institution FY2007 (in $M)

Minority Institutions (MI) 61.6

Historically Black Colleges & Universities (HBCU) 40.6

Tribal Institutions 2.3

High Hispanic Enrollment Institutions (HHE) 106.7

ALL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES xxxxxx

27