Top Banner
Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University of London AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011 DG Research and Innovation, CDMA building, 21 rue Champ de Mars, Brussels AUGUR TRENDS IN DEMOGRAPHY TRENDS IN DEMOGRAPHY AUGUR WORK PACKAGE #4 AUGUR WORK PACKAGE #4
21

Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni CozziCentre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR)

School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS)University of London

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

DG Research and Innovation, CDMA building, 21 rue Champ de Mars, Brussels AUGUR

TRENDS IN DEMOGRAPHYTRENDS IN DEMOGRAPHY

AUGUR WORK PACKAGE #4AUGUR WORK PACKAGE #4

Page 2: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

This presentation covers demographic trends, except for migration (covered in the companion presentation)

The focus is on Europe (which is disaggregated by blocs) and on the evolution of the age structure of the European population (young, working-age and elderly)

Within this focus, our research is concerned with addressing the impact of the progressive ageing of the European population

When the research is complete, we hope to be able to assess and recommend various policy options: 1) raising the retirement age, 2) encouraging more in-migration of workers, and/or 3) prioritising gains in employment (especially for young workers)

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

Page 3: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

We will begin with illustrative ‘baseline’ projections until 2030 of the age structure of the population for five European blocs (based on data in the CAM macroeconomic model)

We will also do some brief comparative analysis of trends in other blocs or countries (US, Japan, China, North Africa, West Asia)

The basic projections are well known: a relative decline in the young (<15), a relative increase in the elderly (65+) and increasing pressure on those of working age (15-64) to support both of these groups, especially the growing number of the elderly

How can we evaluate the impact of such trends? We use two composite indices for this purpose: 1) a ‘Government Service Standard’ and 2) an ‘Economic Dependency Ratio

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

Page 4: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

14

16

18

20

22

24

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

North Europe

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

Page 5: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

USA

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Japan

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

China

Page 6: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

64

65

66

67

68

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

62

63

64

65

66

67

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

North Europe

Page 7: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

USA

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Japan

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

China

62

63

64

65

66

67

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

Page 8: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

Our first assessment tool is called the ‘Government Service Standard’, which is essentially a combination of two ratios:

1) Government Expenditures/a ‘Weighted Population Index’

2) Compared to Average Income per Person

The ‘Weighted Population Index’ contains three groups:

1) The Elderly Population (65+ years), which is given a weight of 3;

2) The Young Population (<15 years), which is given a weight of 2;

3) The Working-Age Population, which is given a weight of 1.

As the Young or Elderly grow relative to the Working-Age population, the Population Index increases

THE ‘GOVERNMENT SERVICE STANDARD’

Page 9: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

This Index will fall for two basic reasons:

1) Government Expenditures fall relative to Total Income

2) The ‘Weighted Population Index’ rises relative to the Unweighted Total Population, meaning that either the Young or the Elderly are growing faster than the Working-Age Population

In many European countries, the Elderly are growing the fastest , meaning that the ‘Weighted Population Index’ is increasing fairly rapidly, as the shrinking Working-Age Population has to support them through Government Expenditures

Though the ‘Government Service Standard’ represents a rough approximation of what we want to measure, it is useful in highlighting general trends

THE ‘GOVERNMENT SERVICE STANDARD’

Page 10: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

North Europe

Page 11: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

8

10

12

14

16

18

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

USA

8

10

12

14

16

18

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Japan

8

10

12

14

16

18

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

China

8

10

12

14

16

18

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

Page 12: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

Page 13: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

.60

.62

.64

.66

.68

.70

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

.60

.62

.64

.66

.68

.70

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

.60

.62

.64

.66

.68

.70

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

.60

.62

.64

.66

.68

.70

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

Page 14: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

One of the aims of our research is to link demographic trends, such as ageing, with employment.

Hence, we are not just interested in trends in the Age Structure of the Population, namely, the dependency ratios based on the relative size of the Young and Elderly Populations

We want a broader measure of Dependency that takes into account the prevalence of Inactivity Rates and Unemployment Rates among the Working-Age Population

Hence, we utilise an ‘Economic Dependency Ratio’, which helps us track such trends (see Palley 1991)

Essentially this indicator represents the ratio of the various categories of ‘the Economically Dependent’ to the Employed

THE ‘ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY RATIO’

Page 15: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

The ‘Economically Dependent’ include four categories:

1) Those Younger than Working Age (<15 years)

2) Those Older than Working Age (65+)

3) Those of Working Age who are ‘Economically Inactive’ (many women, students, persons on benefits)

4) Those of Working Age who are ‘Economically Active’ but Unemployed (such as young workers)

In our analysis we attempt to decompose the effects of these four categories (two of which are strictly demographic and two of which are defined more by employment status)

The first two categories change slowly; the latter two more rapidly

THE ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY RATIO

Page 16: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

1.20

1.24

1.28

1.32

1.36

1.40

1.44

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

1.45

1.50

1.55

1.60

1.65

1.70

1.75

1.80

1.85

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

0.95

1.00

1.05

1.10

1.15

1.20

1.25

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

North Europe

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.60

1.70

1.80

1.90

2.00

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

Page 17: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

1.08

1.12

1.16

1.20

1.24

1.28

1.32

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

1.08

1.12

1.16

1.20

1.24

1.28

1.32

1.36

1.40

1.44

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

USA

0.920.961.001.041.081.121.161.201.241.281.32

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Japan

0.68

0.72

0.76

0.80

0.84

0.88

0.92

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

China

Page 18: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

.40

.44

.48

.52

.56

.60

.64

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

.60

.65

.70

.75

.80

.85

.90

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

.38

.40

.42

.44

.46

.48

.50

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

Page 19: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

Central Europe

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

East Europe

0.76

0.80

0.84

0.88

0.92

0.96

1.00

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

South Europe

.70

.72

.74

.76

.78

.80

.82

.84

.86

.88

90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25 30

UK

Page 20: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

Concluding RemarksHighlights of Europe’s Projected General Demographic Trends: A rising Elderly Dependency Ratio combines with a falling share of

the Working-Age Population in Total PopulationThe Government Service Standard: This Index (gauging government expenditures per

dependants) declines, unfortunately, through 2030 across Europe

The decomposition of the GSS into expenditure and demographic factors shows:

Government Expenditures as a ratio to GDP generally declines, but not markedly under current projections (more strenuous fiscal consolidation would sharpen this decline)

The increases in the Dependent Populations, particularly the elderly, have a more dramatic negative impact on the GSS

Page 21: Terry McKinley, Jo Michell and Giovanni Cozzi Centre for Development Policy and Research (CDPR) School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University.

AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, 17-18 November 2011

AUGUR

The ‘Economic Dependency Ratio’: This Ratio is generally on an upward (adverse) trend until 2030,

beginning with the global financial crisis

The decomposition into its Employment and Demographic factors shows:

The Ratio of Inactive plus Unemployed to the Employed generally increases in the wake of the global financial crisis and stays elevated (except Central Europe’s ratio)

The Ratio of the Young and the Elderly to the Employed exhibits a more dramatic upward trend across all of Europe

CONCLUDING REMARKS